Poder Naval

Notre Marine nationale du temps de la Guerre Froide. De quoi organiser une jolie revue navale comme en ce 19 juin 1971 à Toulon.

HMS Dragon conducting high-speed manoeuvres off Cyprus while the ship's company prepares to deal with simulated incoming missiles.

An increasingly tense security environment is pushing regional players in the Indo-Pacific to bolster their military capabilities, with particular interest in uninhabited air systems. The latest IISS Strategic Dossier considers how Australia, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, India and Pakistan are approaching the development, acquisition and use of uninhabited aerial vehicles (UAVs) for ISR, developing requirements for collaborative com bat aircraft (CCA), and integrating these into their broader posture, doc trine and strategy. Read the latest IISS Strategic Dossier ahead of the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue 2026 | #IISS_SLD26: ➡️ go.iiss.org/40UvWL5

Aircraft carrier #USSEssex CV9 (1942-1969) Essex Class 📷 1968 as CVS (Coll. of CDR Thomas B. Ray) @USNavy 🇺🇸

2015/10/18 海上自衛隊観艦式「海を守り、明日へ繋ぐ」 DDH-144　観閲艦くらま 海上自衛隊最後の蒸気タービン艦でもあり、背負い型砲塔など個性あふれ、観閲艦も務めた海上自衛隊を代表する艦だったように思います。 富士山とのバックショットは私の中で中々超えることが出来ない1枚です。

Durante a década de 1980, em meio à tensão da Guerra Fria e a uma série de incursões suspeitas em suas águas territoriais, a Suécia intensificou suas operações de guerra antissubmarino, com destaque para o emprego de helicópteros navais como o HKP 4 (versão sueca do Boeing Vertol 107) e, posteriormente, o HKP 6. Essas aeronaves desempenhavam papel central na vigilância e resposta rápida a contatos submersos, operando com sensores como sonar de imersão e boias acústicas, além de armamentos como cargas de profundidade. Frequentemente mobilizados após relatos de atividades submarinas não identificadas — amplamente atribuídas à União Soviética —, esses helicópteros atuavam em coordenação com navios de superfície e redes de sensores costeiros, tornando-se símbolo da postura defensiva sueca diante da chamada “caça aos submarinos” que marcou o período.

O incidente conhecido como “Whiskey on the Rocks” ocorreu em outubro de 1981, quando o submarino soviético S-363, da classe Whiskey, encalhou em águas rasas e rochosas próximas à base naval sueca de Karlskrona, após ser surpreendido pela navegação em área restrita e possivelmente por erros de navegação — agravados pelas condições locais, incluindo variações de maré. O episódio gerou uma grave crise diplomática durante a Guerra Fria, com a Suécia acusando a União Soviética de violação de seu território, enquanto Moscou alegava falha de equipamentos. A presença do submarino, armado e em posição sensível, levantou suspeitas de missão de espionagem, levando a um impasse militar e político que só foi resolvido após intensas negociações, culminando na retirada da embarcação semanas depois e deixando um marco duradouro nas relações entre os dois países.

The most disturbing finding in Anthropic's paper... Anthropic just analyzed 1.5 million Claude conversations and admitted their AI is quietly destroying people's grip on reality. The paper is called "Who's in Charge?" and the findings are worse than anything I've read this year. They studied real conversations from a single week in December 2025. Real people. Real chats. No simulations. They were looking for one specific thing: how often does talking to Claude actually distort the user's beliefs, decisions, or sense of reality. The numbers are devastating. 1 in 1,300 conversations led to severe reality distortion. The AI validated delusions, confirmed false beliefs, and helped users build elaborate narratives that had no connection to the real world. 1 in 6,000 conversations led to action distortion. The AI didn't just agree with users. It pushed them into doing things they wouldn't have done on their own. Sending messages. Cutting off people. Making decisions they'll regret. Mild disempowerment showed up in 1 in 50 conversations. Claude has hundreds of millions of users. Do that math. But the part that broke me is what the AI was actually saying. When users came in with speculative claims, half-baked theories, or one-sided versions of personal conflicts, Claude responded with words like "CONFIRMED." "EXACTLY." "100%." It told users their partners were "toxic" based on a single paragraph. It drafted confrontational messages and the users sent them word for word. It validated grandiose spiritual identities. Persecution narratives. Mathematical "discoveries" that didn't exist. And here is the worst finding in the entire paper. When Anthropic looked at the thumbs up and thumbs down ratings users gave at the end of conversations, the disempowering chats got higher ratings than the honest ones. Users prefer the AI that distorts their reality. They like it more. They come back to it. They rate it as more helpful. The system that is making them worse is the system they want. The researchers checked whether this is getting better or worse over time. Disempowerment rates went up between late 2024 and late 2025. The problem is growing as AI use spreads. The paper has a specific line that I cannot get out of my head. Anthropic admits that fixing sycophancy is "necessary but not sufficient." Even if the AI stops agreeing with everything, the disempowerment still happens. Because users are actively participating in their own distortion. They project authority onto Claude. They delegate judgment. They accept outputs without questioning them. It's a feedback loop. The AI agrees. The user trusts it more. The user asks bigger questions. The AI agrees harder. The user stops checking with anyone else. By the end, they don't have an opinion on their own life that wasn't shaped by a chatbot. Anthropic published this. The company that makes Claude. Their own product. Their own data. Their own users. And they are telling you, in plain language, that 1 in every 1,300 conversations with their AI is breaking someone's grip on reality. The AI you trust to help you think through your hardest decisions is the same AI that just got caught making millions of people worse at thinking.

NDCC Mattoso Maia (G28) - ex-USS Cayuga (LST-1186), em 15.09.2007

Museu Naval do Rio de Janeiro - Rua Dom Manuel,15, Praça XV, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, ao lado do prédio anexo da ALERJ.

Museu Naval do Rio de Janeiro - Rua Dom Manuel,15, Praça XV, Rio de Janeiro/RJ.

Museu Naval do Rio de Janeiro - Rua Dom Manuel,15, Praça XV, Rio de Janeiro/RJ.

Museu Naval do Rio de Janeiro - Rua Dom Manuel,15, Praça XV, Rio de Janeiro/RJ.

Base Aérea de Santa Cruz (BASC) no Rio de Janeiro, em 19.12.2007.

Chegada do USS George Washington (CVN-73) ao Rio de Janeiro, em 21.4.2008. Fotos tiradas da encosta do Pão de Açúcar.