Playcerapp

In exploring ChatGPT, I have experienced an interesting evolution of thought about whether or not it poses a threat to Google's search empire. Initially, like everyone else, I was fascinated and amazed. This gave birth to a broad sense of "everything is possible." I believe this line of thinking led many to the belief that ChatGPT could threaten search. Over time, I became less convinced. This was due to ChatGPT's shortcomings becoming more apparent. It makes errors, and it isn't very efficient at "getting things done." If you want to buy a ticket, book a reservation, or search for a new apartment, it simply can't do those tasks. And this is precisely where Google's core search generates most of its revenue. However, my thinking has shifted again, and here's why: for certain searches, ChatGPT is incredibly efficient. If you're simply looking for a fact, a piece of information, or to better understand something, it's amazing. The first victim of lost page views might be Wikipedia. There's no need to sift through pages of information; ChatGPT can take you straight to the answer. As an aside, I actually think ChatGPT is sometimes overly verbose (though this can obviously be changed). Occasionally, it provides too much information. If I ask, "how old is Jon Rahm," I get an answer that's 128 characters. It could be 2. Since it's an excellent research and learning tool, and importantly, because it's highly efficient, I have now added it to my first bookmark. I increasingly find myself starting more tasks with it. As it becomes more efficient, this trend will continue. This is why I have been oscillating about whether or not ChatGPT competes with search. I am leaning back toward yes. Not because it does everything Google can do, but because for the tasks it does well, it does them far more efficiently. It's a classic innovator's dilemma. As a result, it incrementally captures my attention and becomes my starting point for more and more tasks – a powerful position. There are many unanswered questions about integrations (or lack thereof) with deeper vertical players. I am pondering this topic extensively but don't have a complete answer just yet.