Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Fjarlægur
2.4K posts
Fjarlægur
@psydeus
Sardonic-pilled | Complexities of acidity-related ailments | Analyst | Not your doctor, but close enough
Biała Róża Katılım Ağustos 2021
84 Takip Edilen75 Takipçiler
The irony of Luigi (@orthodoxluigi) calling me “miserable” for being an atheist, while he cries to his followers about his own headspace. To add, it looks like I’ve made him so miserable that he had to block me. What a snowflake.
The truth is, he’s just a racist, xenophobic apologist who runs when he can’t defend his views, as shown below.
English
Suppose someone approaches you and claims that murder is good. You respond by saying that murder is bad. When asked how you know it's bad, you reply, "Because God told me." Then you ask them why they believe murder is good, and they respond, "Because God told me."
How do you resolve that disagreement when both parties claim divine authority for opposing moral views? Who determines which belief is right or wrong?
English
I’m a Christian and do not believe any religion but Christianity to be true. Understandable right?
However I do rank the other religions in order of friendliness using one simple metric and I believe all Christian’s should do the same.
“How much respect does this religion give to Jesus Christ?”.
This is my metric.
English
Textbook confirmation bias: you never actually cared about the most rational answer, only the one(s) that affirmed your preexisting belief(s). ChatGPT deemed the question subjective, so you scurried to Grok for a different outcome. Had ChatGPT answered "Christianity," you'd be parading that instead. See, it was never a pursuit of truth, just a desperate need for validation.
English
A private investigator told me that you should baseline assume women are sleeping with 2 men at a time
English
If you want blind faith in something that makes zero sense - go to Atheism
If you want the most logical, reasoned and amazing explanation for everything - go to Christianity
English
Fjarlægur retweetledi
The burden of proof lies with the one making the claim. Atheism isn't a propositional stance; it's simply a lack of belief. If atheism carried a burden of proof, then agnostic atheists—who fall under atheism—would be making a claim, which they aren't. This is why treating atheism as a claim negates their position entirely. It's like saying someone who doesn't believe in unicorns has to disprove their existence. That's not how burden of proof works.
English
Atheists: If “well-being” is the standard of “good,” and secular societies that reject religion collapse due to low birth rates and cultural decline, does that mean atheism and secularism are actually bad and we should reject them as harmful to wellbeing?
Take your time.
English
The mere fact that science aligns with the idea of stardust hardly renders religion evidently true. We once attributed schizophrenia to evil spirits, yet now we recognize its roots in brain chemistry and genetics. Similarly, cancer was once seen as a curse; now we know it's driven by mutations and pathogens.
Science offers grounded, evidence-based explanations for what was once shrouded in ignorance, and it remains the most reliable, whether you like it or not.
GIF
English
When it comes to Atheists, it's never been about the evidence, or the truth, or what makes sense
It's about one thing and one thing only
Hatred of God
English
Let's grant, for the sake of argument, that abortion = murder; which, by logical extension, renders it illegal, thereby making it sinful within your framework.
But now, a more pressing question arises: would you hold yourself to the same unyielding standards for your own sins? If you wielded the power to craft laws and enact legislation, would it be morally just to imprison you for your transgressions, just as it would be for abortion?
Sincerely
(but not too sincerely),
Impiety.
GIF
English
@AgainstAtheismX Is this all the evidence for God that you have?
English
Atheists: "SCIENCE DISPROVES RELIGION REEEEEE!"
Meanwhile, real scientists:
English
There exists X: hollow, bankrupt drivel endlessly regurgitated masquerading as rhetoric propaganda, and Y: empirical evidence contradicting the flaws in so-called "intelligent design" (who.int/news-room/fact…) (nidcd.nih.gov/health/statist…).
So... what, exactly, are atheists lying about?
English
Atheists are lying to you...
Have you realised it yet?
English
Precisely. A relationship demands reciprocity by definition; an omnipotent being capable of effortless revelation yet choosing obscurity signals indifference, not desire. Either he lacks the power to reveal himself, or he simply has no interest in a relationship—or, more plausible, he does not exist.
GIF
English
He shoehorns his own narrative into atheism and parades it like gospel—loud, wrong, and shamelessly assuring in his delusions.
Unintelligible at best, his credibility has been dismantled time and time again; it's practically in ruins.
At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if he were a bot running an algorithm fine-tuned for spewing nonsense on repeat.
English
@AgainstAtheismX No wonder you get angry responses when you antagonize atheists with lies and insulting mischaracterizations.
Where do you see atheists always claiming to be loving and rational? That’s just another lie.
English
Atheists are always claiming to be loving, rational and that their morality is based on "empathy".
In my experience most of them are aggressive, hostile, and profanely insulting.
Christians, what has been your experience with them?
English
@psydeus @AgainstAtheismX In short, “We don’t have to prove anything, period.”
English
I dare you to prove atheism is true… WITHOUT using:
1. Assumptions
2. Faith in science
3. "We don’t know, but one day we will"
Go ahead. I’ll wait.
English
Atheists love arguing like this because it allows them to attack your position while not stating their own… it’s called sophistry
English