pau

358 posts

pau

pau

@overmebury

likes to post after a beer :) so many fakes and rage baters on here.

United Kingdom Katılım Şubat 2011
20 Takip Edilen9 Takipçiler
pau
pau@overmebury·
@Object_Zero_ So a private company who has been taking profits from this pipeline is not investing, the oil companies making profit won't pay. So what we see is private companies not investing and expecting public money to ensure they retain all that profit.
English
19
0
11
1.7K
Object Zero
Object Zero@Object_Zero_·
The Forties Pipeline System (FPS) This is the pipeline system that carries most of the oil from the North Sea to the UK. It collects the oil from 85 different North Sea oilfields, and flows around 550,000 barrels of oil per day back to the UK mainland. For context, in total the North Sea has around 400 offshore platforms between the UK and Norway, producing and exporting both oil and gas. FPS is a British oil pipeline system. Exploration drilling for North Sea oil is currently banned on the UK Continental Shelf. It has been since the current government came to power. As a result of the drilling ban, the Forties Pipeline System is currently uninvestable according to its owner INEOS. They haven’t invested in its upkeep for 2 years. INEOS have said the pipeline will close by 2035, but without investment maybe as early as 2030, which is now just 3.5 years away. 550,000 barrels / day is equivalent to 38.96 GW of primary energy. This is 10x more energy than the UK’s new Hinkley Point C nuclear power project, which is projected to cost £48 billion for 3.2GW of electrical power. Electrical energy is joule for joule more valuable than chemical energy, but the comparison of scale is real. 38.9 GW is more energy than the entire National Grid carries. The largest energy system in the UK is not the grid it is this underwater pipeline system. With drilling banned, and the North Sea entering a period of forced closure, the Forties Pipeline System is going to close in the not too distant future. Once the pipeline is no longer economical, the entire Central North Sea oil production will collapse with it. This isn’t something that closes down gracefully, the entire Central North Sea basin reaches market through a single pipe. BP recently announced they are selling up their remaining assets and getting out, Exxon, Chevron, etc are all already long gone. Nobody wants their brand near this collapse. The tax rate is 78%, the government wants this national infrastructure to shut down. It will. The German Chancellor recently called their nuclear fleet closure a “Strategic Blunder”, interesting choice of words. But I think it was obviously a blunder to anyone outside their propaganda bubble. Likewise the UK’s North Sea. The German nuclear fleet averaged 10.3 GW of primary energy output over its operational life, which is around 1/4 the primary energy of the Forties Pipeline System. The UK has a few other pipeline systems but this one is by far the largest and the most critical. Now this infrastructure, isn’t supposed to last forever. But when it goes you should have a plan. In the UK nobody talks about this. It’s taboo. A lot of people think “yeah but they won’t let that happen”… well it happened in Germany, and it happened in Japan. A lot of people want it to happen, and a lot of those people are in politics. So what replaces this? Nothing? Is the UK just going to go silently into the night?
Object Zero tweet media
English
98
1.1K
2.2K
91.9K
pau
pau@overmebury·
@simongerman600 The funny thing is the Scottish flag is missing
English
0
0
0
176
Simon Kuestenmacher
Simon Kuestenmacher@simongerman600·
In the US neither of these three sports are front of center. Still a funny visual.
Simon Kuestenmacher tweet media
English
295
77
1K
149.5K
pau
pau@overmebury·
@rshereme Really, because the poles are just waiting for a reason to take Kaliningrad. Europe doesn't want war but rest assured Russia v the rest of Europe will not end well for the Russians
English
0
0
2
237
Roman Sheremeta 🇺🇸🇺🇦
An attack on the Baltic states is entirely plausible, and here’s why. There are at least three reasons. First and foremost: russia risks nothing. No matter how events unfold with the occupation of the Baltic countries, things will not get worse for russia. Sanctions are already in place. Europe no longer buys its oil or gas. Weapons are being supplied to Ukraine. From a purely military perspective, russia also risks nothing. It has nuclear weapons, so if it wins and occupies the Baltics, or even parts of them, no one will be able to push it out. And if it loses, it will not lose its own territory. It will simply retreat to its borders, and NATO will not invade russian territory because of those same nuclear weapons. So why not try? Second reason: the goals of the war. The objectives of russia go far beyond the occupation of the Baltics. Above all, russia is interested in weakening or dismantling NATO and the EU. From this perspective, any territorial gain in the Baltics would count as a victory. Even if russia does not capture Vilnius or Tallinn, but only a few border villages, that would still be a win, because it would demonstrate NATO’s inability to defend its members. So again, why not try? Third reason: russia has sufficient forces and resources in the potential conflict zone to carry out military objectives and achieve an acceptable outcome. In the Leningrad Military District, there is a combat-ready army of around 70,000 troops, which can easily be reinforced with reserves from the Ukrainian front. This army is mechanized, with around 700 tanks and a large amount of armored equipment. Separately, I would highlight the drone component, which has no real equivalent in NATO and could significantly shift the balance of power in the event of an invasion. If the forces are sufficient, then why not try? Thus, as of now, we are facing the following situation: russia has enough forces and resources to achieve its goals in the Baltics, and it does not face a bad scenario under any development of events. The situation is very similar to the one before the invasion of Ukraine, especially considering the law that allows putin to “protect russians abroad,” which was quickly introduced in the State Duma. The Baltic states have helped us more than anyone else, so I sincerely hope our friends will not face war. But to preserve peace, one must prepare for a major war. It is very good that our Baltic friends have learned from Ukraine’s mistakes and have built defensive lines and fortifications to repel an invasion. I very much hope that russia will break its teeth on the Baltics, just as it did on Ukraine. Source: translated and adopted from Serhii Marchenko
Roman Sheremeta 🇺🇸🇺🇦 tweet media
English
941
787
2.5K
613.1K
pau
pau@overmebury·
I see people on LSE talking about Siemens and wind turbine recycling. Not sure this was RNS but all adds up I guess if you're hopeful. First of a kind offshore wind turbine recycling to recover rare earth magnets - Innovate UK Business Connect iuk-business-connect.org.uk/casestudy/firs…. #MKA
English
0
1
8
2.1K
pau
pau@overmebury·
@real_shirelass He must be doing a good job if all these pro russian accounts say he is in the shit.
English
0
0
0
28
The Yorkshire Lass
The Yorkshire Lass@real_shirelass·
Not only is there major calls for Keir Starmer to resign, there are also calls for Keir Starmer to be stripped of his knighthood. I’m seeing a lot of accounts today, calling for Starmer to be trialed for high treason. There’s absolutely nowhere else that Starmer can move on the board.
English
358
991
5.2K
53.1K
Nicholas Drummond
Nicholas Drummond@nicholadrummond·
The constant trope that tanks are obsolete is unhelpful. What is obsolete is previous ways of employing them. The question we must address is how do we make tanks relevant to the combat environment in which they must now operate? Clearly this requires an integral counter-UAS capability. But the idea that protection is no longer needed or that large tank guns are useless doesn’t stack up. Many Western tanks in Ukraine have been damaged by Russian drones, but most have been repaired and put back into service - some several times. In short, soldiers travelling around the battlefield in armoured vehicles survive drone strikes. Those walking on foot tend to have a short life expectancy.
English
21
4
128
9.3K
pau
pau@overmebury·
@edwinhayward You will order it online and a drone will deliver it to you and your personal robot will fill the tank.
English
0
0
0
48
Edwin Hayward
Edwin Hayward@edwinhayward·
The tail end of the internal combustion engine industry will be messy, and hard to predict. There will come a time when there are still plenty of ICE vehicles on the road, yet not enough to keep anything like the current number of petrol stations in business. What happens then?
English
186
16
201
27.8K
pau
pau@overmebury·
@GSGB01 I bet the stop oil crew are happy with this, they'll probably join up with you.
English
0
0
1
1.7K
God Save Great Britain
God Save Great Britain@GSGB01·
🚨WOW: It's happening, fuel protests have broken out in England as patriots block the M1 near Nottingham. Ireland have shown us the way.
English
586
2.6K
11.6K
1.5M
pau
pau@overmebury·
@WorldByWolf So you're a russian troll, how much do they pay how do I apply for these troll jobs?
English
0
0
0
65
Wolf 🐺
Wolf 🐺@WorldByWolf·
The Ukraine War has been finished since Autumn 2022. It’s at a stalemate. Ukraine is not going to take back the oblasts they’ve lost. Russia is unlikely to gain much more territory unless they’re willing to endure millions more casualties. The truly tragic part of this war is that once the war is over Ukraine is finished. It will be in the hands of the globalists. It will be flooded with immigrants and the entire country will be purchased by US asset managers. It’s a tragic end for a proud country and one that was entirely avoidable had we just accepted the Donbas was lost in 2022 and cut a peace deal to that effect. Ukrainians have been used as cannon fodder for the Americans to test run their military hardware and software. Used like rats in a tragic experiment. Britain should be ashamed of our role.
Wolf 🐺 tweet mediaWolf 🐺 tweet media
English
77
44
515
41K
pau
pau@overmebury·
@afneil OMG I agree with you!
English
0
0
0
4
Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil@afneil·
When will the Lib Dems — 5th in this poll — dispense with Ed Davey?
JL Partners@JLPartnersPolls

NEW: GB voting intention in @spectator Reform maintains a 7-point lead over Labour, with Conservatives dropping back to third place REF 28% (+1) LAB 21% (+1) CON 18% (-2) GRN 14% (=) LDEM 11% (-1) OTH 7% (-1) Fieldwork: 8-9 April, 3,506 GB adults

English
323
435
2.4K
122.5K
pau
pau@overmebury·
@TiceRichard How much will it cost, we have a problem with people not paying tax correctly what's your answer to solving this and unlocking the funds to achieve your latest headline grabber?
English
0
0
0
415
Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧
Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧@TiceRichard·
Gas prices in US has fallen 20% since start of Iran war, while in UK it’s risen 50%. Because gas can be priced domestically We must licence all our offshore and onshore gas fields to produce and consume domestically This will lower bills and lower cost of living
English
595
2.1K
9.4K
236K
Oasis Mania
Oasis Mania@OasisMania·
"There’s nothing wrong with the world, it’s just full of c—s" - Noel Gallagher
Oasis Mania tweet media
English
15
76
757
24.8K
pau
pau@overmebury·
@Telegraph Bollox I earned this much and more and it's more than enough. Probably greedy and idiotic spending. When you clear 5k cash after tax/nl you have no worries. Just greedy intentions if not careful.
English
0
0
0
223
The Telegraph
The Telegraph@Telegraph·
💰 Graham Robinson grew up “scraping by” – so when his salary hit the £100,000 mark, that figure was not lost on him. But while he assumed that hitting this earnings milestone would yield a healthy amount of spare cash, “there just isn’t any”. This is the reality behind the high-earning dream in Britain 👇 telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/inco…
The Telegraph tweet media
English
14
1
28
20.1K
pau
pau@overmebury·
@DPJHodges God your a wet lettuce, why are all you people on the right so soft and scared. Bunch of pussycat
English
0
0
0
37
(((Dan Hodges)))
(((Dan Hodges)))@DPJHodges·
People need to understand the true danger implicit in Starmer's now non-existent foreign policy. He won't align significantly with the EU because of migration. Trump has turned the Special Relationship into a bin-fire. NATO is fracturing. We are completely isolated.
English
196
110
582
37.3K
John Redwood
John Redwood@johnredwood·
How and when will the PM send minesweepers to the Gulf? The government withdrew the last UK minesweeper in the Middle East just before it was needed as part of their money saving cuts in the number of naval ships in commission and working.
English
58
126
491
12.3K
pau
pau@overmebury·
@7Kiwi Wow solar doesn't work at night, thank god we have geniuses to tell us. Here is a fairer way to see UK electricity mix. grid.iamkate.com
English
0
0
2
32
David Turver
David Turver@7Kiwi·
The LSE's Grantham Institute is a green blob funded propaganda unit that has no credibility. Of course solar is useless for energy independence in Britain. It produces most on summer days when demand is low and nothing at all on winter evenings when demand is highest.
Jon Burke 🌍@jonburkeUK

There’s a reason the London School of Economics refers to David Turver’s research on renewables as “absurd” and that reason is his willingness to make false claims, such as “solar is useless for energy independence in Britain” when the facts show otherwise…👇

English
6
27
102
5.2K
pau
pau@overmebury·
@mikegardner_wb I guess the poverty levels, death rates and plain bankruptcy from medical is looking good. What's the US debt that looks a lot like socialism to me. Muppet they all take money just from.
English
0
0
0
11
Mike Gardner
Mike Gardner@mikegardner_wb·
In short, Socialism has a 100% proven failure rate wherever it has been tried, ever since it was invented. This wretched Labour Government seems determined that we should join the sorry list of countries whose economies, living standards and wellbeing were destroyed by it.
Handre@Handre

Hayek destroyed socialism in 1945 with a single devastating insight: central planners cannot access the dispersed knowledge that makes an economy function. Every price carries information that no bureaucrat can replicate. When you see bread costs $3 instead of $2, that price signals scarcity, consumer preferences, production costs, transportation expenses, and thousands of other variables. The Soviet Union tried to replace this with 12 million bureaucrats setting 200,000 prices manually. They failed so spectacularly that people waited in breadlines while sitting on oil reserves larger than Saudi Arabia. The knowledge problem goes deeper than mere information gathering. Tacit knowledge—the kind you gain from actually doing something—cannot transfer through reports or surveys. A farmer knows when soil conditions change by feel. A factory worker spots quality issues through experience. A local shop owner understands customer patterns through daily interaction. Central planners in distant offices cannot acquire this knowledge, no matter how many forms they collect. Cuba presents the perfect modern case study. Sixty years of central planning has produced an economy smaller than New Hampshire despite having similar populations and vastly superior natural resources. Venezuelan planners destroyed the most oil-rich nation in the Western Hemisphere because they thought they could improve on market prices for currency, food, and fuel. Politicians promise they can plan better than millions of voluntary exchanges between people who actually know their circumstances. They cannot access the knowledge. They will not admit this limitation.

English
6
17
35
605
pau
pau@overmebury·
@7Kiwi You can track some realtime data here, looking good for renewables grid.iamkate.com
English
0
0
1
111
David Turver
David Turver@7Kiwi·
We're generating less electricity than 40 years ago and imports are up too. But don't let the facts get in the way of your false narrative.
David Turver tweet media
Jon Burke 🌍@jonburkeUK

@OrestisDel We now produce more of our own electricity than any time in the past two decades. This is greater energy security. Everything else is waffle.

English
24
190
657
13.8K
pau
pau@overmebury·
@johnredwood And another example of all that is wrong in British politics, no ownership, disingenuous words, untruths. just attack as there was little the current government could do based on this post. Lie attack cheat run the country down, all while talking no responsibility
English
0
0
0
396
John Redwood
John Redwood@johnredwood·
This UK government has retired two frigates, two assault ships and two minehunters to cut the fleet and its costs. This fleet and its poor ship availability is down to decisions of the present government.
English
316
394
1.6K
31K