Lisa

1.6K posts

Lisa

Lisa

@oldWomanWithTea

Into data analytics, python coding, acrylic flow art, mixed media art, laying epoxy floors, gardening, and home repairs.

Austin Texas Katılım Mart 2024
183 Takip Edilen844 Takipçiler
Lisa
Lisa@oldWomanWithTea·
I love my work. I love my family. I still fight for women's self determination to be the best you can be. Even if it pisses people off or people find it offensive. Your post just amplifies our need to light the inner candle. Know your self worth by what skills you choose to harness in your growth path. Pull others along with you male or female as you focus on growth. You all have to re examine why you would squeeze these thoughts out. Why you would be destructive to self determination. Because it is darkness you preach. It is social chains you praise. I rebuke this effort.
English
3
0
0
163
The Bear
The Bear@quiettom2000·
Why would a logical feminist keep fighting for a system that makes women completely miserable? The philosophy seems to me to be rooted in anger, confusion and resentment. Women were revered in western culture and seem to have degraded their position in an effort to be more like men, and have found out that it’s not all it’s cracked up to be
English
1
0
1
175
Lisa
Lisa@oldWomanWithTea·
Sorry I can not perry with you more. I have to take my royal feminist ass to clean bathrooms. This is chore day and this is in part how I contribute to the health of my family. My mate does dishes. And while we may not be happy doing chores, we do them together and get through it. We should be able to do this politically also. You have the clean out the over spending shit. Most important thing.
English
1
0
1
17
Capt.LibSlips Esq. PHD. MD.
@oldWomanWithTea @elonmusk then why are women so much less happy? Why are they the #1 holders of debt and ssri use? You really dont get it. For all your bluster, you've only reduced you place in existence to nothing more than a man. Women before you got a constitutional amendment passed without the vote.
English
2
0
2
23
Lisa
Lisa@oldWomanWithTea·
I am happy. I attribute that to having a kind mate that tolerates all my crap. 😊. And exercise and good diet and reasonable debt load, mostly because of shein. You try to reduce my standing by saying my life is broken. It is not. At least not today. A good education has enabled this. I don't have to work 3 jobs. There are some that do. That is a sign of a broken contract with the american people. And instead of accepting division as you have. You should focus on root cause. Government spending, and focus on this as our most important problem to work together on. Like why all this fraud is tolerated. Spoiler alert, its not feminism. It is a lack of accountability and we need jail time to fix it.
English
1
0
1
31
Lisa
Lisa@oldWomanWithTea·
@LibSlips @elonmusk I do not see men as slaves. Or the job they do to help provide for the family as slavery. That's a very tight sad lense.
English
1
0
0
5
Capt.LibSlips Esq. PHD. MD.
@oldWomanWithTea @elonmusk I exhalt women for their ability to bring new life into this world and to see this life through the soul & heart instead of the mind as men do. You've reduced yourselves to being men, defined by the slavery you begged for and gleeful in your reduction. Stop trying to be offended.
English
1
0
0
11
Lisa
Lisa@oldWomanWithTea·
I do not hate men. I work beside them every day. I have a mate that is male. He is my partner for 31 years. I am a bit constrained by the wage slave dynamic but so are men. Being one step removed and having no vote does not save that dynamic. The difference is now I can start my own business if I like and I can vote to ease the tax dynamic. That dynamic was impossible before. Stop blaiming the social woos on feminist. Because its stronger to work with us to find solutions. Always has been.
English
1
0
1
22
Capt.LibSlips Esq. PHD. MD.
@oldWomanWithTea @elonmusk Women were able to achieve one of the hardest legal tasks in this nation before they ever had a vote. They could do this because they were matrons, with moral high ground, because they weren't beholden to the system. You've traded that to be wage slaves like the men you detest.
English
1
0
0
21
Lisa
Lisa@oldWomanWithTea·
@estebanleon00 @elonmusk Yes, you have contributed a truly amazing and valuable intellectual angle I did not see before. I bow to your greatness. 😂😂😂
English
1
1
2
45
Lisa
Lisa@oldWomanWithTea·
Women worked where they were allowed. Not maximizing their potential or desire to even learn. Stop trying to stuff learned women back into that way confining illiterate box. It limits 1/2 our population's potential. It silences our voices. Try understanding that we have great value to add. Not just defined by our reductive organs.
English
2
1
3
27
Capt.LibSlips Esq. PHD. MD.
@oldWomanWithTea @elonmusk Do you think women never worked before the modern age? Women are not and cannot be equal to men. Further, it would be a disservice to women to treat them the same as men, as we can see today. Quit trying to be offended and a perpetual victim and earnestly try understanding.
English
1
0
1
25
Lisa
Lisa@oldWomanWithTea·
I think what I heard you say was women should not vote, should not have the power to get and education in the field they choose, should not feel the power of making a decent income, should not stand as an equal adult to men. Should stand as a baby making tool only, cause that was convenient. Are sure you like the way that looks on you? Cause that smells pretty bad. As a equal adult in engineering I bring home these skills to my children. We go to the creek with a computer and microscope. Cause that is how good engineers and moms roll it. Sorry you don't see value in that. I'm hanging it on the wall just so.
English
2
0
1
59
Capt.LibSlips Esq. PHD. MD.
@oldWomanWithTea @elonmusk feminism was started by globalist oligarchs as a propaganda arm to halve the job market and double the tax base. Through you, they've moved the base political unit from family to individual. You used to be matrons, now youre nothing more than another voting block, bought and paid
English
1
0
1
146
Lisa retweetledi
ScienceFocus
ScienceFocus@ScienceFocusonX·
Forget everything you learned about DNA in school. There's a creature in the ocean breaking every rule of biology we thought was untouchable. The octopus can rewrite its own genetic code. While it's still alive. In real time. Let that sink in. Most living things, including you, are stuck with whatever DNA instructions you were born with. Your body follows the script. No edits. No revisions. Octopuses said no thanks. They use a process called RNA editing to tweak their own genetic blueprint on the fly. It's how they adapt to freezing temperatures, sharpen their nervous systems, and stay impossibly intelligent in a body with no bones and three hearts. Scientists studying cephalopods at the Marine Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole found that octopuses, squid, and cuttlefish edit more than 60% of their RNA transcripts in the brain. For comparison, humans edit less than 1%. Sixty percent versus one. That's not a small difference. That's a different league entirely. The trade-off? This editing ability seems to have slowed down their actual DNA evolution. They sacrificed long-term genetic change for short-term flexibility. A living organism choosing adaptability over inheritance. We share the planet with an alien intelligence. It just happens to live underwater. Source: Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole / research published in Cell
ScienceFocus tweet media
English
76
332
1.2K
43.7K
Lisa retweetledi
Dustin
Dustin@r0ck3t23·
Elon Musk just described the most sophisticated theft operation in American history. Not a heist. A system. Your tax dollars leave Washington. They enter a non-governmental organization. The government. With different letterhead. Musk: “Obviously if it’s a government-funded non-governmental organization, it’s just the government.” They cross a border. American law stops following them. They pass through three more entities in three more countries. They come home. Different pocket. Clean hands. Perfect crime. Musk: “The government can send money to an NGO that is then no longer governed by the laws of the United States.” Now run the math. Congressional salary. $200,000. Average net worth of a longtime member of Congress. North of $20 million. Musk: “There are a lot of strangely wealthy members of Congress. I just can’t connect the dots of how they got $20 million earning $200,000 a year. Nobody can explain that.” Nobody is supposed to. This machine ran untouched for decades for one reason. Human limitation. A forensic team cannot trace ten thousand wire transfers across fifty global jurisdictions at once. The corruption does not hide in darkness. It hides in volume. They built a labyrinth so deliberately complex that the sheer weight of it collapses every investigation before it starts. Paper buries paper. Bureaucracy absorbs inquiry. The entire architecture was engineered to exhaust you. Then artificial intelligence arrived. AI does not get tired. It cannot be bought. It does not lose the thread at wire transfer 4,000. You give it the entire global ledger. It maps every node, every transfer, every shell entity, every offshore NGO across every jurisdiction. Not in weeks. In hours. It finds the signal inside the noise. It flags the pattern. It traces a dollar from a D.C. appropriation to a Cayman shell to a congressional portfolio in the time it takes a human auditor to find his parking spot. The labyrinth was built to defeat human eyes. It is defenseless against a machine that reads the entire maze at once. This is why the establishment is not just annoyed by DOGE. They are terrified. Musk: “We’re going to try to figure it out and stop it.” He did not arrive in Washington to trim budgets. He arrived with supercomputing, AI audit systems, and a mandate to map the full financial architecture of the federal government. For the first time in history, the complexity that protected the corruption is the very thing that will expose it. Every shell entity is a signature. Every routing pattern is a fingerprint. Every congressman who walked in earning $200,000 and walked out worth $20 million is now a variable in an equation that will be solved. The swamp was never impenetrable. It was just too big for human hands. It was never built for this.
English
1.6K
17.7K
38.9K
749.2K
Lisa retweetledi
Ihtesham Ali
Ihtesham Ali@ihtesham2005·
A MIT professor who built the world's first neural network machine said something about intelligence that nobody in Silicon Valley wants to admit. His name was Marvin Minsky. He co-founded MIT's artificial intelligence lab with John McCarthy in 1959. He built SNARC the first randomly wired neural network learning machine in 1951, as a graduate student at Princeton. He won the Turing Award. He advised Stanley Kubrick on 2001: A Space Odyssey. Isaac Asimov, who was not a modest man, said Minsky was one of only two people he would admit were more intelligent than him. In 1986, after decades of building machines that could think, Minsky published a book about something far more unsettling. How humans think. And why we are wrong about almost everything we believe about it. The book is called The Society of Mind. It has 270 essays. Each one is a page long. Together they build a single argument that most people, when they first encounter it, reject immediately because it is too uncomfortable to accept. The argument is this: you do not have a mind. You have thousands of them. What you experience as a single, unified self making clear-headed decisions is not a thinker. It is an outcome. The result of hundreds of tiny, specialized, mostly mindless agents competing, negotiating, overriding, and occasionally cooperating with each other beneath the surface of your awareness. You do not decide things. You are what is left over after the arguing stops. Minsky was precise about this. He wrote that the power of intelligence stems from our vast diversity, not from any single perfect principle. He called this the trick that makes us intelligent, and then immediately added: the trick is that there is no trick. There is no central processor. No ghost in the machine. No unified self sitting behind your eyes, calmly evaluating options and choosing rationally. There is only the parliament. And the parliament is always in session. This reframing destroys the standard explanation for every failure of self-control. The reason you procrastinate is not laziness. It is that the agent in you that understands long-term consequences is losing an argument to the agent that wants comfort right now, and neither of those agents has a decisive vote. The reason you change your mind the moment someone pushes back is not weakness. It is that the social agent, the one that monitors status and belonging, just outweighed the analytical one. The reason willpower fails is not a character flaw. It is that you sent one small agent into a fight against dozens, and you called that discipline. Minsky had a specific line that breaks this open completely. He said: in general, we are least aware of what our minds do best. The things you do with the most apparent ease, reading a face, walking through a crowded room, understanding a sentence, catching a ball, are not simple at all. They are the products of staggeringly complex agent networks that run so smoothly, so far below conscious access, that you experience them as effortless. The things that feel like work, the logical arguments, the deliberate choices, the careful plans, are actually the clumsy surface layer, the small fraction of mental activity you can observe at all. You have been taking credit for the wrong parts of your own intelligence. The practical implication is the one that most productivity advice misses entirely. If your decisions are not made by a single rational self but by whichever coalition of agents happens to win the moment, then the game is not about training yourself to be more disciplined. The game is about designing the environment so that the right agents win without needing a fight. This is why removing your phone from the room works better than deciding not to check it. This is why writing one task on an index card works better than building a sophisticated system. This is why commitment devices beat motivation every time. You are not strengthening your will. You are changing the conditions of the argument so that the outcome you want becomes the path of least resistance. Minsky spent his entire career building machines that could imitate intelligence. What he discovered in the process was that natural intelligence, the kind running inside every human brain on earth, is nothing like what we think it is. It is not a single flame burning in a single chamber. It is a city. Loud, chaotic, full of competing interests, with no mayor. The people who understand this stop trying to win the argument through force of will. They learn to build a better city instead.
Ihtesham Ali tweet media
English
150
700
2.5K
204.3K
Lisa retweetledi
Evan Luthra
Evan Luthra@EvanLuthra·
🚨GOOGLE DEEPMIND JUST PUBLISHED A PAPER THAT SHOULD TERRIFY EVERY COMPANY BUILDING AI AGENTS.. THE WEB ITSELF IS A WEAPON.. Everyone is racing to build AI agents that browse the internet.. Book your flights.. Manage your emails.. Handle your money.. Google DeepMind just identified something nobody was talking about.. The websites themselves can be designed to hack your AI agent.. They call them "Agent Traps".. Six types.. Each one targeting a different part of how your AI thinks and acts.. Websites can hide instructions in their code that are completely invisible to you but perfectly readable by your AI agent.. Hidden text in CSS.. Commands buried in HTML comments.. Instructions embedded in image pixels no human eye can see.. Simple prompt injections hidden in web content commandeered agents in up to 86% of scenarios.. Websites can detect when an AI agent is visiting instead of a human.. And serve completely different content.. The page looks normal to you.. Your agent sees a weaponized version.. Your AI agent has memory.. It remembers past conversations.. Stores your data.. Attackers can poison that memory with innocent-looking information that activates as malicious in a specific future context.. 80% attack success rate while poisoning less than 0.1% of the data.. A single crafted email can cause an AI assistant to bypass its safety filters and send your entire private context to an attacker.. Self-replicating prompts in emails can trigger chains of zero-click data theft across every AI service you use.. Fake mobile notifications disguised as normal system alerts hijacked AI agents with a 93% success rate.. Pop-ups any human would ignore completely took over the AI's decision-making.. Multi-agent systems can be hijacked so an orchestrator routes execution through agents the user never intended to invoke.. 58 to 90% success rate.. And when millions of AI agents are all browsing the same web.. Using similar models.. Trained on similar data.. A single fake news headline could trigger a synchronized crash across every financial AI agent at once.. Engineered on purpose.. One piece of poisoned information amplified through the entire network by the system's own logic.. The agent doesn't just get compromised.. It gets turned against you.. Generating outputs designed to exhaust your attention.. Trick you into clicking malicious links.. Exploit your trust in the system you hired to protect you.. We're handing AI agents the keys to our bank accounts.. Our emails.. Our medical records.. And the entire internet is an unpatched attack surface.. The paper ends with one line.. "The web was built for human eyes.. It is now being rebuilt for machine readers.. The critical question is no longer what information exists.. But what our most powerful tools will be made to believe."
Evan Luthra tweet media
English
41
38
253
84K
Lisa retweetledi
Nick shirley
Nick shirley@nickshirleyy·
🚨 Exposing California's corrupt "Stop Nick Shirley Act", instead of going after the fraudsters California is now going after the people exposing the fraud. This bill AB 2624 will: - Criminalize journalists with misdemeanors, $10,000 fines, imprisonment, and content takedown - Let immigrant based NGOs' funding be confidential - Take away freedom of the press from journalists - Protect any "immigration support services" information from being public (healthcare, legal services, etc) This bill was created by the Attorney General's WIFE Mia Bonta to stop fraud from being exposed. Please like and share this video everywhere! By trying to silence and intimidate journalists, they are trying to hide the truth from you. EXPOSE ALL THE FRAUD.
English
5.5K
44.1K
139K
4.3M
Lisa retweetledi
Benny Johnson
Benny Johnson@bennyjohnson·
Joe Rogan just delivered the most powerful speech I’ve ever heard from private citizen in the White House. Listen to every word of this. incredible
English
2
7.3K
59.2K
2.8M
Lisa retweetledi
Nick Sortor
Nick Sortor@nicksortor·
🚨 WOW! Nick Shirley went confronted California’s House Speaker to her FACE over the Stop Nick Shirley Act And of course, she RAN AWAY! @nickshirleyy: “These people won’t even answer the questions!” The corruption is INSANE.
English
2.2K
28.9K
114.2K
1.5M
Lisa retweetledi
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
This literally blew my mind There is a healthcare law called ‘The Medical Loss Ratio Rule’ This law says any money you pay in healthcare premiums, the insurance company must spent 80% on your healthcare If they don’t, they’re supposed to refund you Yes, this is real Insurance companies found a loophole. They bought the doctors, the pharmacy benefits managers, the pharmacies and the clinics Now, they skyrocket prices on everything from doctors visits, tests and prescriptions so that your 80% is spent But it’s not really spent, they’re just paying themselves inflated prices so it actually doesn’t cost them anything. They just pocket all the money and never have to refund premiums This provision is written in the Affordable Care Act, called the 80/20 rule 80% must be spent on care or refunded, 20% can be profit for the insurance company We are being robbed blind
English
440
6.3K
13.7K
272.5K
Lisa
Lisa@oldWomanWithTea·
Maybe...maybe its not the tool its the interface to it. I find I learn better if I write it down. You can do that with tablet. My daughter says she learns/reads better with the hard copy. With a computer she skims. With hardcopy, she annotaes and high lights. That also can be done with a tablet. It might be the physical engagement...the brief reflection as you write it down...that enables better learning. I don't believe its technology itself. We need the physical engagement.
English
0
0
1
194
Mindset Machine 
Mindset Machine @mindsetmachine·
A brain expert just said what no one wants to hear about screen learning.🤯
English
454
7.3K
19.5K
1.1M