PathfinderXBT

@ArdiNSC @virtualbacon He shilled aevo at 3$ and it is now at 0.02 cents. He is a scammer.

@virtualbacon You are a paid puppet. You have been shilling solana:WLFinEv6ypjkczcS83FZqFpgFZYwQXutRbxGe7oC16g since before they went live. And just like every other project you’ve ever shilled, it’s also going to zero.

My thoughts on $WLFI's token unlock proposal pros: - all vesting are clearly laid out with insiders being locked the longest - public investors finally get clarity - no panic dump during current bear - tokens unlock near next bull run peak and vest slowly for 2 years for people to exit cons: - public investors need to wait another 2 years to get liquidity - market could change over next 2 years that impact WLFI - trump likely leaves office after 2 years making project less significant In honest opinion, 1+1 year vesting would've been better for all holders to capture all of the next bull run. And as an investor I would've liked that better. Someone should propose this as a change and I'd support it. Other than that I don't see any better design for the vesting schedule at this point, any shorter unlock would cause panic and kill all long term value regardless.

🚨CME GROUP TO LAUNCH SUI FUTURES SOON CME Group plans to launch Sui futures on May 4, pending regulatory approval. The world’s leading derivatives exchange is opening institutional access to $SUI in about two weeks.

@worldlibertyfi @MEXC Still scamming lol

still building. ICYMI on @MEXC: Spot · XAUT, SUI, TAO, DOGE Futures · BTC, ETH, SOL, XAUT, XRP, SUI, TAO, DOGE all quoted in USD1. 🦅☝️

If you like $SUI now, you'll love it at $10.

🤯 The 3 chains everyone is debating just got their report cards. I scored $SUI, $MON, and $SEI on the only 5 metrics that predicted which L1s survived past cycles. The metrics that actually mattered for Solana, Avalanche, and every other chain that made it:

I'm super bullish on $SUI, and my conviction is stronger than ever! With its innovative tech and growing ecosystem, I believe $SUI is ready to break new ground and hit $20 by Q4. Who's with me on this ride? 🚀

I am still the Web3 Ambassador at World Liberty Financial. The dashboard has 9 columns now. When we sold the tokens, the sale materials said they were non-transferable. They could remain locked indefinitely. Unlocks would require a governance vote. We did not specify when. That was by design. 80% of the tokens sold to investors are still locked. 18 months later. The investors paid real money. The money is not locked. The money left immediately. The tokens stayed. These events are unrelated. To unlock the tokens, you need a governance vote. The governance vote on staking passed with 99.12% approval. 76% of the voting power came from 10 wallets. The 80% who are locked can vote. They cannot earn staking rewards. They cannot access Node tiers. They cannot sell. They can participate in the governance of their own captivity. I designed the distinction. Last week our CTO borrowed $75 million against 5 billion of our tokens. He borrowed on Dolomite. Dolomite is the 13th-largest lending platform in crypto. Our CTO co-founded Dolomite. He borrowed from his own platform using our tokens as collateral. Our collateral is now 55% of Dolomite's total value. He did not disclose the conflict. These events are unrelated. He borrowed so much of our own stablecoin that other depositors cannot withdraw theirs. We told them our positions are "nowhere near liquidation." We told them we would "simply supply more collateral." The token hit its all-time low that same week. These events are unrelated. WLFI is $0.078. Down 83% from $0.46. The Co-Founder called it good news in my replies. I am adding that to the dashboard. The treasury spent $65 million buying back 435 million tokens at an average of $0.15. The tokens are now worth $0.078. The buyback is 48% underwater. The treasury's money came from investors. The investors cannot sell their tokens. The project used investor money to buy tokens that lost half their value and the investors cannot sell the tokens the project bought with their money. That is called a protocol. Justin Sun invested $75 million. He received 545 million tokens. He transferred a small number to an exchange. We froze all 545 million. There is a blacklist function in the smart contract. We did not disclose the blacklist function. He called it "a trap door marketed as an open door." He called it "the antithesis of decentralization." He is correct on both counts. He is also our advisor. These events are unrelated. In November we partnered with AB DAO. AB DAO is connected to individuals sanctioned by the United States for ties to Cambodia's Prince Group. The Prince Group is a designated transnational criminal organization. The sanctions were imposed October 14th. We announced the partnership November 12th. 29 days later. We said we were unaware. AB DAO held $10 million of our stablecoin. After journalists called, it dropped to $3.6 million. We did not ask where the $6.4 million went. That is not in my job description. The GENIUS Act created the 1st federal stablecoin framework. Our stablecoin complies. The President's party advanced the legislation. The President's family collects 75 cents of every dollar the stablecoin generates. The regulation that governs our product enriches the family that governs the regulation. That is compliance. The tokens are locked. The money is gone. The CTO borrows from his own platform. The buyback is underwater. The biggest investor is frozen out. The partner is sanctioned. The regulation is self-dealing. The stablecoin funds the deals. The deals require the pardons. The pardons free the partners. The partners fund the platform. The President signs the orders. The orders inflate the assets. The assets fund the family. 600,000 wallets bought in. They lost $3.87 billion. 2 families cashed out. America First. You're America. They're First. I am the reason these events are unrelated.

@cryptomanran @crypto_banter You have nothing new to offer, regurgitating same old shit everyday. Take a long break.

Hey guys, no show today! See you all next week.

BREAKING 🚨 Sui Network's $SUI is setting up for a major altseason target of $20 with a textbook A-B-C-D-E pattern, catching the attention of investors and traders alike. The current market trend and setup indicate a potential surge in $SUI's value, making it a closely watched asset in the crypto space. Watch $SUI closely as it approaches its target, this could be a major opportunity for growth 🚀 #Sui #SuiCommunity #SuiNetwork

JUST IN: @CMEGroup launches $AVAX and $SUI futures on May 4, pending regulatory review, as daily notional volume across its crypto derivatives suite hits nearly $8B.

The reversal on $SUI will be studied. While many chase new narratives, people seem to forget what @SuiNetwork are actually building. Accumulation is looking delightful here.

The $SUI accumulation is a picture of perfection. $10.

$SUI has a history of going on mega runs when it breaks weekly downtrend lines. No action to take yet, but keep on watchlist for when this breaks the white line.

Bear market is the time when everyday u feel why u joined crypto space and should've never been here Bull market is the time when everyday u regret for not joining it earlier Reminded it because that's how most people are feeling rn Stay strong!

Lets do some brutal math SUI = $0.90 today SUI = $5.35 at peak That's a 83% drop You know what else dropped 80%+ before going parabolic? SOL dropped 97% → then went to $260 ETH dropped 94% → then went to $4,800 BTC dropped 84% → then went to $126K History don't lie, People do.

Surprised more chains haven't taken this approach. USDsui allows Sui to control the yield associated with stablecoin issuance that Circle & Tether extract as revenue and reinvest the capital from the proceeds back into the ecosystem. They've already announced the intent to use the revenue toward SUI buy and burns and other defi investments. I'd be shocked if we don't see some incentives for native dapps in the defi eco for users to make the switch sometime in the near future, which would serve as a backdoor to redistribute yield to active holders.

Just for reference a gallon of Diesel costs roughly 9.60 $ in Germany. * Shown prices are Liter in Euro. $OIL $WAR

$SUI/usdt WEEKLY WEEKLY $SUI RSI is the most OVERSOLD in its history, now look at what happened the last 2 times weekly RSI got this oversold. You hate money if you're not loading up here 🎯

@Cobratate So it means you will no more supply women to them. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

I AM CANCELLING BUSINESS WITH ANYBODY WHO LEFT DUBAI

@FurkanCCTV Bitte kurzer schreiben, ich hasse Chatgpt.

Ein $1,8 Billionen Markt bekommt Risse: BlackRock hat einen Kredit in drei Monaten von 100 auf null abgeschrieben. Nicht über Quartale. Nicht schrittweise. In einer einzigen Meldung. Und niemand redet darüber. 25 Millionen Dollar an eine Firma namens Infinite Commerce. Im September noch als voll werthaltig eingestuft. Im Dezember: wertlos. Die Firma kauft kleine Online Händler auf Amazon auf. Spa Produkte. Glühbirnen. Pandemie Hype. Vorbei. Es ist bereits das zweite Mal in drei Monaten, dass BlackRock so etwas passiert. Im November: ein Kredit an eine Renovierungsfirma. Gleiche Geschichte. Komplett wertlos über Nacht. Davor eine Autowaschkette, kurz vor der Pleite noch als gesund bewertet. BlackRock hat die Ausschüttungen an Anleger um ein Drittel gekürzt. 91% der Problemkredite stammen aus der Boomphase 2021. Das ist nicht BlackRocks Problem allein. Das ist das Problem einer ganzen Industrie. Private Credit. Das sind Kredite, die nicht an der Börse gehandelt werden. Große Fonds vergeben sie direkt an Unternehmen. Kein öffentlicher Markt. Kein täglicher Preis. Kein Kurs, den du auf deinem Bildschirm siehst. Stattdessen schätzen die Fonds selbst, was ihre Kredite wert sind. Einmal pro Quartal. Genau da liegt das Problem. Solange niemand verkaufen muss, sieht auf dem Papier alles gut aus. Bis es das plötzlich nicht mehr tut. Dieser Markt ist mittlerweile 1,8 Billionen Dollar schwer. Und die Risse werden sichtbar. Offiziell fallen gerade etwa 2,5% der Kredite aus. Klingt wenig. Aber die offizielle Zahl zählt nur Firmen, die ihre Raten komplett nicht mehr zahlen. Viele Firmen zahlen ihre Zinsen gar nicht mehr in Geld, sondern lassen sie einfach auf den Kredit aufschlagen. Zinsen mit Zinsen bezahlen. Das betrifft mittlerweile 11% aller Kredite in diesem Markt. 2021 waren es noch 7%. Und bei mehr als der Hälfte davon wurde das nachträglich vereinbart, weil die Firma es sich schlicht nicht mehr leisten konnte, bar zu zahlen. Rechnet man all das zusammen, liegt die echte Problemquote nicht bei 2,5%. Sondern bei über 6%. Drei Zahlen. Drei verschiedene Realitäten. Und es könnte deutlich schlimmer werden. Die Schweizer Großbank UBS warnt, dass die Ausfälle 2026 um bis zu 3 Prozentpunkte steigen könnten. Im schlimmsten Fall auf 13%. Der Grund: Rund ein Viertel aller Kredite in diesem Markt gehen an Softwarefirmen. Genau die Branche, die gerade durch künstliche Intelligenz unter massiven Druck gerät. Und weil diese Kredite nie an der Börse gehandelt werden, merkt man es erst, wenn es zu spät ist. Genau das passiert gerade in Echtzeit. Blue Owl, einer der größten Anbieter in diesem Markt, hat Anlegern verboten, ihr Geld aus einem 1,6 Milliarden Dollar Fonds abzuziehen. Nicht pausiert. Nicht verschoben. Verboten. 1,4 Milliarden Dollar an Krediten mussten notverkauft werden. Die Aktie ist 2026 um über 33% gefallen und steht mittlerweile unter dem Kurs, zu dem die Firma 2020 an die Börse ging. Der ehemalige Chef des weltgrößten Anleihefonds PIMCO, Mohamed El Erian, vergleicht die Situation offen mit dem Kollaps der Bear Stearns Kreditfonds 2007. Das war 12 Monate vor Lehman. Dann Blackstone. Der größte alternative Vermögensverwalter der Welt. Anleger wollten 3,8 Milliarden Dollar aus dem größten Private Credit Fonds abziehen. Ein Rekord. Um alle Anfragen bedienen zu können, musste Blackstone eigenes Geld nachschießen. 400 Millionen Dollar. Nicht als Zeichen der Stärke. Damit Anleger überhaupt an ihr Geld kamen. Die Aktie fiel auf ein Zweijahrestief. Apollo. Blue Owl. Blackstone. KKR. Ares. Carlyle. Alle unter Druck. Apollo selbst 30% im Minus seit Jahresbeginn. Und dann sagt Marc Rowan, CEO von Apollo, auf einer der wichtigsten Finanzkonferenzen der Welt diesen Satz: "Das wird ein Shakeout. Und er wird nicht kurzfristig sein." Seine Warnung an die Branche: "Wenn 30% deines Portfolios in einer Industrie stecken, die von Technologie bedroht wird, warst du kein guter Risikomanager." Das Muster kennen wir. Es sind die gleichen Mechanismen wie 2007/2008. Kredite, die niemand bewerten kann. Bewertungen, die künstlich stabil gehalten werden. Anleger, die gleichzeitig rauswollen. Erzwungene Verkäufe unter Druck. Nur dass das Risiko diesmal nicht bei den Banken sitzt. Es sitzt in Fonds, die in den letzten Jahren massiv an Privatanleger verkauft wurden. 2021 gab es diese Produkte noch gar nicht. Heute stecken über 200 Milliarden Dollar drin. Wall Street hat in fünf Jahren eine komplett neue Anlageklasse geschaffen, sie an normale Anleger verkauft, und jetzt rennen alle gleichzeitig zum Ausgang. Private Credit war das Narrativ der letzten Jahre. Stabile Renditen. Geringe Schwankungen. Besser als Anleihen. Die Schwankungen waren nie gering. Sie wurden nur nicht gemessen. Wenn dich solche Makro Insights interessieren und dir helfen, interagiere gerne mit dem Post. 🧡