P P

It seems to me that the Japanese have this exactly right!! Islam is the enemy of all humanity!! We must ALL start posting “No Halal”, and “All Haram”!! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

The Siege of Malta by Mel Gibson. He says he wants to be in it. He would be the perfect cast for the leader of the Knights Grand Master, Jean Parisot de Valette. He looks just like him!

@AntiLeftMemes islam can also just be prohibited

“Islam must adapt to Sweden. It cannot be practiced the same way it is in Muslim countries. This is why I propose banning the burqa and niqab in all public places in Sweden.” Do you agree with Swedish 🇸🇪 Deputy Prime Minister Ebba Busch?

Islam is a scam. Ofege lasan ni. Arodan lasan ni allah #fypシ゚viral #viralvídeo @lindaikeji @instablog9ja

yes

yes

yes

Satan prit l’apparence de l’ange Gabriel pour tromper Mohammed et détourner de nombreuses personnes du Christ. « Et cela n’a rien d’étonnant, car Satan lui-même se déguise en ange de lumière. » (2 Corinthiens 11:14)

✝️⚔️The Templars are the ONLY Organisation who man the borders of Southern Europe to meet this threat head on BEFORE they reach the UK. Sadly we can't stop them all. This is what a Muslim invading army looks like. On their way to the United Kingdom. They are not coming to make friends. And Muslim Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has no intention of stopping them.

Chalukya and Hoysala Temples older than Islam.

🚨 BREAKING: Scott Presler just revealed on Capitol Hill that some senators are worried that it's TOO MUCH "HARD WORK" to pass the SAVE America Act with 50 votes + JD Vance "Then they'd be expected to work tirelessly on every piece of legislation." NO EXCUSES! Time to get to work! 🇺🇸 "We could get this passed with JD Vance's 51st vote." "The problem is this is hard work. I have heard the Senators simply don't want to do [a long filibuster] because if they show that it can be done without 60 votes, then they are going to be expected to work tirelessly on every piece of legislation." "And furthermore, the veil and the shroud of the 60 votes is no longer going to hide members of the Senate that will tell you to their face that they support the bill, but then secretly they don't want the bill to go through." "This is going to do a lot of good for accountability and transparency by showing the American people it can be done without 60." "And I think the Senators, pardon me for saying it, are a little bit mad that we're taking away what they've been able to hide behind for years." Huge props to @RepublicanStudy for pushing this through!

Narcissistic Entitlement. We welcomed immigrants as guests into our nation. We provided them with safety, security, prosperity, equal rights, freedom & opportunities. They thank us by denying the existence of our people & by attempting to erase & replace us. They bite the hand that feeds them. They can acknowledge the ethnic/ Indigenous people that inhabited this land prior to the creation of Australia but they intentionally dismiss the specific ethnic people that founded, created, built, bled, sacrificed everything for & died for Australia. They show a clear bias against White Australians & they are supporting the ethnic replacement of our people & the globalisation of our nation. They are antiwhite.

@kangminlee deep deep disappointment their parents and community are complete failures if your people are weak, your land will become moslem

I now understand how whites feel when they see one of theirs "convert" to Islam Immeasurable disappointment

A Christian girls’ school, led by woke Christians, was taken to a mosque to experience ‘cultural diversity.’ Muslim women made them wear burqas and kneel to worship Allah. Only one girl refused to kneel. Do you stand with this brave girl? A. Yes B. No

Please invite your local MP to our Rape Gang Inquiry parliamentary debate on Monday in Westminster Hall at 16.30. Let's put the pressure on.

ISLAM-SHARIAH LAW: SLAVERY IS STILL THEOLOGICALLY PERMISSIBLE Shariah law never abolished slavery. It regulated the ownership of human beings, permitted their sexual use, and embedded the institution into the Quran, the example of Muhammad, and classical jurisprudence. Even after most Muslim-majority nations formally banned slavery under external pressure in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the theological foundation remained intact. Slavery is still permissible in principle according to the foundational sources of Islam. Jihadist groups have repeatedly demonstrated that they can revive the practice by appealing directly to those sources without theological contradiction. THE QURANIC PERMISSION FOR OWNING AND USING SLAVES The Quran repeatedly refers to slaves as “those whom your right hands possess” (ma malakat aymanukum). This phrase designates men and women acquired through war, purchase, or inheritance as lawful property. Quran 4:24 permits sexual relations with married women except “those your right hands possess.” Quran 23:5-6 praises believers who “guard their private parts except from their wives or those their right hands possess.” Quran 33:50 grants the Prophet special permission regarding his wives and “what your right hand possesses” from among the captives. Quran 4:3 allows men to marry up to four wives or to take from among the female slaves they own. These verses do not treat slavery as a temporary evil to be phased out. They present it as a normal category within the life of the ummah (Muslim community). Female slaves could be used sexually without marriage. Captives taken in jihad became war booty to be distributed, ransomed, or kept. The text assumes believers will own slaves and regulates how to treat them, marry them in some cases, or free them for merit. It never issues a command to end the ownership of other human beings. Freeing a slave is listed as one possible good deed or act of atonement, but owning slaves is never condemned as sinful. MUHAMMAD’S EXAMPLE AS SLAVE OWNER, TRADER, AND DISTRIBUTOR Muhammad’s life sets the pattern that Shariah follows. Islamic sources portray him as an owner of male and female slaves, a trader in human beings, and a distributor of captives taken in battle. He acquired slaves through purchase and through the spoils of war. He kept female slaves as concubines, and at least one of his children was born to a slave woman. After raids, he took his share of the human booty and allocated the rest among his followers. When Muhammad freed individual slaves, those acts are presented as personal generosity or responses to conversion, not as steps toward dismantling the institution. For every slave he freed, others were taken and distributed. Classical jurists studied these accounts carefully and concluded that if the final Prophet of Allah owned, traded, and sexually used slaves without divine rebuke, then slavery itself cannot be inherently immoral. At best, one might argue that conditions have changed and that owning slaves is currently impractical, but the underlying right remains valid under the Quran and Sunnah. CLASSICAL SHARIAH CODIFIES SLAVERY AS LEGITIMATE Islamic jurists across the major legal schools developed detailed rules for acquiring slaves, their treatment, their sexual use, their children, their manumission, and their inheritance. Slavery was integrated into family law, criminal law, and the economics of jihad. Captives from non-Muslim lands could be enslaved. Children born to slave mothers inherited slave status unless freed by the master. Sexual relations with female slaves were explicitly permitted and regulated. These rulings were not fringe opinions. They represented the mainstream consensus for over a thousand years. The texts never reached a point of declaring chattel slavery incompatible with Islamic ethics. They regulated it, limited some abuses, and encouraged manumission as a meritorious act, but they preserved the right of Muslims to own other human beings. MODERN ABOLITION WAS PRAGMATIC, NOT THEOLOGICAL When Muslim nations eventually outlawed slavery, they did so under sustained international pressure, economic shifts, and diplomatic necessity. The foundational texts did not change. Reformers who tried to argue that the “spirit” of Islam pointed toward abolition were countered by traditional scholars who pointed out that the Quran and Sunnah embed slavery deeply into marriage, sexual ethics, inheritance, and the conduct of war. If Allah had intended total abolition, they argued, He could have commanded it clearly. Instead, He regulated slavery and presented it as a normal feature of society. This leaves a permanent gap. Secular laws may ban slavery today, but the theological permission remains available for anyone who returns to the Quran, the hadith, and classical fiqh. Groups such as ISIS openly revived slavery in the twenty-first century, capturing Yazidi women and girls as sex slaves and citing the same verses and prophetic example that classical jurists used. They faced no credible theological rebuttal from within orthodox Islamic sources, only pragmatic or political condemnation. BIBLICAL TRAJECTORY POINTS TOWARD FREEDOM Jehovah’s revelation moves in the opposite direction. The Old Testament regulated ancient forms of servitude in an agrarian world but strictly forbade man-stealing and selling persons into permanent bondage. It limited the duration of Hebrew servitude, instituted the Year of Jubilee for release, and commanded kindness toward servants and strangers. The trajectory consistently protected the vulnerable and loosened the grip of permanent ownership. The New Testament goes further. In Christ there is neither slave nor free. All believers stand equal before God. The apostle Paul urged a Christian master to receive back a runaway slave as a brother rather than property and effectively encouraged his freedom. Jesus took the form of a servant and washed the feet of His disciples. He offered Himself as a ransom for many rather than demanding ransom from captives. Christian abolition movements in later centuries drew directly from these principles to declare chattel slavery incompatible with the Gospel. THE DANGEROUS IMPLICATIONS THAT REMAIN Because Shariah never theologically rejected slavery, the institution can be revived whenever a group decides that the conditions for jihad and conquest have returned. The permission is not historical curiosity. It is live doctrine. Female captives can still be claimed as “those whom the right hand possesses.” Sexual slavery can still be justified by the same verses that classical scholars used for centuries. Modern bans rest on secular law and international norms, not on any internal Islamic declaration that owning human beings is inherently evil. This is the unsoftened reality of what the Quran, the Sunnah, and Shariah jurisprudence actually teach. Slavery was never declared sinful at the source. It was regulated, practiced by the Prophet, codified by the jurists, and left theologically available for future generations who choose to act on it. If it’s within your capacity and you value these educational posts, we appreciate any support on our ‘Buy Me a Coffee’ link found in our profile.

Maël Le Lagadec, an 18-year-old from France, has made global headlines after accomplishing an impressive feat in the Pyrenees. On May 9, he carried a 35 kg wooden cross (1.10 m high, 70 cm wide, and 11 cm thick) on his back, along with a 15 kg backpack, for approximately 14 hours to Pic d’Aneto. At 3,404 meters in altitude, it is the highest point in the Pyrenees, located in Spanish territory (Aragon). The action was motivated by the vandalism of the original metal cross, which had stood at the summit since 1951. In mid-April 2026, the cross was sawn off with a grinder and stolen. Maël decided to build a new cross with his own hands, using black walnut wood. In a statement, he explained: "A few weeks ago, we discovered that the Aneto cross had disappeared. With a friend, we launched this somewhat crazy project to rebuild it." Accompanied by his friend, the young man completed the grueling ascent and, upon reaching the top, knelt down in emotion. "I arrive, I kneel, and I cry!" he recounted. The new cross now marks the summit of Aneto once again.

Muslims in the West are not convincing people that their religion is the best by demonstrating its fruits and positive impact on their lives and communities. They are not persuading others by showing exceptional morality, good citizenship, productivity, charity, honesty, punctuality, credibility, scientific achievement, educational excellence, or outstanding business practices. Instead, what many people see are prayers in public squares used to project power and claim territory; preachers declaring that one day they will impose Sharia on everyone; cases of fraud and scams associated with some Muslim communities, such as the well-known Somali fraud cases in Minnesota; the Pakistani grooming-gang scandals in the UK; terrorist attacks across Europe carried out while shouting "Allahu Akbar"; intimidation and threats against those who criticize Islam; attacks on writers, artists, and critics such as Salman Rushdie, Theo van Gogh, and the staff of Charlie Hebdo. Even Tariq Ramadan, one of the most prominent Muslim preachers in Europe, was convicted of rape in Switzerland and sentenced by a French court to 18 years in prison for raping three women. So my question is simple: How have Muslims in the West demonstrated to Western societies that their religion is good for society and makes people better? If Muslims believe Islam is superior, shouldn't the strongest argument be the positive example they set through their conduct, achievements, and contribution to society rather than demands, intimidation, and calls for religious supremacy?

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 BREAKING: U.S. has launched a military action in self-defence in Iran’s Qeshm island against the IRGC