
⏳
3 posts



I cannot endorse this more. If your seat doesn’t come with a license to go deep, adapt your mental frameworks quickly, be extremely open-minded, and occasionally sound insane, you are probably in trouble long term. Many unimaginative investors waited almost 10 years for the P/E multiples on their Bloombergs to mean-revert without noticing that increasingly enormous companies were generating massive returns at increasing scale, which made that nearly impossible. This period is a version of that on steroids. That isn’t a determinative statement. The path does not have to be upward. But there exist right tails that require depth and imagination. If you can’t see them, you can’t understand the underlying asymmetry and therefore can’t have a properly calibrated lens to assess risk.





Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "AI will take us to a world where we have very high GDP growth and potentially also very high unemployment and inequality. We've never had a technology that's this disruptive. So the idea that we could have 5% or 10% GDP growth, but also, 10% unemployment, it's not logically inconsistent at all. It's just never happened that way before. And I'm really quite, for those both reasons, excited and worried. I have some engineering leads within Anthropic who have basically said to me, I don't write any code anymore. I just let Opus do the work and I edit it. There are still things for the software engineers to do, right? It's like, even if the software engineers are only doing 10% of it, they still have a job to do or they can take a level up. That's not going to last forever. The models are going to do more and more. " --- From "The Wall Street Journal" YT channel (link in comment)