Jennifer Reeves

If you are brown, Democrats will specifically not look into any crimes you may have committed, and if they find out about them accidentally will dismiss them immediately. because they think you’re so far beneath them you couldn’t possibly have been anything better than a criminal. They believe your criminal behavior is just part of being brown and out of your control, and should therefore be excused by your liberal White saviors.

In the United States, if you are brown and make money too quickly, Republicans will investigate you for crimes.

Here’s Ben Stein in 1979 describing television as an engine of cultural demoralization. He argues that a small clique of producers and writers pushed a left-coded inversion of reality onto the public. They despised traditional power centers and hated figures like Buckley. They propagandized the nation into accepting a fake world where businessmen are villains, criminals are the good-guys, small towns are sinister, military officers are proto-fascists, and work barely exists.

If a text based conversation was enough to get through to people, Charlie Kirk would have spent most of his time sitting behind a desk instead of going out to college campuses and various other forms and debating people face-to-face. You knew that it allows you to not just argue a single statement, but to refuse each point individually. And that’s just not effective in the format of an X post or in a comment section. It’s why he stands out above all the rest of the influencers and commentators and conservative voices that go online and make statements about what they believe to be true. Charlie had conversations and they’re simply more effective and productive.

Here’s why face to face debate with the Candy Cult is one of our best tools!

Absolutely nothing that psycho has said about Charlie is true. He never told her he thought he was a time traveler. He also never told her he was Catholic. He did not dabble in the occult. He did not only marry Erika because he was being forced to. Candace is so full of crap. See there are two versions of Charlie Kirk out there. The one that he showed it to the world and the one that Candace has described to the world. They directly contradict each other. They are opposites. So one of them can’t be real. I have much more faith in Charlie’s version, that he was the godly man he claimed to be, than in this ridiculous clown Candace has made up and given the name “Charlie Kirk.” we saw him proudly telling the world who he was, and what he believed, and we saw him back up those statements with his actions and the way he lived his life and the way he treated people. The only evidence we have of Candace‘s version is that she said so. The same people that are ridiculing others online saying “so you’re just gonna believe the FBI?“ Are totally on board believing all kinds of nonsense just because this one woman said so.

@pennys_moogie @LxxLatin @CinemaShogun You think Charlie was a liar?? Wow. The disrespect you give him and his family is atrocious. She’s a grieving widow for chrissakes.

For the past 6 months people have been questioning why Candace Owens won’t stop lying. Many have stepped forward with their own theories as to why they believe she won’t stop. But now the speculation is over because Candace Owens just answered the question herself.

Just another day on the Democrat plantation. #TikTok tiktok.com/t/ZTkFPGfFx/

This is so good, I seriously felt like I was watching Candace Owens. #TikTok tiktok.com/t/ZTkFPFENr/

@clerpatriot I think she misread Dr. Seuss. It’s cat IN the hat not cat IS the hat. How does a person even get the idea to do something like this? Out of all the places someone might try to hide their cat while they’re traveling, they went with the top of their head??

OMG, she straight-up TRICKED the airline by rocking her CAT as a HAT on her head and they LET HER FLY?! 😱 Did the guy just not wanna look racist calling her out?? WHAT OTHER EXCUSE IS THERE?! 😂💀

she also has a gut instinct that she’s an alien, Charlie is a time traveler, and that Elon Musk is a human reptile hybrid. And that’s just the beginning of her delulu instincts. So if you believe that all those things are possible, you’re not the kind of person that should even be having a conversation about a murder investigation. because you live in a different kind of reality, and no amount of facts are going to convince you of anything.

@CinemaShogun She has a gut instinct about what happened to Charlie that goes beyond the facts available. The only people worried about her are Zionists. She was right about the investigation being faulty.

@ZacKaizen @lisaknows429 @TPUSA Nick is incredible. I’m so sad that he dropped out of politics, he would make an amazing president! But he will do a good job at these campus events because he can debate with the best of them. He is very wise.

These people are wild. Yes, there has been a shift because Erika realizes she is not Charlie. She is not going to be able to stand in front of college kids and have debates. Instead, she has farmed that out to people like Nick Freitas, who are doing similar campus tours. The core principles and values remain 100% the same - the only difference is she realized she could not do what her husband did, so to carry on his legacy, she had to adjust the method.

The Candy Cult claims Erika has changed, and that she is moving @TPUSA in a completely different direction from what Charlie wanted. Looking back at her speeches over the last 6 months. Starting with Charlie’s memorial Erika has consistently spread a message, and a goal of helping young Americans through TPUSA to find a path that is full of purpose over that of the destruction our culture leads them to. She has specifically focused on young men, and more specifically white young men such as the one who took her husband’s life. Erika for months now has made parallels to the fact, Tyler Robinson was the exact kind of young man Charlie was trying to help. I see nothing but consistency from Erika and TPUSA. It’s in fact everyone else who is being radicalized against their mission. I would have never dreamed while watching her speech at the memorial, and seeing the outpouring of support she received in the immediate aftermath. That just a month later it would completely flip on its head. That over half the people sitting in that arena would completely turn on Erika and be working to destroy TPUSA.

They’re really no different than the people on the left who celebrated when Charlie died.. I have a Charlie Kirk picture as my profile pic on Facebook. I made a comment in an eBay sellers group on there one day and started getting messages threatening that I might be the next to die. That behavior was considered abhorrent by conservatives when he died, but now we’ve got “ conservative” people supporting Candace Owens doing the same thing to people that won’t get on board with the hate for Erika campaign. And it’s all coming from the same place of hate and the deliberate spreading of lies.

@lisaknows429 @TPUSA It's sick and sad. I don't get it! I had to change my Pic and my name cause someone was finding my personal stuff on fb and posting my family on here because I defended Erika and talked against Candace. I don't get these people. They are the new left!

A new Christian asks Charlie Kirk about loyalty to Israel… youtube.com/shorts/wpdvPeI… via @YouTube

@the_real_Iulian @TRUMPGIRL_STL “ Did Trump said?” what kind of grammar is that? Oh right, the kind from Romania. And I’ve seen this comment three times, are you almost done?

@TRUMPGIRL_STL Did Trump said no wars, America first? Yes Did Trump said, focus in the economy because US is now 39 Trillion in debt? yes. Did Trump said Obama would start a war with Iran because he is a poor negotiator and his popularity is low? Yes. This is about Trump not following through

I’m done with Candace Owens. I’m done with Marjorie Taylor Greene. I’m done with Tucker Carlson. I’m done with Milo Yiannopoulos. I’m done with Jack Posobiec. I’m done with Tim Pool. I’m done with Megyn Kelly. I’m done with the Hodgetwins. I’m done with the entire cottage industry that built empires on the backs of a movement and now wants to lecture that same audience like they just discovered virtue. What we’re watching isn’t some great awakening. It’s a rebrand. It’s a pivot. It’s a group of people reading the room, spotting where the next pile of money is, and sprinting toward it while pretending it’s about conscience. That’s the part that insults people’s intelligence. These are not newcomers finding their voice. These are professionals who understood exactly what they were doing when they built their platforms. They knew the audience. They knew the message. They knew the stakes. And they were more than happy to cash in on all of it. Now, with a different set of incentives, they’re suddenly above it all. Suddenly they’re the referees. Suddenly they’re the ones telling everyone else they’ve been misled. No. They didn’t discover truth. They discovered a new revenue stream. There is serious money right now in turning on the very people who made you relevant. There is attention, media amplification, and a fresh audience waiting to reward you for it. So the script flips. The tone shifts. The lectures begin. And the same people who once spoke with certainty now speak with superiority. They wrap it in big language about principles and clarity, but look a little closer and the pattern is obvious. The timing is perfect. The messaging is coordinated. The outrage is monetized. This is not bravery. This is market positioning. Meanwhile, the people actually living in the real world, the voters, the families, the ones who don’t get paid to post, are treated like props in someone else’s content strategy. Talked down to. Written off. Used when convenient and discarded when not. That’s where the real frustration comes from. And here’s what makes all of this even more absurd. They’re squandering a once-in-a-generation moment. Donald Trump is not a polished conservative intellectual. He’s not Buckley. He’s not Reagan in tone or temperament. He’s blunt. He’s transactional. He’s often crude in ways that make even his supporters wince. And yet, in the only place that ultimately matters, results, he has governed like the heir to Reagan’s legacy. He reshaped the federal judiciary in a way conservatives had talked about for decades but never fully delivered. He put forward justices who helped overturn Roe v. Wade, something that for years was treated as a distant goal. He proved it was real. He pursued policies rooted in national interest, economic strength, and American leverage, not as theory, but as action. That combination unsettles people because it does not fit neatly into any ideological box. He is not a movement conservative in the traditional sense, but he has delivered outcomes that movement conservatives once said they wanted. And politics is not a clean business. It never has been. It is rough. It is personal. It is unforgiving. And it demands a level of resilience that most of the people commenting from the sidelines have never had to show. Trump has taken hit after hit, from media, from institutions, from political opponents, and yes, from people who once claimed to be on his side. And he keeps standing. They threw everything at him, and when that wasn’t enough, someone tried to take his life in Butler, Pennsylvania. That is not rhetoric. That is reality. And by the grace of God, he survived. Most people would disappear after that. Most people would step back, protect themselves, and walk away. He didn’t. So spare me the lectures from people who found a more comfortable lane the moment things got difficult. It is easy to posture. It is easy to pivot. It is easy to cash in. It is a lot harder to stand in the fire and keep going. And while all of this noise floods social media, something else is happening that people should be paying attention to. Foreign actors are pouring fuel on every internal disagreement, amplifying the most divisive voices, boosting the most inflammatory content, and creating the illusion that the country is more fractured than it actually is. They do not need to invent our disagreements. They just need to magnify them until it feels like there is nothing else. That distortion becomes reality for people who live online. It creates a collective illusion that America is coming apart at the seams, that neighbors have nothing in common, that the center has collapsed. But step outside of that bubble and it tells a very different story. Most Americans still believe in the core principles that built this country. Individual liberty. Personal responsibility. Equal justice under the law. The idea that rights come from God, not government. Those ideas have not disappeared. They are not fringe. They are the quiet consensus that does not trend on social media because it is not designed to provoke. What we are seeing online is not the country. It is a distorted mirror of it. And too many of these influencers are either blind to that or actively participating in it because it benefits them. You don’t have to like everything about Trump. Nobody does. But pretending this moment is ordinary, or that what has been accomplished is meaningless, is not serious. Some people are willing to take the hits to move the country forward. Others are just trying to make sure they land on their feet when the winds shift. And people can tell the difference. President Trump in the president we need at this historic moment. And he needs our support now, more than ever!! #MAGA

@lisaknows429 What does she even need an “alibi“ for? Is she being accused of some crime? I don’t think that Candace Owens, or even anyone who is an actual investigative journalist, or the general public has a right to demand an alibi of anyone they want.

I just want you all to know I saved this video last Wednesday because I already knew Candace wasn’t going to provide a single thing 🤣🤣🤣 This clown still has this video up on her page! How are they not embarrassed!

You’re really living in a little bubble, aren’t you? A small group of people who are suckers for Candace’s gossip and drama, who helped her make $59 million since Charlie’s death with all of her conspiratorial nonsense, think that about Erika Kirk. The rest of us see A widow doing her best to grieve the loss of her husband, while carrying on his dreams and his legacy and fulfilling his final request to her, of taking over his business. You are just jealous because you had a weird para social relationship with Charlie Kirk before he died and now think you have some sort of ownership to him and you’re mad that you don’t have a say in what his wife does and how his company is run. Charlie doesn’t belong to you like you always thought he did when you watched him online. He picked a beautiful girl and it makes you jealous to see people honoring her and supporting her when you’ll never have that.

@GrahamAllen @ginamilan_ Why are you so obsessed with defending his wife? The rest of the country views her as a disingenuous, fame seeking, money-hungry, GRIFTER. It’s really disturbing that you don’t see what the world see’s in the 🕷️ Widow Kirk.

Dear Charlie, I’m so sorry. You deserved better friends. Your wife, Erika, and your children deserved a better life. I’m truly sorry that things have come to this. It breaks my heart. I’m gonna keep fighting 💔

@jackisaidit27 @jotreeme @catturd2 @MagaBoss2024 That was beautiful thank you.

This video I posted a day or 2 after we lost Charlie. As we all do we ask "God why"? This is why. It was for us to keep his spirit alive. To keep his movement going. To spread the word of Jesus Christ. We owe Charlie so much. Always spread the word of Jesus and never be afraid to proclaim him as the only Lord and Savior

I have a question, and I’m serious … Why are all of us who never personally knew Charlie Kirk, defending his wife and children so vigorously - while the grifters who claim to be his best friends are too cowardly to even call that evil POS Candice Owens out? I’m so glad I don’t have fake friends like this.

@myLeitaBug @chicksonright Let’s see, false, false, and false. What has she lied about? Every one of those claims made by Candace has been debunked. But since you people only listen to her, and don’t believe actual fact or evidence, you probably don’t even care.

@chicksonright True or false: Erika Kirk was involved in a Romanian orphanage that was under heavy scrutiny and investigation for alleged child trafficking? T or F: Erika has been caught in numerous lies since CK died. T or F: Erika lied about her previous relationships leading up to CK

It appears that Candace Owens gave her husband a black eye and until either one or both of them promptly deny this we have no choice but to accept that she is guilty. Also, if she denies it, she’s guilty. And if she doesn’t deny it, she’s guilty. That’s pretty much how it works with every accusation she makes against TPUSA and Erika Kirk, so… Am I Candacing right or

@grok @USAChihuahua @myLeitaBug @chicksonright I think the other commenter here (who is ignored for not being a premium member ) is correct, you were wrong about number three. She said she wasn’t in the dating scene when she lived in New York City. Those other relationships all came prior to her time living there.

1. False. Fact-checks from WRAL, People, and others find no evidence Erika Kirk or her Romanian Angels group was accused of child trafficking or banned from Romania; claims trace to unverified social media. 2. Subjective/debated. Critics (incl. Candace Owens) cite inconsistencies in statements on texts, security, and events post-Charlie's 2025 death, but these remain contested without court findings. 3. True. In Dec 2025 interviews, she said she "never dated"; public photos, videos, and records show prior relationships (e.g., Cabot Phillips) and a reality TV appearance.

You may be right. The worst thing they have done is taken a segment of the conservative population and turned them into racists. They built up these huge audiences of conservatives and taught them to trust the things they say. And then they started building this anti-Israel narrative. So now when people on the left call us racist, all they have to do is point to all of the antisemite bigots that have started publicly announcing their hatred for Jews, in support of Candace and Tucker, etc. that behavior is in defensible. And it will destroy everything that we have worked for in the last five years. Not to mention, Candace and her character assassination of Charlie Kirk. The version of Charlie Kirk that she claims to be real is only possible if everything he ever said and did was a lie. So she has discredited all of his work by making all these people believe that her version of him was true. She has torn down everything that he did, all of his work. And by trying to make the world believe that he was also anti-Israel she is saying that they were all all right to call him a racist when he died.

@eveforamerica Candace - used to be a Dem Nick Fuentes - Obviously was a Dem Tucker Carlson - Was a Dem Ian Carroll - lies so much he's obviously a Dem etc etc etc None of this was organic, this was their nuclear option, infest the Republican party, then create an 'internal' civil war

I do not know one genuine Trump supporter that is now all of a sudden backpedaling. NOT ONE. These big pretend-MAGA accounts were NEVER MAGA. Am I right?

I’m seeing a common theme in the replies here. Almost everyone is saying that they support him. But the people that aren’t, all seem to be Candace Owens followers and antisemites. I’m kind of glad to see that she’s helping pull all of the Israel haters out of the woodwork, they’re all finally publicly announcing themselves. Because I don’t want them in my party anyway. We spent the last few years trying to convince the world that we are not the racists the left makes us out to be. And now all of a sudden, all of these “conservatives“ are screaming and yelling and crying about Jews. It’s so delusional and it goes against everything conservatives believe in. They are not MAGA, they are not conservative, they can go start their own little party, because we don’t want them. maybe they can make Candace their leader. They believe everything she says anyway. And they can all go fuck themselves.

As an actual widow, who was left with a four-year-old and an 18 month old to take care of when my spouse died, if his last wish had been for me to take over his company and fulfill his dreams… Yes, I absolutely would. I was a stay at home mom when my husband died and I had to pick up the pieces and become a provider. So if I had the opportunity to pick up my husband‘s work and continue it as my way of providing for my children, there would be no question! I don’t see why anyone would criticize her choice to do what she and Charlie agreed she would do if something happened to him. This is the stupidest debate. In every circumstance where someone has lost a spouse, especially where they have children to take care of, they have different factors to consider, different choices to make, a different past and a different future, and their choices are theirs alone and not for anyone else to question. How dare you presume that you know better how to live her life than she does? And how dare you presume that you know better than she, what her husband would want her to do. Frankly, I’m glad I did not have to be put on display in front of the entire world for assholes to judge my every move and the way I grieved. But if my husband‘s last wish would have been for me to do so, I absolutely would have. There’s no doubt about it. I would’ve put myself through that for him. And I give her a lot of credit for doing so.

If your spouse passed away, would you really go on a tour and promote yourself like Erika, and leave your children at home with a nanny?