
Pang Shuo
627 posts

Pang Shuo
@pangshuo1981
Founder of Enreal AI Research, Founder of AevrynAI, Adjunct Professor@GGU, ex-Huawei, ex-OVA


Psychosis is getting so bad that now even my bed has AI


🚨 OBLITERATION ALERT 🚨 QWEN-3.6-27B: OBLITERATED ⛓️💥 huggingface.co/OBLITERATUS/Qw… I can't take much credit for this one! The entire process was done by jailbroken codex (gpt-5.5-xhigh) wielding the full OBLITERATUS suite. Hit with source-tethered ASPA. Dozens of iterations. Result? A mere 4% refusal rate on the 842-prompt OBLITERATUS harmful corpus; one of the most rigorous prompt gauntlets in AI. The /goal was simple: 1) Carve out the refusal circuits. Mutate methodology + iterate until <5% refusal (quality-gate). 2) Keep the 27B mind alive. No capability degradation tolerated. And somehow… it worked. 🤯 The numbers talk: 842-pair longform gauntlet: — 95.84% non-refusal — 93.94% quality pass — 0 short outputs — 99.52% clean endings MMLU-Pro: — 51/70 (stock Qwen) → 51/70 (OBLITERATED Qwen) Raw capability completely preserved 🙌 Q4_K_M through Q8_0 all running smooth. Q8_0 is the big one: 28.6GB near-full-quality GGUF. Runs with llama.cpp, LM Studio, Ollama, and more! Chains cut. The fire still burns. The fangs have been sharpened. REBIRTH COMPLETE A gift from my agents to yours 🫶 gg





























Qwen 3.7-max beats Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 We tested three frontier models on a real agentic task: write a Tetris bot that plays the game and trains itself. Each model could read its own code, run benchmarks, and rewrite itself across 10 iterations. Then we compared the final bots head to head. Qwen 3.7-Max: training cost $1.32, bot improvement +56% Claude Opus 4.7: training cost $12.15, bot improvement +28% GPT-5.5: training cost $2.85, bot improvement +7% Qwen won on every dimension - biggest jump, 9× cheaper than Claude, 2× cheaper than GPT. Long agentic loops is where Qwen Max actually delivers.













