Premgeeth 🇿🇦 🇱🇸🇵🇸

@LetlapaMphahlel I think it was my father (B Sooknanan) that represented you in your bail application in Bloemfontein.

27 April 1994, I was in Leribe, Lesotho, where I had fled to because there was no general amnesty for freedom fighters. The following year in December, I was kidnapped from Lesotho, handcuffed and iron-legged. Thus I was forcefully brought to SA to enjoy the fruits of "freedom."

This is my Netanyahu hate group. Like and repost to join.

Dr Hussam Abu Safiya has been held in Israeli captivity for 482 days, subjected to torture, inhumane living conditions and medical neglect. No charges have been brought against him. What is Israel holding him for? Free Dr Hussam Abu Safiya and Palestine

Here is a picture of John in Ukraine

Russia brings oil. China bring solar energy. The US brings starvation and darkness. Tells you all you need to know.

Two great men who happen to share the same birthday. One was the greatest writer in human history, the other was William Shakespeare.

LENIN Lenin walks around the world. Frontiers cannot bar him. Neither barracks nor barricades impede. Nor does barbed wire scar him. Lenin walks around the world. Black, brown, and white receive him. Language is no barrier. The strangest tongues believe him. Lenin walks around the world. The sun sets like a scar. Between the darkness and the dawn There rises a red star. LANGSTON HUGHES

The way the DA is campaigning makes me feel so uncomfortable. In 'white areas' (despise the term), there's a certain gravitas in the way they conduct their electioneering. There is town hall type of meetings, speeches and explaining their policies etc.. In 'Black areas', they go to shisanyamas et al, dance and toto toyi looking absolutely ridiculous. They play into these racist and anti Black stereotypes and they don't even see how utterly out of touch they look

Nelson Mandela was never treated this brutally by the South African apartheid authorities. Israel is an apartheid state so out of control that it has become bestial

Nigeria became the first African country to install Starlink in January 2023. 1. Nigerian Poverty Rate (2023) - 56.2% 2. Nigerian Poverty Rate (2026) - 62% In three (3) years of Starlink existence in Nigeria, poverty has increased by 5.8 percentage points. You're a liar😅

Words have meanings. There is a reason they describe the ANC internal democratic process as a “battle”, whilst he just went through the same in the DA and it’s called “elections”. Battle = war, instability and division. Elections = process, order and democracy. Language shapes perception. And perception shapes reality.

I don’t care what party you guys decide to vote for, but please understand their ideology is the most important thing there is. It’s tells you their beliefs and values, what they care about and what they’ll neglect, whether they care about people or not. If nothing else, FOCUS on their ideology.

The new generation isn’t falling for the “I’m Jewish, you must be antisemitic” line anymore.

Mutilating the penises of baby boys and calling it circumcision instead of male genital mutilation

South Africa played a key role in NASA's Artemis II mission in terms of deep space tracking and communications. The South African National Space Agency provides vital tracking, telemetry, and ranging data through the Hartebeesthoek Ground Station (HartRAO).

It reminds me of when Cuba held it down for Angola against Apartheid South Africa.

Voting for the DA means endorsing racists. The lack of empathy towards oppressed people means they will never see your blackness

Having Gayton McKenzie as the Cabinet minister talking at Chris Hani's memorial service is nauseating 🚮 Doesn't matter what comes out of McKenzie's mouth, he's a criminal, gangster and friend of the most unrepentant apartheid beneficiaries. Diametrically opposite to Hani.

There’s a huge difference between recognising that Africa’s borders are colonial and believing they should be removed. No one is disputing that Africa’s borders were drawn primarily at the 1884–85 Berlin Conference by European powers with little knowledge of or interest in the communities they were dividing or lumping together. Yes, the European lines indiscriminately cut through pre-existing kingdoms, split the same ethnic group across multiple states, and forced them into single nations. However, the idea that the borders are colonial and therefore should be removed is a completely separate argument, and cannot be seen as simply flowing seamlessly from the history of these borders. For one, “artificial” borders apply almost everywhere. Most of the world’s borders reflect conquest, negotiation between powers, or historical accident rather than neat ethnic boundaries. European borders themselves have shifted dramatically just in the last century, often catastrophically. The Treaty of Westphalia, the Congress of Vienna, the post-WWI settlements and other Great Power agreements all involved drawing European lines with limited local consultation. Even post-colonial states like India and Indonesia inherited and maintained colonial administrative boundaries. The “artificial” label applied selectively to Africa carries an implicit assumption that European borders elsewhere somehow did align with natural communities, which is historically inaccurate. Artificiality is not unique to Africa. Most crucially, we cannot pretend not to know that redrawing national borders would likely cause more violence than any problems it resolves. After all, it’s not like there’s an existing “natural” alternative waiting to be restored or some romanticised pre-colonial “African” unity that never actually existed as a continental political form. In any case, African identities have also grown into these “artificial” states over generations. Nigeria, Kenya, Senegal, Zimbabwe, and South Africa are now real political communities with their own histories, cultures, and loyalties, however messy their 1884 origins may be. Dismissing these as “false consciousness” is itself a form of external imposition. Whatever anyone may think of the African Union, it did look into this matter in 1964 and made a deliberate choice to accept inherited colonial borders through the uti possidetis principle, which recognised that the alternative was potentially endless, destabilising secessionist conflict. This is not to dismiss the reality of why state capacity is often weak in many African states or why regional integration might work better than rigid centralism. Rather, the point is that the artificiality explains a lot of the continent’s underdevelopment, but it just doesn’t prescribe removing borders as an automatically viable option. Recognising that borders are arbitrary doesn’t imply that having no borders is preferable. After all, the fences between you and your neighbouring homes are arbitrary too, but abolishing them doesn’t follow. In fact, removing borders, colonial as they may be, ignores that the post-colonial states within them have thus far functioned, however imperfectly, as units of governance, service delivery, and identity. Now, to be fair, the “borderless Africa” vision, when pressed, often seems to point toward either a European Union-style free movement and trade zone, which preserves states while integrating functions. This does not require eliminating borders. In short, recognising Africa’s borders as colonial artefacts is a matter of historical accuracy, but advocating for their removal is a matter of political practicality. Because while these lines were drawn with little regard for local realities, they have since become embedded in identity and regional stability. In this sense, the artificiality of borders does not automatically invalidate their function, nor does removing them offer a clear path to a better alternative. As the African Union understood 60 years ago, accepting inherited borders, historically painful as they are, was a necessary settle. Moving forward, a more viable path lies in deepening regional integration and cooperation within the same borders.

White South Africans will read such stories then look you dead in the eyes and tell you Palestinians are the terrorists and Israel is defending itself.