Peter MacMahon

61 posts

Peter MacMahon banner
Peter MacMahon

Peter MacMahon

@peter_macmahon

Irish Radiologist. Emergency Radiology. Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention. Artificial Intelligence.

Dublin City, Ireland Katılım Eylül 2017
209 Takip Edilen241 Takipçiler
Peter MacMahon
Peter MacMahon@peter_macmahon·
Thank you @theajnr. Our study has the potential to be particularly impactful in those health systems with a limited out-of-hours MRI service. CT can effectively distinguish between cases requiring urgent intervention and those that can be managed conservatively. @HSELive
AJNR@TheAJNR

"An Optimized CT Protocol for Detecting Suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome: A Comparative Analysis with MRI" doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A… #FellowsJournalClub @The_ASSR @ERadSociety

English
1
1
12
1.6K
Peter MacMahon
Peter MacMahon@peter_macmahon·
@bhwords @nelson_piercy This is too complicated. The standard of care in the non-pregnant population is CT (if appropriate), not venous ultrasound or V/Q. Radiation dose in pregnancy should no longer be a significant factor.
English
1
0
1
169
Peter MacMahon
Peter MacMahon@peter_macmahon·
🎉A heartfelt thanks to all involved in our OPTICA study, just published in European Radiology. which validated the safety of low-dose CT in pregnancy 🙏 Special gratitude to 113 pregnant Irish women who participated. Your contribution was invaluable in advancing care for others
Brendan Kelly@BSKellyRad

In our inaugural #EurRadiologySpotlight, we delve into the OPTICA Study's pivotal findings on safe, low-dose CT Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) in pregnancy, addressing critical needs in maternal health. OPTICA study is a prospective observational study. #PatientSafety #MaternalHealth

English
1
6
26
2.7K
Peter MacMahon retweetledi
RTÉ News
RTÉ News@rtenews·
The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital in Dublin has announced that it has become the first hospital in Ireland to use Artificial Intelligence across its radiology department rte.ie/news/health/20…
English
5
19
86
40.3K
Peter MacMahon retweetledi
Kevin Fischer
Kevin Fischer@kevinafischer·
I don't talk much about this - I obtained one of the first FDA approvals in ML + radiology and it informs much of how I think about AI systems and their impact on the world. If you're a pure technologist, you should read the following: There's so much to unpack for both why Geoff was wrong, and why his future predictions should not be taken seriously either. Geoff made a classic error that technologists often make, which is to observe a particular behavior (identifying some subset of radiology scans correctly) against some task (identifying hemorrhage on CT head scans correctly), and then to extrapolate based on that task alone. The reality is that reducing any job, especially a wildly complex job that requires a decade of training, to a handful of tasks is quite absurd. Here's a bunch of stuff you wouldn't know about radiologists unless you built an AI company WITH them instead of opining about their job disappearing from an ivory tower. (1) Radiologists are NOT performing 2d pattern recognition - they have a 3d world model of the brain and its physical dynamics in their head. The motion and behavior of their brain to various traumas informs their prediction of hemorrhage determination. (2) Radiologists have a whole host of grounded models to make determinations, and actually, one of the most important first order determination they make is whether there is anything notably wrong with a brain structure that "feels" off. As a result, classifiers aren’t actually performing the same task even as radiologists. (3) Radiologists, because they have a grounded brain model, only need to see a single example of a rare and obscure condition to both remember it and identify it in the future. This long tail of rare conditions to avoid missing is a large part of their training, and no one has any clue how to make a model that acts similar in this way. (4) There’s so many ways to make Radiologist lives easier instead of just replacing them, it doesn’t even make sense to try. I interviewed and hired 25 radiologists, whose primary and chief complaint was that they had to reboot their computers several times a day. (5) A large part of the radiologist job is communicating their findings with physicians, so if you are thinking about automating them away you also need to understand the complex interactions between them and different clinics, which often are unique. (6) Every hospital is a snowflake, data is held under lock and key, so your algorithm might not work in a bunch of hospitals. Worse, the imagenet datasets have such wildly different feature sets they don’t do much for pretraining for you. (7) Have you ever tried to make anything in healthcare? The entire system is optimized to avoid introducing any harm to patients - explaining the ramifications of that would take an entire book, but suffice to say even if you had an algorithm that could automate away radiologists I don’t even know if you could create a viable adoption strategy in the US regulatory environment. (8) The reality is that for every application, the amount of specific and UNKNOWABLE domain knowledge is immense. LONG STORY SHORT: thinkers have a pattern where they are so divorced from implementation details that applications seem trivial, when in reality, the small details are exactly where value accrues. Should you be worried about GPT5 being used to automate vulnerability detection on websites before they’re patched? Maybe. Should you be worried GPT5 is going to interact with SOCIAL systems and destroy our society single-handedly? No absolutely not.
Yann LeCun@ylecun

This must be said and repeated. Yes, Geoff was totally wrong to predict a drop in radiologist positions. We knew that it was wrong when he said it. We have data now.

English
85
566
2.7K
1.6M
Peter MacMahon
Peter MacMahon@peter_macmahon·
@irvinederm Needs proper study. From the paper referenced on poster: "increased fluoroscopy use was not associated with an increased breast cancer prevalence." "We also did not detect an increased breast cancer risk by radiation exposure group or specialty type"
English
1
0
2
0
Peter MacMahon
Peter MacMahon@peter_macmahon·
Congrats to Mater Radiology Spr Bryan Buckley who provides a thought provoking perspective about medical imaging data storage and climate change in the prestigious journal Radiology. @MaterTrauma @UCDMedicine @IrishDocsEnv @HSELive @HSE_DA @HSE_NIMIS @radiology_rsna @UCDCompSci
Susanna I Lee@SusannaLeeRad

Radiology and global warming. How are radiologist contributing and how could we be more green? This #RadInTraining Perspective article authored by a radiology resident offers insights! @radiology_rsna @RSNA pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/ra…

English
0
3
31
0
Peter MacMahon
Peter MacMahon@peter_macmahon·
@drfranok @ross_moy @FerdiaBolster Yes definitely can be done. Quite good imaging possible. Probably do CT of needle to confirm securely in marrow first. Not sure how modern contrast pumps, that are very good at detecting pressure problems with intravenous use, would respond though.
English
0
0
1
0
Peter MacMahon retweetledi
AJNR
AJNR@TheAJNR·
"Multiphase CT Angiography: A Useful Technique in Acute Stroke Imaging—Collaterals and Beyond" | #NeuroRad bit.ly/3lhpYyq
AJNR tweet media
English
0
23
49
0