
Polycarp Nakamoto priv/acc
4.6K posts

Polycarp Nakamoto priv/acc
@polycarpweb5
#Web5 is more open and decentralized. Where you own the hardware, software and data, with no user agreements or contracts. It is a layer 3 built on #bitcoin.










NEW: Claude-powered AI coding agent deletes entire company database in 9 seconds — backups zapped, after Cursor tool powered by Anthropic's Claude goes rogue — Tom's Hardware


Judge Rakoff of the SDNY in US v. Heppner just warned everyone from vibe lawyering because anything they vibe lawyer can be discoverable, whereas actually consulting with a lawyer is generally protected from disclosure. Bradley Heppner was charged with securities fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy, false statements to auditors, and falsifying corporate records, all tied to an alleged scheme to defraud investors to the tune of more than $150 million. After Heppner’s arrest, the FBI seized devices and documents, including about thirty one documents memorializing his exchanges with @AnthropicAI @claudeai . The question before the court was whether those @claudeai communications were shielded from Government review by attorney client privilege or the work product doctrine. The court treated the case as a question of first impression about public AI tools in criminal investigations, but said ordinary privilege rules still controlled and required disclosure here. J. Rakoff held that they were not. Heppner’s Claude chats were discoverable because Claude was not his lawyer, the communications were not confidential, they were not made to obtain legal advice from counsel, and they were not prepared by or at the direction of counsel so as to qualify as work product. The attorney client privilege did not apply because the Claude exchanges lacked at least two, and likely all three, of the doctrine’s basic elements. First, they were not communications between client and attorney. Claude was not a lawyer, and the court rejected the idea that a public AI platform should be treated like ordinary neutral software in a way that would preserve privilege, emphasizing that recognized privileges rest on protected human relationships involving fiduciary duties and professional discipline. Second, the court found the communications were not confidential. Anthropic’s privacy policy says Anthropic collected user inputs and outputs, could use them to train Claude, and could disclose data to third parties, including regulators and parties involved in claims or litigation. Heppner could not reasonably expect confidentiality. Third, the court found that Heppner was not communicating with Claude to obtain legal advice in the legally relevant sense - i.e. in order to facilitate discussions with his actual lawyers. Because Heppner used Claude on his own, the key question was whether he sought legal advice from Claude itself, not whether he later intended to discuss the subject with lawyers. Claude expressly disclaimed that it was a lawyer (because obviously its not a lawyer) and said it could not provide formal legal advice (because, again, its obviously not a lawyer), which reinforced the court’s conclusion that the communications were not privileged when made. Moreover, sharing the Claude materials with defense counsel did not change their status. Nonprivileged communications do not become privileged simply because they are later transferred to a lawyer - this is nothing new. The work product claim failed for similar reasons. These documents were not prepared by counsel or at counsel’s direction. Defense counsel had admitted that Heppner created them on his own. The court also found that, although the documents may later have affected defense strategy, they did not reflect counsel’s strategy at the time they were created. That was enough for the court to conclude they were not protected work product. In short, this case covered a novel area but predictably applied very old, ordinary rules when concluding that Heppner’s use of Claude satisfied neither attorney client privilege nor work product protection, so the Government was entitled to inspect the documents.


"It's an absolute joke." Tory MP @LauraTrottMP demands a ban on social media for under 16s to protect children from 'the nastiest bits of the internet'.

This new open-source bitcoin wallet called ‘Cryobrick’, invented by a team of developers in India, can be hidden on old cellphones and disguised as any app.




Your Old Kindle Still Works Perfectly. Amazon Is Killing It Anyway reclaimthenet.org/your-old-kindl…

Claude Mythos is the start of the end. I think this is my psychosis moment.

society needs to grapple with the reality of a mythos-level model being open source in <12 months. i’m not sure we are prepared.










