Sydney Carton, Esq.

@CS_Jack_B @bhhdhjdjds86216 @PomTerkins I never said otherwise.

@pmags30 @bhhdhjdjds86216 @PomTerkins Antizionism is not antisemitism

Judges are largely finding that criticism of Israel/Zionism is 1st amendment protected speech, not antisemitic. Ditto for slogans like “From the river to the sea” Major blows to pro-Israel lawfare operation theguardian.com/us-news/2026/m…

@MarcelloMaio @PomTerkins Yes

@pmags30 @PomTerkins But is your shirt actually linen?

@Ciscopanda @MasKpls @joschein @PomTerkins Depends on the specifics of the criticism, the context and the speaker.

@pmags30 @MasKpls @joschein @PomTerkins What’s the most common criticism you see that in your opinion is “disguised antisemitism” ?

@EvanPallotta @puncushion @joschein @PomTerkins Your subjective interpretation of your own subjective “rules” could not be more meaningless to me

@pmags30 @puncushion @joschein @PomTerkins It's definitively fair and bones to play by the same rules. Unless one thought they should be able to play by a different set in which case that would need to be clearly stated. Any subversion of the rules without stating intent could be viewed negatively by the masses. Get it?

@bhhdhjdjds86216 @PomTerkins You're confusing "antisemitism" with its myriad manifestations and the expression of "antisemitism" with the actions that may or may not accompany it.

@pmags30 @PomTerkins in the context of alleged discrimination at a university, it is absolutely relevant whether the behavior complained about is discriminatory in nature. read the opinion if you don't believe me courthousenews.com/wp-content/upl…

@EvanPallotta @puncushion @joschein @PomTerkins Sounds like you want to do whatever it is you want to do. Whether what you think is playing by the same "rules" is "fair and honest" is a different set of considerations.

@pmags30 @puncushion @joschein @PomTerkins I suppose we just play by the same rules as antisemitism, eh? Seems fair and honest.

@bhhdhjdjds86216 @PomTerkins That would be a bunch of bs. Whether a statement is "antisemitic" or not is hardly a legal/judicial determination.

@pmags30 @PomTerkins The court explicitly found that it was not antisemitic

@EvanPallotta @kundlejennerr @puncushion @joschein @PomTerkins You're going to need to be a bit more specific.

@kundlejennerr @pmags30 @puncushion @joschein @PomTerkins Jus trying to understand the rules. I saw Laura Loomer say some of the most racist and vile things about Muslims while saying the word antisemitism in the same post. And it seems like she had quite a bit of support from the same folks complaining about the danger of antisemitism

@EvanPallotta @puncushion @joschein @PomTerkins Depends on what you mean by "Muslim hate".

@pmags30 @puncushion @joschein @PomTerkins Do you feel the same about Muslim hate?

@MasKpls @joschein @PomTerkins As I said, it depends on the nature and specifics of the criticism and the context of both the speech and the speaker.

@pmags30 @joschein @PomTerkins “in disguise” based on what? truly?

@puncushion @joschein @PomTerkins It depends on the nature of the criticism and the context of both the speech and the speaker. Some criticism of Israel is totally legit; some is antisemitism in disguise.

@pmags30 @joschein @PomTerkins How can one criticize Israel without being antisemitic, according to you, counselor?

@puncushion @joschein @PomTerkins Dude, you’re lying. Move along.

@pmags30 @joschein @PomTerkins About what? That zionists reflexively conflate all criticism of Israel with antisemitism?

@puncushion @joschein @PomTerkins Then why are you lying?

@pmags30 @joschein @PomTerkins yeah, people don't seem to care too much about context when it's thrown at every criticism of Israel.

@redrick786 @PomTerkins Antisemitism is the natural reaction of antisemites towards Jews.

@pmags30 @PomTerkins So what? Anti-Semitism is a natural reaction to war-mongering Jews

@is_charizard @PomTerkins It depends on the criticism and the context. Some criticism of Israel is legit; some is antisemitism in disguise. But, NEITHER is “hate speech”.

@pmags30 @PomTerkins Hating a country or an ideology isn’t hate speech towards an ethnic/religious group.

@joschein @PomTerkins It depends on the criticism and the context. Some criticism of Israel is legit; some is antisemitism in disguise. Neither is “hate speech”.

@pmags30 @PomTerkins If it is merely criticism of Israel, it’s neither

@AlexGodofsky @Heminator Dems are so adorable when they begin to pretend they care about spending

If you took $200 billion from the top 5 most expensive school systems in the country and spent it on bombing Iran you would improve both countries.

@RobProvince "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules". -- Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals (Rule #4) Welcome to the party, pal.

Watching cancel culture aficionados suddenly realize the stupidity of their 20 year long movement is a sight to behold…..

I think some people need a reminder: Megyn Kelly tried to take Trump down before he was even elected in 2016. Steve Bannon was fired from the administration and later joined forces with Jeffrey Epstein to try to take Trump out. Massie has never been aligned with Trump. Tucker Carlson’s own texts in 2020 made clear how he actually felt. Candace Owens broke with Trump in 2022. MTG has never been a serious political force. So as you can see… Everyone leading the charge and telling you MAGA is dead has one thing in common: They’ve all turned on him at one point or another. And somehow, he’s still standing. MAGA isn’t dead. It’s just learned who not to listen to.