[email protected] retweetledi
7.5K posts

@osommo
Musica Scienza Tecnologia e Scienza Notizie
Grottaglie, Puglia Katılım Ağustos 2017
216 Takip Edilen252 Takipçiler
[email protected] retweetledi
[email protected] retweetledi

🔴 Primeras imágenes del modelo de prueba a tamaño real de la nave espacial reutilizable Space Rider de la @esa.
Tiene un tamaño del 4,6m de largo y se usará para el drop-test.
Español
[email protected] retweetledi

[email protected] retweetledi
[email protected] retweetledi
[email protected] retweetledi

China backs orbital data center startup with $8.4 billion in credit lines spacenews.com/china-backs-or…

English
[email protected] retweetledi

Jour 068, orbite 1054 – Ouverture des volets le matin: un moment ressourçant pour commencer la journée ! 🌍
🎥 NASA/ESA
#εpsilon • @esa • @esaspaceflight • @Space_Station • @NASA •
@NASA_Johnson • @ESA_fr • @CNES
Français
[email protected] retweetledi
[email protected] retweetledi
[email protected] retweetledi

This is actually happening in China RIGHT NOW.
A startup called Super Brain charges $3 for a basic AI clone of your deceased loved one
You send them pictures, videos, or voice recordings and they build a version that looks, sounds, and talks exactly like your person who passed.
people are using it to talk to their dead parents, grandparents, children.
The grief market is a BILLION dollar industry nobody in the west is taking seriously.
English
[email protected] retweetledi
[email protected] retweetledi

Elon Musk just named the single variable that will decide the next hundred years.
It is not compute. It is not capital. It is not the chip.
Musk: “Nothing will make you happier than having kids. We’ve evolved to have that, as all creatures have.”
The consensus says this century belongs to whoever stacks the most GPUs.
Musk is pointing at something the spreadsheets will never quantify.
Look at the West. Birth rates are in freefall. Below replacement. Below recovery.
Not because people stopped wanting families. Because the modern economy turned families into a math problem no one could solve.
Rent took two incomes. Careers swallowed your twenties and thirties whole. Biology became a scheduling conflict you kept postponing until the window closed.
A whole generation traded the continuation of their bloodline for the privilege of staying solvent.
AI is about to shatter that equation permanently.
When machines do the labor, your time stops being currency. The grind that ate your life ends. The moment it does, a question arrives that no algorithm can answer.
If you no longer need to work to survive, what exactly is the point of you?
Musk handed you the answer before the question landed.
When survival is automated, you finally get the runway to do what four billion years of evolution actually built you for.
Now zoom out. America is locked in an existential technology race with China over the future of intelligence itself.
But China is staring down something no supercomputer can fix. The most catastrophic demographic collapse any modern nation has ever seen. A workforce aging off a cliff with no generation underneath to catch it.
You do not win a long war against a country that runs out of people.
The real American moat was never the chip. It was the cradle.
We are racing to build superintelligence that secures the future. But a country without heirs is just a building with the lights still on.
Spend the AI dividend on digital sedation and civilization dies quietly on schedule.
Spend it on being human again and the West becomes physically impossible to replace.
The machines will run the grid. They will route the supply chains. They will win the arms race.
They will never love you back.
We spent a century outsourcing our humanity to the economy.
Artificial intelligence is about to buy it back.
The nation that owns the future will not be the one that builds the most powerful intelligence in history.
It will be the one that builds it and then walks away from the screen to go hold its children.
English
[email protected] retweetledi

People often say there's no difference between "new" space and "traditional" space. Not true, and we've seen that play out with this spacesuit contract. Axiom has no guarantees it will ultimately profit on its fixed price suit contract with NASA. It could lose big time. But the company realizes that if it stays the course, and is successful, there will eventually be a huge demand for its suits. Imagine if there is a Moon base. You'll need a lot of suits. So it has invested a lot of its own resources in the program.
Collins Aerospace, by contrast, was a long-time NASA contractor working for milestone payments and bailed at the first sign of trouble.
Maybe Axiom will go bust. Who knows. But the difference is they are willing to take more risk now in order to build a future of abundance in space. SpaceX, Blue Origin, Rocket Lab, K2, Intuitive Machines, Impulse Space, and so many other startups are doing the same. That is what "new space" really is.
English
[email protected] retweetledi

Plasma inside the ST40 fusion reactor, filmed in color for the first time
x.com/fluxfolio_/sta…
English
[email protected] retweetledi

The smartest men in the world bet everything on the right idea.
They went bankrupt.
Elon Musk had the same idea and built a monopoly.
Marc Andreessen just explained why.
Starlink crossed 10 million subscribers.
Consumer satellite internet was a graveyard before Musk ever touched it.
Bill Gates tried it at the peak of Microsoft’s power. Teamed up with Craig McCaw and launched Teledesic.
Andreessen: “Complete catastrophe, total bankruptcy, complete disaster.”
Then Motorola. The company that built American cellular telephony.
They created Iridium.
Andreessen: “Classic business school case study of just complete disaster, capital destruction.”
Unlimited capital. The best engineers money could buy. A vision of the future that turned out to be dead right.
Both went to zero.
When Musk announced Starlink, the industry waited for the funeral.
Andreessen: “Elon’s like, ‘I know, I’m going to do number three of those.’ Starlink. As a side project at the rocket ship company.”
They missed the inversion.
Musk wasn’t building a satellite company.
He was building a railroad.
Andreessen: “If the rockets are reusable, we’re going to be launching them all the time. And then the question becomes, what’s going to go in the rockets?”
This is the fracture line between a bankruptcy and a monopoly.
Gates paid someone else to reach orbit. Motorola paid someone else to reach orbit. The cost of the rocket killed the economics before a single customer ever logged on.
Musk owned the rocket.
If he didn’t fill it with his own cargo, the trains ran empty.
So he invented the cargo.
Starlink was never the product.
It was the freight.
He didn’t build infrastructure to serve a business.
He invented a business to feed his infrastructure.
That is the inversion no one studied.
Andreessen: “It’s a formula that captures both sides of it, and it may be like the least studied and understood thing I know of in the world right now.”
Three men. Same vision. Same ambition. Same bet.
Two are case studies in destruction. One owns a global monopoly.
The idea was identical.
The physics underneath it were not.
Gates wasn’t wrong about the future.
He was standing on the wrong floor of it.
Musk didn’t build a better satellite.
He built the floor it rose from.
Right now, across every frontier that matters, the floor of the next century is being poured.
Almost nobody is looking down.
English
[email protected] retweetledi
[email protected] retweetledi
[email protected] retweetledi

It’s a start. Vastly more will be needed to extend consciousness to the stars.
The Rabbit Hole@TheRabbitHole
SpaceX has launched more then every other company combined
English
[email protected] retweetledi







