Pete

9.7K posts

Pete banner
Pete

Pete

@pensive_thinkr

United Kingdom Katılım Şubat 2013
486 Takip Edilen85 Takipçiler
Pete
Pete@pensive_thinkr·
@overtaxation50 @RandyRRQuaid Jackson's team asked the judge for the criminal trial to go first, as the civil case before criminal would prejudice the trial. The judge rejected that request. The parents could have also continued with the criminal trial and sent Jackson to prison. But they ran off with money
English
2
0
4
61
Overtaxation
Overtaxation@overtaxation50·
@RandyRRQuaid So why did he settle out of court with the parents of the children he allegedly abused, included non-disclosure agreements, and the parents dropped charges afterward? As I recall, California, at the time, had no statutory prosecution so the parents could drop charges.
English
3
1
3
425
Randy Quaid
Randy Quaid@RandyRRQuaid·
Santa Barbara DA was paid off and there was zero credible evidence against Michael Jackson.
English
41
275
2.1K
18.7K
Pete
Pete@pensive_thinkr·
@BobVilla618568 @RandyRRQuaid Read the police reports? It went to trial and he was acquitted convincingly during that trial. Absolutely nothing damning about fake testimony
English
0
1
7
48
Bob Villa
Bob Villa@BobVilla618568·
@RandyRRQuaid Randy, with you on 98% of your views but MJ was guilty as sin. Read the police reports, the children's testimonials. It's beyond damning. Lets talk about present day monsters🧟‍♂️and demons👹 destroying humanity.
English
1
1
5
296
Pete
Pete@pensive_thinkr·
@EkpoNeptune @AnUnabashedNerd @xoxocoreyn I'd ignore her now. She obviously ignores all the facts of the case. Only an obsessed crazy person would think anyone could be convicted in that 2005 trial
English
1
0
0
11
Pete
Pete@pensive_thinkr·
@AnUnabashedNerd @EkpoNeptune @xoxocoreyn The mother who tried to get 500k from jc penney and wanted her kids to star in their commercials as a settlement, totally would never lie or use her kids for financial gain. Sure Jackie
English
1
0
1
27
Pete
Pete@pensive_thinkr·
@AnUnabashedNerd @xoxocoreyn What do you mean I wasn't there? The time lines THEY GAVE. You don't have to have been there. They couldn't do a civil suit because they LOST in a criminal court emphatically. Noone would take them seriously. Again, you have NEVER looked into the case just admit it
English
1
0
0
41
Jackie Talks Nerdy
Jackie Talks Nerdy@AnUnabashedNerd·
@pensive_thinkr @xoxocoreyn “It was impossible during the timeline they gave” YOU WEREN’T THERE. And again, if they were just a bunch of “scammers” out to “make a buck off of Jackson,” why did they never try to “make a buck”? No interviews, no books, no civil suits…weird behavior for “scammers”
English
1
0
0
35
Pete
Pete@pensive_thinkr·
@AnUnabashedNerd @xoxocoreyn Yeah sure of course. It was Gavin and not his mother. Who accused Jackson of kidnapping, which was impossible during the time line they gave, accused Jackson of abusing after the world's eyes were OK him after the Bashir doco etc. Just admit you know nothing of the case
English
1
0
0
38
Jackie Talks Nerdy
Jackie Talks Nerdy@AnUnabashedNerd·
@pensive_thinkr @xoxocoreyn His mother wasn’t accusing Jackson of sexual abuse. Gavin was. And for a bunch of “scammers” supposedly out to make a buck, isn’t it interesting how they never filed civil suits, never did interviews and never published books? 🤔
English
2
0
0
35
Pete
Pete@pensive_thinkr·
@AnUnabashedNerd @xoxocoreyn Yes it will because they are a bunch of scammers. Race has nothing to do with it. And his mother previously accused a jc penney employee of sexual assault for a payout. Found to have lied
English
1
0
0
40
Jackie Talks Nerdy
Jackie Talks Nerdy@AnUnabashedNerd·
@xoxocoreyn They can’t go after Jordan but they can go after Gavin. I don’t think portraying a Latino family as a bunch of scammers and a 13 yr old cancer survivor as a scammer is going to go over that well in today’s climate. I hope Gavin sues
English
1
0
1
266
C💗
C💗@xoxocoreyn·
@elphieroseee honestly i don’t think he would’ve survived the me too era if he never passed away. but ngl i do love his music, but i can’t lie and say it doesn’t make me uncomfortable
English
3
0
20
345
Pete
Pete@pensive_thinkr·
@joe_kopsick Are you suggesting it's possible that 50% of them lied?
English
0
0
0
14
JoeKopsick
JoeKopsick@joe_kopsick·
M Jackson was accused by 22 ppl Assuming that there's a 50% chance that each accuser is lying, The odds that Michael raped ZERO of those kids, are 1 in 2 to the power of 22 Or 1 in just under 4.2 million The # of his accusers makes it virtually impossible that he was innocent
English
11
0
6
896
Pete
Pete@pensive_thinkr·
@Variety Dan Reed is 61. He is English. When he made LN he said he's never heard a Michael jackson song in his life. The guy is a liar and a media vulture.
English
0
0
0
103
Variety
Variety@Variety·
“Leaving Neverland” director Dan Reed says the public can’t see Michael Jackson as a pedophile because he has “metastasized into something much bigger than who he actually was": "He’s become part of the collective imagination, and the collective imagination can never include the fact that he’s a pedophile. It’s just not possible. You can’t say, God, that guy liked to have sex with children, but isn’t his music great? That’s not a narrative people can hold in their minds." variety.com/2026/film/feat…
Variety tweet media
English
294
148
1.6K
496.9K
Pete
Pete@pensive_thinkr·
@sarahdistortion @paulgirl861 Firstly, are you suggesting it's OK for those 5% which are false, to go to prison? Secondly, that stat would be MUCH higher if there was a monetary gain, such as with Jackson.
English
3
0
0
64
Sarahdistortion
Sarahdistortion@sarahdistortion·
@pensive_thinkr @paulgirl861 For CSA? Yes I am. Fraudulent childhood sexual abuse accusations make up less than 5% of all abuse cases. Please use common sense. This rhetoric is why rape is grossly underreported
English
1
0
1
61
Miss Brown
Miss Brown@paulgirl861·
GUILTERS: Just because Michael Jackson was acquitted, doesn’t mean he was innocent. So I guess his fans think OJ Simpson was innocent too, right? LOGIC: OJ Simpson was accused of two counts of first degree murder. A case based on overwhelming physical evidence which included blood, hair fibers, DNA, etc..His guilt was proven not beyond a reasonable doubt, but beyond all doubt. Now that’s a case where you can attack the jury and accuse them of being a bunch a star struck idiots. Michael Jackson on the other hand was accused of child molestation. A case based on zero physical evidence, and entirely on credibility. According to the jury, his accuser, as well as his family, lacked credibility, and so they acquitted him of all 14 charges. They even struggled to get him on a misdemeanor because the evidence was so bad. So yeah, please stop comparing these two cases. It makes you look very foolish and desperate.
Miss Brown tweet media
English
58
91
613
30.1K
Sarahdistortion
Sarahdistortion@sarahdistortion·
@paulgirl861 Would you say that to a female rape victim? People like you are the reason people don’t report assault
English
5
0
2
348
Pete
Pete@pensive_thinkr·
@Angela734198012 @SyphinOmg @popnewx You are one of the outliers. Congratulations for being special. His music was embraced by everyone around the world. No other artist has come close.
English
1
0
0
91
PopNews
PopNews@popnewx·
Top 5 Biggest artists in the World across all music platforms #1. Justin Bieber #2. Michael Jackson #3. BTS #4. Bad Bunny #5. Taylor swift
PopNews tweet media
English
230
5.6K
26.9K
864.8K
Akhil Jackson
Akhil Jackson@AkhilJaxxn·
If Michael Jackson were guilty, he would have paid in Aug 1993 when Evan Chandler demanded $1M and threatened to go public, instead of Jan 1994. That could have helped him avoid the humiliating strip search, police raids, media scrutiny, and backlash.
Slonk@Pies_of_Lee

the fact that michael jackson settled the case with jordan chandler for $23 million is possibly the biggest piece of evidence against him. $23 million in 1993 is about $53 million today. you're delusional if you think someone would settle for that much if they were innocent

English
12
79
883
36K
Pete
Pete@pensive_thinkr·
@joe_kopsick @jojoslyfe21 @AkhilJaxxn No man don't do that. That's not the same at all. The whole premise of the film and the narrative they pushed was that mj was only into prepubescent boys. Now that James story unravel, we're being told he was also abusing 16-17 year olds? Ok
English
0
0
0
13
JoeKopsick
JoeKopsick@joe_kopsick·
@jojoslyfe21 @pensive_thinkr @AkhilJaxxn Aged out? Getting older doesn't make a child safe from being abused My dad molested me at ages 8 and 9 He tried again when I was age 13. I fought him off. HoW cOuLd mY fAtHeR TrY tO aBuSe Me At AgE 13 iF hE wAnTed eIgHt YeAr OlDs?! Because I was still around
English
2
0
0
25
Pete
Pete@pensive_thinkr·
@joe_kopsick @jojoslyfe21 @AkhilJaxxn Because the whole FILM told us he lost interest in boys when they hit puberty and would cast them aside. Now we're being told he was interested in 6ft 16/17 year olds?
English
1
0
1
29
Pete
Pete@pensive_thinkr·
@joe_kopsick @jojoslyfe21 @AkhilJaxxn I'm really sorry you went through that. That's horrible. It doesn't change that James would have been 16/17 and not a prepubescent boy
English
1
0
1
20
JoeKopsick
JoeKopsick@joe_kopsick·
@jojoslyfe21 @pensive_thinkr @AkhilJaxxn I forgot the ENTIRE FACT THAT I WAS EVER RAPED by my dad I was raped in 1995 and/or 1996 I forgot the abuse in 1999 or 2000 I recovered the memories between 2015 to present I forgot the ENTIRE molestation. For over a DECADE. Of course someone can get the date wrong
English
2
0
0
23