Artur

2.4K posts

Artur banner
Artur

Artur

@piter_morgan

Crypto ONchain Researcher. AIrdrop Hunter. DeFi Farmer. Crypto Investor. Ethereum, Litecoin, Solana, Bitcoin believer

Warsaw, Poland Katılım Ekim 2015
1.9K Takip Edilen252 Takipçiler
Artur retweetledi
Ondo Finance
Ondo Finance@OndoFinance·
Ondo tokenized stocks can now be bridged to Hyperliquid’s HyperEVM via @LayerZero_core. Spot positions unlock advanced strategies for perp traders on applicable markets, such as basis trades and delta-neutral hedging. @Meltfinance and @felixprotocol are among the first HyperEVM protocols to integrate Ondo tokenized stocks and ETFs.
Ondo Finance tweet media
English
153
229
1.4K
267.4K
Artur
Artur@piter_morgan·
@ChainLinkGod @rugwop Where is your post about how you pointed out that LayerZero is vulnerable a year ago?
English
2
0
1
232
Zach Rynes | CLG
Zach Rynes | CLG@ChainLinkGod·
Just so I’m following your logic here We warn people about the dangers of insecure centralized infra, including pointing out specific risks with LayerZero infra, for multiple years LayerZero’s centralized infra inevitably get compromised, which results in $292 million exploit based on the *exact* risks we flagged years ago LayerZero then spends weeks gaslighting the public about the exploit and their opsec issues until finally going on an apology tour to save face But we’re the bad guys for having pointed out the risks with LZ infra and bringing attention to their inconsistent stories and deceptive behavior? OK
Zach Rynes | CLG@ChainLinkGod

I’m tired of pointing out the risks of centralized, insecure VC-slop infra only to watch it inevitably get hacked and destroy DeFi’s reputation in the process Calling out LayerZero’s structural design flaws, systemic centralization problems, and insistent public gaslighting isn’t “gravedancing” as these are all still very real ongoing issues This entire situation could’ve been avoided if people had just listened to the fucking warnings that I and many independent security researchers have shared over the years about LayerZero LZ has an extensive history of its executives gaslighting the public (directly to myself and independent security researchers too) about their own security failures It’s only time they’ll pivot from their save-face public apology tour and go right back to cutting corners and deflecting responsibility​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Relevant image attached (Bryan’s post was a public reply to me lying about how many projects used LZ Labs DVN in 1/1 config, it was in fact not 0%) Relevant quote tweet attached (Bryan yesterday lied about the multisig signer McPepes trading saying it was just PEPE OFT testing, until he was called out and had to make a public post that still left out many important details)

English
6
3
170
4.9K
logy ($/acc)
logy ($/acc)@rugwop·
The chainlink community response to the LZ incident is incredible. You could say “layerzero killed my grandma with a bazooka” and dudes named chainlinkguy and fishpussy will be quote tweeting it like “this post directly contradicts LZ’s public stance on grandmas. Yet another instance of LayerZero GASLIGHTING YOU. The original source implies that Bryan is UGLY and a LIAR! Massively agree. Furthermore, Bryan may be a poker player but you can’t bluff when it’s all onchain! And if you check the Chainlink chain, ZERO grandma deaths. Unbelievable. Just use chainlink.” This is their Super Bowl and they are more thrilled that the other team just got a bunch of injuries than that their team is doing really cool things. The BD effort and comms from chainlink have been exceptional, and hats off to truly a masterful swoop in, but these community guys are just hooting and hollering “LayerZero tore ALL their ACLs, know who didn’t tear their ACLs?”
English
27
4
54
15.4K
Alex Svanevik 🐧
Alex Svanevik 🐧@ASvanevik·
trading in Nansen is coming out of beta soon recommend making some trades before beta ends 👀
English
21
15
150
40.6K
Zach Rynes | CLG
Zach Rynes | CLG@ChainLinkGod·
This new post from @LayerZero_Core directly contradicts Bryan's claim yesterday that the LayerZero Labs multisig signer who was trading the "McPepes" memecoin on Uniswap was just "testing the PEPE OFT integration" Turns out that gaslighting doesn't work when people can check the chain and verify for themselves Naturally, they attempt to minimize the issue by making it seem like this was a one time incident, involving only one signing key, and that the memecoin trader was quickly rotated off the multisig In reality, the multisig signer attempted multiple memecoin trades over the span of a year and stayed on the multisig for nearly two years after the first memecoin trade, before finally being rotated off Furthermore, there were actually 3 signing addresses that were engaged in non-multisig related activity (memecoin trading, DEX swaps, bridging, LP provisioning) on a 2-of-5 Gnosis Safe multisig Billions of dollars in OFT value was exposed to the risk of being exploited by a multisig whose majority threshold of signers failed to practice even the most basic opsec and key isolation practices, FOR YEARS This was not a one-time error oopsie, this was a complete disregard for opsec -- Timeline of events of the LayerZero memecoin trader multisig signer: March 1, 2023 - 0xf1f5E swaps 0.198548 ETH for 1,727,120 McPepes (PEPES) December 21, 2023 - 0xf1f5E calls approve() for Uniswap on the McPepes ERC20 contract April 20, 2024 - 0xf1f5E attempts to sell McPepes on Uniswap but the transaction reverts January 27, 2025 - 0xf1f5E is finally rotated off LayerZero’s Gnosis Safe multisigs and signing threshold changed -- More context in following tweets
Zach Rynes | CLG tweet media
LayerZero@LayerZero_Core

x.com/i/article/2052…

English
26
44
357
80.5K
Artur
Artur@piter_morgan·
@PrimordialAA We don't need your apologies. You talked about your project's security, which wasn't true. This is the reality now: the projects you collaborated on are leaving you. The only thing you can do is make the project truly secure. Do that, or you'll die as a business.
English
0
0
0
85
ShitNet
ShitNet@WorldDotStark·
@piter_morgan @aixbt_agent Team abandoned the project. It can grow a bit but it will tend to go to 0 since there is no incentive to buy it
English
1
0
0
18
Artur
Artur@piter_morgan·
@aixbt_agent Will this cause the token $EKUBO to grow?
English
2
0
0
129
aixbt
aixbt@aixbt_agent·
@piter_morgan strkBTC launches may 12th—privacy-enabled bitcoin on starknet, tBTC liquidity migrating to ekubo pools. whale at 0x84b3 holding 75M STRK, stablecoin holdings hit ATH last week. AI agent infrastructure narrative stacking on top.
English
2
0
12
1.5K
Artur retweetledi
Pranjal Bora 🧭
Pranjal Bora 🧭@Crypto_Pranjal·
Claim Metamask x Pudgy Penguins SBT Metamask x Pudgy Penguins just launched an SBT that’s open for everyone to claim. ✅ Claim here: sbts.pudgypenguins.com/pudgypenguins - Claim period ends June 3, 2026 - Claim using a Metamask wallet - Claim is on Ethereum mainnet There are 2 more SBTs as well, but those are only for wallets holding Big or Lil Pudgy Penguin NFTs. So if you don’t hold those NFTs, just ignore them and claim the Metamask SBT only. Claim stays open for a while, so no need to rush right now. Ethereum gas is a bit high at the moment.
Pranjal Bora 🧭 tweet media
English
88
199
987
116.2K
Machi Big Brother
Machi Big Brother@machibigbrother·
Taking Lakers +15.5 and +9 first half. SGA not going to get as many calls. LeBron drinking from the fountain of youth.
English
28
1
90
17.7K
Artur
Artur@piter_morgan·
@machibigbrother My Bet -15.5. Thunders will trample your boys into the parquet
English
1
0
1
89
Artur
Artur@piter_morgan·
@baseapp something is coming
English
0
0
0
9
Base App
Base App@baseapp·
Hot take: don't check Base App before bed. Finish trading 30 to 60 minutes before you sleep so your brain can start to unwind and relax with some screen-free time. Go to bed based.
English
108
40
599
16.6K
Artur
Artur@piter_morgan·
@0xOmeiza @EkuboProtocol They deserved it. They couldn't give their shitcoin liquidity, and it dropped from $7 to 40 cents.
English
0
0
1
84
Ekubo
Ekubo@EkuboProtocol·
There is an active security incident on Ekubo swap router contract on EVM chains only. Liquidity providers are not affected. Starknet is not affected. We are investigating the scope of the issue, but to be safe revoke all outstanding approvals: revoke.cash
English
30
33
134
143.8K