Patrick Debois

43.5K posts

Patrick Debois banner
Patrick Debois

Patrick Debois

@patrickdebois

Generative AI and DevOps specialist - co-author Devops Handbook - https://t.co/PZlox9jwoq

Ghent, Flanders, Belgium Katılım Temmuz 2008
8.5K Takip Edilen29.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Patrick Debois
Patrick Debois@patrickdebois·
A diagram showcasing the evolution from LLM to Agents and beyond - Does this align with your journey ? #aiengineer
Patrick Debois tweet media
English
11
12
57
4.9K
Patrick Debois
Patrick Debois@patrickdebois·
llm= road, coding agent = car, pilot = coder, context = fuel . What else would you add to the metaphor?
Patrick Debois tweet media
English
1
0
4
840
Patrick Debois
Patrick Debois@patrickdebois·
The best AI coding conference is coming to London 🎉 and I have a 50% discount code for you (PATRICK50). AI Native DevCon, June 1-2. As content curator, proudly biased, I genuinely think we've built the best program on AI coding out , see you there ! - ainativedevcon.io - luma.com/aidevcon-ldn26…
GIF
English
0
0
2
298
swyx
swyx@swyx·
this one is doing v well btw if you want the popular vote filter on the firehose of all the things @patrickdebois was one of the track keynotes i gave a "blank check" to based on his sincere support since our very earliest days + when in europe we must feature the DevOps guy. he didnt disappoint!
swyx tweet media
AI Engineer@aiDotEngineer

Context may be the most under-engineered layer in AI coding today. In this keynote, @patrickdebois, argues that if agents are driven by prompts, rules, and memory, then context deserves the same rigor we already give code. youtube.com/watch?v=bSG9wU…

English
7
2
52
8.6K
Veselin Dimitrov
Veselin Dimitrov@vidimitrov·
it’s not that they want to write docs, we both know that docs drift fast… what they really want is to: - stop repeating themselves (reconstruct intent each new session) - talk to an agent that is fluent in their context and recalls historical decisions - get consistent results that belong with their codebase (conventions) - trust the outcome (verification procedures) - keep only persistent context that cannot be recreated from reading the code - share the same experience with their team the packages approach is good but it doesn’t cover the full spectrum of context types
English
1
0
1
33
Veselin Dimitrov
Veselin Dimitrov@vidimitrov·
agree on the "rigor", but "context is the new code" isn't quite right what @patrickdebois describes was always part of code creation - lived in our heads and scattered docs, just never captured its not new - we need the right taxonomy to define it and a way to materialise it reliably
AI Engineer@aiDotEngineer

Context may be the most under-engineered layer in AI coding today. In this keynote, @patrickdebois, argues that if agents are driven by prompts, rules, and memory, then context deserves the same rigor we already give code. youtube.com/watch?v=bSG9wU…

English
1
0
1
224
Patrick Debois
Patrick Debois@patrickdebois·
@buildsafter5 @swyx agree on the tdd. But the non-determism makes it feel more like error-budget and risk mitigation vs full testing
English
1
0
0
43
Jonas Vetterle
Jonas Vetterle@jvetterle·
@aiDotEngineer @patrickdebois basically context is the only AI dev artifact that compounds. Models commoditize, workflows shift, frameworks rot but the context graph (rules, examples, constraints, learned-from-failure) gets more valuable over time.. everything else is rented.
English
2
0
2
49
Patrick Debois retweetledi
AI Engineer
AI Engineer@aiDotEngineer·
Context may be the most under-engineered layer in AI coding today. In this keynote, @patrickdebois, argues that if agents are driven by prompts, rules, and memory, then context deserves the same rigor we already give code. youtube.com/watch?v=bSG9wU…
YouTube video
YouTube
AI Engineer tweet media
English
15
36
285
22.1K
Alex Carmichael
Alex Carmichael@ai_carmichael·
@aiDotEngineer @patrickdebois Agreed. the gap I keep hitting is that context has no ownership model: no versioning, no diff, no rollback when an agent starts drifting because something upstream changed silently.
English
1
0
1
22
fatih
fatih@fatihaydindev·
thoughts on context management. Better knowledge = better context management. I'm calling this the triadic hermeneutic loop, building on the classical hermeneutic circle from philosophy (Schleiermacher, Gadamer) and extending it with a third actor: the AI. The main problem isn't model capability; it's informatics. We need structured know-how, shared context, and a maintainable lifecycle [@patrickdebois 's CDLC]. Humans in the loop, i mean, the actual agent (in the philosophical sense) is the human: the one who learns new things, reflects them back into the context, and externalizes knowledge into shared structure. The AI agent executes; the human agent understands.
fatih tweet media
English
1
0
0
279
Patrick Debois
Patrick Debois@patrickdebois·
@swyx Appreciate the trust you put in me. Keep pushing the industry!
English
0
0
2
239
Patrick Debois
Patrick Debois@patrickdebois·
The Human Harness engineer = The person that enables the Agentic Coder
English
0
0
2
446
Patrick Debois
Patrick Debois@patrickdebois·
Wonder if anyone created a website where agents do all the writing and you just feed/curate relevant articles as context.
English
1
0
1
498
Patrick Debois retweetledi
Jan Wilmake
Jan Wilmake@janwilmake·
I created 'Self driving Repo' (. com) - let's you spawn recurring agents with budget control - agents have full FS access and sources like other repos, issues, and the web - agent outputs are pushed to your preferred repo/branch This makes it super easy to setup durable knowledge-base automations in the cloud reply 'yes' for early access
Jan Wilmake tweet media
English
1
1
4
842
Patrick Debois
Patrick Debois@patrickdebois·
@janwilmake I definitely like the idea and it can work the more refined the harness is around it.
English
0
0
1
45
Jan Wilmake
Jan Wilmake@janwilmake·
Do you think self-driving repos will become a thing? Most codebases now evolve iteratively by humans prompting them. When will we see codebases that evolve based on a problem in the market, a connection with your notion, and possibly, an ai having conversations with the team? x.com/janwilmake/sta…
English
1
0
0
629
Patrick Debois
Patrick Debois@patrickdebois·
Context Coders & Agentic Coders: I see two distinct coder types emerge: the Context coders manage the context development lifecycle and use the agentic pipelines the Agentic coder maintain: a platform provided to other coders. So some will keep building the thing and others build the thing that builds the thing. The latter might be the new CI/CD emerging.
English
1
0
4
688
Jamie Mallers
Jamie Mallers@JamieMallers·
@patrickdebois The org dimension is the silent killer. Teams invest in better tools and richer context files, but if tribal knowledge stays in Slack threads and postmortems nobody reads, the agent operates with a fraction of what it needs. Context maturity has to be a team sport.
English
1
0
1
140
Patrick Debois
Patrick Debois@patrickdebois·
Context maturity for coding agents. Not agent maturity. Context maturity. Three dimensions: 1/your tools, 2/your context, 3/your org. Most teams are advancing one and ignoring the other two. He're the full article - tessl.co/ggm
Patrick Debois tweet media
English
2
3
10
1K