Lori Schneider 🗣️

@DavidBlizzard Our city charges us whether if we use city water or well water and sewer unless you have a septic system, and if they turn off your water they charge you for water and sewer, they say it's in the contract they signed with the city we get it from, or it was voted on to be that way

This is a new one for me. "Only the state's water is clean." Also, my home doesn't have a connection to any govt water system, but those of you that do, don't you get billed for it?

@MS4justice Not all state constitutions are lawful. Mine lists an ordinance for taxes, ordinances aren't laws, it grants higher courts to make lower courts that shouldn't exist, etc.. It's a mess. Not all states have had just 1 constitution ours had 3 before we finally got the 1 we have

Read all 51 Constitutions Bill/Declaration of Rights! There's a reason they're not taught in schools! 📖⚖️

@DarkSkiesNE @CRIXUSwasHERE no

@CRIXUSwasHERE Sadly, they likely meant through the election process.

PLAN B, Y'ALL!!👇📜⚖

🧵 THREAD 1/ Why is government surveillance wrong? Because it violates the Constitution. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Every government official swears an oath to uphold it. Every law must comply with it. And any law that contradicts the Constitution is not a law at all. It is an illegal act dressed up in legal language.

@mbell58 @Apocalypse_Skr1 @PoliceThePolic1 the "judge" has nothing to do with it. It all starts with us, the sheriff's and their deputies. As long as people don't know their rights and the sheriff's and their deputies don't know their constitutional duties it will stay the same.

@prplmnstr9872 @Apocalypse_Skr1 @PoliceThePolic1 Tell it to da judge.

*Question of the day:* Is driving a privilege or a right?

@mbell58 @Apocalypse_Skr1 @PoliceThePolic1 it doesn't need to be changed, people just need to learn that the government can only control commerce. That's why DRIVING is a privilege, it includes those who drive for hire/make money, which includes taxi drivers, bus drivers, truckers, uber, etc.. Personal use is a right.

@Apocalypse_Skr1 @PoliceThePolic1 So, change the Constitution. It says what it says.

@Fonseca123112 @PoliceThePolic1 DRIVING is a privilege, Drivers, are those who make money/drive for hire, commerce, ie.: bus drivers, truckers, uber, taxis, etc... TRAVELERS are those who are PRIVATE men/women who are going to church, work, the store, etc..

@PoliceThePolic1 A right. That it’s a privilege is ludicrous. Never could understand who the hell coined it.

@atlkru @PoliceThePolic1 Traveling is our right to go where we want in our PERSONAL automobiles, ie.: church, work, the store, etc. DRIVING is where you make money/drive for hire, commerce, ie.: taxis, bus drivers, truck drivers, uber, etc..

@PoliceThePolic1 While technically it’s a privilege that can be lost. If you abuse it, in the United States you have to be able to drive or be driven to build wealth. So it should be a right. If you of course, drive drunk, you should still lose it.

Modern courts do not operate in isolation from financial systems. While presented as neutral arbiters of justice, court systems are embedded within broader governmental structures that generate, allocate, and manage revenue. Fines, fees, forfeitures, and assessments imposed through court proceedings are not merely incidental—they are accounted for, tracked, and often integrated into larger fiscal frameworks. Public records and municipal finance disclosures demonstrate that governmental entities—including counties, districts, and special authorities—regularly issue bonds and financial instruments supported by revenue streams. These may include taxes, service fees, and in some cases, justice-related revenues. When such revenues are pledged, pooled, or reported in financial disclosures, they become part of a system that extends beyond the courtroom and into treasury, banking, and investor-facing structures. This creates a dual-capacity condition: the same institution acts both as an adjudicator and as a participant in financial systems. While not inherently unlawful, this overlap raises serious due process concerns where enforcement actions produce revenue that feeds into broader financial obligations or reporting systems. The risk is not theoretical—courts and municipalities are subject to accounting standards, disclosure obligations, and, in some contexts, securities regulations. The critical issue is transparency. If court-generated revenues are tracked, allocated, or pledged in ways that intersect with financial instruments, the public has a right to know how those funds are classified, reported, and used. This includes identifying whether case-linked obligations—such as fines or penalties—are treated as receivables, assigned to funds, or included in disclosures to external parties. The question is not whether courts “sell cases,” but whether the financial outputs of court activity are integrated into systems that operate beyond judicial functions. That distinction matters. Where financial incentives intersect with enforcement, even indirectly, the integrity of the process must be scrutinized. The path forward is simple: produce the records. Identify the revenue classifications, disclosure reports, bond statements, insurance arrangements, and treasury routing mechanisms. If no such financial integration exists, the records will confirm it. If it does exist, transparency is required. The authority to demand transparency and accountability in financial and enforcement practices is grounded in multiple statutory and legal frameworks designed to prevent abuse, misrepresentation, and coercive financial conduct. At the federal level, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. § 1692e) prohibits false, deceptive, or misleading representations in connection with the collection of any debt. Where court-imposed financial obligations are enforced, clarity must exist as to the nature of the obligation, the authority behind it, and the entity entitled to collect or benefit from it. The Truth in Lending Act (TILA, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.) reinforces the principle that financial obligations must be clearly disclosed, particularly where terms, liabilities, or beneficiaries are involved. While traditionally applied to consumer credit, its underlying doctrine—full and transparent disclosure of financial obligations—reflects a broader legal expectation applicable to any system imposing monetary liability. The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. § 552a) requires federal agencies to disclose the authority under which records are collected and how those records are used, maintained, and disseminated. If court-generated data is transmitted to or integrated with financial, treasury, or disclosure systems, such use must be identifiable and lawful.

@RayKIII03 @Jessethefree Fun Fact: Lawfully you don't need a license to practice law. A BAR card isn't a license to practice law anyway, it's more like Union dues, or a SAM'S club membership.

@Jessethefree fun fact! state legislators do not need law degrees. how is that not practicing law w/o a license?

If a law is found unconstitutional, the lawmakers who passed the bill should be held liable.

@gggirl924 none of those, but Life Saver had ornaments. Betty Crocker points to get dishes, silverware, etc.. , Baby food labels for baby stuff, Diaper brand points for baby stuff. Tobacco points for brand logo items. Jelly jars that were glasses when empty

I found a list of free things you would get in products. Now they don’t give you anything. They just raise the price. Do you remember any of them?

@2025DJT2025 those with law degrees should worry you more. Judges don't have the authority they/you think they do. Just because someone has a "law degree" doesn't mean they know the law, they're not taught constitutional law, law of the land, they're taught maritime law, law of the sea.

Did you know… there are officially appointed judges in some of our states, that literally do not have a law degree of any kind?? That should scare the 💩 out of all of us!!

He did, in fact, eat those words. 💀

@iam_me73 @BadgedPatriot soy wax is toxic, beeswax is best

@BadgedPatriot Very true! And, they can be very bad for A/C filters. The kind of candles you buy matters! Cotton wicks and soy wax with natural fragrances are best!

Somebody just told me that burning candles in your home is dangerous because the perfumes & chemicals go into the air & you ingest them into your lungs which can lead to all kinds of medical issues😳

@Ravensfell @BadgedPatriot soy candles are toxic

@BadgedPatriot Yes. Use only beeswax or soy candles infused with herbs & essential oils.

TAKE DUE NOTICE ALL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, SERVANTS, JUDGES, LAYERS, CLERKS, EMPLOYEES: "Ignorance of the law does not excuse misconduct in anyone, least of all in a sworn officer of the law." In re McCowan (1917), 177 C. 93, 170 P. 1100. "All are presumed to know the law." San Francisco Gas Co. v. Brickwedel (1882), 62 C. 641; Dore v. Southern Pacific Co. (1912), 163 C. 182, 124 P. 817; People v. Flanagan (1924), 65 C.A. 268, 223 P. 1014; Lincoln v. Superior Court (1928), 95 C.A. 35, 271 P. 1107; San Francisco Realty Co. v. Linnard (1929), 98 C.A. 33, 276 P. 368. "It is one of the fundamental maxims of the common law that ignorance of the law excuses no one." Daniels v. Dean (1905), 2 C.A. 421, 84 P. 332. Jurisdiction challenged to all, at any and all times. "Judge acted in the face of clearly valid statutes or case law expressly depriving him of (personal) jurisdiction would be liable." Dykes v. Hosemann, 743 F.2d 148 (1984). "In such case the judge has lost his judicial function, has become a mere private person, and is liable as a trespasser for damages resulting from his unauthorized acts." "Where there is no jurisdiction there is no judge; the proceeding is as nothing." Such has been the law from the days of the Marshalsea, 10 Coke 68; also Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall 335,351." Manning v. Ketcham, 58 F.2d 948. "A distinction must be here observed between excess of jurisdiction and the clear absence of all jurisdiction over the subject-matter any authority exercised is a usurped authority and for the exercise of such authority, when the want of jurisdiction is known to the judge, no excuse is permissible." Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall 335, 351, 352. Government is established to "PROTECT AND MAINTAIN INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS" "All political power is inherent in the people, and governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, and are established to protect and maintain individual rights." Washington constitution article 1 §1. If government does not have the duty to protect then there is no longer any real government, just those acting as, posing as, pretending to be said public servants who are instead being the destroyers of those rights they claim to be there to protect.

Who would be willing to sit on a Common Law Grand Jury and hold the elected representatives responsible.

La fiction juridique de la « personne » : le droit américain vous définit comme une fiducie, une société ou une entité artificielle -- 26 USC § 7701 (a)(1), law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26… realworldfare.com/the-legal-fict…

@skillz17q is this something being sent to said agencies, or is it something we need to send?

Notice and Declaration on Color of Law Attention: To All Attorneys, Bar Members, Public Officers, Corporate Agents and agencies Acting Under Presumption of Law I. Authority and Purpose This declaration is issued by authority of the people, domiciled upon the land and soil jurisdiction, in lawful assembly and original jurisdiction, to correct the public record and establish lawful clarity regarding the concept of “Color of Law”, its misuse, and the widespread injury resulting therefrom. This instrument serves as final and lawful notice to all attorneys, BAR affiliates, administrative officers, and agents of any and all corporate governments operating under colorable authority within the boundaries of the united States of America. II. The Supreme Law: Article I, Section I — Legislative Power The Constitution of the united States of America (1787), Article I, Section 1, vests all legislative powers in Congress. Only Acts duly passed by both houses of Congress and enacted by the President become Public Law and are recorded in the Statutes at Large. All legitimate lawmaking authority in this nation must trace back to: – A specific constitutional grant; and – A corresponding statute duly enrolled and published as Statutes at Large. Subordinate bodies — such as state legislatures, county boards, municipalities, and administrative agencies — possess no inherent legislative power. Any attempt by such bodies to impose regulations, codes, policies, or mandates not founded directly upon the Statutes at Large is a colorable act and carries no lawful force. III. Color of Law — Definition and Imposture “Color of Law” is the false appearance or presumption of lawful authority. It arises when officers or agents pretend to act under lawful authority while executing duties unauthorized by the Constitution or legitimate statute. Examples include but are not limited to: – Enforcing administrative codes against private citizens without contractual nexus; – Prosecuting men and women under commercial statutes absent a verified injured party; – Applying corporate policies upon the public as if they were binding laws; – Operating courts under corporate rules and equity doctrines while posing as Article III judicial tribunals. Such acts are not merely procedural errors — they constitute fraud, personage, entrapment, and sedition. IV. Contract Law — Presumption and Consent Without a valid, knowing, and voluntary contract, no statute, code, ordinance, or administrative rule is binding upon a man or woman on the land. The state cannot compel a private American to enter adhesion contracts by force, coercion, threat, or presumption. Doing so violates: – The common law principle consensus facit legem (consent makes the law); – Commercial maxims of equity; – The fundamental right to due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Any officer, agent, attorney or agency acting to impose corporate statutes on a private American without express, voluntary agreement is acting ultra vires, and under color of law. V. Color of Office, Personage, and Capital Crime When a person pretends to hold lawful office and uses such pretense to subvert the rights of the people or to enforce foreign law forms: – That person engages in color of office; – If the person falsely claims authority as a government actor, that is personage; – If said person enforces a foreign jurisdiction knowingly and unlawfully, it is an act of treason and capital crime under public law. The imposition of foreign corporate jurisdiction upon American people via fraud and presumption, especially through the misuse of legal terms, misapplied contracts, and deceptive court processes, is a systemic war crime and commercial fraud. VI. Final Notice to the Legal Community To all attorneys, bar members, public officers, and corporate agents and agencies:

OUR WHOLE ENTIRE SYSTEM IS FULL OF CORRUPTION AND THE ANTI-CHRIST OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING... - HOSPITALS & THEIR POLICES, PRACTICES & SYSTEMS. - LOCAL CITY, COUNTY, STATE, FEDERAL CORPORATE GOVENMENT CARTELS OF MANIPULATION & PROFIT OF THE PEOPLE. - ALL OUR SCHOOLS FROM ELEMENTARY THROUGH COLLEGE & TRADES ARE A INDOCTRINATION TO THIS ENSLAVED SYSTEM. - CORPORATE FOOD & DRUG INDUSTRIES ALL OF THEM ARE POISONING US AND OVER CHARGING US. - INCOME & PROPERTY TAXES, LICENSES, TITLES, PERMITS, REGISTRATIONS & BONDS ALL UNCONSTITUTIONAL. - THE ENTIRE BANKING INDUSTRY, LOANS, MORTGAGES, INTEREST, USARY INCLUDING THE STOCK MARKET, IMF, FEDERAL RESERVE ARE ALL CORRUPT CORPORATION CARTELS. - THE ENTIRE REAL ESTATE MARKET, TITLE & INSURANCE COMPANY'S & PROPERTY ADJUSTORS - ALL DEALERSHIPS THAT OFFER LOAN FINANCING, TITLE REGISTRATION WITH THE STATE ARE ALL CORRUPTION. - ALL COURTS ARE CORRUPTED AND ENFORCE BRITISH CROWN MARITIME CORPORATION LAW. - ALL JAILS & PRISONS ARE PRIVATE CORPORATIONS. - AND THEN, THERE ARE THE CHILDREN. CHILD PEDOPHILIA & SACRAFICES THAT MOST OF THESE CORPORATE ENTITIES ARE INVOLVED WITH. ARE WE JUST GOING TO CONTINUE TO ALLOW THIS? OUR WHOLE WORLD IS ONE BIG LIE OF CORRUPTION & CONTROL OF SATANIST... WHAT ARE WE ALL DOING ABOUT THIS TODAY? DO YOU BELIEVE IN SATAN? ARE YOU A SOVEREIGN SOUL OF OUR CREATOR OR A SLAVE TO THE SATANIC CORPORATION SYSTEM THAT LEADS YOU INTO TEMPTATION OF EVIL MANIPULATION OF POWER & MONEY??? STOP SUPPORTING THESE CORPORATION SYSTEM OF SNAKES...WE ALL HAVE TO COMPLETE THIS MISSION, NO MATTER HOW HARD IT IS... THIS IS A SPIRITUAL WAR AGAINST ALL EVIL... COMMANDER IN CHIEF HAS EXECUTIVE ORDERS IN PLACE, YOU CAN NO LONGER SAY: "I WAS JUST DOING MY JOB." OR "MY BUSINESS IS HOW I MAKE MONEY." IF IT IS UNLAWFUL, PART OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING, OR COMMITS CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY... NOT KNOWING & KNOWING, IF YOU KNOW YOUR BUSINESS OR JOB IS FRAUDULANT AND CORRUPT AGAINST THE PEOPLE, WILL YOU DO THE RIGHT THING? THERE IS NO FENCE RIDING, THERE IS GOOD AND THERE IS EVIL...THE CHOICE IS YOURS... WILL YOU RISE AS CHRIST DID?