praxis
39 posts


@PolymarketDevs why are we moving to a third version of the deposit/proxy wallet setup, can't all of these just be wrapped into one?
English

Friday Update - Week of June 1st, 2026:
- CLOB performance: long-awaited taker-delay fix landed in production this week as part of broader execution-path improvements, together with a new trading gateway. Large latency reduction and better stabilization under load. More architectural work continuing
- World Cup launches: final testing pre-release next week
- Beacon Deposit Wallet: new version launching 6/11 (moved from 6/8), for new users
- Taker Rebates: prod rollout started, tier badges live on leaderboard, expanding across the UX next week - Market Resolution upgrade: large improvements in consistency and speed
- Perps: continuing access rollout to users; taker delay, reduce-only, and TP/SL shipped to production testnet; Limit Close on open positions, trading directly from the chart, and mobile UX improvements
- In-house indexer: preparing for full production rollout, big performance gain on high-traffic endpoints
- TS SDK: RFQ support released; World Cup feature support and docs wrapping next week
English

@thenarrator @ValkriLabs is tackling this with some smart people. its a hard but really fun problem
English

there is a billion dollar opportunity in creating a token standard for prediction market positions that plugs into DeFi liquidity pools and enables lending/borrowing against PM shares
the core problem: PM positions go to zero at resolution so no lender touches them. a standard that wraps positions with risk metadata (probability, time to resolution, volatility) lets lending protocols price binary risk dynamically instead of avoiding it
connect this to the wave of prop firms emerging to fund PM traders
a lot of them will need infrastructure to extend capital against trader portfolios and manage binary resolution risk at scale
that infrastructure doesn't exist yet and the demand side is already forming. the supply side is wide open.
putting this out there for whoever wants to build it
English

@RhysSullivan bro just say you’re using/paid by corgi and let’s keep it pushing
English

for anyone building in prediction markets right now:
1/ stop trying to out-polymarket polymarket. build something they can’t or won’t build
2/ ship ugly and fast. 3 weeks with real users beats 6 months perfecting a UI nobody trades on
3/ the bear sentiment is your friend. the teams quitting now are freeing up space for the ones that stay
4/ talk to traders not other founders. the telegram groups where actual PM traders complain about what’s broken is your roadmap
5/ pick one user type and obsess. the platform for everyone is the platform for no one
charge something from day one and see who’s ready to pay (much more important than hundreds or thousands of testnet users)
English

@absurdistphil i think there needs to be a run on the bank or some sort of investigation into whats happening over there
English

@TThompson when are we gonna stop acting like @kylekuzma and this guy are posting these themselves
English

@redacted_noah @toly all i heard last year was that temporal is the answer
English

Is there any definitive guide on fast transaction landing on Solana? Or is it still mostly religion and everyone has their own strats?
Like it would be nice to see a breakdown of the various different mechanisms at play, and how they affect your chance of landing: CU usage. Num accounts. Prio fees. How hot the account is. Etc.
Similarly seems like there’s no one “best” way to land txs the fastest. I saw Triton has a TPU sender. Temporal has their own thing. Various RPCs offer their own services. Seems like a mess of options, with everyone protecting and/or selling their secret sauce to be faster in DeFi.
English

@DataBasedBets @JskeltsLoLBot idk how i just realized the name is No Vig, mind blown
English

@JskeltsLoLBot No vig
But I see you’re trying to make a counterparty point. There’s rec flow in these situations for main sports so I disagree
English


very hard to estimate honestly. and the comparison isn't fully apples to apples either. Hyperliquid frontends mostly cater to active traders who want better UX, custom features, fancier charts. that audience self-selects toward third-party tools. Polymarket's user base skews more casual, lots of people just opening the app to bet on the news of the day. that's a harder audience for a frontend to target
that said, I think the ceiling is high once a few things happen: more specialized verticals (sports terminals, election-only apps, AI agents), better UX for power users, and probably mobile-first frontends since Polymarket itself is pretty desktop-heavy. could be 15-25% in a few months or years imo, 40% feels aggressive for the user mix in this case
English

for someone who built on solana for years,@cavemanloverboy might be the goat
English




