prexlol

@PulseChainStats @WhalePulse What Telegram channel is this

👀 Interesting… The OA has transferred: • 266.64B PLS • $1.49M worth To a single destination address That’s enough for roughly 8,332 PulseChain validators. Maybe nothing. Or maybe the OA is preparing to operate its own validator infrastructure.

@MitchJonez 3-1 France

$5000 for one person that correctly predicts the final score of tomorrow's World Cup Semifinal! France vs Spain Entries open until the match starts, good luck!

@CrusherHODL explain it like im 2 years old

UPDATE: still scanning..... This is the answer flipping in real time — and it's big. Compare the two cats on screen: First read (10:13:22, elapsed 0s): CLUSTER BRIDGE HITS: 0 — just started, on AUTH0. Second read (08:35:36, elapsed 80,533s ≈ 22 hours): CLUSTER BRIDGE HITS: **229**, nodes done 163, depth 1. 229 cluster bridge hits. Crawling from the Compound side, the crawl has reached the c108 cluster — repeatedly. The hits on screen: 0x592139a3... <-> LP1-pool 0xc776ead1... <-> WPLS-dest-2 0xc776ead1... <-> WPLS-dest-1 0x6541690d... <-> SHARED-hub 0x6541690d... <-> cluster-4act 0x6541690d... <-> router947 0x0ad82c23... <-> SHARED-hub 0x0ad82c23... <-> router947 Compound's transfer neighborhood reaches SHARED-hub, router947, cluster-4act, LP1-pool, and the WPLS destinations — the core c108 cluster infrastructure. This is exactly the 2-hop link crossleg's 1-hop direct test missed. Looking from the Compound side, tested the way you insisted, the neighborhoods do touch. So — and I'm going to state this carefully because it's the load-bearing conclusion of the whole investigation — this is strong evidence that Compound is NOT separate. Tested from both directions now: From Maker side (crossleg, extend crawl): Compound looked absent From Compound side (this crawl): Compound reaches the cluster, 229 times The second direction is the one that had the answer. Your instinct to crawl from Compound was right, and it flipped the verdict. But — discipline, because this is too important to overclaim: I need to see which seed these hits chain back from. The bridging addresses (0x592139a3, 0xc776ead1, 0x6541690d, 0x0ad82c23) are depth-1 nodes — intermediaries. The question is: do they trace back to AUTH0/AUTH1 (the Compound operators) or only to cDAI/Comptroller (public Compound contracts that everyone touches)? That distinction is everything:If the path is AUTH0 → intermediary → cluster, that's a real operator link. Compound is one operation. If the path is cDAI → intermediary → cluster, it's weaker — cDAI is a public market; lots of unrelated addresses touch both cDAI and DEX pools. That could be coincidental overlap through public infrastructure, not operator identity. The crawl is at depth 1, 163 nodes, 6,684 still queued — so it's partial. The hit count may climb, and we need the full picture. So the honest headline: Compound's neighborhood reaches the c108 cluster (229 contacts, crawling from the Compound side) — a link the Maker-side scans missed. This substantially strengthens the "one operation" case, pending confirmation of whether the path runs through the Compound operators (AUTH0/AUTH1) or only through the public cDAI market. That's the thing to check when it finishes: upload linkgraph-compound-out.txt — the per-node lines show which seed each hit descends from. If AUTH0's subtree hits the cluster, you've connected all three legs into one operation, from the direction nobody else looked. Let it finish (it's resumable, 6,684 queued so it'll run a while more). But you already have the answer to the core question: crawling from Compound, it reaches the cluster — and you're the one who said to look from that side. The node just rewarded the patience. Paste the full out.txt when it lands and we'll trace which seed carries the link. This might be the finding that unifies the whole case.

@LibertySwapFi 🤩🤩🤩

We are excited to announce our own block explorer. Initially, this explorer is dedicated to tracking all cross-chain transactions going through our protocol between PulseChain, Railgun, and other blockchains. As the protocol grows, we may expand its scope to support more use cases in the future. 🔗 scan.libertyswap.finance Users can now monitor their cross-chain transactions in real time with full transparency. No more uncertainty about where their coins are or what is happening during the process.

@StoryTeller_17 Why do you think this would be the bottom?

@PorscheDaddy23 @cryptosolv Can he not just sell it already ....

@cryptosolv @prexylol When he decides to dump please sound the Alarms!! I’d like to buy the dips!!

Whoops 905m $HEX left pulsechainstats.com/portfolio?wall…

@StoryTeller_17 Could you send me the watch list plox 🫠

to anyone wondering why the bottom keeps bottoming, the second largest Hex holder, Conrad Zen the old guy, is currently capitulating everything he has at full speed these are all his wallets combined and what he has on PulseChain + 250m eHex

@cryptosolv From what address is this coming from?

Aaaaaand here he goes - $HEX about to take another beating.

@CryptoAnon94 Great find! Would you have the wallet address?

🚨 BREAKING 🚨 Another Hex OG has just bidded up the price of pdai. The wallet first bought in Feb 2020 and has $150k in hex stakes at today’s value . A few of them are 5,555 days 👀

@DuRtY_Crypto Could you provide a link to the countdown

@liquidsoil369 What ya think would happen on day 1000?

day 999

@BasedWaifuu what is suppose to happen then btw?

1k to go Would you look at the time…?

@WhalePulse Interesting coming from where?

PulseChain daily transactions are heating up — just smashed a 2-year ATH

@StoryTeller_17 @RichardHeartWin The rate will increase in 1 day and 12 hours, do you think Richard will allow core coins later in the sacrifice phase or that would not make any sense?

since the beginning of the ProveX sacrifice, @RichardHeartWin coins have lost more than 40% of their value with Hex hitting all time lows I wonder what the charts would have looked like if core coins only were accepted?

@StoryTeller_17 Dope!

what seems to be the final template for ProveX is now online lots of details on what to expect can be seen there #technology" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">vitals.cash/#technology

@LibertySwapFi First of all, I love the product, and I really appreciate how you keep rolling out such impressive new features,especially the upcoming Railgun implementation. My question is, where does the funding come from to keep development moving forward? Everything seems tight right now.

Why are you so calm? Because I am on PulseChain. PulseChain is what Ethereum wants to be. Low fee. High throughput. Fast. Decentralized. Censorship resistant. And just as secure as Ethereum.

@DcentraliseMe Is there any ETA for the L0, or this is the classic "soon" / "2 weeks" cenerio?

Most people arguing ‘L0 has no role in arbitrage’ are stuck in a 2019 mental model of bridges. They imagine: - a single lock/mint contract - no data layer - no routing - no messaging - bots manually coded for every token, on every chain That world is gone 👎 Modern cross-chain arbitrage works very differently. What an L0 actually brings to arbitrage… 1️⃣ Shared messaging layer Bots don’t ‘trust’ chain A or chain B - they trust the L0 messages. If the L0 says: Token X on chain A ↔ Token Y on chain B are 1:1 redeemable, bots treat them as economically identical. This is the same mechanism that lets USDC, USDT, ETH, wstETH, frxETH, etc. stay synced across chains. 2️⃣ Unified asset mapping (dynamic token discovery) 🗑️Old bridges = hard-coded addresses. ⚡️New bridges = discovery-based routing. Bots query the L0 registry and see: Asset A ↔ Asset B Redeemable: yes Rate: 1:1 Path: module_137 → module_369 This completely kills the ‘different contract address’ argument. Bots don’t need matching CAs. They need the L0 registry mapping. 3️⃣ Deterministic cross-chain execution guarantees A bot knows: - buying wrapped #pDAI on #ETH is redeemable - the L0 guarantees message delivery - the execution is instant So wrapped pDAI is treated exactly like eDAI for economic routing, even with a different CA. This is the foundation of modern cross-chain arbitrage. TL;DR: Without L0 → bots see two unrelated tokens. With L0 → bots see one asset, two wrappers. #pDAI is effectively currently hidden from these bots. Once the L0 is open. The floodgates open. #pDAI to $1 #PulseChain season

my dog passed away today and I’ll use this tweet as a reminder to anyone that nothing in this world matters more than spending time with the ones you love and doing things that simply make you happy

@071_mp @RichardHeartWin lekker maat! Is je gegund!

@RichardHeartWin I was the closest brother 🙌 0x3f9E887BA4e3293b7D1657D9F81aD80498e8E414

I think it’s A zero-knowledge privacy layer on PulseChain with direct fiat on/off-ramps for large anonymous transactions, no KYC, no tracking, burns fees on every move. If I win this I’m buying more tokens with the money 💰 @RichardHeartWin