ixyz

5.3K posts

ixyz

ixyz

@pelefact

Katılım Mart 2014
1.3K Takip Edilen29 Takipçiler
Eitan Fischberger
Eitan Fischberger@EFischberger·
Looks like my jihad against Euro-Med and chief Ramy Abdu has him rattled. He just suspended the group's Geneva office, where there are Swiss jurisdiction, terrorism financing laws, and mutual legal assistance treaties. Convenient time to consolidate in Turkey, where Erdogan won't cooperate. Abdu wouldn't be doing this just because of my investigations unless he knew they were having a real impact (thanks, guys!). Combined with Israel now barring Euro-Med officials' entry, he can feel the walls closing in. And it's about damn time.
Eitan Fischberger tweet media
Eitan Fischberger@EFischberger

SCOOP: I've discovered that Euro-Med Monitor has actually been formally designated as a terrorist organization by Israel — since 2015. And nobody realized. Not journalists. Not myself. Not even the Israeli Diaspora Ministry, which published a detailed report on Euro-Med just last week following the Nicholas Kristof NYT op-ed. So what happened? Israel designated the organization under its old name, "EUROMID OBSERVER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS." The group rebranded circa 2015 as "Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor," and the old spelling made the designation invisible to any obvious sanctions search. It sat buried in the government's official list for ten years, completely undetected. The Swiss commercial registry makes the link unambiguous. Same organization. New name. Still designated. The original designation, issued by then-Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon, declared Euro-Med an "unauthorized association" under Israel's 1945 Defense (Emergency) Regulations. Under Section 101 of Israel's 2016 Counter-Terrorism Law, that designation was automatically converted into a permanent terrorist designation, with no additional process required. A terror front. Rebranded. Undetected for a decade.

English
39
246
1.1K
37.9K
ixyz
ixyz@pelefact·
@ChronicBabak @Zionist_Logic @strxwmxn the jews are the rightful real owner of the land palestine have arab dna the dna of THE SQUATTER 😂😂😂 argue this if you can x.com/pelefact/statu…
ixyz@pelefact

@r168538 @ReddCinema the jews never stole the land zionism is legal it is a movement to go back to the ancestor land the land belongs to jews ancestor dna research proves it before 135 AD expulsion the jews were the majority the roman were the invader the colonizer

English
0
0
0
8
Babak
Babak@ChronicBabak·
@Zionist_Logic @strxwmxn The land is inhabited by the most direct descendants of ancient Levantines. It does not belong to Jewish people anywhere in the world. They used words like “colonialism” to described what they were doing in Palestine like other European peoples had done elsewhere.
English
2
0
0
30
Strxwmxn
Strxwmxn@strxwmxn·
The irony of anti-hasbara is that it’s a hall of mirrors of distortions far worse than the alleged tactics it denounces. Every inconvenient historical fact gets waved away as "hasbara!" and replaced with cherry-picked, context-free arguments. Saying that "European Jews had no right to sovereignty" erases decades of Jewish immigration and land purchases, a substantial preexisting Jewish population, and the fact that many Jews in 1947 were Middle Easterners themselves. Palestinian Arabs had never exercised sovereignty over an independent Palestinian state either. Under the Ottomans, Palestine consisted of administrative districts (sanjaks) ruled from remote cities like Damascus and Beirut. By the end of the British Mandate, two rival national movements existed in the same territory, each claiming self-determination. Partition was part of the broader postwar dismantling of empires and mandates into new nation-states, an attempt to resolve competing nationalist claims after the collapse of imperial rule, not the creation of some new European colony. Which is why the claim that Resolution 181 "violated the UN Charter" is nonsense. It was a nonbinding recommendation passed by the required supermajority for partitioning a Mandate already set to expire. Jews accepted the compromise; Arab leaders rejected any Jewish state and chose war instead. Within hours of the partition vote, Arab irregulars launched attacks on Jewish roads, settlements, and civilians months before the invasion by Arab armies even began. As for the Dean Rusk memo, it’s endlessly recycled as though it proves a preplanned expulsion campaign. In reality, Zionist leaders rejected American-mediated truces because they viewed them as suicide — an unenforceable pause while five Arab armies openly prepared to invade. It had nothing to do with the Zionists being “too successful” at creating refugees. Even Benny Morris, selectively quoted by anti-hasbarists whenever useful, rejects the master plan theory (usually citing the misunderstood "Plan Dalet"): "The Yishuv did not enter the war with a plan or policy of expulsion." He documents a far messier reality involving war, panic, local expulsions, and battlefield chaos. By early May, 300K Palestinians had fled or been displaced, but the much larger refugee waves followed the Arab invasion after May 15. The anti-hasbarist pattern is boring and predictable: erase Arab rejectionism and the wars it triggered, flatten everything into an ahistorical settler-colonial myth, and then claim every Zionist military action was unprovoked aggression detached from the surrounding conflict.
Strxwmxn tweet mediaStrxwmxn tweet media
Babak@ChronicBabak

@strxwmxn @_ZachFoster The Zionist mvmt also refused a truce negotiated by the US ten days before May 14th, because they were having too much success with the Nakba already, having made 300k Palestinians refugees by that point. And Israel still plays the victim in hasbara. It’s remarkable.

English
5
14
55
1.8K
ixyz
ixyz@pelefact·
@fite_cs @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel no argument at all only repeating palestine animal bullshit propaganda and then you block me blocking = losing LMAAAAAOOOOO 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
English
0
0
0
11
ixyz
ixyz@pelefact·
@fite_cs @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel and lost miserably every action bears CONSEQUENCES YOU ANIMAL CANT UNDO HISTORICAL EVENT LMAAAAAOOOOO 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
English
1
0
0
12
☀️👀
☀️👀@zei_squirrel·
John Mearsheimer: "It's not just Israeli leaders who support the genocide. You don't see any protest among the Israeli public. It's shocking. It's sickening. You have to file all this under the Nazification of Israel. They are like the Germans under Hitler."
English
390
7.7K
21.1K
330.6K
ixyz
ixyz@pelefact·
@fite_cs @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel btw your head is filled with GENOCIDE all over this reflects what hamas did and palestine grandpas head in 1947 every accusation is a CONFESSION LMAAAAAOOOOO 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
English
0
0
0
9
ixyz
ixyz@pelefact·
@fite_cs @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel instead of spamming with your palestine ANIMAL BULLSHIT argue my FACT if you can ... 🤭🤭🤭 I can see that you feel like SLAPPED SO HARD with my FACT and got CHOKED ... LMAAAAAOOOOO 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
English
1
0
0
10
CSFite
CSFite@fite_cs·
@pelefact @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel Israeli motto: "We have a right to steal Palestine and murder Palestinians!" Why? "Because the Nazis did the same thing!" Holy fk 🤡
English
1
0
0
11
ixyz
ixyz@pelefact·
@fite_cs @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel baby killings is nothing more than your BULLSHIT accusation LMAAAAAOOOOO 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 this is my FACT that the jews are the rightful real owner of the land 😎😎😎 x.com/pelefact/statu…
ixyz@pelefact

@r168538 @ReddCinema the jews never stole the land zionism is legal it is a movement to go back to the ancestor land the land belongs to jews ancestor dna research proves it before 135 AD expulsion the jews were the majority the roman were the invader the colonizer

English
1
0
0
8
ixyz
ixyz@pelefact·
@fite_cs @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel aah, you acknowledged it 😆😆😆 nope other countries do that too like I said in AI era you cant LIE anymore YOU CANT FIGHT THE TRUTH LMAAAAAOOOOO 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
ixyz tweet media
English
1
0
0
11
CSFite
CSFite@fite_cs·
@pelefact @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel Eastern European Zionists literally have the least amount of Levantine DNA of any group in Palestine. I guess that's why DNA tests are largely forbidden in Nazi Israel.
English
1
1
1
25
ixyz
ixyz@pelefact·
@fite_cs @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel this is biblical claim not supported with factual proof the so called eastern european zionist are proven have levant dna besides the jews have archaeology proof >merneptah stele no land steal because the jews are the rightful real owner of the land LMAAAAAAOOOOO 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
English
1
0
0
9
CSFite
CSFite@fite_cs·
@pelefact @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel "Abraham's children" invaded ancient Palestine and murdered the Canaanites and stole their land, just like Eastern European Zionists invaded Palestine, murders Palestinians and steals their land. Baby killing land thieves.
English
1
0
0
9
ixyz
ixyz@pelefact·
@fite_cs @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel no proof only accussations from palestine animal side and this is not official policy of israel LMAAAAAAAAAAOOOOOOO 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
English
0
0
0
7
CSFite
CSFite@fite_cs·
@pelefact @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel Hamas is easily the moral superior to Nazi Israel, as is everyone on death row. -IDF terrorists snipe children in the head for sport -Israeli guards rape prisoners with dogs, a la` Klaus Barbie -Nazi Israel targets hospitals, journalists, educators & aid workers
English
1
0
0
27
ixyz
ixyz@pelefact·
@fite_cs @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel of course because they have been abroad so long the fact that they still have substantial levant dna says ALOT you can NEVER DISPROVE that their ancestor are from the land not like palestine animal that have arab SQUATTER dna though ... LMAAAAAAAAOOOOOOOOOO 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
English
1
0
0
25
ixyz
ixyz@pelefact·
@fite_cs @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel oct 7 hamas can rape torture murder parade israel woman civilian like HUNTED ANIMAL when will israel get the chance to do the same to gaza? cant israel do the same to gaza? why??? palestine is MUCH worse than NAZI ... 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
English
1
0
0
23
CSFite
CSFite@fite_cs·
@pelefact @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel Hitler's thugs at least had the moral sense to try to hide their war crimes. Nazi Israel celebrates its war crimes on social media. Oopsie
English
2
0
0
13
ixyz
ixyz@pelefact·
@fite_cs @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel google check it yourself .... I always back my claim with the TRUTH unlike you source > palestine animal BULLSHIT propaganda palestine is full of MANIPULATION LIES BULLSHIT 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
ixyz tweet media
English
2
0
0
25
ixyz
ixyz@pelefact·
@fite_cs @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel nope that polish is a jews diaspora jews diaspora have levant dna proven by dna research why is the TRUTH so hard for palestine ANIMAL ... 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
English
1
0
0
10
CSFite
CSFite@fite_cs·
@pelefact @shrlckhmlck @zei_squirrel "Polish Jews are the real owners of Palestine, not the Palestinians who have lived there for thousands of years!" Blue bottle flies are smarter than ZioNazis, by miles.
English
1
0
0
13
ixyz
ixyz@pelefact·
@AlbertkobbyOsei @nxt888 @Aoe21Aoe52 " counter claim " 🤣🤣🤣 you are trying to be DISHONEST??? are you the same ANIMAL like the arab palestine well not ordinary ANIMAL you are BLOODTHIRSTY ANIMAL !!!! 😂😂😂😂
English
1
0
0
11
Sony Thăng
Sony Thăng@nxt888·
"Palestinian suffering is historically brought upon by themselves." This sentence is the most revealing thing you have written in this entire exchange. Not because it is uniquely callous. It is a commonly held position. But because it exposes, with unusual clarity, the foundational move that your entire argument has been making from the beginning. It assigns agency and therefore responsibility entirely to the Palestinians, and strips agency and therefore responsibility entirely from the Zionist movement, the British colonial government, the United States, and the international community. The Palestinian population did not bring upon themselves the Balfour Declaration, which was issued without their consent. They did not bring upon themselves the British Mandate policy of facilitating Jewish immigration against their expressed political objections. They did not bring upon themselves the UN partition plan, which was voted on by a body in which they had no representation. They did not bring upon themselves Plan Dalet, which was adopted by the Haganah two months before Arab armies entered. They did not bring upon themselves the expulsions at Lydda, at Haifa, at Jaffa, documented by Israeli historians, including Benny Morris, who names the commanders and describes the orders. What they did was resist. And you have classified resistance to dispossession as the cause of the dispossession. That is not history. That is the logic every colonial power has used about every colonized population that refused to accept its own elimination quietly.
§@EarthOddysey

On what moral basis were Palestinians "obligated" to accept partition? They weren’t obligated to like it. They were not obligated to see it as fair. They were entitled to reject it politically. But rejection is not the same as a right to launch or support a war to prevent any Jewish state from existing. By 1947 there were two peoples on the land with competing national claims. Jews were not a random foreign lobby with no connection to the place; they were a people with ancient ties, continuous presence, mass displacement, and a real need for sovereignty after centuries of persecution. Partition was morally imperfect because reality was morally impossible: two peoples claimed the same land, and neither was going to disappear. The moral basis was not that Palestinians owed Jews a debt. It was that Jews also had a right to self-determination, and partition was the proposed compromise between two conflicting claims. The tragedy is that compromise was rejected in favour of war by the Arabs. Palestinian suffering which is historically brought upon by themselves is real but it does not erase Jewish legitimacy and it does not turn rejection of any Jewish sovereignty into moral innocence.

English
41
673
1.6K
30.2K