Bob Morris🌵☀️

"I was 16 when they told me girl Know your place this ain’t your world If you dress like that then you're asking for And you’ll go nowhere with a voice like yours Fuck it" youtu.be/2WoqCnVmV8w?si…

Any ethical politician would have publicly disclosed he owned the land as it is an obvious conflict of interest. 2/2

Utah Speaker of the House Mike Schultz actually owns 25,000 acres near the proposed Box Canyon data center obscenity. This reeks of corruption. Made worse by his sleazy evasions that he didn't know anything about the data center. ksl.com/article/514981… 1/2

Help Trump win bigly battles in Operation Epic Furious Strait to Hell! epicfurious.com

The electrical grid cannot handle all the proposed data centers. There is no short-term solution. fortune.com/2026/05/13/gol…

@StallionCornell @ChiarchiaroTena Oh look, an exceptionally dimwitted bot.

Building a massive water-sucking data center upstream from the collapsing Great Salt Lake is so transparently stupid on its face that I don’t understand how it was even seriously considered, let alone approved.

These gerrymandered maps only work if we don’t show up. That is what they are counting on. These maps will break under the pressure of turnout.

Doctors say that hantavirus can kill you. A guy who performs penile implants and another guy who brings raccoon penises home for “further study” say you’ll be fine if you take ivermectin and drink raw sewage. For busy cruise passengers, it can be hard to know who to trust

@nick_lindquist @flaccidodomingo I would go with surge pricing

@flaccidodomingo Of course. For a reasonable $1,200 a month

Central Park is great, but it takes up a lot of space and isn’t utilized to its full potential. That’s why I worked with McKinsey on a plan to make it a state of the art data center, complemented by rooftop parking and nuclear power. We can still build beautiful things.

@nick_lindquist Why would there be a need for humans and their cars. Replace the humans with robots. Then you can build at least one more floor.

Google is making $62 billion a quarter destroying the websites it NEEDS to survive. This is literally a death spiral that ends with Google killing itself. Let me explain what's going on... Google added AI summaries to the top of every search result in 2024. When you Google something now, the answer sits right there on Google's page. You never have to click anywhere. Google took the information from someone else's website, summarized it, and kept you inside Google's ecosystem. The result: 60% of all Google searches now end without a single click to any website. Small publishers lost 60% of their traffic in one year. Medium publishers lost 47%. Even the biggest names in media, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Business Insider, all saw traffic fall between 22% and 55%. The Axios CEO called it "a referral extinction event for the ad-supported web." Google's response to all of this was to tell publishers they can "opt out" of having their content summarized. But opting out also REMOVES your description from normal search results. So the choice Google gives you is let us steal your content for free, or become invisible on the internet. That's extortion. The Washington Post laid off another round of journalists this year because of it. Stereogum, one of the most respected music publications on the internet, had to BEG readers for donations. Business Insider cut 21% of its staff. Dozens of smaller publishers have shut down entirely. The people who actually CREATE the information Google summarizes are going bankrupt while Google posts record revenue. But here's where this gets interesting and where everyone stops thinking: Google's AI summaries are only as good as the content they summarize. If the publishers who write the original articles, run the original investigations, and create the original data go out of business, there is nothing left for Google to summarize. The AI starts recycling old information, the answers get stale, the quality drops, and users start noticing that Google's summaries are increasingly wrong, outdated, or useless. Google is essentially strip-mining the internet for short-term revenue. They are extracting all the value from content creators without paying for it, driving those creators out of business, and then wondering why the quality of their own product is declining. This is exactly what Napster did to the music industry in the early 2000s: Made content free, creators went broke, and quality collapsed. It took a decade to rebuild. Google is doing the same thing to the entire internet at 100x the scale. Rolling Stone, Variety, Deadline, The Hollywood Reporter, and Billboard are now suing Google for antitrust violations. Chegg, the education platform, lost 49% of its traffic and is suing too. The UK's competition authority just ordered Google to let publishers opt out without being punished. The DOJ already ruled Google is an illegal monopoly. And Google's defense in court is genuinely unbelievable. They argue that publishers CHOOSE to let Google index their content and can leave anytime they want. That's like saying you choose to pay protection money to the mob because technically you could close your business and move to another city. Google controls 90% of search. Leaving Google means leaving the internet. Meanwhile Google is investing billions in custom AI chips to make these summaries cheaper at scale. Every quarter the problem gets worse. The internet as we've known it for 25 years ran on a simple deal: Publishers make content. Google sends traffic. Advertisers pay for the traffic. Everyone wins. But Google just BROKE that deal and kept all the money.

@VitalVegas Do you think it could happen?

Lots of moving parts.

Help Jackie & Gabi from Elevate Utah out! They're the ladies that confronted Billionaire Kevin O'leary for calling them Chinese Agents. For their epic own of that piece of shit, & to help stop the data center insanity give them some love! @ElevateUtahPAC linktr.ee/elevateutah

Yesterday, I signed the bipartisan SB26-189 to keep Colorado a leading state for AI growth and innovation, supporting Coloradans and businesses. This law protects consumers, supports innovation, and makes clear that Colorado is a hub for new technology.

🚨 WOWWW — UTAH — the brilliant young women @kevinolearytv 🤥 accused of being Chinese ops just discovered Utah speaker of the house Mike Schultz (Republican) bought 640 acres of land right next to the data center site just 2 months before it was announced. Incredible find.

Jared Polis is a craven lickspittle.

Avant. Uncompromising. "I’ll break the bullet and I’ll bite the end This is disappointing news for both of us, my friend There’s nothing to you, and that’s very sad I looked for depth in a dick, that’s my bad You threw yourself under the bus" youtu.be/FHNdXyvFNlc?si…

Utah fights back against the grotesque Box Elder County data center, which would use twice as much electricity as the entire state and ginormous amounts of water in an arid area. “ I think it’s crazy that we’re even considering it.” utahnewsdispatch.com/2026/05/14/box…

Local opposition, soaring costs, missed construction deadlines. Big data centers aren't getting built. The Utah obscenity is a proposed 9 GW and IMO, never goes online. "Building A Data Center Is Difficult, And Nobody Has Built A 1GW Data Center Yet" wheresyoured.at/where-are-all-…

@zenpundit A more remote part of the Santa Monicas, however it shows how difficult clearing would be. Not even sure if chain saws could be used because of danger of sparks on a rock. Indeed, way too many big homes there border areas similar to this.