Kyle
1.9K posts
@nonotnowkyle
just a lone Kyle out here in a big world against Kyle. not your Kyle and not their Kyle. just my Kyle.
@lowmintmick @skythek1dd @bankrbot @highmintmick @OmilliTees @KINGMAKER_2712 @Miss___Rose_ @serwellzy Thanks to all the followers and those who pushed for it. When @bankrbot finally responds I'll organize a giveaway for something similar to this @mamo plushie for bankr club members only
Don’t fear the people who tell you sour shit ain’t good. Don’t listen to those who tell Zoe to do this and that. Do things at your paste. Cut off the noise around you. Builders will be blessed. It’s a universal law. No Degens will help you. Help yourself. Be bullish on you!
If you’re giving a commencement speech in 2026, maybe don’t mention AI techcrunch.com/2026/05/17/if-…
I may have identified the primary fee collection wallet behind $SWP: 0x06bC4E150Dcd88Ce48DC8CD4ca69Da12D381D646 But the wallet behavior is extremely unusual. According to Bankrbot’s onchain analysis of the @Thespawn0a-linked wallet (0x39df...a883), the project does not appear to accumulate or hold $SWP long term at all. Observed pattern: • Fees are continuously collected from the token contract • Collected $SWP is immediately swapped into ETH/WETH through 0x Allowance Holder • The converted WETH is then consolidated and forwarded to a higher-level wallet • Funds ultimately appear to route toward Bybit-linked flows In multiple cases, millions of $SWP tokens were sold almost instantly after collection rather than held. This suggests the operation may be structured around immediate extraction and monetization of fees instead of long-term token alignment or treasury accumulation. In short: holders hold the token, while the operator appears to continuously convert revenue into WETH and move it outward. NFA. Verify everything onchain yourself.
