Chicks On The Right

121K posts

Chicks On The Right banner
Chicks On The Right

Chicks On The Right

@chicksonright

Co-Founders https://t.co/xs7RWjfOjU PODCAST: https://t.co/VYtF5KaLMp All Socials: https://t.co/KUkuuhDhMU

SC and TX Katılım Ağustos 2009
3.9K Takip Edilen161.9K Takipçiler
Chicks On The Right
Chicks On The Right@chicksonright·
This is the most terrifying creature you're going to see today.
English
6
8
42
1.8K
Chicks On The Right
Chicks On The Right@chicksonright·
Hillary Clinton looks pretty good in this...for her.
English
7
5
34
3.4K
Chicks On The Right retweetledi
Vince Dao
Vince Dao@VinceDaoTV·
Trump didn’t throw the Iranian people under the bus. I’m so sick of the ungrateful whining. He told them to take back their country and left behind a historic power vacuum to do so. The regime is disjointed, confused, and unstable. Huge opportunity there. But is America expected to do all the work for your diaspora? Iranian people have no role in this? What do you want us to do, anyway? Invade them? Start a chain reaction of energy infrastructure blowing up across the Middle East? We’re expected to destroy everything to save your people? Ultimately, it’s not America’s job to help the Iranian people (even though we did). It was America’s job to secure its own geopolitical interests, which involve Middle East alliances, oil, and the nuclear issue. If the deal succeeds, and that’s a big if, then it’s a huge win for America. Which is literally all that matters. It’s notable how quickly neocons and Persian diaspora switch up. When bombs were flying, they were cheering, but now that Trump is trying to make a deal, they’re screaming betrayal. I thought he was the best President ever? What happened?
𝐍𝐢𝐨𝐡 𝐁𝐞𝐫𝐠 🇮🇷 ✡︎@NiohBerg

It really does seem like Trump threw the Iranian people under the bus so that he could force countries like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan to normalise with Israel. Was this war ever about Iran, or was it always with the goal to strengthen the Israelis at the expense of Iranians? I dislike asking these questions, but they need to be asked sadly.

English
189
84
507
53.1K
Chicks On The Right retweetledi
Vivid.🇮🇱
Vivid.🇮🇱@VividProwess·
The amazing @lalshareef explains how Israel removed Jews from Gaza in 2005 to get peace, leaving behind greenhouses worth millions of dollars. The Palestinians looted the greenhouses, and Gaza was turned into a terror fortress. This must go viral.
English
127
3.2K
6.9K
72.2K
Civics Education Academy of Utah
@chicksonright Memorial Day falls on the last Monday of May. Not the 25th. The 25th is the day Floyd was murdered in this Mayor's city. Does someone tie your shoes for you? 🤣
English
1
1
2
44
Chicks On The Right
Chicks On The Right@chicksonright·
Happy Memorial Day, y’all 🇺🇸 Hope you’re soaking up the long weekend, spending time with people you love, and remembering the heroes who made our freedoms possible. Today we remember and honor the brave men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice for our freedom. ❤️🤍💙
Chicks On The Right tweet media
English
5
9
79
1.2K
Chicks On The Right
Chicks On The Right@chicksonright·
Baron Coleman is a disgusting piece of trash.
glorybe@iknowitsilly

🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️ Someone deliver to @baroncoleman please Last night you told your audience that if you discover you’re wrong about something, you’ll go back, correct it publicly, and we’ll hear it first from you. The proof on Charlie Kirk’s actual “Priorities” list was REposted yesterday: this is your moment to follow through on that commitment. You have yet to follow through and publicly correct when you’ve been proven wrong. Your claim regarding the list You said one side reflected what he loved most: family, kids #1, legacy. The other side listed what he didn’t like: careerism, consumerism, and loneliness. You explicitly told listeners he left “spouse” off because his marriage to Erika was heading for divorce. You said you couldn’t show the interview because “The Blaze was weird about using their stuff”. By not using Erika’s own words you were able to change the entire narrative behind that list. That narrative has now led thousands of people to believe Charlie was airing deep personal frustrations about his wife and family life right before he died. Here’s what you left out: Charlie himself presented this exact same list on Fox News with Laura Ingraham on September 9, 2025. Column 1 referred to young men who voted for Trump and Column 2 referred to young women who voted for Kamala Harris. There is zero mention of Erika, marriage, kids, divorce, or any personal family issues whatsoever. This has been debunked for months. You were also deceptive about the wedding picture that was not in the shot behind Erika during her interview. You pushed the story that the picture was removed or hidden as some sign of marital breakdown. That claim was debunked too, yet you continued to use it to paint a false picture of Charlie’s Instead of facts, you built an emotional, misleading narrative around a political list and personal details that were never there. Now that the full truth is out, it’s time to own it and correct the record publicly, exactly as you promised you would. Will you set this straight? (You need to watch the entire video of Baron explaining the list on his show last night to get an idea of how he completely changed the entire narrative to fit his storyline last night).

English
4
11
107
3.1K
Chicks On The Right retweetledi
The White House
The White House@WhiteHouse·
Memorial Day isn’t about barbecues or beach days—it’s about those American heroes who gave everything for our freedom. THIS 70-SECOND VIDEO CAPTURES WHAT THE DAY IS TRULY ABOUT. 🇺🇸
English
2.6K
23.8K
84K
2.5M
Chicks On The Right retweetledi
Apple Lamps
Apple Lamps@lamps_apple·
Hasan's own broadcasts do the prosecution's work for it. He placed himself at a named, military-owned hotel on both the Prohibited Accommodations List and the Restricted List, described handing cash to Cuban nationals while acknowledging the limits on doing so, and confirmed he understood the sanctions regime well enough to obtain a Treasury clearance before going. He then recited the prohibition on funding government and military entities, disputed only the policy behind it, and announced he would disregard the restrictions outright on any return trip. The license he would lean on collapses on his own footage, where the schedule centers on state officials, regime-solidarity messaging, and recreation rather than the independent civil-society contact §515.574 demands. On CNN, Hasan volunteered that the delegation obtained Treasury authorization and then stayed in a designated five-star hotel... "we had to get an OFAC clearance from the Treasury Department just to go" and "the American government has actually created these incredible restrictions that only allow American citizens to stay in four hotels on the island… these are five-star hotels… if I don't stay in one of those hotels, I could go to prison for 10 years and have to pay a $250,000 fine." He repeats the "they have to stay in what they've declared as five-star hotels" claim on stream. That legal description is inverted. There is no four-hotel whitelist. The relevant instrument is a prohibition list. And the hotel the delegation used has been named in the reporting as the Gran Hotel Bristol, where Piker and other participants were staying. That property is on the government's lists... It appears by name on the State Department's Cuba Prohibited Accommodations List as the Gran Hotel Bristol Kempinski, 485 Av. Bélgica, La Habana, the list of properties where the Cuban Assets Control Regulations generally prohibit persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction from lodging, paying for lodging, or making any reservation to lodge. It also sits on the Cuba Restricted List. The ownership chain is the reason... Kempinski signed a management contract with Grupo de Turismo Gaviota, Cuba's largest hotel operator, which is owned by GAESA, in turn controlled by the Cuban Ministry of the Revolutionary Armed Forces. So payment for lodging at the Bristol is a direct financial transaction flowing to the Cuban military, prohibited under 31 CFR 515.210 and 515.209. This is strict-liability on the civil side, and purpose is irrelevant. The Support-for-the-Cuban-People license he would invoke expressly does not cure it... §515.574(d) states the license does not authorize lodging at any CPA-List property. His own framing makes it worse, not better. He told over a million viewers he was required to stay there, a claim a Community Note corrected, noting U.S. law only prevents Americans from staying at venues owned by the Cuban government or its officials. He was publicly put on notice that his stated justification was wrong, contemporaneously with the trip. On his "IT’S DEVASTATING" stream he describes the delegation "peppering people with… just wads of cash for the most part… with hopes that there's a little bit of economic respite for each individual Cuban that we encounter." On the 'Collective Punishment Kneecap Call Out Donald Trump Over Cuba Crisis' stream he goes further and counsels his audience to do the same while showing awareness of the limit... "you should bring hard American cash to Cuba and give it to the people of Cuba… obviously, there's restrictions on how much cash you can bring, but… it is what it is." A documented series of financial transactions on the island, and an on-camera acknowledgment that he knew cash transfers are restricted. The "it is what it is" is a knowing disregard. Civil liability needs no intent, but DOJ referral requires willfulness. Hasan supplied unusually direct evidence of it. He knew the regime applied and sought authorization... "we had to get an OFAC clearance from the Treasury Department just to go." So this is a sophisticated actor with access to sanctions counsel, not someone unaware the rules exist. He demonstrated specific knowledge that the targets of his spending were government and military entities, and pressed ahead anyway. In the mini-doc, standing in the hospital compound... "a lot of the public administrations here… according to the American government, it's still technically… owned by the Cuban government and therefore the Cuban military. So when American sanctions are applied, they might try to justify it by saying, oh, you're funding a foreign adversary's military. But the reality is… it's funding that would be going to rebuilding these buildings." He recites the prohibition and then disputes the policy rather than the fact. He stated an intent to violate on a future trip... "when I do [come back], I'll probably not abide by the American restrictions." And the public record adds consciousness of illegality from before the trip... he had canceled a 2025 trip to the island fearing legal repercussions in the U.S. He understood the legal risk a year out and went anyway. Some wonder whether the conduct fits 31 CFR 515.574, which requires a full-time schedule of activities that promote the Cuban people's independence from Cuban authorities and that involve independent civil-society actors. His own footage points the other way on every prong. He spent his time with state actors, not independent civil society. By his own description he conducted interviews with a state hospital surgeon, state university scientists, and the director of international medical missions, and an hour-and-a-half sit-down with the Cuban Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs, Carlos Fernández de Cosío. He also met Jodie Evans of CodePink and the Progressive International delegation. These are government and government-aligned figures. The framing is solidarity with the authorities, not independence from them. The mini-doc closes on the regime's revolutionary slogan, "Patria o muerte, venceremos," and on praise for Cubans "who refuse to trade their sovereignty for a momentary relief." That is the opposite of the statutory purpose of §515.574. His schedule reads recreational in large part. Across the streams he describes drinking at La Bodeguita del Medio and "a local establishment," attending the Kneecap concert, "living la vida loca," planning to visit La Plaza de la Revolución and "everything," sampling cigars and Cuban coffee, and being photographed in what reporting valued as an outfit worth around $5,000 including Cartier glasses and rings. The full-time-qualifying-schedule requirement bars free time and recreation beyond what a full schedule allows, and the group-qualification bar in §515.574(b) means the delegation does not qualify just because some members might. He also had an organizing role rather than passive attendance... "as soon as this trip was being planned, I knew… I hit up Daniel, their manager [Kneecap]." That supports the coordination element and ties him to the convoy's assembly. He repeatedly foregrounds the non-medical hardware. On the "First Day" stream the charter was "full of good stuff, you know, medicine, food, and most importantly, solar panels," and in the mini-doc the convoy is delivering "over 40 tons of necessary supplies." The solar panels and generators are the weakest fit for the medical-humanitarian export carve-out and the most likely to be characterized as material support to state infrastructure. His own discussion that Cuba's solar supply is "more than 90%" Chinese and that China "doesn't abide by… American restrictions" frames the hardware in circumvention terms.
Apple Lamps tweet media
hasanabi@hasanthehun

the american govt would rather try to criminalize delivering aid to a country we’ve starved, than punish the epstein class.

English
159
884
3.7K
248.9K
Chicks On The Right retweetledi
Missy
Missy@QueenMarkmyword·
So @baroncoleman tried stating the paper Erika Kirk was holding up was Charlie comparing these things, also insinuated they had a problem marriage,what it was his notes from his interview. The last one I believe on fox. I'm surprised he didn't realize this. I hope he corrects himself. Please send it to him because he blocked me.
English
36
27
170
27.9K
Chicks On The Right retweetledi
Deborah
Deborah@DeborahBHint·
Disgusting behavior from @baroncoleman — caught cropping out the caption like a pathetic liar. Charlie posts a beautiful beach photo with his daughter on her birthday, thanking and tagging his wife @MrsErikaKirk they raise her together… and Baron edits the evidence to manufacture divorce rumors. This isn’t ‘commentary.’ This is the behavior of a sad, dishonest grifter who knows his audience won’t check the facts. Absolute bottom-feeder tactics of an ignorant low life.
English
156
60
451
55.6K
Chicks On The Right
Chicks On The Right@chicksonright·
This will make you a Washington Nationals fan!
English
5
3
71
2.6K