Sabitlenmiş Tweet
pkyt65
3.3K posts
Red button:Women stop having children and humanity dies off but the last generation lives the most comfortable luxurious lives they have ever lived in human history.
Blue button: Humanity continues as is.
English
It’s absolutely baffling to me how every British man is not a complete far right wing lunatic at this stage.
AshleY@Aku_700
🚨 HORRIFYING: "HELP ME! PLEASE HELP ME! THEY ARE GOING TO RAPE ME!" 15-year-old British girl screams for help as two Muslim men drag her away to rape her in Leamington Spa park. She recorded the entire attack on her phone. The Muslim attackers were Afghan asylum seekers. Lawyers warned: "If the footage is released, there would be riots across the country."
English
@MatthewtrueI @Arlieredeyejedi @paleochristcon It's a shame nobody watches you. Your arguments are so good, and your IQ is through the roof. You deserve your own show on prime time TV.
English
@pkyt65 @Arlieredeyejedi @paleochristcon By your rationale, Destiny must have great arguments because he has a large following.
Obviously, size of following doesn't correlate with intelligence or quality of arguments.
Keep vomiting laughably idiotic nonsense.
English
Why not come on stream and have a chat with me about it "Matey"
Destiny | Steven Bonnell II@TheOmniLiberal
Debate what? On whether or not you can have moral preferences without believing in objective moral fact? Sure, give me the exact prompt, one debate of you going over the subject, and a couple of weeks to prepare and I'll gladly do it. As a side-note, I will be expecting the same level of epistemic justification for your perspective as you do for mine, and no amount of you squirming around screaming "internal critique! internal critique!" is going to change that.
English
@MatthewtrueI @Arlieredeyejedi @paleochristcon look in the mirror retard.
Andrew gets 5000 live viewers, whereas you have been on youtube for nearly 10 years and your last video has 31 views.
There is a reason people don't care what you have to say, and its because you don't have good arguments for your philosophy.
English
@pkyt65 @Arlieredeyejedi @paleochristcon He bailed mid debate, with an insincere claim that we'd continue it another time, so certainly not him.
English
@MatthewtrueI @paleochristcon you know how when you talk to an idiot and they don't follow your arguments and so you just agree with them and say whatever they want to get rid of them? We've all been there. Well, that day in the Discord you were that idiot.
English
@pkyt65 @paleochristcon He literally said we'd continue the debate another time. I'm not lying. You are. And it's pathetic.
English
@MatthewtrueI @Arlieredeyejedi @paleochristcon who won the debate you had with Andrew in the Discord?
English
@pkyt65 @Arlieredeyejedi @paleochristcon His little cult of sycophants laughed at me, when they weren't screaming like demented retards, because they're pathetic sycophants who line up to suck Andrew's dick and attack anyone who challenges him.
You're a bunch of shamelessly dishonest morons.
English
@MatthewtrueI @paleochristcon no you are the one who is lying, he was done with you because you're dumb
English
@pkyt65 @paleochristcon He literally said we'd continue it another time, you pathetic liar.
English
@pkyt65 @paleochristcon There's a couple people who tried to argue in good faith, it they fell short in the debate and couldn't even explain their positions properly. They didn't even know what objective moral even meant.
You're a bad faith actor. You're some snarky kid who thinks they're smart.
English
Exact prompt then.
How about.
Are the values and morals Destiny advocates for superior than the values and morals Andrew Wilson advocates for?
That seems reasonable and in line with the dispute. Ill even put in some rules for both of us to make it better for you. I wont do personal attacks if you dont and we can do it in person or via video and you can have a couple of weeks. Seems like all the conditions are in line.
Destiny | Steven Bonnell II@TheOmniLiberal
Debate what? On whether or not you can have moral preferences without believing in objective moral fact? Sure, give me the exact prompt, one debate of you going over the subject, and a couple of weeks to prepare and I'll gladly do it. As a side-note, I will be expecting the same level of epistemic justification for your perspective as you do for mine, and no amount of you squirming around screaming "internal critique! internal critique!" is going to change that.
English
The Bible does not account for modern dating.
English
@MacBeastyAMC @paleochristcon I am a woman, you disgusting not-even-good-for-fucking yank male hole.
You people are literally all identical, all human centipeding the same garbage into one another's mouths.
Do you people realise the WORLD hates your lot?
English
This chick is still seething because after the debate I beat her in on whatever (Shes a paycologist or something) she heard me tell Brian I didn't understand why she wore a short t shirt because her gut was hanging out. Lol.
Upsetty spaghetti.
Ann@LeftistBlondie
This pathetic tweet makes this so much funnier
English
@Loragar @paleochristcon surely you're intelligent enough to make a valid logical arguments, instead of saying the first thing that comes into your head, and jumping to conclusions.
English
@paleochristcon I don't know, mate! Maybe because the definition of "objective" directly conflicts with what morality is?
English
@MatthewtrueI @Arlieredeyejedi @paleochristcon you bought a philosophy not your own, and then put it in your voice box and pressed play. That's why people laugh at you.
English
@pkyt65 @Arlieredeyejedi @paleochristcon Retards screaming at me does not count as destroying my arguments.
The bs you serve up is laughably pathetic.
English
@pkyt65 @paleochristcon He bailed mid debate with an insincere promise to continue another time. Then his sycophantic followers screamed at me for a while.
My arse remained unkicked throughout.
You people are beyond pathetic.
English
@MatthewtrueI @Arlieredeyejedi @paleochristcon even the people in his Discord destroyed your arguments
English
@Arlieredeyejedi @paleochristcon Yes. In fact, ownership and rights are only coherent based on individual self ownership.
How can you own anything if you don't even own yourself?
Who has greater claim over you than you?
If rights/ownership is a thing, then individual self ownership is undeniable.
English
@MatthewtrueI @paleochristcon you already debated Andrew in his Discord and got your arse kicked
English
@paleochristcon I'm happy to debate you on morality and rights, Andrew.
Individual self ownership vs. force doctrine and Christian ethics.
I represent the Nations of Sanity project nationsofsanity.com
youtu.be/qOHhEOPiSW4?si…
YouTube
English
@avengethetruth @paleochristcon you don't know what the word subjective means.
English
@paleochristcon How is this even a debate? The answer to that prompt is no just like yours isn't superior to his. Debating morality is like debating whether the water at 10C is hot or cold. It's subjective.
English
@richardfitzw311 @TheOmniLiberal Andrew didn't say subjective meant arbritary. You just made that up.
English
@TheOmniLiberal I hate to say it, but Destiny is right. Subjective does not mean arbitrary. It's just that his subjective morals are inconsistent and gross.
English
People can occupy a ton of different positions whether or not they believe in moral facts. It's the laziest, most 20 IQ high school Christian take to go "oh, this guy doesn't believe in moral facts, therefor everything is arbitrary and trivial and they can believe in anything!!!"
Andrew Wilson@paleochristcon
If you want to debate if you think there are moral facts let me know lol.
English