Andy okay

@maverickecom MAVERICK

Claude + Higgsfield MCP + Manus = AI UGC FACTORY Here's the workflow that makes hundreds of photo carousels Real UGC creators charge $150-$5000 per video. 5-7 day turnaround. By the time you get 12 variants, your winning angles are already dead. We built a system that does up to 550 unique video ads in under a day. Cost per video? Like 30 cents 🤯 The stack: • manus (design your avatar and setting) • Claude (creative director + viral prompt engine) Broke down the entire thing in a step-by-step guide. What you'll get: → The exact 5-step workflow from URL to finished ad → how we make image prompts → The prompt framework that fixes 90% of bad AI outputs → The maverick method for scaling (AI for testing, plus humans for winners) No design skills needed. No wasting samples. No photo shoots. No lost time. Just paste your product URL. Generate. Export. Launch. If you're running Meta or TikTok ads and your creative rotation is slower than your ad spend, this is for you. Comment "MAVERICK" to get access (must be following)

@mikefutia OMNI

Google Gemini Omni is f*cking insane for UGC ads 🤯 Google just dropped their new video model and I spent the past 24 hours putting it through its paces. Multi-shot UGC ads -> Consistent creator across every scene ->Agent mode that runs the whole session. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who need UGC creative at volume without hiring creators or paying per-video platform fees. If you're briefing creators every week, waiting days for footage, paying $150–$300 per UGC video, and still getting ads that miss the brand vibe... Gemini Omni eliminates the entire loop: → Generate a realistic AI creator from a single image prompt → Upload your creator + product image, reference both by filename in every prompt → Agent mode writes and runs your full production session → Creator stays consistent across every scene change and outfit → Product label accurate, correct color, readable text → 5-shot direct response ad in one briefing No creator briefs. No waiting for footage. No per-video platform fees. What you get: → Multi-shot UGC ads with a locked creator across every scene → AI creator image prompt tuned for realism — not plastic AI faces → Asset tagging system that keeps your product consistent shot to shot → A reusable workflow: new product, new angle, same pipeline I also built a Claude Cowork skill that writes your entire production package before you generate a single frame: Creator prompt, shot list, dialogue, asset-tagged prompts, and voiceover script. I put together a full playbook with the Claude skill file and the exact workflow to run this yourself. Want access for free? > Like this post > Comment "OMNI" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

@blvckledge Demand

huge opportunity in ecom rn is running demand gen ads to cold traffic. google made some big changes in 2025 & 2026 that made it way more profitable we’re scaling brands from $0 to $50k/day spend in under 30 days here and almost nobody in your market is doing it well yet. i put together a guide on our full demand gen playbook like + reply “demand” and i’ll DM it to you (must be following)

@daffyduckinson ugcengine

550 videos/day with claude + seedance 2.0 this is where ai ugc starts getting unfair not “one decent clip after 40 tries” a full system that creates, variants, and scales realistic short-form ads fast creator-style hooks natural camera movement believable product shots different angles different scripts different personas same workflow no creator fees no shipping delays no manual editing bottleneck claude maps the angles, scripts, and testing logic seedance turns them into realistic ugc-style videos at volume this is how you stop making ads one by one and start running an actual creative machine i put the full ai ugc engine workflow into one file rt + comment "ugcengine" and i’ll send it (follow for dm)

@mikefutia UGC

I just cracked the code on AI UGC ads 🤯 This ad is nearly THREE minutes long, and it has perfect character, voice, and product consistency across the entire video. I found a winning authority-style ad running on Meta, recreated it shot-for-shot with AI, and ended up with what you see below. Two consistent characters, consistent voice, real product in hand. If you've been stuck generating 8 second clips that look fine but can't hold attention for a full funnel ad, this is the workflow you're missing. Here's exactly how I did it: → Find a winning ad in Meta Ad Library and download it → Upload to Loom to get a timestamped transcript (this becomes your script) → Screenshot each character → clean in ChatGPT Images 2.0 → upload as Seedance Elements → Generate your first clip per character to lock in their voice → Extract that voice as an MP3 via CapCut, attach it to every clip after → Edit in CapCut: remove dead zones, speed up to 1.1x, done → Drop final video in the Captions app, add subtitles, export 2 minutes and 40 seconds, perfect character & product consistency. I put together the full step-by-step playbook with exact Seedance prompts, the CapCut speed trick, and a voiceover technique most people don't know about. Want access completely for free? > Comment "UGC" > Like this post And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

@FynCas AI

this video is 100% AI these “yapping” style UGC ads are insanely fast to make and even faster to scale one script → dozens of variations same product, different faces, tones, settings you can sell anything: - saas - ecom - supplements - digital products rt + comment “AI” and i’ll send the guide (follow for dm)

@ahmad_a_wahabb Canvas

spent the last 6 months producing ai ads. the single biggest shift wasn't a better model. it was moving to a canvas. one workflow. every model in the same place seedance, gpt image 2, kling 3, veo. chain them, reuse them, automate them. and the part nobody talks about: you can plug claude into the canvas and have it build production workflows with you, not for you. one hour of learning this beats a year of switching tabs. comment "canvas" for the link.

@mikefutia STATICS

I just vibe coded a static ad generator in Claude Code that creates 100+ Facebook ads in minutes 🤯 All using the new insane ChatGPT Images 2.0 model. Upload one image of your brand or product → get 100+ brand-new ad concepts across every DR archetype, each one matched to a specific customer persona. Built 100% in Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who need to rapidly test mass creative statics at scale. Here's how it works: → Upload a single image of your brand or product → Add your brand kit (colors, fonts, logos) → Tool generates 10 customer personas from your brand research (Depleted Woman, Burned-Out Professional, Brain-Fogged Mom) → Pick how many concepts you want (40, 60, 100+) across archetypes — Bold Billboard, Listicle, iPhone Notes, iMessage, UI Hijack, Us vs Them, Press/Authority, Lo-Fi Sketch, UGC → Hit "Generate All" → finished ads render in seconds, each one targeting a specific persona with its own copy angle No more paying "static ad agencies" $3,000 per month. What you get: - 100+ on-brand static ads from a single product photo - Perfect product and text adherence powered by ChatGPT Images 2.0 - Persona-specific copy on every ad, no generic hooks - Iterate and scale statics in minutes instead of weeks - Reusable brand kits + persona libraries you build once and pull from forever - Every ad ships with the exact prompt and persona attached, so you can iterate instead of starting over. This is essentially a static ad agency in a box. I put together a complete playbook which includes EVERY single prompt I used to make this in Claude Code. Want all the prompts for free? > Like this post > Comment "STATICS" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

@georgeclem META

Most agencies are getting destroyed by Andromeda right now... 1. CPMs climbing. 2. Hook tests collapsing. 3. Ad sets fatiguing in 30 days. 4. Creative variation advice that's difficult to sustain. I put together a 36-page doc on the full system I'm using to keep my own agency profitable post-Andromeda. Comment "META" and i'll send it over. (must be following + RT for priority access)

@CTtheDisrupter @johnjhcoyle I still take unfunny Charley with the value than no Charley at all. Don’t give up! I hope you find a way to engage and share value that still feels true to you and who you are, because I do think you’re one of the most knowledgeable here.

I'm sorry, I'm not as funny anymore. I've decided to just not engage nearly as much with the small dick energy bros who just, for some reason, haven't given up their false reality from COVID. To be fair, most of them have given up because that cheat code stopped working. If you want actual value, I'm still doing things that most people won't talk about for a while. Hey, Taylor Holiday is still copying the things that I say, only a few years later and modified to fit his agenda.

Breaking news! This just in: New customers are more expensive… Cost Cap Bros are in shambles.

@HeyOz_AI @Emdad_AI Cooked

Still spending $500 per UGC ad? This was made under $15 This golden period won't last long Capitalize when you can One product Image One character Image Full storyboarded video in <10 mins of work This is magic Comment "cooked" and I'll send the full workflow (must be following) P.S: This is just an AI production and in no way shows affiliation with any persons or products depicted in the media

@FynCas AI

Claude just CHANGED AI ADS FOREVER And I just made a free guide showing the tools we use to make 250+ viral ads per day... Just like + comment "AI" and I'll DM it to you (must be following)

@FynCas GPT2

GPT-2 is F*cking crazy! I gave it one product photo... and it generated agency-level ads in under 2 minutes. No editor. No capcut. No $10k/month creative retainers. Then I combined it with my custom GPT pipeline — and suddenly my ads started looking like top 1% DTC brands... for $0. Honestly, it feels like something Google released by mistake. It’s almost unreal. Should I drop it? Comment "GPT2" and I'll send it (must be following)

@monicaa_AI @maria_wats8492 System

BREAKING: AI just replaced your entire TikTok team. One prompt = 500+ product videos. No creators. No $500 UGC. No waiting. We reverse-engineered how top brands scale to millions of views… Now it runs on autopilot: → AI builds a realistic UGC persona (face + voice + personality) → Auto voiceovers in seconds → Auto edits, hooks, captions — done → Mass upload system pushes content daily → Finds winning hooks BEFORE you even post Result? 100 hooks tested in the time most brands test 10. Winners scale. Losers die fast. TikTok isn’t about quality anymore. It’s about volume + speed. The brands posting 10x more… win everything. Comment “SYSTEM” and I’ll send the full blueprint.

@tryahdd Si UGC

i probably shouldn’t be saying this publicly… but i’m tired of seeing people struggle with AI videos seedance 2.0 + claude + tiktok is literally broken i’m talking hyper-realistic videos that make people stop scrolling and think: “nah… this has to be a real person” i spent weeks testing EVERYTHING and finally locked in a system that: - makes AI sound human (no robotic nonsense) - adds natural body movement + micro expressions - keeps videos consistent no matter how long they are - cuts tool costs down like crazy i wasn’t going to share this yet… but f*ck it. RT + reply “Ai UGC” and i’ll send the full step-by-step system (if you’re serious, follow so i can dm you)

@spwfeijen AI

We’re generating 350+ videos/hour with Seedance 2.0. Cinematic quality — built for performance marketing. UGC cost: $0 Production time: 0 mins Scale: 10× overnight No shoots. No freelancers. No delays. One AI ad engine — creating, testing, and posting short-form content automatically. It’s live. Campaigns are running now. Follow, comment “AI”, and I’ll DM you the guide. (Must be following)

@georgesttock Guide

Imagine paying $1,000 for product photos in 2026... AI can turn one product image into dozens of scroll-stopping ads. Different styles. Different backgrounds. Different creatives. All in minutes. I made a step-by-step guide showing exactly how to do it. Comment “Guide” and I’ll send it. (must be following)

@lorenzo_pravata @Bogzabs96 VSL

Your ads are talking to the people who already know your brand. The other 90% of your market is scrolling straight past you. After $106M in managed Meta ad spend, we broke down the VSL format we use to convert cold audiences. For the next 48 hours I'm giving it away: - The exact script structure we use (hook, villain, mechanism, product reveal) - How to cast an authority figure that makes cold audiences trust you - How to map VSL formats to the right awareness level so you know exactly when to use them Like + Comment "VSL" and I'll send it over. (Must be following)

@jspujji UGC

I recently spoke to a Head of Growth at a brand doing $50M+ in revenue. He told me +50% of their winning ads were made by people they've never met. No agency or contractor. One marketing assistant is finding, briefing, & scaling these creator programs through a system most brands haven’t scaled yet. Today, their ROAS and % of new web visitors have never been higher. So I asked him to break down the operational blueprint behind how they run it: He sent me this guide with everything brands need to know about the UGC system: — How Meta and TikTok's new algo rewards embedded creative signals — The exact org design behind high-growth UGC programs — The specific hooks and landers that convert Reply with "UGC" and I'll DM you the guide.

@JerryFederline @binghott @herrmanndigital To me personally Meta said there is basically no overlap with IA, so it’s fine to dupe a campaign and test side by side. But it gave medioker results for me. Would love to knowing this method checks out with @binghott as well.

@binghott @herrmanndigital What’s the best way to go about testing IA? Launch my next round of fresh creative with that as the attribution setting? Or half of the new creative? Would love to know how you’re rolling it out. Thanks!

Not a tinfoil hat thing, @herrmanndigital! Very simple, but alsooo get comfortable, strap yourselves in: Meta was counting all conversions after any clicks on an ad as conversions until ~March 16th. (Clicks to pause a video, clicks to read comments, clicks to like a post, etc) Meta is optimized to take credit for as many conversions as it can. Meta's optimization doesn't care if those conversions were caused by those ads or if they just took credit for them by getting them after "clicks". Meta's machine learning algorithm is extraordinary at targeting in-market users. Meta knows what users are in-market and most likely to buy. Meta knows this from actions users take on your website annnnd on other websites. Meta's system knows which cheap clicky ads are easiest to deliver to those warm users. (If you let it!) Meta delivers cheap clicky ads to high-intent users so it can easily steal credit for tons of "conversions" (that were actually driven by other sources). Meta doesn't care whether or not it caused the conversions (and whether they're incremental) or not. Meta only cares that it can take credit for it. Many of those clicks were not valuable or high-intent clicks, but they look like it in reporting. Check your link clicks vs clicks (all) and CPC vs CPC (all) Many advertisers have formed their opinions about "what works" with creative but in reality all they learned is what clicky highly-branded ads work at getting non-incremental "conversions" from warm users and existing customers instead of actually driving value/impact. Nooooow, Meta is only counting conversions after link clicks since ~March 16th. Sooooo, in order for it to take credit for many of those same "conversions" Meta had to shift delivery to ads that weren't just getting clicks, but getting actual link clicks. Getting link clicks is typically harder and more expensive than getting cheaper in-platform clicks. Before: it favored ads with cheap in-platform clicks. After: it has to favor ads with cheap link clicks. This has caused a few problems for advertisers: 1. Meta had to focus more on link clicks instead of all clicks, so that means traffic increasing (including clickbait and mis-clicks), CPC's dropping, and CVR plummeting for some advertisers. 2. If it's harder for Meta to get conversions (or "conversions") for you now, your costs increase (that's just how their relevance/auction system works). Accounts that were advertising with the most real incremental impact were hurt the least. Accounts with the least incremental impact were hurt the most. Factors that relate to the most pain in the past month, but not exclusively: 1. Bigger brands 2. Brands with more traffic from sources other than Meta, like other ad platforms, high-intent search ads/organic, etc 3. Accounts using minimal or zero customer/visitor/engager exclusions, especially for brands with high repurchase rates Things to consider changing/improving if this has been happening to you: 1. Exclude all customers and/or RECENT visitors/engagers (but less necessary if you do #2...) 2. Use Incremental Attribution optimization and reporting: Meta uses its powers to get you more actual incremental conversions rather than just click-attributed "conversions" 3. Revisit and re-study your creatives, some old "losers" might actually be hidden winners. 4. Conversion lift studies for free in Meta's Experiments tab and/or incremental lift tests from 3rd party platforms 5. Book a call with me and I can help you better understand all of this I don't think Meta understood (or cared) how much this would impact some advertisers. Meta's system is probably still adapting, and it may not improve for advertisers who don't adapt with it. I hope you found this valuable, I'd love to hear your thoughts, experiences, and opinions.