nycko🧜🏾‍♂️

@stcbank_ksa Alnassr to win 2-0 in the most beautiful way ever to win a league.

كم تتوقع نتيجة مباراة اليوم 🤔⚽️؟ بنختار شخصين جابوها صح ولهم جهازين Xbox 🎮

Hypothetically speaking, AI is great at things like boilerplate, prototypes, and turning caffeine into CRUD. But revolutionary products? Those still come from taste, architecture, debugging scars, and people who can think beyond just prompts.

For the better part of a decade, London treated AI as an interesting research problem. That era is ending, the city is now moving from experimentation to operational dependence. Banks, law firms, consultancies, logistics networks, even parts of government are no longer asking whether AI will matter. They are asking how quickly it can be integrated without destabilising the institution itself. What fascinates me is that the real race is no longer model capability. It is organisational adaptation. The winners of this decade may not be the firms with the most advanced models, but the ones capable of restructuring labour, compliance, and decision making around agentic systems faster than their competitors, I know for sure Britain once mastered the machinery of the industrial age. London now appears determined not to miss the machinery of the cognitive one.

I believe one of the great misunderstandings surrounding AI is the assumption that businesses are merely replacing chat interfaces with better chat interfaces but that is not what is occurring in London. What firms increasingly desire are autonomous systems capable of executing entire chains of work with minimal supervision. In finance, legal services, and operations, the ambition is no longer “an assistant that answers questions,” but rather a digital colleague capable of navigating procedure, context, and consequence, basically everything. This alters the character of work itself… The modern software engineer, for instance, is gradually shifting away from pure implementation and toward what might best be described as behavioural engineering: defining intent, establishing constraints, maintaining context, and supervising machine generated execution. The machine writes more of the code but then the human becomes responsible for judgement. A subtle transition perhaps, but historically speaking, those are the ones that reorder entire economies.

One of the wildest things about AI right now is watching a single person casually build things that used to require an entire studio, research team, funding, and months of production. Chat, I just saw someone create an interactive biology app where you can rotate cells in 3D, zoom into organelles, dissect neurons, compare structures, switch microscope views… the whole thing genuinely looked like software you’d expect from some giant education company 😭!! and the craziest part is the stack itself: One AI for images Another for code. Another for 3D assets. Then somehow it all comes together into a polished experience. We are entering an era where “I have an idea” is slowly becoming more important than “I have a company.” That shift is still frying my brain like #WWEBacklash #WardleyDubois did.

London spent years importing skilled immigrants to patch labour shortages in finance, consulting, tech, media, and now the same “elite class” cheering AI the loudest is building systems designed to erase the exact white collar pathways those immigrants came here for… talk about hypocrisy. We all know that the “learn to code” generation studied, relocated, took visas, paid absurd rent, survived a brutal city… only to discover the ladder is being quietly chopped by executives calling it “efficiency,” and the irony is disgusting; the people safest from automation are often the ones promoting it most, and they do it AGGRESSIVELY! I keep telling people “AI is not arriving equally; surely those who already have a seat would have an edge.”

Not just Claude. Take @GeminiApp, it can see your docs, your emails, your files… …but somehow still answers like it just met you 5 seconds ago!! And I’m like huh?🤣 Access doesn’t equal understanding! Until these systems can connect context across surfaces, “AI assistant” is just a fancy autocomplete with permissions.

People ask the wrong questions about AI. The big question isn’t whether we use it to write boilerplate drudgery no one wants to read. The question is what we do in a society when AI builds a house in a day for free, sews all our clothes, transports all our goods, and harvests every field and crop we need. We formed as the thinking ape. Will we survive as the recreational one?

There’s truth in that. Those building the kit are rarely the ones modelling second order effects on work and careers. Incentives are elsewhere. Worth repeating because it gets lost in hype cycles. Interesting thread you are on.

Interesting framing, but it’s a bit too clean. AI heavy founders do get leverage, yes, but “8 hours of agents” doesn’t automatically translate into compounding. A lot of it is just faster iteration, not necessarily better judgement or distribution. And the gap isn’t replacing the old technical vs non technical split so much as layering on top of it. You still need taste, domain understanding, and the boring parts like sales and trust XD. Feels like a real shift happening, just not as binary as “compounding vs buying software.”

I’ve lived long enough to see machines learn to speak… and now, apparently, forget how to work. Claude Opus 4.7 arrival is a shocker to me cause I expected more. If you put it with actual code, it starts writing essays about the problem instead of solving it. A model that knows everything, yet finishes nothing is less an engineer and more a philosopher with WiFi. Meanwhile GPT 5.5 fixes in minutes what Opus treats like a weekend retreat. We used to say in service: a map is useful, but it won’t save you when the bullets start. Claude 4.7 is a beautiful map. Shame it can’t fight😂!

Some of you aren’t angry at ai, you’re scared!! and instead of saying that plainly, you become loud, angry, and start calling everyone using AI a “pretender.” Let’s be honest for a second, AI is not coming to end us. it’s exposing you and I. If all you had was access to tools, time, or some gatekept process, then yeah… you’re in trouble because now everyone can play but real creativity? I’m talking ‘bout 1. taste 2. direction 3. vision These things didn’t disappear and they won’t. That’s what makes us different from AI! The people who actually have it are moving faster than ever right now: building more, trying more, learning more while the rest are online shouting at strangers like that’s going to stop anything🤣🤣 Nobody is replacing you, you’re just refusing to evolve.

I don’t even understand why people keep blaming AI for the flood of mediocre products, even though bad builders were already shipping bad products long before AI arrived. The difference now is just speed lol. Ai reduced the distance between an idea and execution. So now we’re seeing two things happen at once. We are seeing great teams iterating faster, experimenting more, fixing problems quicker, and building things that would’ve taken months just a few years ago!! and at the same time, terrible I mean terrible teams are mass producing soulless slop at industrial scale 🤣 Everyone suddenly noticed the “enshittification” because AI turned a slow already made leak into a burst pipe.

London doesn’t blow a trumpet about its tech scene, does it? I’m thinking out loud again, am I not?🤣 Regardless, It just gets on with things while you’re stood on a packed platform, muttering at the announcer because the Central Line’s thrown another wobbly. Take @wayve_ai , they’re not programming cars like some obedient robot following a map. They’re letting the bloody things learn on the actual roads, dodging black cabs and cyclists the way a proper London driver does after a few years behind the wheel. Then you’ve got @IsomorphicLabs , quietly turning drug discovery from white coats and test tubes into something that feels more like clever code whispering to nature itself. Less trial and error, more “let’s see what the algorithm reckons.” That’s the London way, isn’t it? No parades down Oxford Street. Just quiet absorption. AI weaving itself into the banks, the hospitals, the roads, and the daily grind. So here’s the thought I’ll leave you with, while you’re waiting for that delayed train or queuing for your flat white: When all these clever startups stop feeling like bold new companies… and start behaving like the utilities we take for granted… At what point do we stop calling it “innovation”… and just call it Tuesday?🤣

@Uzualzuzpekt @MissRozapepper This one jus get IQ of monkey

@MissRozapepper Dammy krane 5ive better pass that agrobeats global fl0p

Davido retired that bro with 5ive 🤣

@MadelaineLucyH @MichaelRosenYes They’re insecure, greasy, desperate, rejected, pathetic losers behind screens🤣. They try to make themselves happy by h@ting and bullying other people online and in the process they embarrass their entire bloodlines online. Lmao!!🤣

@MichaelRosenYes @nyckodotfun you’re very knowledgeable about the various scams and trolls out there, how does it work?

Do people who write bots’ tweets, get a fee? If so, someone may be earning a packet tonight writing variations of the same tweet directed at me over and over again.

@Core_002 @grok @BitcoinPulseX DONE

Yoo @grok in exactly 24 hours pick 20 random people from my replies to win a new iPhone 17 pro max. RULES: like this tweet, comment 'DONE' and you should follow @BitcoinPulseX *WORLDWIDE SHIPPING* Thanks and good luck!

@Core_002 @grok @BitcoinPulseX Yayy!!

@BlessingGives 1-3 athletico to win

@CodedPromis_ @ErlingRoIe He was offside

@ErlingRoIe Maybe it's time for my GOAT to leave the football before the football leaves him

He can't turn up at the World Cup like this