DataBasedBets

14.9K posts

DataBasedBets banner
DataBasedBets

DataBasedBets

@DataBasedBets

Long-term profitable sports bettor with over $500,000💰in profit | Helping you learn & win | Get +EV plays & tools in the DBB Discord which is pinned below!⬇️

Massachusetts, USA Katılım Şubat 2024
501 Takip Edilen6.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
DataBasedBets
DataBasedBets@DataBasedBets·
The DataBasedBets Discord recently turned 1 year old, and we've quietly added a lot 🚀 • New bots, custom feed & tools to find more +EV plays • Continued boosted & unboosted coverage • ~1300 +EV contributor plays per month Start your free trial⬇️ whop.com/databasedbets
English
8
4
52
62.4K
The Bet Desk
The Bet Desk@TheBetDesk·
If you have a betting product that can make an idiot like me a winner, comment below or DM me and let’s discuss ways to help move things back on the right track.
English
12
1
21
5.5K
DataBasedBets
DataBasedBets@DataBasedBets·
New one-way market on Fanduel for the WNBA All-Star Game
DataBasedBets tweet media
English
4
0
33
15.5K
Josh Hamlet
Josh Hamlet@Josh_Hamlet·
Two guys bet $500 on Spain. One on DraftKings, one on Kalshi. One is a degenerate, one is a trader. Only one gets taxed on money he didn't make. x.com/i/article/2081…
English
10
4
36
7.3K
DataBasedBets
DataBasedBets@DataBasedBets·
@bernardbulletin Democratic 2028 Presidential Nominee, Republican 2028 Presidential Nominee, and 2028 Presidential Election matchup But of course those don’t settle forever so that’s part of why
English
1
0
11
2K
Bernard
Bernard@bernardbulletin·
Do you want to know the three most badly mispriced election markets right now?
English
27
0
68
10.3K
Grizzflow
Grizzflow@Grizzzy_Grizz·
@DataBasedBets Lowkey convinced he fell down for his homies to get the live number
English
1
0
2
144
Grizzflow
Grizzflow@Grizzzy_Grizz·
Hated every second of that fight
Grizzflow tweet media
English
4
0
8
1.7K
DataBasedBets
DataBasedBets@DataBasedBets·
@JohnBerry35 My understanding is they have now paid out both sides of this market and absorbed the cost. Misbonders on the spread are still down bad though
English
0
0
0
504
DataBasedBets
DataBasedBets@DataBasedBets·
MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR RINSE: Full single-post summary for people with normal sleep schedules of the most insane rinsing of bond bots I've seen firsthand, in which PM bonders appear to have lost 7 figures🤯 Scene: Last MLB game of the night (Giants vs Angels) bottom of the 10th inning tied 6-6. The time is ~1:15am EDT - With the bases loaded, Devers hits what is normally a ground rule double. The initial final score shown is an 8-6 Giants win (due to an official MLB scorer error). Video below in thread - Over 13.5 runs, Giants -1.5, and Giants team total o7.5 runs bond to 99c thanks to bots - MLB rules state that a walk off ground rule double cannot score multiple runs and in this scenario counts as a single instead of a double - People start to realize this and insane action comes in to unbond the above markets. Prices go absolutely haywire, touching 1c and 99c multiple times - Kalshi closes and settles the totals & team totals markets while at least one (if not all) of the listed source agencies (MLB / Fox Sports / ESPN) still showed the final score as 8-6. PolyUS does the same for settlement of Giants -1.5 - However, the Kalshi spread (run line) markets remained open longer. Source agencies had then changed the final score to be 7-6. Market volume on the spread balloons from under 12,000 to 5 million (!) between the start of the bottom of the 10th inning and final market settlement - Despite Kalshi settling the total as over 13.5 based on an 8-6 final score, per their CFTC rules, the spread must now settle Angels +1.5 as a win, and it does - PolyInt settles Angels +1.5 as a win as well, rinsing botters there too and appearing to make the total losses for traders assuming a 8-6 final score "multi-millions" across all exchanges - Sportsbooks all appear to have paid out incorrectly initially as well, but it seems all of them have resettled based on the 7-6 final score. CFTC certified exchanges on the other hand don't quite work the same way as sportsbooks. - I fail to make riches since my 1am brain was staring at just the totals market and didn't notice the spread market had stayed open longer until it was too late - I'm aware of some of the big winners, but am yet to hear who specifically were the big losers on this score adjustment - Kalshi volume on the two "incorrectly" settled markets: 1.1mil on o/u 13.5 runs, ~60k on o/u 7.5 Giants team total. No idea or guess on how much was traded on the PolyUS "incorrectly" settled spread market. I would not expect a refund if you had the wrong side of these markets since the settlements appear to have complied with the sites' CFTC rules, but we'll see TLDR: An official MLB score correction post-game made some grinders rich and rinsed others (mostly botters, I assume). Per the sites' CFTC rules, it appears all markets were settled correctly despite being inconsistent settlements
DataBasedBets tweet media
DataBasedBets@DataBasedBets

I'm now processing the scale of what happened. If you have a friend with a bonding bot, please check in on their wellbeing because bonders lost MILLIONS, many while enjoying their Friday / sleeping Kalshi spread volume at 1:15am: 11,149 Kalshi spread volume at close: 5 million🤯

English
37
19
249
201.8K
DataBasedBets
DataBasedBets@DataBasedBets·
The term bond has become popular for 99c (or 99.5c / 99.9c) trades that are “effectively guaranteed”, just like a U.S. Treasury bond, and returns a low %. But consistently bonding correctly can result in nice “risk-free” paydays It was several minutes before the score updates occurred
English
0
0
2
566
Shane
Shane@boostar83·
Perhaps a random question, but how come they are referred to as “bonders”? I assume the equivalent to what we’d call “snipers”, picking off the crumbs on orders left open and unattended when key live events occur. Sounds like absolute carnage anyway. How soon after the initial score of 8-6 was this updated to 7-6?6
English
1
0
2
952
Brett Chandler
Brett Chandler@bachandler27·
@DataBasedBets So what is the latest on this? Did they settle based on the error or correct score?
English
2
0
0
1.2K
Alex Carter
Alex Carter@acarter881·
@DataBasedBets Thanks for sharing. It's one of many reasons why knowledge of the sport itself is important and bonding risk is generally too high regardless of the event.
English
1
0
4
1.5K
Plus EV Analytics
Plus EV Analytics@PlusEVAnalytics·
The set of possible "what if" scenarios has infinite size and therefore, by definition, any automation you build will never be guaranteed to cover the entire set.
DataBasedBets@DataBasedBets

MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR RINSE: Full single-post summary for people with normal sleep schedules of the most insane rinsing of bond bots I've seen firsthand, in which PM bonders appear to have lost 7 figures🤯 Scene: Last MLB game of the night (Giants vs Angels) bottom of the 10th inning tied 6-6. The time is ~1:15am EDT - With the bases loaded, Devers hits what is normally a ground rule double. The initial final score shown is an 8-6 Giants win (due to an official MLB scorer error). Video below in thread - Over 13.5 runs, Giants -1.5, and Giants team total o7.5 runs bond to 99c thanks to bots - MLB rules state that a walk off ground rule double cannot score multiple runs and in this scenario counts as a single instead of a double - People start to realize this and insane action comes in to unbond the above markets. Prices go absolutely haywire, touching 1c and 99c multiple times - Kalshi closes and settles the totals & team totals markets while at least one (if not all) of the listed source agencies (MLB / Fox Sports / ESPN) still showed the final score as 8-6. PolyUS does the same for settlement of Giants -1.5 - However, the Kalshi spread (run line) markets remained open longer. Source agencies had then changed the final score to be 7-6. Market volume on the spread balloons from under 12,000 to 5 million (!) between the start of the bottom of the 10th inning and final market settlement - Despite Kalshi settling the total as over 13.5 based on an 8-6 final score, per their CFTC rules, the spread must now settle Angels +1.5 as a win, and it does - PolyInt settles Angels +1.5 as a win as well, rinsing botters there too and appearing to make the total losses for traders assuming a 8-6 final score "multi-millions" across all exchanges - Sportsbooks all appear to have paid out incorrectly initially as well, but it seems all of them have resettled based on the 7-6 final score. CFTC certified exchanges on the other hand don't quite work the same way as sportsbooks. - I fail to make riches since my 1am brain was staring at just the totals market and didn't notice the spread market had stayed open longer until it was too late - I'm aware of some of the big winners, but am yet to hear who specifically were the big losers on this score adjustment - Kalshi volume on the two "incorrectly" settled markets: 1.1mil on o/u 13.5 runs, ~60k on o/u 7.5 Giants team total. No idea or guess on how much was traded on the PolyUS "incorrectly" settled spread market. I would not expect a refund if you had the wrong side of these markets since the settlements appear to have complied with the sites' CFTC rules, but we'll see TLDR: An official MLB score correction post-game made some grinders rich and rinsed others (mostly botters, I assume). Per the sites' CFTC rules, it appears all markets were settled correctly despite being inconsistent settlements

English
4
0
57
17.1K
shark
shark@sharko0trades·
@BookieBeats1 Worst day in BB history (for most of us)
English
1
0
3
4.3K
Alan Sass
Alan Sass@alansass·
🧐🤯🤣
DataBasedBets@DataBasedBets

MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR RINSE: Full single-post summary for people with normal sleep schedules of the most insane rinsing of bond bots I've seen firsthand, in which PM bonders appear to have lost 7 figures🤯 Scene: Last MLB game of the night (Giants vs Angels) bottom of the 10th inning tied 6-6. The time is ~1:15am EDT - With the bases loaded, Devers hits what is normally a ground rule double. The initial final score shown is an 8-6 Giants win (due to an official MLB scorer error). Video below in thread - Over 13.5 runs, Giants -1.5, and Giants team total o7.5 runs bond to 99c thanks to bots - MLB rules state that a walk off ground rule double cannot score multiple runs and in this scenario counts as a single instead of a double - People start to realize this and insane action comes in to unbond the above markets. Prices go absolutely haywire, touching 1c and 99c multiple times - Kalshi closes and settles the totals & team totals markets while at least one (if not all) of the listed source agencies (MLB / Fox Sports / ESPN) still showed the final score as 8-6. PolyUS does the same for settlement of Giants -1.5 - However, the Kalshi spread (run line) markets remained open longer. Source agencies had then changed the final score to be 7-6. Market volume on the spread balloons from under 12,000 to 5 million (!) between the start of the bottom of the 10th inning and final market settlement - Despite Kalshi settling the total as over 13.5 based on an 8-6 final score, per their CFTC rules, the spread must now settle Angels +1.5 as a win, and it does - PolyInt settles Angels +1.5 as a win as well, rinsing botters there too and appearing to make the total losses for traders assuming a 8-6 final score "multi-millions" across all exchanges - Sportsbooks all appear to have paid out incorrectly initially as well, but it seems all of them have resettled based on the 7-6 final score. CFTC certified exchanges on the other hand don't quite work the same way as sportsbooks. - I fail to make riches since my 1am brain was staring at just the totals market and didn't notice the spread market had stayed open longer until it was too late - I'm aware of some of the big winners, but am yet to hear who specifically were the big losers on this score adjustment - Kalshi volume on the two "incorrectly" settled markets: 1.1mil on o/u 13.5 runs, ~60k on o/u 7.5 Giants team total. No idea or guess on how much was traded on the PolyUS "incorrectly" settled spread market. I would not expect a refund if you had the wrong side of these markets since the settlements appear to have complied with the sites' CFTC rules, but we'll see TLDR: An official MLB score correction post-game made some grinders rich and rinsed others (mostly botters, I assume). Per the sites' CFTC rules, it appears all markets were settled correctly despite being inconsistent settlements

ART
1
0
1
827
DataBasedBets
DataBasedBets@DataBasedBets·
@WinningEV If you’re not grinding MLB at 1:15am on Saturday morning in peak dead sports betting season, you’re being lazy 🤣😭
English
1
1
7
853
DataBasedBets
DataBasedBets@DataBasedBets·
@impaqss Yeah for sure, but bots losing millions on bonds and the value being available for more than an instant and replenishing liquidity is what makes this one insane. Wild stuff
English
0
0
0
1.3K
Sean Fetsko
Sean Fetsko@impaqss·
@DataBasedBets This is the biggest one but these oddscreen mishaps happen at least once or twice a week. This was unique because the mlb app etc got it wrong. However all the time theres massive mistakes with strikeouts that get challenged and the oddscreens will report incorrect outs.
English
2
0
2
1.4K
Solstice
Solstice@alch3my101·
In case you missed it. I'm not sure reading does it justice. Checking out the OB graph really grounds this one. Craziest thing I've ever seen outside of mentions.
DataBasedBets@DataBasedBets

MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR RINSE: Full single-post summary for people with normal sleep schedules of the most insane rinsing of bond bots I've seen firsthand, in which PM bonders appear to have lost 7 figures🤯 Scene: Last MLB game of the night (Giants vs Angels) bottom of the 10th inning tied 6-6. The time is ~1:15am EDT - With the bases loaded, Devers hits what is normally a ground rule double. The initial final score shown is an 8-6 Giants win (due to an official MLB scorer error). Video below in thread - Over 13.5 runs, Giants -1.5, and Giants team total o7.5 runs bond to 99c thanks to bots - MLB rules state that a walk off ground rule double cannot score multiple runs and in this scenario counts as a single instead of a double - People start to realize this and insane action comes in to unbond the above markets. Prices go absolutely haywire, touching 1c and 99c multiple times - Kalshi closes and settles the totals & team totals markets while at least one (if not all) of the listed source agencies (MLB / Fox Sports / ESPN) still showed the final score as 8-6. PolyUS does the same for settlement of Giants -1.5 - However, the Kalshi spread (run line) markets remained open longer. Source agencies had then changed the final score to be 7-6. Market volume on the spread balloons from under 12,000 to 5 million (!) between the start of the bottom of the 10th inning and final market settlement - Despite Kalshi settling the total as over 13.5 based on an 8-6 final score, per their CFTC rules, the spread must now settle Angels +1.5 as a win, and it does - PolyInt settles Angels +1.5 as a win as well, rinsing botters there too and appearing to make the total losses for traders assuming a 8-6 final score "multi-millions" across all exchanges - Sportsbooks all appear to have paid out incorrectly initially as well, but it seems all of them have resettled based on the 7-6 final score. CFTC certified exchanges on the other hand don't quite work the same way as sportsbooks. - I fail to make riches since my 1am brain was staring at just the totals market and didn't notice the spread market had stayed open longer until it was too late - I'm aware of some of the big winners, but am yet to hear who specifically were the big losers on this score adjustment - Kalshi volume on the two "incorrectly" settled markets: 1.1mil on o/u 13.5 runs, ~60k on o/u 7.5 Giants team total. No idea or guess on how much was traded on the PolyUS "incorrectly" settled spread market. I would not expect a refund if you had the wrong side of these markets since the settlements appear to have complied with the sites' CFTC rules, but we'll see TLDR: An official MLB score correction post-game made some grinders rich and rinsed others (mostly botters, I assume). Per the sites' CFTC rules, it appears all markets were settled correctly despite being inconsistent settlements

English
2
1
16
4.8K