perifetes

2.6K posts

perifetes banner
perifetes

perifetes

@perifetes

nothing /nobody / noone / i don't know / i haven't seen / i don't think anything about it.

Katılım Temmuz 2025
277 Takip Edilen36 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
perifetes
perifetes@perifetes·
Revelation 13:18 (NIV) „This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666.“ 👆"This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. " <-- Here is a point at the end of a sentence.👈 The point is the number itself. The purpose of the vaccination was for you to get a number - QR code. The whole comedy from the beginning was for everyone to get a number. That didn't work. It failed. So today we are in the second round of trying to get everyone to get a another number. If the number in the form of a QR code covid passport didn't work, then you get a Digital ID number.. You MUST be numbered . So that you don't escape with some number. 17 "so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name." You will not be able to buy or sell without this number. Without Digital ID - if it will be installed, you will not sell or buy anything.
Sonia Faria@222faria1976

@joanie_n_scott Rev 13:5 And he was given a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies, and HE WAS GIVEN AUTHORITY TO CONTINUE FOR FORTY-TWO MONTHS 42 months = 3.5 years! The mark of the beast is the vaccine....

English
0
0
0
11
perifetes retweetledi
Camus
Camus@newstart_2024·
A woman just said what a lot of people have been thinking but rarely say out loud. She’s tired of the “boss bitch / bad girl” energy that pretends men and women are exactly the same and can do everything equally. Her point: we’re equal in value, but we’re not the same. Women need more fat, more sleep, and we’re generally less stress-resilient than men. We run on a 28-day cycle while men run on a 24-hour one. The houses we live in, the roads we drive on, the entire infrastructure of society — most of it was built by men. Instead of seeing each other as competition, she says, we should recognise how beautifully we complement one another. And the next time you feel like looking down on men, remember the hard work your father, grandfather, and great-grandfather put in. A bit of respect costs nothing. It’s a refreshingly honest take in a world that loves to pretend biology doesn’t matter. What do you think — are we better off celebrating the differences between men and women, or pretending they don’t exist?
English
84
393
2.4K
81.6K
perifetes retweetledi
Josef Musil
Josef Musil@MusilJosef3·
Ten Macinka je božskej. Ale můžeme děkovat, že ho nainstaloval do funkce sám pan prezident s Kolářem. Tomu se říká výdrb na druhou.
Čeština
30
92
838
12.6K
perifetes retweetledi
Emad777
Emad777@Emad777_·
@vxunderground Fuck Playstation, talk about Lockheed Martin. Is this legit?
Emad777 tweet mediaEmad777 tweet media
English
2
2
47
8.5K
perifetes
perifetes@perifetes·
@AnthropicAI So you measured it. So what did you get? Is it a man or a woman?
English
0
0
0
3
Anthropic
Anthropic@AnthropicAI·
New Anthropic research: Emotion concepts and their function in a large language model. All LLMs sometimes act like they have emotions. But why? We found internal representations of emotion concepts that can drive Claude’s behavior, sometimes in surprising ways.
English
949
2.5K
16.7K
3.2M
perifetes
perifetes@perifetes·
👀 Nový výskum Anthropic: Koncepty emócií a ich funkcia vo veľkom jazykovom modeli. Všetky LLM niekedy pôsobia, akoby mali emócie. Ale prečo? Našli sme vnútorné reprezentácie konceptov emócií, ktoré môžu riadiť Claudeovo správanie, niekedy prekvapivo.
Anthropic@AnthropicAI

New Anthropic research: Emotion concepts and their function in a large language model. All LLMs sometimes act like they have emotions. But why? We found internal representations of emotion concepts that can drive Claude’s behavior, sometimes in surprising ways.

0
0
0
8
The Lunduke Journal
The Lunduke Journal@LundukeJournal·
MidnightBSD Becomes First Open Source Operating System to Ship Age Verification The just released 4.0.4 version of the FreeBSD derived Operating System includes "aged", new system wide daemon for handling age verification and attestation. Not an April Fools Joke.
English
18
32
223
10K
perifetes retweetledi
Kim Dotcom
Kim Dotcom@KimDotcom·
🤣
QME
274
1.6K
10.6K
724.2K
Sohail Lamvel
Sohail Lamvel@Lamvel·
@Arwenstar Apple just want to make sure kids aren't getting groomed etc online. Do the verification and move on.
English
26
0
1
2.1K
Nat
Nat@Arwenstar·
I’m interrupting a long break from here to share something I’m just furious about. I switched iPads, from the one I was using to another (better) 1 we’ve had for years. I simply transferred my stuff from 1 to another…and I have to confirm my age. I knew this was a thing now but I never update phone or iPad so I knew I wouldn’t see that dreaded message any time soon, I totally forgot transferring my stuff would mean an automatic software update. Silly me, uh? But…silly government, actually. Bloody awful, authoritarian govt! Apple knows I’m over 18, they don’t need verification, it’s the BLOODY GOVT that requires it. I’ve had this iPad in my house for years, I’ve had an Apple ID for years, there is NO VALID REASON for me to verify my age to be able to (fully) use MY OWN DEVICE bought years ago! Needless to say, I’m not verifying my age. Nuh-uh. Not happening. It’s the principle. This government has no real reason and *no right* to impose this on people. They’re not ‘protecting children’, it’s laughable to believe they care about that - what they do care about is tagging and controlling adults. This is how the digital ID abomination starts, and I’m not complying - I never ever will.
Nat tweet media
English
133
401
1.9K
108.7K
perifetes retweetledi
Reuters
Reuters@Reuters·
Exclusive: Vaccine makers Pfizer and BioNTech halted recruitment for a large US trial of their updated COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults aged 50 to 64, saying enrollment in the trials had been too low to generate the needed data reut.rs/4m4S5zZ
English
296
708
1.6K
453K
perifetes
perifetes@perifetes·
This is not just about the Covid scam that was here. This pattern is repeated in everything. People were fucked-up by emotions that someone purposefully evoked in them and then manipulated them like puppets on strings - fear, death, a sense of responsibility, "If you don't get vaccinated, you'll kill your grandmother", "The vaccine is freedom" - Idiots, fools never even dreamed that someone had TAKED their freedom and then returned it WITH CONDITIONS. Nothing seemed strange to them at all. Because they were hypnotized by their emotions. And emotions turned off their brains. "Normal" people tried to stop them, but the hypnotized puppets were already acting like animals, not like reasonable people - "eliminate, isolate, lock up the unvaccinated!". Vaccination lotteries - a total absurd delusion - nothing about it was strange to them anymore. It wasn't strange to them that even cleaners in public toilets, firefighters, random volunteers (!!!) were giving them some injections. Everyone, except maybe total psychopaths, has some emotions. That's normal. But it's not normal to let them control you. It's the absence of self-control and elementary self-discipline. You can have emotions - BUT THEY CANNOT CONTROL YOU. Do you think those sheeps learned any lessons from that? No.. no and no. They deny that it happened..
English
1
0
2
47
Kenny Carmody
Kenny Carmody@KennyCarmody·
In my post psychological autopsy of COVID we keep returning to the same question. Why did some people see it immediately, and why could others not see it at all, no matter how clear the evidence became? We have offered many answers. The neuroscience of prefrontal cortex degradation. The sociology of conformity under institutional pressure. The Milgram obedience data. The Asch conformity findings. The shadow psychology of people who needed their compliance to be universal. All of those answers are true. But there is a deeper layer. One that Jesus addressed directly in Matthew 13, and that Jung spent his entire career mapping from a different direction. When the disciples asked Jesus why he spoke in parables rather than plainly, his answer was one of the most psychologically honest statements in the entire New Testament. Because to you it has been given to know the mysteries of the kingdom, but to others it has not been given. To the one who has, more will be given. To the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away. This passage has been weaponised for centuries as a justification for spiritual hierarchy, the elect, the saved, the chosen few set above the damned majority. That reading has always troubled people with a genuine conscience. It should. But read it as psychological diagnosis rather than theological verdict and something entirely different emerges. The symbol, the parable, the deeper meaning, the truth encoded in the story does not fail to land because some people are spiritually inferior. It fails to land because the symbol can only activate in a person who has the corresponding psychic reality to receive it. The unconscious content that the symbol is designed to reach must already exist within the person, must already be accessible, for the symbol to find purchase. If that content is buried too deep, if the defensive structures around it are too solid, if the person is too invested in the psychological architecture they have built around their current understanding of reality, the symbol bounces off. The parable about the sower becomes a nice story about a farmer. The warning encoded in it never arrives. To the one who has, meaning the person who has already begun to open. Who has already cracked. Who has already suffered enough, been disillusioned enough, been broken open enough by life, by loss, by the collision of their beliefs with an intractable reality, that person has already created the interior space into which the deeper meaning can enter. The symbol finds the wound and speaks directly to it. To the one who has not, meaning the person whose ego is still hermetically sealed. Whose defenses are fully intact. Who has not yet encountered the suffering or the disillusionment that would make them permeable. This is not condemnation. It is diagnosis. And it explains COVID with a precision that sociology alone cannot match. The people who saw it, who recognised immediately that something was profoundly wrong, who felt in their bodies the falseness of the narrative before they could articulate why, were not smarter. They were not spiritually superior. They were more broken open. They had already been through something that cracked the hermetic seal of the defended ego. A serious illness. A loss. A betrayal by an institution they had trusted completely. An encounter with suffering that the official story could not contain or explain. The crack let the light in. And the light let them see. The people who could not see, who not only complied but enforced, who not only accepted but attacked, were not stupider. They were more defended. Their psychological investment in the existing structure was too great. Their defenses too solid. The cost of seeing too high given everything that seeing would require them to dismantle. This is not condemnation. It is diagnosis. And it carries an implication that should inform everything about how we approach the people around us who still cannot see.
Kenny Carmody tweet media
Kenny Carmody@KennyCarmody

COVID in a Psychological Autopsy🧵 We spent five years debating the science. We have barely begun to examine ourselves. Let us conduct a genuine psychological autopsy of what happened during COVID. Not a political one. Not a medical one. A psychological one because until we understand what drove human behaviour during those years at the deepest level, we are condemned to watch it happen again. And it will happen again. What the virus revealed about human nature was more contagious than the virus itself. This story did not begin in 2020. It did not begin with Milgram in 1961 or Zimbardo in 1971 or Asch in 1951 or any other event in the last centuries. It began, if you read it that way, in a garden. Adam and Eve did not eat from the forbidden tree because they were evil. They ate because they were afraid of missing something, because an external voice told them that what they had was not enough, and because the social pressure of that moment, the presence of another person making the choice, the authority of the voice offering the fruit overrode their own inner knowing. The first act of human compliance with a destructive authority is written into the oldest story we have. Cain and Abel goes further. The first murder in human history was not committed by a monster. It was committed by a man consumed by comparison, by wounded pride, by the shadow of his own inadequacy projected outward onto his brother. He did not see himself as evil in the moment. He saw himself as justified. As wronged. As acting on a feeling so overwhelming it demanded expression. This is the psychological pattern that has repeated across every atrocity in recorded history. Not monsters. Ordinary people. With unexamined shadows. If you study Nazi Germany, if you read Hannah Arendt on the banality of evil, if you sit with the Milgram data, if you study the actual psychological profiles of the men who administered the Holocaust what you find is not a population of uniquely evil individuals. You find clerks. Teachers. Fathers. Men who loved their children and fed their dogs and went to church on Sundays. As one of the sharpest psychological observers of our time has put it, if you study those perpetrators and ask what they were like, the answer is they were just like you. And if you do not know that, it simply means you do not know anything about people, including yourself. That is not a comfortable sentence. It is the most important sentence in this entire post. Because the question COVID demanded of every individual was not primarily a medical one. It was a psychological one. Who are you when the authority speaks? Who are you when the crowd moves? Who are you when compliance is rewarded and dissent is punished? Who are you when the cost of standing still while others march past becomes socially, professionally, and personally unbearable? The psychology of compliance under COVID breaks down along lines that have been well documented in social science for decades. The compliant individual is not, in most cases, malicious. They are frightened. And beneath the fear is something deeper, a fragile relationship with their own authority. A lifelong pattern of looking outward for validation, for safety, for the definition of what is real and what is acceptable. These are people who were never taught or were actively discouraged from learning to trust their own perception when it contradicts the consensus. When the authority spoke, they felt relief. Not just safety from the virus. Relief from the anxiety of having to decide for themselves. Relief from the responsibility of independent judgment. The system told them what was true and what was good and all they had to do was comply and in exchange they received belonging, approval, and the deep comfort of being on the right side. And then something more sinister activated.

English
64
193
534
29.7K
perifetes
perifetes@perifetes·
Hlavný výskumník Anthropicu Nicolas Carlini (67,2 tis. citácií na Google Scholar) hovorí, že Claude je lepší bezpečnostný výskumník ako on, zarobil 3,7 mil. dolárov z exploitov inteligentných kontraktov a našiel zraniteľnosti v Ghostovi (projekte s viac ako 52 tis. hviezdičkami na GitHub).
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai

Anthropic top researcher Nicolas Carlini (67.2k citations on Google Scholar) says Claude is a better security researcher than him, made $3.7 mn from exploiting smart contracts, and found vulnerabilities in Ghost (a 52K+ Github star project).

0
0
0
22
perifetes
perifetes@perifetes·
@kimmonismus If you say "a" say "b" too. - How do our current distribution networks cope with the instability of supply from these amazing entry point systems? - How is the fluctuation of supply resolved depending on 1000 external conditions? (clouds, cold, calm)?
English
1
0
0
105
Chubby♨️
Chubby♨️@kimmonismus·
Global solar energy capacity has skyrocketed over the last decade: - 228 gigawatts in 2015, providing 1% of the world's electricity - 759 GW in 2020, or roughly 3% of global energy demand - 2,919 GW in 2025, according to estimates - solar now supplies about 10% of the world's energy, more than nuclear at 9% (source: DW)
Chubby♨️ tweet media
English
41
35
328
14.1K
perifetes
perifetes@perifetes·
Dnes, ak webová stránka chce vedieť váš vek, spýta sa vás naň. Aby ste to obišli, môžete použiť VPN alebo jednoducho nenavštíviť stránku. Ale keď sa overovanie veku presunie do vášho operačného systému, to sa zmení, pretože vaše zariadenie určí váš vek raz a zdieľa tento signál s každou aplikáciou.
Proton VPN@ProtonVPN

Today, if a website wants to know your age, it asks you. To circumvent this, you can use a VPN, or just not visit. But when age verification moves into your operating system, that changes, because your device determines your age once, and shares that signal with every app. 2/6

0
0
0
31
perifetes
perifetes@perifetes·
To je to, čo sa deje vo vnútri mozgov zranených po spike. Nie úzkosť. Nie psychosomatický prejav. Nie stres z prežívania pandémie. - BBB-penetrujúce nanočastice. - Patogénny spike proteín produkovaný neurónovými bunkami. - Semienkovanie amyloidu. - Vznik mikrokrvných zrazenín. - Neurozápal. - Progresívne neurovaskulárne poškodenie sa hromadiace v tkanive, ktoré sa nemôže regenerovať tak ako periférne tkanivo. Neurologické príznaky, ktoré zranení hlásia: - kognitívna hmla, - zmeny osobnosti, - autonómna dysfunkcia, - záchvaty, - progresívna degradácia – majú presný biologický mechanizmus. Centralizovaná medicína sa ešte nedostala na úroveň. Oni popierajú škody. Alebo presnejšie, medicína vie a rozhodla sa nevidieť.
Kenny Carmody@KennyCarmody

The covid mRNA vaccines lipid nanoparticles cross the blood-brain barrier. The lipid nanoparticles used to deliver mRNA in the COVID injections were not designed to stay in the arm. The bio distribution data, released only through court-ordered document requests, showed accumulation in the liver, ovaries, adrenal glands, and crucially, the brain. The LNPs were engineered for cellular penetration. It was engineered so that it has a positive charge on the lipid nanoparticles. That means that that charge is drawn to your inner mitochondrial membrane, so it creates a short circuit, like a scar. The damage that it causes is a scar that you can't see, but you see it in the disease you get, like, like myocarditis or turbo cancer,, neurological disorders, things like that. That is their entire design purpose. And the blood-brain barrier, the biological fortress that evolution spent millions of years constructing to protect neural tissue from exactly this kind of foreign intrusion, was not sufficient to stop them. BBB-penetrating LNPs. Documented. In the data they did not want you to see. Once inside the central nervous system, the mRNA payload instructs neural and glial cells to produce spike protein. Spike protein that the brain was never designed to encounter. Spike protein that is pathogenic, that triggers neuroinflammation, that activates microglia, that disrupts the delicate electrochemical environment upon which cognition, emotion, autonomic function, and consciousness itself depend. And then there is the amyloid problem. Spike protein has been documented to misfold and seed amyloid-like structures, the same class of pathological protein aggregates associated with Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and other devastating neurodegenerative conditions. It has been demonstrated in vitro and is now being observed in the clinical presentations of the severely post-vaccine injured, the cognitive decline, the neurological deterioration, the symptoms that arrive without a prior history and progress without a conventional explanation. The microclots that Resia Pretorius documented. The fibrous, amyloid-containing clots that resist normal fibrinolysis and obstruct microvascular circulation throughout the body including cerebral circulation. Reduced oxygen delivery to neural tissue. Chronic, low-level, invisible ischemia accumulating over months and years. Add to this the direct interaction of spike protein with the ACE2 receptors lining the blood-brain barrier itself, disrupting barrier integrity, increasing permeability, and creating a feedback loop in which each subsequent inflammatory event further compromises the protection the barrier was providing. This is what is happening inside the brains of the post-spike injured. Not anxiety. Not psychosomatic presentation. Not the stress of living through a pandemic. BBB-penetrating nanoparticles. Pathogenic spike protein produced by neural cells. Amyloid seeding. Microclot formation. Neuroinflammation. Progressive neurovascular damage accumulating in tissue that cannot regenerate the way peripheral tissue can. The neurological symptoms the injured are reporting the cognitive fog, the personality changes, the autonomic dysfunction, the seizures, the progressive deterioration. have a precise biological mechanism. Centralised medicine just has not caught up yet. They deny the harms. Or more accurately, the medicine knows and has chosen not to look.

0
0
0
11
perifetes retweetledi
Ivo Svoboda
Ivo Svoboda@isvoboda77·
@GeGvendy Když se nudím, rad AI trápím, pak se dostaneme třeba k takovýmto závěrům ale trvá to a vůbec se jí nechce:
Ivo Svoboda tweet media
Čeština
0
1
1
32
Rapid Report
Rapid Report@RapidReport2025·
WATCH: Panic breaks out onboard Delta Air Lines Airbus to Atlanta after engine failure with visible fire forces return to São Paulo
English
839
2.1K
20.6K
10.6M