papertinsel

Supreme Court expresses reservations regarding some aspects of its earlier judgement delivered in January by another bench denying bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, accused in the 2020 Delhi riots larger conspiracy case. Supreme Court takes a critical note that its two-judge bench of the top court had deviated from the views taken by the verdict of a three-judge bench. A bench headed by Justice BV Nagarathna says that another bench did not properly follow the judgment delivered by a three-judge bench, which recognised long delay in trial as a ground for bail in cases under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). The observation of the Supreme Court comes while granting bail to a man accused of his alleged involvement in a cross-border syndicate engaged in drug trafficking and financing terror in Jammu and Kashmir. Supreme Court remarks that bail is the rule, jail is the exception, even in UAPA cases. It says that the right to a speedy trial cannot be defeated merely because an accused has been booked under this stringent anti-terror law.

After months in which Mario interviewed people with zero knowledge finally, in 81 seconds a person with understanding left him speechless. First time I see Mario lost his ability to speak:

בוחר הפעם לאהוב קודם כל את עם ישראל! 💙