attention please

some woman just came to me and removed lettuce from the burger from my forehead, beyond absurd, can’t go like that, staying one more day

realize now that it was probably this exact sauce that burned my mouth to hell a few day ago, didn’t really know what’s happened

some cultures are way too primitive to understand it

having french fries with wasabi galactic dip if that’s okay

chinese again

@p1kA4A m.youtube.com/watch?v=vpknIw…

@p1kA4A both

was looking at the mirror today and couldn’t recognize myself, became chinese

@piax0x @bryan_johnson beyond anyone’s expectations

@bryan_johnson breakup is gonna be legendary

guys you’ll never believe where I found the fountain of youth

i understand what rape means in modern context of immigrants doing that but let’s not make it uncool please

@unkonfined operating without cocaine, in grey area, relying on instincts

Being too nice for too long teaches people the wrong lesson. Remember that.

@CatchUpFeed you know exactly why

Ukrainian man with draft exemption conscripted right off the streets Why is this happening?

funny that it is not the law that stops you, you just need a little bit of fucking agency

had a chance to rape some good looking woman in the elevator when everyone else left just now

for any niggers out there, the risks you carry to stay fat are beyond your understanding of what is going to happen to you

@Plinz @Dan_Jeffries1 no one can kill me, for what fucking reason, the idea that superintelligence will want to kill you is beyond funny

@Dan_Jeffries1 You are misunderstanding the doomers. The doomers don’t truly believe that AI replacing human jobs is bad. Their alliance with the labor unions ist strategic: they want to prevent AI because they think it will kill everyone

AI will create more jobs than any other technology in history. The doomers' fundamental error isn't just the lump of labor fallacy. It's deeper than that. They assume a finite problem space. This is the fundamental error of AI and job doomers. They look at the economy and see a fixed amount of work to be done, a pie that can only be sliced thinner as machines take bigger bites. They see humans a competitive resource for a finite amount of work and a finite amount of problems to solve that must be eliminated. This is fundamentally, totally and completely wrong. The pie isn't fixed. It never was. And the reason it isn't fixed is baked into the very nature of technology itself. Technology is nothing but abstraction stacking. And abstraction stacking is infinite. Therefore the work is infinite. The hammer didn't reduce the amount of work. It moved the work up the stack. And the new work was more complex, more varied, and more interesting than the old work. Complexity breeds more complexity and more variety. Once you have houses instead of mud huts, you have a cascade of new problems that didn't exist before. Plumbing. Wiring. Insulation. Roofing materials that don't rot. Drainage systems so the foundation doesn't flood. Fire codes so your neighbor's bad wiring doesn't burn down the whole block. Each of those problems becomes a job. A plumber. An electrician. An insulator. A roofer. A civil engineer. A building inspector. None of those jobs existed when we lived in mud huts. They exist because we solved the mud hut problem. Think of all of human technological development as a stack of abstraction layers, each one built on top of the ones below it. At the bottom: raw survival. Finding food. Building shelter. Making fire. These are the base-layer problems. Each major technology wave solved a base-layer problem and in doing so created an entirely new layer of problems above it: Agriculture solved "how do we reliably eat?" — and created problems of land ownership, irrigation, crop rotation, storage, trade, taxation, and governance. Writing solved "how do we remember things across generations?" — and created problems of literacy, education, record-keeping, law, bureaucracy, and literature. The printing press solved "how do we spread knowledge at scale?" — and created problems of intellectual property, censorship, journalism, publishing, public opinion, and democratic discourse. The steam engine solved "how do we generate mechanical power without muscles?" — and created problems of factory design, worker safety, urban planning, railroad engineering, coal mining, labor relations, and environmental pollution. Electricity solved "how do we deliver energy anywhere?" — and created problems of grid design, power generation, appliance manufacturing, electrical safety codes, utility regulation, and an entire consumer electronics industry. The Internet solved "how do we connect all human knowledge?" — and created problems of cybersecurity, digital privacy, online commerce, content moderation, network infrastructure, cloud computing, social media dynamics, and an entire digital economy that employs tens of millions. Notice the pattern? Each solution didn't just solve a problem. It created an entirely new problem space that was larger, more complex, and more varied than the one it replaced. The stack grows. It never shrinks. It's turtles all the way down and all the way up.

it is very literal holocaust when people are hunted down on the streets for death to feed your homosexual preferences, nothing like this has ever happened so expect the punishment that has never happened

have zero interest in politics but due to unfortunate circumstances of knowing the language i see as clearly as theoretically possible that absolutely all “ukraine supporters” or more commonly known as homosexuals will face punishment that no one has ever seen

@francoisfleuret masturbating again brother?

How comes the video feeds are so good now? This can not be optic line. It's because it's far from the front, jamming sucks?

@IterIntellectus balkan countries were very communist as well up until very recently

@IterIntellectus france is the most secular country in europe afaik

no european country's fertility rate reaches the replacement rate