Luna Classic Revival validator | Marz token

5.7K posts

Luna Classic Revival validator | Marz token banner
Luna Classic Revival validator | Marz token

Luna Classic Revival validator | Marz token

@onlycryptobaron

Creator of MARZ token treasury on Luna Classic & Luna Classic Revival validator. MARZ token TG: https://t.co/T83nTuGSF2 Not financial advice.

Katılım Ekim 2021
101 Takip Edilen3.6K Takipçiler
Luna Classic Revival validator | Marz token
To the entire #LunaClassic community we are almost there, 10 hours until we can actually make a serious difference for this chain.. If you are delegated with a validator that is voting no on raising the the tax to 1.5% you can redelegate to myself or anyone who has voted YES. The entire #LUNC & #USTC holder base appreciates the Binance burn which I do as well, but remember.. we were burning double that amount daily when the burn tax was at 1.2% with the same development. We are currently going down a path of insanity by trying to do the same thing over and over hoping for a different outcome. Binance helps us but they will not save us, top validators that have L2 tokens with a tax just want the tax for themselves. I urge all of you to open your eyes and see the light. I will do everything I can to revive this chain, we all deserve it and we have the ability to do it now👇🔥
Luna Classic Revival validator | Marz token tweet media
English
5
8
44
1.7K
BurnItAll
BurnItAll@LuncBurnItAll·
Lunc Community Burn Alert ⚠️ 📢 🔥 Here it guys 109,163 Ustc burned forever. Thank you to Ken for gifting the community 100k this week. And thank you to the BIA delegations who allow us to burn our commissions every week without fail. 🔥🔥🔥 Burn week #150 is in the books 📖
BurnItAll tweet media
English
5
15
38
1.7K
BiNodes
BiNodes@BInodes_·
#Binance has just burned close to 280 million #LUNC Transaction hash: 048DEC93F8997CA11E0F939A4720A5419FDFE0453B51FF238BE10D351F68A98D $LUNC #USTC
BiNodes tweet media
English
3
13
64
3.1K
Irapua Puertas Costa
Irapua Puertas Costa@CostaIrapua·
@onlycryptobaron Infelizmente vários validadores ignoraram o desejo de sua própria comunidade. Espero que quem delegou observe e deleguem com outros validadores....
Português
1
0
0
33
Luna Classic Revival validator | Marz token
Thank you Binance for burning your monthly trading fees for #LunaClassic 🔥 280M #LUNC have been removed forever.. Just a reminder that under a 1.2% tax we were doubling this amount daily🧠 That can be achieved again, just vote YES. If your validator didn't, we welcome you with open arms 🤝
Luna Classic Revival validator | Marz token tweet media
English
1
8
43
1.3K
HTX
HTX@HTX_Global·
Name the loudest community in crypto. Show up 👇
English
767
160
783
82.9K
HTX
HTX@HTX_Global·
gm, scroll down :) 🌕 🌖 🌗 🌘 🌑 🌒 🌓 🌔 🌕 🌖 🌗 🌘 🌑 🌒 🌓 🌔 🌕 🌖 🌗 🌘 🌑 🌒 🌓 a little further... 🌔 🌕 🌖 🌗 🌘 🌑 🌒 🌒 🌓 🌔 🌕 🌖 🌗 🌘 🌑 🌒 🌓 🌔 🌕 🌖 🌗 🌘 🌑 🌒 🌓 🌔 🌕 🌖 🌗 🌘 🌑 🌒 🌓 🌔 🌕 🌖 🌗 August is your month.. claim it! ( Like + RT for good luck )
English
161
123
444
54.5K
Terra Army 🐋
Terra Army 🐋@terra_army·
🔥 Another Binance $LUNC burn is in. Over 280 millions LUNC gone Every monthly burn is another step toward reducing supply. Burns alone won't change everything, but combined with development, utility, and adoption, they keep the long-term vision alive. 💎🤲🏻 The community keeps building. Shared In 🤝 @coinexcom @coinexcreators #coinex #LUNC #TerraClassic #Crypto
Terra Army 🐋 tweet media
English
10
14
118
4K
Currency365
Currency365@Currency365·
Mr Diamondhandz1 does this every time the burn 🔥 tax proposal goes live. He tweets about cz and anti-burning all day long until the proposal ends 😆 🤣 😂 in his mind 1.5% tax is 15% tax 😆 🤣 😂
LuncCommunity.com | 0% Fee & USTC Airdrops@L_U_N_C

$LUNC Proposal #12223 - PART 2 Mr Diamondhandz the LUNCLIVE Validator appears to continue misleading the $LUNC community again to promote his own projects. A project that taxes its own transactions at the exact rate he calls “stupid” for LUNC. Mr Diamondhandz, told the community: “Even CZ knows a 1.5% LUNtax is stupid.” CZ never said that.👇 CZ’s comments were from September 2022 and concerned whether Binance should add an extra 1.2% charge to every LUNC trade inside Binance. They were not about Proposal #12223. They were not about a 1.5% Terra Classic on-chain tax. Appears that LUNCLIVE Validator doesn't understand the difference. There were two separate issues in 2022. First, Terra Classic’s 1.2% on-chain tax. Binance confirmed that the network tax would apply to deposits and withdrawals, while spot and margin trading inside Binance would not be affected. Binance accepted the on-chain tax and adjusted its systems. Second, people wanted Binance to copy that 1.2% charge onto every LUNC trade inside its own exchange. That is what CZ was discussing. His blog opens with: “Will Binance support the LUNC burn of 1.2% for every trade on Binance?” The section is titled: “Taxes on Centralized Exchanges.” CZ’s concern was that if Binance charged an extra 1.2% while competing exchanges did not, traders would simply leave Binance and trade somewhere cheaper. He was talking about Binance customers, Binance order books and Binance competitors. He was not telling Terra Classic what tax rate it should set on-chain. CZ even proposed an opt-in system and linked an earlier statement saying the project needed to implement the tax on-chain first. That is exactly what Proposal #12223 is about. It raises Terra Classic’s on-chain tax from 0.5% to 1.5%. It does not add a 1.5% charge to every trade inside Binance. Binance later chose to burn part of the LUNC trading fees it already collected without increasing normal user trading fees. He opposed Binance charging its users an extra 1.2% while competing exchanges charged nothing. Taking that position and rewriting it as: “CZ thinks Terra Classic’s 1.5% on-chain tax is stupid” is not quoting CZ, It is putting words in his mouth. Now look 👇 Mr Diamondhandz owns LUNCLIVE Node. WESO’s own litepaper lists him as its Public Relations spokesperson. That same litepaper states: “WESO imposes a 1.5% swapping tax on all transactions.” It describes that tax as funding project initiatives and maintaining: “Healthy market dynamics.” WESO’s original exit tax started at 20.5%. So when WESO charges 1.5%, it is called healthy market dynamics. When Terra Classic proposes 1.5%, WESO’s owenerwcalls it stupid. 1.5% for WESO: Healthy. 1.5% for $LUNC Stupid? @Allnodes @DutchLunc_Val Read the original sources👇 Check the dates👇 Follow the incentives👇

English
2
3
16
807
Luna Classic Revival validator | Marz token
Oh they did? The only exchange holding more than half the supply from funds that should have been burned related to the court order but claim they can't verify them as part of TFL and company even though they are easily traceable? Okay let's listen to them.. Be real, if they want to actually help LUNC they would burn what is in their reserves. They only burn LUNC through trading fees because their supply they hold is illegitimately minted LUNC..
English
0
0
0
77
Luna Classic Revival validator | Marz token
This is for the brainwashed anti-tax promoters for #LunaClassic We literally have people DONATING to burn #LUNC & #USTC .. that's how bad people want it.. We are not talking a 1k donation, not a 10k donation, but 100,000 $USTC handed over to burn. Yet the brainwashing of validators that have L2 token taxes that feed their own pockets say a 1.5% tax is going to ruin the chain because it hyper burns supply and fills a very needed OP. Be smart and stake with those that voted yes such as our validator "Luna Classic Revival Validator" 🧠
Luna Classic Revival validator | Marz token tweet media
English
8
6
39
2.3K
Luna Classic Revival validator | Marz token
@kcharlespjr Haha no it doesn't, sorry to break that news to you. The only way I can agree is that technically the rewards can go as low as .000001% or lower but never 0 but still get a fraction of one if thats what your talking about but that is just as good as 0. So yes the OP can die.
English
0
0
0
29
Kenth Patterson Jr.
Kenth Patterson Jr.@kcharlespjr·
@onlycryptobaron The OP doesn’t go dry the rewards just reduce. Area under the curve scenario approaching but never reaching. What we really need is to grow the user base, the OP meters itself.
English
1
0
0
17
Luna Classic Revival validator | Marz token
For every validator that opposes the increased #LunaClassic burn tax, you are the ones filled with greed.. They can't stand the thought of paying measly $1.50 for every $100 made to help support the oracle pool and supply reduction that this chain needs so desperately. They are the ones sucking us dry. When the supply does not reduce and the OP is gone then everyone will truly leave as we don't have staking to attract investors or the price appreciation to justify staying. It is us validators that support burns that are generous as we too pay the tax but know it is for the greater good. Be very careful who you stake with. Here are the list of "no" and "no with veto"👇 Remember.. we never had more excitement and volume than when our tax was 1.2% .. the .2% and .5% killed that for this chain and we have been in a flat cycle ever since. #LUNC & #USTC deserve better🔥 We voted yes. Luna Classic Revival validator, join us✅
Luna Classic Revival validator | Marz token tweet mediaLuna Classic Revival validator | Marz token tweet media
English
5
6
37
1.4K