Fabio retweetledi
Fabio
1.2K posts

Fabio
@oibaftom
VP, Biz Ops at SKALE Foundation @skalenetwork @FAIR_Blockchain
🇨🇭 Katılım Mart 2018
488 Takip Edilen607 Takipçiler
Fabio retweetledi

Privacy isn’t a one fits all strategy. The agent economy needs Programable Privacy that is composable, compliant, and offers limitless scale. Check it out
SKALE@SkaleNetwork
Onchain safety and strategy have been exposed for too long. Introducing Programmable Privacy, making applications private, compliant, and limitless. Your privacy isn't a feature its a requirement.
English
Fabio retweetledi
Fabio retweetledi

DECRYPTED: Episode 27 - Blockchain Hacks & AI Defence x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English
Fabio retweetledi

SKALE Portal 5.1 is here, making cross-chain finally simple.
1-click bridging with @TrailsHQ by @0xPolygon, clearer UX, and real-time feedback across every step.
Explore now → base.skalenodes.com

English
Fabio retweetledi
Fabio retweetledi

Had a developer ask me a series of really great questions about @SkaleNetwork Conditional Transactions (CTXs). Here are some of the Q&A summarized:
> How does condition evaluation impact latency and throughput?
CTXs (and other SKALE privacy features) are defined in Solidity and uniquely execute as normal transactions automatically by the SKALE Chain. This means that the throughput limit for CTXs is theoretically the same limit as normal transactions. Latency on the other hand is a callback and so while technically slower, CTXs are transactions queued up and ideally executed in the next block (which is very fast on SKALE).
> Are race conditions possible?
Technically they should not be since CTXs are added to a dedicated transaction queue when the condition is met and executed before anything else. This also simplifies ordering within DeFi since it's FIFO from an execution perspective by default across the entire chain.
> What is the DevX for tracking a CTX across a block?
(See image) and you'll notice that there is an address emitted in the CTXSubmitted event. This is the ephemeral wallet in charge of submitting the transaction. Pretty cool since it acts as a perfect and simple unique id.

English
Fabio retweetledi

Hot Take: If you're building on a vanilla EVM, you're ngmi.
Here is a 5-post intro series on @skalenetwork programmable privacy + the first working onchain poker game with private player cards. (Automated Agnetic DeFi is 100% on the table too).
Here's why you won't make it👇

English
Fabio retweetledi
Fabio retweetledi

DECRYPTED: Episode 26 - $BTC Moves & Why Privacy Matters x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English
Fabio retweetledi

Friends, we are pleased to announce that we are launching a new contest! 😊
New Pixudi Meme contest is start!
The terms have changed, read more here - > @pixudi/new-pixudi-meme-contest-ef1cbce514e2" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@pixudi/new-pi…
Short video -> youtube.com/shorts/5B_FG2Q…

YouTube

English
Fabio retweetledi

Agents can’t operate in a fully transparent system, and that’s starting to matter.
Join @jackoholleran, @Stan_Kladko & @iFalcore as they break down Bitcoin, global signals, and why programmable privacy is critical for agentic commerce 🤖
📅 Tomorrow | 9am PT / 4pm UTC

English
Fabio retweetledi

Agents can’t operate if every action leaks data.
The Barista Test sets the standard, share enough to execute, nothing more.
Listen as @VittoStack & @TheGreatAxios explain why this is required for agent economies.
English
Fabio retweetledi

Privacy is no longer a constraint -- it is now a composable primitive.
For years, onchain applications have been forced into a false dichotomy: either accept full transparency or abandon composability entirely. That era ends today.
With @SkaleNetwork privacy primitives, confidentiality becomes a first-class citizen of smart contract logic -- not bolted on, but architected in from the foundation.
What was previously impossible or required massive complexity is now straightforward:
> Private state management without sacrificing verifiability
> Confidential computations that remain provable
> Selective disclosure where you control exactly what, when, and to whom
> Current proof of concept: A fully onchain poker platform where player hands remain cryptographically concealed throughout gameplay -- zero information leakage until deliberate reveal
> The game state is verifiable, the outcomes are enforceable, and the cards stay hidden
The implications extend far beyond games of skill: autonomous agents can now participate in strategic interactions requiring hidden information. Negotiations, auctions, competitive scenarios -- any domain where opacity is a feature, not a bug.
Challenge accepted: Name a use case that demands onchain privacy and currently feels out of reach. I will do my best to demonstrate how SKALE's architecture makes it achievable.
The infrastructure exists. The primitives are available on testnet. What will you build?

English
Fabio retweetledi
Fabio retweetledi
Fabio retweetledi

From the very beginning of Pixudi, one of the first blockchains we started working with was @SkaleNetwork
We've worked with many networks, and we can confidently say: SKALE is one of the few that truly delivers on its promises and keeps building.
🚀

English
Fabio retweetledi

DECRYPTED: Episode 24 - Quantum Resistance save Bitcoin? x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English

