Norris Da Boss Windross

FLASHBACK: We fought vaccine passports and mandates together outside the Senedd before Now we need you all to do it again 🚨 A #together national rally is coming to London, Cardiff, Edinburgh & Belfast - we want the government to scrap Digital ID once and for all 🗓️ Sat 25th April - SAVE THE DATE 📢 Spread the word, share this far and wide Together our voices are #stronger

How military conscription happens in Russia—a thread Gosuslugi (the Russian digital ID system) has become a central hub without which life in Russia is almost impossible. Through it, people obtain documents, schedule doctor appointments, and more recently, receive electronic military summons. If a citizen does not confirm receipt, their rights are automatically restricted (leaving the country, selling property, driving a car) — which is a direct implementation of digitally "switching off" an individual from the system. This represents one of the most radical examples of a state transforming into a digital control mechanism in modern history. What was once a portal for paying parking fees or booking passport appointments has become a digital cage. Before this law (2023), a military summons in Russia had to be delivered in person and signed for. People would simply avoid opening the door or live at different addresses. Now, a summons is considered delivered the moment it appears in your personal Gosuslugi account — or, if you do not have an active account, 7 days after it is entered into the "Unified Register of Conscripts." The travel ban activates immediately upon delivery of the summons — before the 20-day window begins. If a citizen then fails to report to the military office within 20 days, the following additional restrictions are triggered: - Driving ban: The driver's license becomes invalid in the traffic police database. - Ban on buying/selling real estate: The land registry (Rosreestr) blocks any transactions. You cannot sell property to leave the country. - Credit ban: Banks automatically see that the applicant is subject to conscription restrictions and loan access is blocked. - Business restriction: You cannot register a company or work as a freelancer (self-employed). In Russia, it is nearly impossible to function without a Gosuslugi account. You use it to enroll your child in school or kindergarten. You receive QR codes through it (as seen during the pandemic). When people began attempting to delete their accounts in March 2023 ahead of the spring conscription drive, the authorities disabled the "delete account" option on the website. This happened proactively on March 31, 2023—the same day the Defence Ministry announced electronic summonses—rather than in response to a mass exodus already underway. The system is integrated with a network of over 200,000 cameras in Moscow equipped with facial recognition. In documented cases, the flagging has occurred specifically when a conscript contests his draft order in court—at which point the enlistment office enters him into the system as an alleged evader, triggering a facial recognition alert and enabling police to detain him on the spot. It is not confirmed as a blanket automatic trigger for anyone who has simply received a summons and not yet reported. The state can effectively cut a person off from the social and economic bloodstream—without the ability to drive, manage money, or use property. This became reality in Russia faster than almost anywhere else because the state used war as justification to merge all databases (tax, police, medical, and military) into one central system. Russia no longer uses technology merely as a service for citizens, but as an operational tool of enforcement. 🧵

👥 Do you personally know anyone who had unexpected health effects after a Covid jab?

Companies House' website security flaw: "The sheer scale of this exposure is just staggering" After this @CompaniesHouse, how can you deny thousands of directors who contacted you asking for an offline alternative to One Login - their data security being a key reason? Clip - Analysis Cloud IT Vlog

🚨COMPLETE REMISSIONS of Stage IV cancers using anti-parasitics are now being documented in the peer-reviewed literature. HUNDREDS of studies find ivermectin and fenbendazole exert over 12 distinct anti-cancer mechanisms across more than 12 cancer types.

Study involving 1.7 million children has found that Myocarditis & Pericarditis only appeared in children who had received COVID mRNA vaccines. Not a single unvaccinated child in the group suffered from these heart-related problems. Source: Edward Dowd

An Open Letter to Keir Starmer and his Marxist Government. Dear Mr.Starmer, I am writing in response to the Government’s consultation on the proposed UK Digital Identity system. Having read the full consultation document in detail, I would like to begin by congratulating you on what is surely one of the most impressive exercises in political reassurance ever produced: a 91-page document repeatedly explaining that a system which looks, behaves, and functions like a national digital identity infrastructure is definitely not a national digital identity infrastructure. Naturally, I was particularly comforted to learn that the system will be entirely voluntary. This is a powerful commitment to personal freedom. It is therefore reassuring to understand that while citizens will remain free not to use the digital ID, they may simply find themselves unable to complete right-to-work checks, prove their age, access services, or interact with organisations that adopt the system as the default form of identity verification. In other words, it will be voluntary in the same sense that umbrellas are voluntary during a rainstorm. The consultation also describes a vision of “joined-up public services,” supported by what appears to be a universal identifier capable of linking records across multiple government departments. I must commend the ambition here. For decades the British state has been forced to endure the inefficiency of citizens existing in separate administrative systems. Finally, technology will allow a citizen’s interactions with employment checks, benefits, education, and other services to be smoothly connected. I can only assume this will be done with the lightest possible touch, given the Government’s entirely understandable desire to know everything about everyone only in the most privacy-respecting way imaginable. Equally reassuring is the promise of “selective disclosure.” I understand this to mean that when I prove something simple, such as my age, the receiving party will only see the minimum information required. Meanwhile, the system operating behind the scenes may still confirm my identity and record that the check took place. I am sure this information will be handled with the utmost restraint and never used to build broader profiles of citizens’ lives, habits, or movements. Governments are, after all, well known for resisting the temptation to analyse data once it has been collected. Security, too, appears to be robust. The proposal sensibly places a citizen’s core identity credentials on a device that is famous for its stability and careful handling: the modern smartphone. The same device that people regularly lose, break, leave in taxis, or expose to malware will now hold the keys to their legal identity. Should anything go wrong, it is comforting to know the state retains the power to revoke or suspend a digital identity if fraud is suspected. This elegant feature ensures that, if a mistake occurs, a citizen’s ability to prove who they are and access services can be paused instantly, a level of efficiency rarely seen in government systems. The consultation also acknowledges that around one in ten adults lack in-date photo identification and that a significant portion of the population struggles with digital services. Fortunately, this challenge will apparently be addressed through an “inclusion programme.” While the details are understandably still being developed, I am confident that the elderly, the poor, the homeless, and the digitally excluded will be reassured to know that a plan exists somewhere. I was also intrigued by the system’s admirable restraint regarding scope. It will begin with only a few modest attributes — name, date of birth, nationality, and biometric image — while exploring the possibility of additional fields such as address and other identifiers in the future. The consultation also raises the possibility of digital identity for children from birth or adolescence. It is heartening to see such forward thinking: a lifelong identity record beginning at the very start of a citizen’s life is surely the most efficient way to ensure administrative continuity. The Government emphasises that the system will help combat fraud, which already represents a large share of recorded crime. I agree that criminals will undoubtedly be discouraged by the existence of a national digital identity infrastructure. Cybercriminals, phishing operations, and identity thieves are historically known for abandoning their activities the moment governments introduce a new digital platform. Finally, I appreciate the Government’s assurances regarding public trust. Britain has, in the past, rejected national identity card systems due to concerns about cost, surveillance, and civil liberties. It is therefore deeply reassuring to learn that this proposal is entirely different. After all, the previous proposal involved a physical card. This one merely involves a digital framework capable of verifying identity across multiple sectors of life, linking government services, and being carried constantly on a personal device. The distinction could not be clearer. For these reasons, I would like to thank the Government for its efforts to reassure the public that the proposed system is voluntary, privacy-preserving, secure, inclusive, limited in scope, resistant to mission creep, and worthy of complete trust. I must admit that after carefully reading the consultation, I find myself in the unusual position of understanding exactly what the Government says it intends and simultaneously feeling no more confident that the system will remain as limited or benevolent as promised. In summary, while I appreciate the ambition to modernise identity verification, the proposal appears to construct the technological foundations for a permission-based identity infrastructure in which the state ultimately controls the mechanisms by which citizens prove who they are. History suggests that systems with such capabilities rarely remain as narrow as their original descriptions. I therefore remain unconvinced that this proposal protects the privacy, autonomy, and freedoms of citizens in the way the consultation claims. Yours faithfully, Glen Maney @_Government_UK @Keir_Starmer @thecoastguy @TheFreds @AllianceDemFree @juneslater17 @LiberalParty_UK @reformparty_uk @Togetherdec @RbinmanRichard @FatEmperor @mattletiss7 @LeilaniDowding @BelmontAccord @liamtuffs1 @labourpress @UKLabour @GBNEWS @SkyNews @SkyNewsPolitics @Channel4News @auksupporters @DrTeckKhong @Conway_NE @MCRobredz @KenJLThomson @rustyrockets @davidicke @benhabib6 @RestoreBritain_ @

Get the date in your diary! We will be gathering outside the Senedd to say NO to Digital ID! We did it against vaccine passports and won! Let's do again! Together we're stronger! April 25th 2026 @Togetherdec

"I just made the biggest mistake of my life...last night I looked at the Epstein files." ~Peter Gold "The Devil is here on earth...I can’t unsee what I saw."

Remember a patient cured is a customer lost. The Big Pharma code of practice.

The Online Safety Act was drafted by a paedophile. Epstein/Mandelson isn't even the worst Labour nonce scandal this week. Paedophile, Labour politician and senior member of Hope Not Hate (there's a Venn diagram with a lot of overlap) Liron Velleman has just pleaded guilty to child sex offences including sending a 13-year-old girl a video of his erect penis. Incredibly, he helped draft the Online Safety Act, legislation that's supposed to keep children safe from men like himself. Hope Not Hate are known to use fake online profiles, covert techniques and coercion - he used these techniques to target children. A full audit of Hope Not Hate is required to see what other nefarious activity they engage in.

BATH: The LibDems and the Net zero zealots want our city split in 4 with no through traffic. (Oxford is being chopped into 6.) Free Bath Streets formed with support from @Togetherdec to resist and were called conspiracy nutters. 15 minute cities are coming. Believe us now?

Dr. Paul Thomas' study of 3,324 kids showed unvaxxed children had far fewer health issues—like 9x less fever, 5x less asthma & ZERO ADHD cases vs. vaxxed kids. Just days after the study was published, his medical license was suspended! Doctors are being punished for data. He isn’t the only one who faced swift punishment for publishing 'inconvenient' science. Other doctors have faced similar consequences for exposing the truth. Here’s what his data showed: Fever – 9.1X higher in vaxxed Ear Pain – 3.4X higher Otitis Media (Ear Infections) – 2.9X higher Conjunctivitis – 2.4X higher Asthma – 5.2X higher Allergic Rhinitis – 6.9X higher Sinusitis – 4.3X higher Breathing Issues – 2.9X higher Anemia – 5.5X higher Eczema – 4.5X higher Urticaria (Hives) – 2.1X higher Dermatitis – 1.4X higher Behavioral Issues – 4.1X higher Gastroenteritis – 4.7X higher Weight Disorders – 2.5X higher There were zero ADHD cases in the unvaccinated.

A bombshell vax vs. unvax study is now seeing the light of day — and the results are staggering. Dr. Marcus Zervos led the study, but he decided not to publish it because “publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” Here’s what the study revealed: • Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma. • Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema). • Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders — a category that includes over 80 different diseases. • 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. • 2.9 times more motor disabilities. • 4.5 times more speech disorders. • Three times more developmental delays. • Six times more acute and chronic ear infections. • In nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders. • The study’s conclusion is devastating. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.” If this study could be sidelined for producing inconvenient results, how many others have met the same fate? But the truth is, you don’t need a study to notice the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. 🧵

Farage asking why Zahawi wants to jab primary school children! I guess he can ask him in person now!

Nigel Farage and Nadhim Zahawi think that the Covid vaccine was a massive success. Reform are not who you think they are .

I had a phone growing up and social media at 13 I didn’t spend all my time on it and I didn’t see anything I shouldn’t have because my parents didn’t let me bed rot on it all day and made me do other things Phones and social media aren’t the problem - bad parents are

Digital ID not going to be compulsory…there’s a BIG but One Login for 8 million directors, All Our kids via Children’s Wellbeing & Scholls Bill, Facial Recogition & push to ‘verify’ all re age: No! We must be free to participate fully without digital. The fight goes on This is why we need a Digital Bill of Rights @Togetherdec @TalkTV

🔥NO TO DIGITAL ID: From Hull - to Cardiff - to Bath - to Hitchin - to Ealing It may be early Jan & freezing - but #together members were out this weekend spreading the word! @Keir_Starmer feedback on the street is clear: public do NOT want this. This is going to sink you 🧵