Martin Sugar

2.1K posts

Martin Sugar banner
Martin Sugar

Martin Sugar

@pappsworthy

Katılım Nisan 2025
288 Takip Edilen56 Takipçiler
JeremyMeta
JeremyMeta@omipotentblack·
@DeemTheDreem That doesn’t refute the point. China’s economy was created out of y’all’s definition of capitalism. That economy wouldn’t be prosperous without the U.S.
English
2
0
0
69
Deeda Weeda aka DMAN 🇵🇸
Imagine making these arguments in 2026, when non-capitalist countries are economically lapping the birthplace and foremost purveyors of capital. Literally have to distort reality to do so. Have to tell yourself a nigga that SOLD CRACK never exploited anybody lmfaoooo.
DUB HERE@TheFilesWithDUB

🚨Marc Lamont Hill CRUSHED ISH & Zaire Franklin about CAPITALISM‼️ Marc Lamont Hill argued that Jay-Z has TAKEN ADVANTAGE of people to become a Billionaire 😱 Marc WALKED em DOWN‼️🗂️🏆

English
18
242
1.3K
42.3K
Jake w/ Juice
Jake w/ Juice@D_RosesKnee25·
@DeemTheDreem @_AceMiggy How many left the iron curtain in search of a better life? How many died trying? Revisionist soviet propaganda is insane.
English
4
0
0
324
Martin Sugar
Martin Sugar@pappsworthy·
@kekoprask @azimuthium You are an eastern eurotrash недочеловек who worships America. I like that all of you people have been revealed to be worthless as China does both socialism and capitalism better than your nations could ever do.
English
1
0
0
6
kekoprask
kekoprask@kekoprask·
@azimuthium leave a gothic cathedral without maintenance for a century and all that happens is it gets a patina from air pollution that arguably makes it even more beautiful to look at commoids stay seething, your shit ideology produces shit architecture on purpose to break the human spirit
kekoprask tweet media
English
13
0
16
3.3K
JP Bastos 🧉
JP Bastos 🧉@jpmvbastos·
I really should create a bot that replies with a link to this paper every time the word "neoliberal" appears in X
JP Bastos 🧉 tweet media
English
9
67
338
16.8K
Martin Sugar
Martin Sugar@pappsworthy·
@alt_w_v_g Marrying you is proof positive that your wife is a stupid fucking cunt.
English
0
0
0
6
Ethan Brooks
Ethan Brooks@alt_w_v_g·
Had a parent-teacher conference this morning My wife told me not to come I came anyway She said "please just listen and nod" I said "I always listen" She said "you listen like you're sitting in a boardroom looking for something to challenge" That's how listening works Nice classroom Small chairs I am 6'4" and was seated at a desk designed for someone who still believes in Santa Claus My knees touched my chest The teacher introduced herself Shared her identified pronouns I shared my identified adjectives Smart and handsome My wife closed her eyes The teacher had a folder Color-coded tabs I respected the organization She said our son is "a pleasure to have in class" My wife smiled I waited That sentence is never the whole report It's the executive summary before the risk section She said "however" There it is She said he "asks a lot of questions" I said "good" She said "during quiet time" I said "when is quiet time?" She said "it's when students are expected to work independently and in silence" I said "so he's the only one trying to get information and you've structured the environment to prevent it?" My wife put her hand on my arm I continued The teacher said he recently told another student that "sharing pencils doesn't make sense if nobody brings their own" I said "that's an accurate observation" My wife squeezed harder The teacher said she's concerned about his "resistance to group activities" I said "he's not resistant. He just doesn't see the value of doing more work for the same grade." The teacher said he also corrected her math on the whiteboard I said "was he right?" She paused She said "that's not the point" I said "it's a little bit the point" My wife stood up Sat back down Compromise The teacher pulled out an evaluation sheet Categories like "works well with others" and "follows directions" and "respects classroom norms" All subjective Not a number on the page I asked how these are graded She said "based on observation" I said "so one person's opinion with no second review?" She said "it's professional judgment" I said "my auditors say that too. Right before I disagree with them." She looked at my wife My wife said "I'm sorry about him" I said "I'm sitting right here" My wife said "I know" The teacher said overall he's a bright kid and she just wants to make sure he learns to "collaborate" I said "collaboration is important. But so is recognizing when you're the only one doing the work. He'll learn that again in college. And again in the real world. Might as well start now." Nobody spoke The teacher closed her folder She said "I think we've covered everything" I said "one more thing" She braced herself I said "his reading is above grade level. His math is strong. He asks hard questions and corrects mistakes when he sees them. I just want to make sure this school knows what it has." The teacher looked at me differently My wife looked at me differently I said "that's all" We left In the car my wife was quiet Then she said "he's turning into you" I said "is that a good thing?" She didn't answer From the backseat he said "dad, why does the teacher count off for asking questions? Isn't that the whole point of school?" I looked at my wife She looked out the window I said "yes. It is." He said "I don't think she likes when I'm right" I didn't say anything Neither did my wife Small chairs Color-coded tabs No follow-up items But the kid's going to be fine Sent from my iPhone
English
4K
7.1K
58.8K
3.8M
Kevin Vallier
Kevin Vallier@kvallier·
Reminds me of Nozick's claim that intellectuals lean socialist because, as the smart kids in school, they resent that their dimmer peers went into business and got rich. AI version: academics can't see smart tech people, so they can't believe tech people built something smart.
Dean W. Ball@deanwball

My theory about why so many on the left remain in denial about AI is that their worldview rests on a load-bearing notion of “the tech industry” as being composed of vapid morons whose accomplishments will always be superficial, never “real,” always based on some grand theft. With social media and search, the theft was manipulation of people’s minds. With Amazon it was worker exploitation. With Apple, it was a mix of these. In the left retelling of the story, no value whatsoever was created from these technologies. All a trick. With AI the “grand theft” in the telling of the left is the use of copyright-protected data in pre-training. This one is a particularly dangerous mindworm for them, since they identify with the “artists and writers” from whom they imagine this training data was “stolen.” This is why things like “mode collapse” from synthetic data, stochastic parrotry, “it can only mimic things it has seen on the web” and similar are so core to the argument for the left: it supports the notion of “tech bro” thieves—who lest we forget, and they never will let us, have no “liberal arts” training!—continuing their unbroken string of robberies. Of course the “grand theft” notion is an old motif on the left, relating as it does to a zero-sum mindset about economics, business, and growth that is. more traditionally associated with the left, though the lines have always been blurry, since the zero-sum mindset is above all else a *human* fallacy and thus a useful tactic in mass politics of all valences. The lines have become especially blurry lately, as has been widely observed. Anyway, the notion that AI *is* a genuinely world-changing technology, that it can “go beyond” its “stolen” training data, breaks this load-bearing conception of the tech industry as vapid and superficial and, more importantly, of the people within it as blood-sucking thieves.

English
18
11
98
102K
Martin Sugar
Martin Sugar@pappsworthy·
@deanwball Stfu, you stupid fucking blowhard. There are plenty of leftists who know that China is using it far better and more expansively in real world applications AND without energy cost inflation for ordinary people. You cocksuckers are just trying to make $ off hype and bullshit.
English
0
0
0
41
Dean W. Ball
Dean W. Ball@deanwball·
My theory about why so many on the left remain in denial about AI is that their worldview rests on a load-bearing notion of “the tech industry” as being composed of vapid morons whose accomplishments will always be superficial, never “real,” always based on some grand theft. With social media and search, the theft was manipulation of people’s minds. With Amazon it was worker exploitation. With Apple, it was a mix of these. In the left retelling of the story, no value whatsoever was created from these technologies. All a trick. With AI the “grand theft” in the telling of the left is the use of copyright-protected data in pre-training. This one is a particularly dangerous mindworm for them, since they identify with the “artists and writers” from whom they imagine this training data was “stolen.” This is why things like “mode collapse” from synthetic data, stochastic parrotry, “it can only mimic things it has seen on the web” and similar are so core to the argument for the left: it supports the notion of “tech bro” thieves—who lest we forget, and they never will let us, have no “liberal arts” training!—continuing their unbroken string of robberies. Of course the “grand theft” notion is an old motif on the left, relating as it does to a zero-sum mindset about economics, business, and growth that is. more traditionally associated with the left, though the lines have always been blurry, since the zero-sum mindset is above all else a *human* fallacy and thus a useful tactic in mass politics of all valences. The lines have become especially blurry lately, as has been widely observed. Anyway, the notion that AI *is* a genuinely world-changing technology, that it can “go beyond” its “stolen” training data, breaks this load-bearing conception of the tech industry as vapid and superficial and, more importantly, of the people within it as blood-sucking thieves.
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania

Narrator: And none of them would answer the question of whether they use the models. I’ve never seen rightists in this much denial about AI. I wonder why it’s a left-wing thing to bury your head in the sand this much.

English
106
107
1.4K
195.6K
Martin Sugar
Martin Sugar@pappsworthy·
@Reilly707 @europa Thank god we don't have a bunch of retards to create a cult around one of those people and then elect them president multiple times and then go to war for Israel on his say-so. That would really suck.
English
0
0
5
287
Europa.com
Europa.com@europa·
The Daily Mail has published more details about OnlyFans now dead owner, Leonid Radvinsky A Ukraine-born Jew who migrated to the U.S. as a child, Radvinsky set up Cybertania, a monetisation network for adult websites, aged 17 while still in high school. Cybertania included a site called Working Passes which had a link for 'the hottest underaged hardcore' containing 16-year-olds. "It was undeniable that he was, as Forensic News put it, 'catering to pedophiles to make a buck.'" Radvinsky became a multi-millionaire by creating MyFreeCams, a live webcamming site that advertised its adult 'camming' on chat forums for 'boys,' 'girls' and 'teens' where the minimum user age was 13. Radvinksy was monitored for years by law enforcement over myriad accusations covering systemic wage theft, worker exploitation and potential underage activity, but never charged. Before his death, he had been in talks to sell OnlyFans for $8 billion but reportedly had difficulty finding a bank willing to handle the deal. Follow: @europa
Europa.com tweet mediaEuropa.com tweet media
English
240
1.4K
5K
1.1M
Martin Sugar
Martin Sugar@pappsworthy·
@esjesjesj Give it a rest. Americans say stuff like this b/c we love gaslighting ourselves with self-flattering bullshit.
English
0
0
1
203
Martin Sugar
Martin Sugar@pappsworthy·
@MaMoMVPY I know; it's terrible. We could kill and maim so many more children if the empire were being run more competently. And you could happily serve as one of our human toilets without worrying about issues with the plumbing.
English
0
0
1
51
Martin Sugar
Martin Sugar@pappsworthy·
@Zivilynn @NathanJRobinson The thank you is owed to Russia. Kindly shut your mouth or stick to posting about the epstein class that you worship.
English
0
0
1
4
Zivilyn
Zivilyn@Zivilynn·
@NathanJRobinson So you are trying to say Thanks Trump without actually saying it?
English
1
0
0
52
Martin Sugar
Martin Sugar@pappsworthy·
@NathanJRobinson Far more likely that Russian hard liner elements with balls and integrity pushed through the decision against the wishes of pathetic America-worshipers like @kadmitriev and @MedvedevRussia and assorted freaks like Malofeev.
English
0
0
1
62
Martin Sugar
Martin Sugar@pappsworthy·
@yashalevine Do not do this kind of shtick when you literally make a living off of this. Or at least have some fucking humility when you do so.
English
0
0
0
156
Yasha Levine
Yasha Levine@yashalevine·
log off. read a book. go for a walk. make love. call your mom. plant some tomatoes. your addiction to information will not change anything.
English
67
1.4K
15.3K
341.6K
Martin Sugar
Martin Sugar@pappsworthy·
@TherynDArnold @PipelineH8r You appear to have already made up your mind, and, dollars to donuts, did so a long time ago. I'm not in academia, so I have not consumed the same number of monographs explaining why 🇨🇳 should never be called socialist & therefore the western capitalist order remains undefeated.
English
1
0
1
23
Sandeep Vaheesan
Sandeep Vaheesan@sandeepvaheesan·
The billionaire class stands between us and both a more just economic system and a less evil foreign policy
English
4
6
43
1.2K
Policy Tensor
Policy Tensor@policytensor·
Another thing that worries me about a ground war is that it would present the perfect opportunity for Russia and China bleed us dry. Maybe that’s what the Chinese are waiting for and why they are not giving the Iranians what they want.
English
25
18
137
20.8K