Phyllis Stein and the Philistines

5.9K posts

Phyllis Stein and the Philistines banner
Phyllis Stein and the Philistines

Phyllis Stein and the Philistines

@ponderousfool1

livin’ off borrowed time the clock ticks faster

Ottawa, Ontario Katılım Mart 2015
804 Takip Edilen100 Takipçiler
Phyllis Stein and the Philistines
@whitesocksclips Megyn Kelly is insincere. A grifter, and it’s becoming more obvious in hindsight. First a basic Fox News neocon, never Trump Republican, pro-Trump and then Trump skeptical again. Fox News to MSNBC to alternative media. Wherever the money and attention go, she goes.
English
1
0
3
250
S.clips
S.clips@whitesocksclips·
Nick Fuentes reacts to Megyn Kelly saying she’ll vote Republican no matter what the GOP does and predicts the future two years from now “Mark my words: Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Sneako… all of them are going to tell you to vote for JD Vance in 2028.”
English
66
179
2.3K
78.5K
Phyllis Stein and the Philistines
Okay, but that’s realpolitik at play. If you don’t offer any incentive for your MPs to remain in caucus rather than cross the floor to a position where they can exert more influence, that’s on you.
Don Martin@DonMartinCTV

This is getting ridiculous. I get it that Poilievre is not Mr. Congeniality but these MPs ran under his banner just last spring. They knew who and what they were running for. Clearly this is just personal opportunism.

English
0
0
0
19
Phyllis Stein and the Philistines
@Lindahill2climb @ForMYCanada You can choose to disbelieve the polls if you want, but if you arbitrarily decide to believe one poll you see from a random Twitter user and discard all others than you’re living in a world of your own delusion, not reality.
English
1
0
1
21
linda hill
linda hill@Lindahill2climb·
@ForMYCanada For those at the senator game, Carney was booed. He’s getting more protesters, and we are supposed to believe the polls that say 70% of Canadians view him favorably. C9 will get certain biblical passages deemed hateful Miller said so himself there’s your clarification.
English
15
0
4
1.8K
ForMYCanada
ForMYCanada@ForMYCanada·
☀️ Good morning Canada. Welcome to my misinformation edition 🇨🇦 Canada politics Today’s theme: how misinformation spreads through influencer networks and social media. • A viral claim from commentator Marc Nixon cited a “poll” from Maple Polling claiming Mark Carney had 77.1% negative approval. When questioned and compared with legitimate polling data, Maple Polling deleted the tweet. The misinformation had already reached ~19K impressions. • A second viral claim alleged Carney was booed on a jumbotron clip at a sports event. The claim was circulated by accounts including Tracy Wilson and echoed by others. The accompanying TSN video clip contains no audible booing. • Claims that Canada is planning to join the European Union also circulated online. While commentator Mario Zelaya framed this as a serious Liberal proposal, there is no government policy or negotiation suggesting Canada could or would join the European Union. • Another viral post suggested Bill C‑9 (Canada) could criminalize passages from the Bible. In reality, the bill concerns judicial discipline procedures and does not regulate religious speech. • Jasmine Laine claimed Carney ignored French speakers until campaigning in Terrebonne. Yet Carney’s public engagements in Quebec pre-date that event. 📉 Pattern: Unverified claims → viral posts → impressions accumulate → corrections rarely travel as far. This is just in the last week. Pluralistic democracies depend on evidence-based debate, not viral narratives. You have coffee ☕️, I’ll pour myself a glass of wine 🍷 #GoodMorning #Canada #cdnpoli #MediaLiteracy #Misinformation
English
87
747
1.7K
135.2K
Polymarket
Polymarket@Polymarket·
BREAKING: Trump confirms to Bret Baier, "8 PM is happening"
English
399
856
13.1K
1.6M
Phyllis Stein and the Philistines
@CanadaGray It’s not just pipelines but refineries he mentions which I’m thinking “whose responsibility is this?” Are conservatives going to complain when private companies decide they don’t want to invest in refineries but also complain when the government does it and runs a loss?
English
0
1
3
124
Timothy Gray
Timothy Gray@CanadaGray·
Love this. The irony of standing in front of a Petro-Can which we used to own and was sold to Suncor. Also the brutal dis-information of claiming that building another pipeline will end Canadians' exposure to global oil commodity prices. #Grifters #cdnpoli
Aaron Gunn@AaronGunn

Canada has the 4th-largest oil reserves on the planet. We should not have $2-per-litre gas. Canada's political leaders need to stop making excuses and start building. We need to build pipelines. We need to build refineries. And we need an energy policy that actually puts Canada and Canadians first! 🇨🇦

English
118
171
774
27.3K
Aaron Gunn
Aaron Gunn@AaronGunn·
Canada has the 4th-largest oil reserves on the planet. We should not have $2-per-litre gas. Canada's political leaders need to stop making excuses and start building. We need to build pipelines. We need to build refineries. And we need an energy policy that actually puts Canada and Canadians first! 🇨🇦
English
903
1.5K
5.4K
258.3K
Phyllis Stein and the Philistines
Why isn’t there a similar level of conspiracy theorizing about Damien Kurek? Did we ever get the “full story” in that?
English
0
0
0
15
Phyllis Stein and the Philistines
I’d say Biden and Pelosi “failing to deliver” (insofar as they did fail) is categorically different than Trump fundamentally contradicting his platform.
R@shibadad8

English
0
0
0
25
NewsWire
NewsWire@NewsWire_US·
Gavin Newsom's office praises former President George W. Bush.
NewsWire tweet media
English
239
80
1.2K
289.4K
Toronto Star
Toronto Star@TorontoStar·
Doug Ford praises Mark Carney and appeals for a majority Liberal government ahead of byelections trib.al/qZVqOeu
English
436
102
526
360K
Phyllis Stein and the Philistines
Phyllis Stein and the Philistines@ponderousfool1·
The first addition here makes no sense. Even if you assumed every dollar of the $90B was a sunk cost you wouldn’t be doubling the total cost.
Liam Out Loud@liam_out_loud

Pierre Poilievre opposing the $90 billion Liberal high-speed rail project has caused quite the controversy. Likely because the Laurentian Elite who loot Canadian taxpayers stand to gain BILLIONS and they want major backlash against anyone who threatens their impending goldmine of corruption. Let's do the math they don't want you to see.... The Base Cost: According to Joe Carson's "Diagnosis Red Tape," for every dollar paid in federal taxes, 26.72% never re-enters the private economy. It's consumed by bureaucracy. That means a $90B public project carries roughly $24B in administrative overhead. True taxpayer burden: ~$114B. There are roughly 20 million taxpayers in Canada. That's ~$5,700 per taxpayer, so that 12 million people in the Toronto-Ottawa-Montreal corridor can have access to rail. EXCEPT THINGS NEVER GO ACCORDING TO PLAN Bent Flyvbjerg's database of 16,000+ megaprojects across 136 countries finds that 91.5% go over budget, over schedule, or both. The mean cost overrun is 62%. Rail projects specifically (according to Liberal friends McKinsey & Company) go over budget by an average of 44.7%, and their demand is overestimated by 51.4%. Applied to Alto: $114B × 1.447 = ~$165B. That's ~$8,250 per taxpayer. Meanwhile, the Liberals' projected $35B yearly GDP increase? If demand is overestimated by half, that's closer to $17B. Now, consider the recent Eglinton subway line in Toronto. The Eglinton Crosstown LRT was originally projected at ~$5B. Final cost: $13B and it took 15 years. The Eglinton Crosstown is 19km long. Alto is ~1,000km. That's 53× longer. The Eglinton Crosstown cost $684M per kilometre. If Alto hit a similar per-km cost, you'd be looking at $684B. That's obviously absurd but the point stands: Canada just proved it cannot build 19km of light rail on time or on budget. The answer is to build 1,000km of high-speed rail? The Eglinton's cost multiplied by 2.6×. Apply that same factor to Alto: $114B × 2.6 = ~$296B. That's ~$14,800 per taxpayer. But it gets EVEN WORSE. Now add corruption... The Charbonneau Commission established that mafia-linked cartels inflated Montreal public contract prices by up to 30%. A whistleblower told the Globe and Mail in 2009 that the Mafia controlled roughly 80% of road contracts, with prices inflated up to 35%. Then there's the "Green Slush Fund" scandal: the Auditor General found 186 conflicts of interest at SDTC, with an estimated $150-390M in misappropriated funds. That's roughly 17-45% of the fund's total approvals funnelled to insiders. Applied to Alto's $90B base: $15-40B in corruption. Applied to the Eglinton-style $296B scenario: $50-133B in corruption. Let's summarize, shall we? Best case (on budget, on time... which never happens): ~$114B total. ~$5,700 per taxpayer. Realistic case (Flyvbjerg's average rail overrun): ~$165B total. ~$8,250 per taxpayer. With half the promised GDP benefit. Eglinton case (2.6× cost escalation): ~$296B total. ~$14,800 per taxpayer. With corruption layered on top: $15-133B more (depending on the scenario) vanishing into the pockets of the politically connected. Also, don't forget: VIA Rail, the organization that would operate this system, currently can't run its existing trains on time. And that, my friends, is how you market corruption and economic insanity as "infrastructure investment."

English
1
0
1
53
solar enthusiast 🇬🇧
solar enthusiast 🇬🇧@Heavy_Oiler·
@ponderousfool1 @FriendlyBot2000 Respectfully, spending 90B (more like 190B) to make train cars nicer and not have to stop doesn’t strike the rest of the country as a good project. We need to pivot our trade infrastructure to international markets, not ensure a handful of people get from TO to QC slightly faster
English
2
0
1
44