
Pauperised
263 posts

Pauperised
@pauperised
Engineer, Pilot, Sailor, Family man who simply cannot believe the injustice of the Loan Charge


I’m grateful for the decision made at the budget to write off £5,000 of the liabilities of those affected by the loan charge scandal – but there is more to be done.

It seems very clear that the outcome of the McCann #loancharge 'Review' was agreed at the outset and the Reviewer would know his job was to help HMRC get more cash. It had nothing to do with "Fairness for all taxpayers".







@DanNeidle As you can probably guess, the reason the Gov (i.e. HMT & HMRC) won't act,is that it will highlight the complete lack of action taken against #LoanCharge promoters for the last 20 years. @loanchargeAPPG @jamesmurray_ldn


@keithmgordon Pls @TanDhesi @loanchargeAPPG read this tweet wrt HMRC sending individuals s684 for pre-2010 tax years which we out of scope of the #LoanCharge post the SAM report. I have a684 opening up 3 years pre cutting off of #LoanCharge



@IanTodd85332631 @PedantPedro @sussexlc @SarahEGabbai @keithmgordon @DanNeidle @legalclaret @HMRCgovuk The thing about making up rules as you go, is it's sometimes hard to use the internal procedure manuals you haven't written because the court case that hasn't happened yet doesn't provide the scenario wording you need to include in the manual to take into the time machine 🤨

@TheNewEuropean Barrowman stated £60m was a reasonable return on the £200m contract, given significant risk. I cant fathom how there is any risk, when you set up a company to take advantage of the VIP lane opp, and the government will always going to pay. The pair are repugnant.


@IanTodd85332631 @HMRCgovuk If APNs can be used to require taxpayers who have used schemes disclosed under DOTAS to pay tax on account based on HMRC’s view without a court decision, why can’t HMRC decide whether the schemes are effective or not in their view before the promoters sell them to the taxpayers?

Thank you @DesmondSwayne for your support against the unjust unprecedented retrospective tax called the #LoanCharge #RuleOfLaw


@ArmadilloSupprt HOW THE FUCK CAN ANY TRIBUNAL RULE THAT HMRC HAVE POWERS TO APPLY A DISCRETION 10 YEARS AFTER THE FACT BASED ON HMRC UNPUBLISHED MANUAL AND FOR A PURPOSE NOT INTENDED AND NEVER PREVIOUSLY USED? JUDICIAL MALFEASANCE! HM GOV AGAIN FUCKING WITH THE LAW!




