
Matthew Sands
10.1K posts

Matthew Sands
@MatthewtrueI
Advocate for Nations of Sanity project (it's pretty much the only reason I'm here). https://t.co/lVPIL18UwX https://t.co/glzSxVe4Va
Katılım Kasım 2022
8 Takip Edilen123 Takipçiler


@Izen @Ends_wolf @StefanMolyneux The problem is that just gives you infinite regression where the question of where that came from remains.
The best we can do is kick the can down the road, but existence itself doesn't really make sense. It's either something from nothing or some kind of eternal infinity.
English

@Ends_wolf @StefanMolyneux other universes. something out of something is always more likely than something out of nothing
English

Haha modern government physics is just bongs and tarot cards at this point.
All day Astronomy@forallcurious
NEWS🚨: Big Bang wasn't an explosion from a point. It was fiery collision between our universe and another parallel universe in a higher dimension, new study reveals.
English

@RealEdFriendly Taking sides with the solution will remedy it nationsofsanity.com
youtu.be/qOHhEOPiSW4?si…

YouTube
English


@LibertariansUK Abolish the state, statism and all NAP-violating coercion.
The Nations of Sanity project presents the solution.
We should synergize our efforts.
nationsofsanity.com
youtu.be/qOHhEOPiSW4?si…

YouTube
English

@Rerazer Another cat has been herded.
Very interesting conversation with Michael Haupt (and I didn't delete it or f up the audio this time).
I know you've reached out to Michael too (who has now responded) so hope you speak with him soon.
I sense some synergistic potential rising
English

A very interesting conversation with Michael Haupt, discussing his critique of Nations of Sanity and how we can use this solution to create real change.
youtube.com/watch?v=y9y3Ht…

YouTube
English

This is the article that motivated this conversation.
frameros.substack.com/p/nations-of-s…
English

@Styx666Official It's lost on all statists. People need to understand the problem for the solution to reveal itself.
We can and must abolish statism and all NAP-violating coercion by establishing the NAP as law through a peace agreement.
nationsofsanity.com
youtube.com/watch?v=qOHhEO…

YouTube
English

@ThePholosopherX Those things don't magically happen.
Statism has to be abolished so that property rights and liberty can thrive.
The Nations of Sanity project presents the solutio.
Establish the NAP as law through a peace agreement.
nationsofsanity.com
youtu.be/qOHhEOPiSW4?si…

YouTube
English

@PeterMcCormack If you are pro freedom then you don't want to limit government, you want to abolish it.
The only equal rights is the right over ourselves, as individuals.
The Nations of Sanity project presents the solution.
Enjoy your beer.
nationsofsanity.com
youtu.be/qOHhEOPiSW4?si…

YouTube
English

Freedom and liberty should be the common ground, it is what can unite us.
This is why libertarians don’t fit neatly into left or right. They’re trying to apply a consistent principle.
If you are pro-freedom you align with the left on opposing stupid wars, defending civil liberties and opposing the prison industrial complex.
If you are pro-freedom you align with right on free markets, sound money, property rights, low tax and limiting the size of government.
The problem is both sides abandon freedom when it becomes inconvenient.
If you are confused on your position, ask yourself if it progresses freedom or restricts it, if it’s the latter you are likely on the wrong side of history.
If you actually believe in freedom, it has to be applied consistently.
Happy Friday, off for a freedom beer.
English

@DeepAnalysls @A_refusenik I appreciate what you're saying but I think there's an important distinction between rights violating and rights protecting force.
Enforcing defensive laws (protecting rights) doesn't require ruling authority. The right to protect ourselves and each other comes from selfownership
English

@MatthewtrueI @A_refusenik I’m not saying it should be this way. I’m saying any system that actually functions at scale ends up this way.
You can call it ‘rights protecting’ instead of ‘rights-violating,’ but the moment you enforce anything, you’ve created a coordinating authority.
English

@KingLibertarian No. Nor should we try.
This system is rotten and evil at its core and must be abolished.
The Nations of Sanity project presents the solution nationsofsanity.com
youtu.be/qOHhEOPiSW4?si…

YouTube
English

@liberty_lyss Step 3. Abolish statism and all NAP-violating coercion by establishing the NAP as law through a peace agreement.
The Nations of Sanity project presents the solution nationsofsanity.com
youtu.be/qOHhEOPiSW4?si…

YouTube
English


@DeepAnalysls @A_refusenik I'm describing what should and could exist. You're describing what does exist but you also seem to be asserting that it can only be this way, correct me if I am wrong.
I'm saying it doesn't have to be and rights violating force can be replaced with rights protecting force.
English

@MatthewtrueI @A_refusenik You’re arguing what should exist. I’m describing what does exist.
In any system, coordination and control concentrate somewhere. It’s a structural outcome, not a moral choice.
Sorry, I didn’t make this rule. Ashby’s Law of Requisite Variety did.
English

@DeepAnalysls @A_refusenik Not if you abolish that power. No one has right to rule others but everyone has right to protect themselves and each other.
The Nations of Sanity project presents the solution nationsofsanity.com
youtu.be/qOHhEOPiSW4?si…

YouTube
English

@A_refusenik There will always be a ruling class. In a collapse scenario, it might be a band of highly armed locals deciding what happens next.
Remove one control structure and another emerges to stabilize the system. Power fills the vacuum.
English











