Per Torstensson

5.4K posts

Per Torstensson banner
Per Torstensson

Per Torstensson

@pertorstensson

As it seems, I am a serial re-tweeter. One day I will contribute with original, thoughtful content. But not this day.

Stockholm Katılım Ağustos 2007
875 Takip Edilen570 Takipçiler
Per Torstensson
Per Torstensson@pertorstensson·
@nikitabier To be fair, there is value in aggregation... Perhaps let them keep 30% à la App Store?
English
0
0
0
31
Nikita Bier
Nikita Bier@nikitabier·
Over the past month, we have identified a number of large accounts that have been programmatically reuploading content from smaller accounts to game the revenue share program and circumvent crediting the original author. We are now identifying these posts and allocating the impressions entirely to the creator. If you have insightful commentary about a post, we recommend using the Share Video or Quote feature to ensure your posts are properly attributed.
English
2.6K
3.9K
38.8K
3.4M
Per Torstensson retweetledi
Henrick Johansson
Henrick Johansson@compliantvc·
A trolley is about to hit 5 people laying on the track You can redirect the car, but the other track has not yet reached regulatory approval or completed its 1 year environmental testing period, so operating a train car on it is a violation of transit regulations What do you do?
Henrick Johansson tweet media
English
553
692
8.5K
545.1K
Annick De Ridder
Annick De Ridder@AnnickDeRidder·
Ondertussen heeft @Tesla FSD al meer dan 2000 testkilometers afgelegd op onze Vlaamse wegen. De voorziene 5000 km zullen zo snel gereden zijn om de specifieke verschillen met de Nederlandse weginfrastructuur in kaart te brengen met het oog op een snelle homologatie. @elonmusk #tesla #FSD
Nederlands
116
156
1.3K
214.2K
Blake Scholl 🛫
Blake Scholl 🛫@bscholl·
There’s a missing place in the market for a company that regularly introduces magical, aspirational consumer products. Apple did under Jobs—every keynote was like Christmas, with something new and wonderful. Tesla almost owned this. No one owns “surprise and delight” anymore.
Franz von Holzhausen@woodhaus2

After nearly 18 years I can stop working on Model S and X. We put so much love into these products, but will continue to pour that into the future products. Thanks to everyone who believed in and supported these cars through the years. We strived for the best and will never stop. Saying goodbye to something great and making room for something even greater!

English
31
13
446
34.4K
Nostalgic Gamer
Nostalgic Gamer@16bitnostalgia·
Mentally…I’m still here
Nostalgic Gamer tweet media
English
119
774
6.5K
111.2K
Per Torstensson
Per Torstensson@pertorstensson·
@larsmoravy @elonmusk Thank you Lars. I have a somewhat unhealthy affection to both my 3 (2019) and X (2023). Your love truly shines through, they are things of beauty.
English
0
0
4
184
Lars
Lars@larsmoravy·
Each one built with love. When @elonmusk said that, really choked me up. Everyday we make our products with our customers in mind. We love all of you more than you know. Thanks for CONSTANTLY lifting us up. ALL THE LOVE!!!!
Lars tweet media
English
338
578
7.6K
525.5K
MissPookems
MissPookems@MissPookems·
‼️GAMERS ONLY‼️ Which game has a soundtrack so good that it lives in your head rent-free?
English
6.4K
127
3.3K
1.1M
Per Torstensson
Per Torstensson@pertorstensson·
@bscholl @JeffBezos @elonmusk 1. It’s only federal tax on the table for discussion, no? 2. They would still be beholden to pay all other taxes, no? 3. Be honest, are you not privileged with some sort of tax benefit in your life?
English
0
0
2
264
Blake Scholl 🛫
Blake Scholl 🛫@bscholl·
@JeffBezos @elonmusk If half the people don’t pay any tax, then we have 50% of the population with votes and no stake in how government is run. And they can simply vote themselves ever greater handouts at the expense of more productive people. This would not end well for America.
English
327
169
2.8K
146.5K
Jeff Bezos
Jeff Bezos@JeffBezos·
Thank you. The important part is zeroing out taxes on the bottom half. Best way to put money in someone’s pocket is to not take it out in the first place. Bottom half is only 3% of total tax revenue. But it’s very meaningful to that person. Zero it out.
Chris | Venture X Media@thecoachchris_

Facts It's great that Jeff Bezos thinks this way, because too many people who don't make money think that giving money to the government will solve a lot of their problems. They think these government programs are the answer, and it's clearly not. You can look at the federal level or at the state level, and you will see that a lot of government programs are simply waste.

English
3.3K
5.4K
54.5K
8.6M
Per Torstensson
Per Torstensson@pertorstensson·
@KRoelandschap Even if it was already simmering, the US election proved how strong the Swedish hive mind is; The Elon-disgust quickly became - and remains - *very* strong, alas. And unfortunately, many of them are bureaucrats in all the wrong places.
English
0
0
2
51
Per Torstensson
Per Torstensson@pertorstensson·
@AFV_magasin Vilken fullständigt efterbliven take på att beskriva en ineffektiv elmarknad
Svenska
0
0
0
45
Ed Ludlow
Ed Ludlow@EdLudlow·
Parag Agrawal on the show today! His startup Parallel launches “Index” — a new system designed to compensate publishers and creators when AI agents use their content. @paraga
English
5
3
44
3.4K
Bojan Tunguz
Bojan Tunguz@tunguz·
I’ve been *slowly* getting back into the habit of writing by hand. I would really love to do it far more than I currently do.
Ihtesham Ali@ihtesham2005

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper. Her name is Audrey van der Meer. She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth. The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time. Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen. Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task. When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once. The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected. When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely. Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG. Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events. The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem. Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next. Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve. Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews. Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad. Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page. A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched. The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall. The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down. The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page. That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it. Two studies. Two countries. Same answer. Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast. Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth. You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick. The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew. Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

English
11
6
92
11.4K
Ara Mustafa
Ara Mustafa@NordnetAra·
Har du tips på stekpanna? Min go-to-stekpanna har efter lång och trogen tjänst kapitulerat. Letar efter en ny, non-stick, lättskött, pålitlig stekpanna. Inget komplext. Vad har ni där ute?
Svenska
135
0
41
82.6K
Per Torstensson
Per Torstensson@pertorstensson·
@gnoble79 @biggjay29 Says a charlatan who never worked to make an atom more valuable but only knows how to move other peoples money while skimming from the top
English
0
0
1
31
George Noble
George Noble@gnoble79·
@biggjay29 Elon Musk is a dishonest grifter. He has not earned his cost of capital. He is an epic failure.
English
8
0
36
1K
George Noble
George Noble@gnoble79·
Elon Musk is the Ivar Kreuger of our time, and the OpenAI trial is PROVING it in real time. If you don't know who Kreuger was, you should: In the 1920s he was the most admired businessman in the world. The "Match King." He controlled 90% of global match production, lent money to sovereign governments, and his securities were the most widely held in America. But after his death in 1932, auditors spent 5 years untangling over 400 subsidiary companies and discovered the whole thing was held together with fictitious assets, forged bonds, and the unquestioning loyalty of people too dazzled to ask questions. Investors lost $750 million (~$17 billion in today's money). His deficits exceeded Sweden's national debt. Doesn't this sound familiar? The Musk playbook is the most DANGEROUS house of cards I've witnessed in my career. This week in federal court, Musk took the stand to argue that Sam Altman stole a charity. 3 days later he'd contradicted himself under oath so many times that the judge told his lawyers she suspected plenty of people don't want to put the future of humanity in Mr. Musk's hands. OpenAI's attorney asked if Tesla is pursuing AGI. Musk said no. The attorney then pulled up Musk's OWN post from March 4 where he wrote Tesla will be one of the companies to make AGI. His own words entered into evidence against him. BY HIM. Then the attorney asked if xAI used OpenAI's models to train Grok (which violates OpenAI's terms of service). Musk called it a general practice among AI companies. Pressed for a direct answer, he said "partly." Think about that: Musk is in court accusing OpenAI of betrayal while admitting under oath that xAI violated the very same company's terms of service to build Grok. Then came the credibility test: Musk was asked to name his companies that benefit society. He listed Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, and X without hesitation. Every one of them is an uncapped for-profit enterprise. Then why did xAI start as a benefit corporation and quietly flip to a for-profit C-corp? No clean answer. This is someone who repeatedly launches entities with noble-sounding charters and converts them into for-profit corporations once the money gets serious. Then his money manager Jared Birchall took the stand: OpenAI's lawyer asked about the donor-advised funds at Vanguard and Fidelity that Musk used to send his $38 million. Did Musk have any legal right to direct where the money went once it entered the DAF? Birchall couldn't answer. Said the legal question was beyond his expertise. The entire lawsuit hinges on that donation creating enforceable obligations. But the man who managed Musk's money just told a federal jury he can't confirm Musk had any enforceable claim over those funds. Now step back... This is a man who promised full autonomy by 2018, a million robotaxis by 2020, and unsupervised FSD by June 2025. EVERY deadline was missed. He claimed he invested $100 million in OpenAI. The real number was $38 million. His defense? His "reputation" made up the difference. Kreuger had 400 subsidiaries and used one entity to prop up another through structures nobody could follow. Musk has Tesla, SpaceX, xAI, Neuralink, the Boring Company, and X. He shifts AI talent from Tesla to xAI, has xAI building the brains for Tesla's Optimus robot, and uses X as a megaphone while the algorithm amplifies his narrative to 200 million followers. Kreuger's investors trusted the man, NOT the math. They loved the confidence. They stopped asking questions because the aura of genius made questioning feel foolish. The same psychology applies to Musk's empire today. Kreuger's reckoning took 5 years of forensic auditing after his death. But Musk is providing his in REAL TIME: contradicting his own posts under oath, admitting to the practices he's suing others for, watching his logic collapse under cross-examination. Different decade. Different industry. Same ending. The truth always catches up.
George Noble tweet media
English
227
1.5K
3.5K
197.9K