Why does nobody get invoices right? All I want is a range selector with a download button...
English
Nikolas Schröter
62 posts
Nikolas Schröter
@nwidynski
Founder | Design Engineer | Working on accessible web commerce
Berlin, Germany Katılım Haziran 2018
27 Takip Edilen55 Takipçiler
@devongovett Oh no 😱 At least it was worth the effort, I appreciate the time very much!
We have benefited tremendously of react aria’s compatibility layer, so I'm trying to give our best work back!
English
All web forms should have auto save. I just spent 2 hours writing a very detailed comment on a GitHub PR, went to press Cmd + A to select all and copy, but accidentally hit Cmd + Q instead and lost all of my work. Infuriating. 😡
English
@MrFlashAccount @devongovett We continue to skip CI for non-affected code paths, which we now determine via lockfile.workspaces & git diff. But once an app is considered affected, we build the entire dependency tree - nothing is restored from artifacts.
English
@nwidynski @devongovett So you run all build tasks on each ci run? Or keep using heuristic like git changes?
English
Nice to see Parcel mentioned as an inspiration for Turbopack's incremental architecture.
Kinda funny though because I'm actually considering removing a lot of that in the next major version. 😅
Next.js@nextjs
Learn how we built Turbopack with incremental computation to scale development and builds to Next.js applications of all sizes. nextjs.org/blog/turbopack…
English
@devongovett Funny enough, we just ripped Nx out of our repo after migrating to an oxified toolchain, because task caching became the bottleneck.
I think it makes sense to gradually spend more devtime on CI as contributions inherintly become more frequent.
English
Memoization in general assumes that the function being memoized is slow in the first place. In the world of JS-based bundlers, that was true.
But esbuild showed that you can do a complete production build in milliseconds with no cache. In that world, adding caching actually becomes a bottleneck. In some cases it's even slower to serialize and deserialize from the cache than just rebuild from scratch.
Tracking every possible thing that could invalidate the cache is also super difficult (in some cases impossible), uses a large amount of memory, and is a huge source of bugs.
So yes, O(changes) is better than O(app), but at what cost to complexity? If full builds are fast enough, is it necessary?
English
@hernan_yadiel @devongovett This had been shipped previously, but was reverted. Check out #issue-2121756169" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">github.com/adobe/react-sp… for the details!
English
I'd like to see "use client" added to each component. For quick prototyping in Next.js, it’s pretty annoying to create wrapper files just to use something like or
English
What do you want to see from React Aria this year? Anything from small fixes, API nits, DX improvements, feature suggestions, new components, etc. No promises but send me your wildest dreams. 😀
English
I'm excited to share that Limitless has been acquired by Meta! Here’s why we joined forces, what this means for customers, and what comes next.
English
@devongovett Not gonna lie, this one kinda triggers me, haha. I'm so excited for the new docs though, you guys did an amazing job so far!
English
@FugoCS @Rambofight @csfloatcom Btw, I know this may all sound like EU copium - but if that's the standard we are holding our companies to, then might as well abolish all of corporate and employment law to make products cheaper.
English
By Stripe fees incurring much more, do you mean the deposit/purchase ones CSFloat already includes by default?
If it's tax penalties, they could stop serving EU countries one by one (as they're doing) or halt deposits/withdrawals entirely to avoid compliance costs. I mean, since they're based in the US, they could avoid EU penalties by going crypto-only as well, no?
English
@FugoCS @Rambofight @csfloatcom No - Stripe would normally be charging a 1% fee each time a balance is transferred between users, which they are not paying.
So you are suggesting they may as well just go completely illegal while they are at it, got it!
English
Stripe fees are incurred for much more than just the withdraw. They usually arise (~1%) at each transfer, which CSFloat skips entirely by bypassing Stripes usual safety mechanism to protect user funds.
They are only allowed to do so, precisely because they claim balances as their property - meanwhile advertising it as cash.
Its simply them disregarding user safety to gain an edge in the market, while lying about the aftermath of that decision. It doesnt have to be a rugpull - what do you expect would happen if CSFloat is faced with large tax penalties for example?
English
I get what you mean, but it isn't the best example...
Not all fees translate to direct consumer benefits like airbags. Airbags are a MANDATED safety feature with clear, obvious value; Fees, however, can be a choice that includes profit-driven decisions without safety or benefit, like delivery service fees, or CSFloat's 4% fee on cancellations and the current 2.5% fee on withdrawal if the Stripe thing is true.
Correct me if I'm wrong, aren't Stripe fees for these things max 1% on withdrawal? So if they start following Stripe TOS, wouldn't CSFloat still be financially profitable?
Based on CSFloat's record of adding extra fees for their own benefit, you can't expect the extra fees not to come from profit-driven incentives and then expect it to be a good thing.
Regarding CSFloat TOS, I would assume it's a strategy to mitigate potential legal risks from Valve. Ain't no way CSFloat is rugging anyone, I believe there would be legal implications even if the TOS says it's not your funds
English
@g00nboss @pricempire Funds are guaranteed to be at your disposal on any EU marketplace, e.g. SkinBid, Skinport, Gamerpay, etc.
How is this considered standard?
English
Some CS2 traders are concerned after finding out CSFloat's TOS does not guarantee account balances & that it should not be treated as cash.
English
@Skruiba @pricempire This is not them being transparent, while other marketplaces are not. Its rather them saving costs at the expense of users, while grossly misadvertising as "real cash"
x.com/nwidynski/stat…
Nikolas Schröter@nwidynski
I am a developer. Please log in to your Stripe Express Dashboard with CSFloat and check your Connect balance - it will display exactly $0.00. While CSFloat should transfer funds immediately after sale, they only do so on pay out - leaving users vulnerable to losses while they hold the balance, while also violating Stripe ToS and pretty much every banking regulation out there.
English
@pricempire i assume this has something to do with finland and norway losing ability to deposit through stripe few weeks back 🤔
English
@pricempire It’s almost like all cs2 skins are technically “worthless” !
English
@iMaskos @pricempire So you would be fine with your balance being used as collateral in case CSFloat suffers losses?
Why advertise something as "real cash", when its not in the fine print... I for one would not like money i put up for buy orders being gone overnight.
English
@pricempire Thought this was pretty obvious. Its their money and if your account get banned ect. Your not getting that money back
English
@pricempire @neoxic Calling them compliant is a though sell, when they are acting like this.
x.com/nwidynski/stat…
Nikolas Schröter@nwidynski
I am a developer. Please log in to your Stripe Express Dashboard with CSFloat and check your Connect balance - it will display exactly $0.00. While CSFloat should transfer funds immediately after sale, they only do so on pay out - leaving users vulnerable to losses while they hold the balance, while also violating Stripe ToS and pretty much every banking regulation out there.
English
@neoxic They are the only compliant regulated market that has this in their TOS.
English
@Chaminar2 @pricempire This is not them being transparent, while other marketplaces are not. Its rather them saving costs at the expense of users, while grossly misadvertising as "real cash"
x.com/nwidynski/stat…
Nikolas Schröter@nwidynski
I am a developer. Please log in to your Stripe Express Dashboard with CSFloat and check your Connect balance - it will display exactly $0.00. While CSFloat should transfer funds immediately after sale, they only do so on pay out - leaving users vulnerable to losses while they hold the balance, while also violating Stripe ToS and pretty much every banking regulation out there.
English
@pricempire this is actually a good thing because all other sites function the same, csfloat is just being open about it.
English
@neoxic @pricempire This is not them being transparent, while other marketplaces are not. Its rather them saving costs at the expense of users, while grossly misadvertising as "real cash"
x.com/nwidynski/stat…
Nikolas Schröter@nwidynski
I am a developer. Please log in to your Stripe Express Dashboard with CSFloat and check your Connect balance - it will display exactly $0.00. While CSFloat should transfer funds immediately after sale, they only do so on pay out - leaving users vulnerable to losses while they hold the balance, while also violating Stripe ToS and pretty much every banking regulation out there.
English
It's the same thing with the whole CS2 skins ownership... Steam Subscriber Agreement – Section 2.A (as of the latest version available on November 8, 2025)
"Licensed, not sold" → You do not own Counter-Strike skins (or any Steam content).
"No title or ownership" → Valve retains full ownership; you only have a revocable license.
The license is non-transferable outside Steam’s approved systems (e.g., Steam Community Market).
Valve can revoke your access at any time (e.g., for violations, account bans, or service shutdown).
This is the core legal rule that establishes Counter-Strike skins are not your property.
The Content and Services are licensed, not sold. Your license confers no title or ownership in the Content and Services.
English