Justin O'Neill

@joyofcodedev Nice! I wonder if the chat-to-code bots are using something similar for generating in-chat component results..or possibly a different method? e.g. @v0 , @boltdotnew , @Lovable , etc Project coming up soon that'll require a method like this so exploring ideas

I wanted a simple way to sandbox examples in the Animotion docs so I ended up creating a SvelteKit route to dynamically load components and pop the prerendered route inside an <iframe>

@wesbos You think it's because people are getting tired of seeing the "ask anything" AI prompt UI and making assumptions too early? Seems to be a hard division between the people on this matter still

Starbuck'ss ChatGPT app is one of the first MCP apps I've seen break outside the tech circle. very interesting that the public's reaction is poor as this is supposed to be the future of UI

They are calling for the genocide of Whites

@wesbos @airseskohq @X Em dashes will be the death of us —\_(ツ)_/—

@airseskohq @X “But here’s the problem —“ Your ChatGPT tweets are the problem

Dear @X ,“Up to 90% deduction” is crazy. So the platform built on reposts is now punishing reposts? Make it make sense. Nikita Bier basically just told every aggregator, meme page, and football fan account: you’re not welcome anymore. But here’s the problem — original content doesn’t spread without distribution. Reposts ARE the algorithm. Kill that, and you kill reach… for everyone. This won’t create better content. It’ll just make the timeline dry.

@joyofcodedev Ooo nice! New power unlocked

Turns out if you export an object with state from a Svelte component it includes get/set methods so it just works 🤔

@thdxr Sorry to hear man 🙏

my dog got out and got hit by a car today both front legs broken - they're checking to make sure it's nothing else and hopefully he'll fully recover hug your puppies!

@shadcn I think it's an accumulation of us using it every day giving it feedback. It's probably at a point now to where it takes this in a self improves

Nobody move. GPT-5.4 is working amazingly.

@sama No one's going to read this. They will only be able to read the first headline: you made an agreement with the DoW (Department of War).

Here is re-post of an internal post: We have been working with the DoW to make some additions in our agreement to make our principles very clear. 1. We are going to amend our deal to add this language, in addition to everything else: "• Consistent with applicable laws, including the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, National Security Act of 1947, FISA Act of 1978, the AI system shall not be intentionally used for domestic surveillance of U.S. persons and nationals. • For the avoidance of doubt, the Department understands this limitation to prohibit deliberate tracking, surveillance, or monitoring of U.S. persons or nationals, including through the procurement or use of commercially acquired personal or identifiable information." It’s critical to protect the civil liberties of Americans, and there was so much focus on this, that we wanted to make this point especially clear, including around commercially acquired information. Just like everything we do with iterative deployment, we will continue to learn and refine as we go. I think this is an important change; our team and the DoW team did a great job working on it. 2. The Department also affirmed that our services will not be used by Department of War intelligence agencies (for example, the NSA). Any services to those agencies would require a follow-on modification to our contract. 3. For extreme clarity: we want to work through democratic processes. It should be the government making the key decisions about society. We want to have a voice, and a seat at the table where we can share our expertise, and to fight for principles of liberty. But we are clear on how the system works (because a lot of people have asked, if I received what I believed was an unconstitutional order, of course I would rather go to jail than follow it). But 4. There are many things the technology just isn’t ready for, and many areas we don’t yet understand the tradeoffs required for safety. We will work through these, slowly, with the DoW, with technical safeguards and other methods. 5. One thing I think I did wrong: we shouldn't have rushed to get this out on Friday. The issues are super complex, and demand clear communication. We were genuinely trying to de-escalate things and avoid a much worse outcome, but I think it just looked opportunistic and sloppy. Good learning experience for me as we face higher-stakes decisions in the future. In my conversations over the weekend, I reiterated that Anthropic should not be designated as a SCR, and that we hope the DoW offers them the same terms we’ve agreed to. We will host an All Hands tomorrow morning to answer more questions.

@dummdidumm_ Sick! Been wanting this for a long time

New in Svelte: Comments inside component/element tags!

@sama IDIOT

Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network. In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome. AI safety and wide distribution of benefits are the core of our mission. Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems. The DoW agrees with these principles, reflects them in law and policy, and we put them into our agreement. We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should, which the DoW also wanted. We will deploy FDEs to help with our models and to ensure their safety, we will deploy on cloud networks only. We are asking the DoW to offer these same terms to all AI companies, which in our opinion we think everyone should be willing to accept. We have expressed our strong desire to see things de-escalate away from legal and governmental actions and towards reasonable agreements. We remain committed to serve all of humanity as best we can. The world is a complicated, messy, and sometimes dangerous place.

nailed it #ChatGPT #ChatGPTWrapped

@geteviapp @dummdidumm_ you mean something like this? github.com/versionnow/docs

@dummdidumm_ Why there’s an MCP? Can we just have normal CLI stuff which Codex launches??

Svelte MCP server is goated

@anaeem152 Build something people want that they don't know they want.

YCombinator : “Build Something People Want” Steve Jobs: “People dont know what they want” Who to listen to ?

@joyofcodedev Will definitely give this a read later today

The Svelte 5 guide has everything from reactivity and how it works, when to use and avoid effects, events, bindings, components and composition, transitions and animations to using third party libraries and making external systems reactive. 🔥

I've found that listening to #zelda beats while #coding is the equivalent to playing Zelda. #ZeldaAndChill 　▲ ▲　 ▲ music.youtube.com/playlist?list=…

@YodasMyDad @adamwathan CSS Wind Garden?

@adamwathan My god we are going full circle and back to the CSS Zen Garden days 😂 (I'd actually like that, those were good times)

Redesigning a real website by just changing the CSS file and not touching the HTML 🙈

@adamwathan I'm close (Fast forward 10 years) I'm closer

@LinusEkenstam @LimitlessAI Does it transcribe and do diarization? Does it let you bring your own ai? Does it cost monthly or one time payment for the hardware?

This AI pendant records everything I wore it for 24 hours and I'm floored Here is all you need to know:

@argyleink WTF??! why??? there has to be some explanation for this...... when i think of next level css stuff i always think of you first. this is wack!

G̶o̶o̶g̶l̶e̶r̶… ex-Googler. nerdy.dev/ex-googler

@FU_joehudson @threadapalooza I love this

How to be more emotionally intelligent (without trying so hard) 🧵 for @threadapalooza