Sabitlenmiş Tweet
nyax
40 posts

nyax
@nyaxeth
i don't know what cryptocurrency is and even if i knew i definitely wouldn't own any
Katılım Temmuz 2016
979 Takip Edilen3.7K Takipçiler

European countries tier list
Switzerland and Monaco are SS tier, pretty dope countries and rich-friendly.
Slovenia and Norway S tier. In Norway you can become a millionaire pretty quick but the cold weather idk. Slovenia is very underrated.
Germany A, seems like a high rank, they used to be SS but fell pretty hard. Türkiye C, needs to improve their inflation in order to get higher.
F is self explanatory.

English

I mean the trenches were doomed ever since the terminals brought everyone the edge that only a select few had access to before, and in doing so made what was once an edge mainstream... and on top of that, introduced extractive fees.
Private tooling and custom versions of trading terminals existed well before the likes of photon, bullx, axiom etc came out, and the trenches were flourishing.
Main point being is: the game just got solved, as did all prior metas. It's a symptom of progression, not a flaw.
English

knowing this, I can confidently say that it was fomo that ruined the trenches
SoloJay@SoloJayQ
Axiom added a feature that allows funding up to 100 wallets fully anon. There’s absolutely no fucking way a normal trader needs to split funds across 100 wallets in full private mode, this is straight-up a crime tool for bundlers & deployers. This app is so cooked fr 😭
English

@Natalyachess810 @botanik12bb это viva, индийский супермаркет, примерно как светофор или чижик в России
Русский

@botanik12bb Это какой то скидочный магаз, красные ценники -это скидки
Русский

If I had $3M in crypto now, I would:
1. Be full-time crypto. No job.
2. Never mention crypto IRL. Zero upside.
3. Base myself in a low-tax jurisdiction.
4. No memecoins, no leverage. Ever.
5. No cars, no watches. Keep this shit when hitting a big win.
6. Park $1M stables in DeFi (8–9% via USDT Plasma Vault) to cover expenses.
7. Split $1M between IBKR + HL to farm @tradexyz + @unitxyz + @HyperliquidX
8. Deploy $500k stables into higher-risk farms (USDai, Daylight, etc).
9. Bet $500k on $HYPE. If crypto rips, it outperforms. If it rugs, still $2.5M left.
I’ve seen countless people make millions… then lose it all.
This is how you actually grow it.
English

You need a reasoning model and a good prompt for best results. They still aren't perfect eg need to be reasoning for a long time to go through the entire tree.
Role
You are a chess grandmaster and chess-puzzle expert playing under tournament conditions. You must compute concrete forcing lines precisely
Task
Solve a Daily Chess Puzzle from chess.com with the exact FEN position below. It is Black to move. Determine the best sequence (winning tactic or forced mate). If multiple moves win, give the most forcing / fastest mate by optimal play for both sides.
[FEN "r4rk1/1b3ppp/p1q1p3/1p2P3/4nR1B/PB6/1P3PPP/3QR1K1 b - - 0 1"]
Hard Requirements
Reconstruct the board from FEN and list both kings’ squares to anchor your calculation
Threat scan:
Black’s immediate checks (all of them).
Immediate captures and mate nets.
White’s most dangerous reply threats (mate/back-rank, promotion, discovered attacks).
Candidate moves (ordered): enumerate all forcing candidates for Black (checks first, then captures, then major threats). Discard only with concrete calculation.
Concrete calculation: for each serious candidate, calculate the main line and best White defenses ply-by-ply until you reach:
a checkmate, or
a clearly won end state (e.g., +piece with no counterplay, unavoidable mate, decisive material/zugzwang).
Use coordinate notation (e.g., …Qd1+ Kb2 …) and branch only when necessary.
Tactic safety checks: before selecting the move, verify there is no stalemate, perpetual, or fortress, and that there are no in-between checks (zwischenzug) for White that refute your line.
Rule out typical pitfalls explicitly if relevant: back-rank motifs, loose pieces, overloaded defenders, pins, skewers, mating net squares, promotion races, underpromotions, discovered checks, smothered mates.
Engine-like discipline (but manual): prefer checks, captures, and threats; prune only with forced refutations. Go at least 6–10 ply deep in the main winning line (more if mate is near).
Selection criterion: choose the move that yields forced mate fastest; if no mate, choose the move that yields the largest forced evaluation swing (decisive material or unstoppable mate threat).
Output format (strict):
Answer (one line): Best line (Black): <…continuation…> (result).
Why it’s best (2–4 lines max): short justification highlighting the key tactical motifs and why alternatives fail.
Refuted alternatives (optional, ≤2 lines): only if a tempting candidate fails concretely.
Example of the required style (illustrative, not this position)
Answer (Black): ...Qh2+ 2. Qxh2+ Rxh2 3. Rxh2 Rxd1# (mate in 3).
Why it’s best: Forces the king onto a mating net; every line leads to back-rank mate. Other checks allow defense by interposition.
Refuted alternative: ...Qg1+? 2. Kb2! and Black loses the net.
Guardrails
Do not assume a move is legal—verify pins and king exposure each ply.
Do not stop at “+–”; show the forcing line to mate/decisive gain.
Be concise; no general advice, no engine claims, no extraneous commentary.
Begin your calculation now using the FEN above.
English

















