Sabitlenmiş Tweet
pumps
1.7K posts
pumps
@pumpsmoji
Animated emojis based on the pump fun logo - hand-drawn & animated. ca: J8zjyj4HHnGap8efyyH9aR67y4u7ifvgZc128KKFpump
Katılım Eylül 2025
385 Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
P.S. NOBODY on the pump fun/Terminal team (including myself) will be accepting any fees sent our way under any circumstance. This feature is for trenchers!
Learn more about how claiming works
x.com/Pumpfun/status…
Pump.fun@Pumpfun
how it works creators & CTO admins can now allocate specific percentages of fees after launch to up to 10 members through the pump fun mobile app or the pump.fun web app, as well as transferring ownership & revoking update authority anytime a fee recipient claims fees, claims will be triggered for every fee recipient if a user doesn’t claim fees, the fees will remain claimable for that recipient and will never be taken away from them
English
Creator fees need change.
When Dynamic Fees V1 was introduced a few months ago, the goal was to help create more success cases in our ecosystem by giving top project founders and teams a strong incentive to launch their token on pump fun and drive it to success.
Only a week later, the potential of the mechanism showed: more and more creators - many of which have never touched a crypto app before - began organically launching coins and streaming on the platform. The Streaming meta created some of the best onchain conditions of 2025, doubling activity by more than 2x, as evidenced by the below chart showing pump fun bonding curve volumes (in USD).
However, it wasn’t sustainable, and it exposed critical issues within the platform.
While creator fees are a game changer for Project Tokens (those with well-defined active teams, rather than communities) they failed to meaningfully change the behavior of the average memecoin token deployer.
Therefore, creator fees may have skewed the incentive for users to engage in low-risk activity (coin creation) instead of high-risk activity (trading), which is dangerous, because traders are the lifeblood of the platform.
Pump fun’s mission is to create the best possible environment for coins to thrive, and successful tokens are much more likely to come about in an environment where traders are incentivized to participate in the market, provide liquidity, create volume, and take risk.
Furthermore, Creator Fees on the platform have lacked utility. Many narratives could use Creator Fees to raise the ceiling for that project by, for example, sending the fees to a notable person that is related to the narrative and onboard them to the community e.g. White Whale, rainbowfish, etc. The platform so far fails at providing a good user experience here, oftentimes requiring users to CTO coins, trust other people to fulfill their promises, etc.
So, to summarize our analysis:
- Creator Fees are a great tool to incentivize high-quality Project Tokens. Perhaps they require tweaking, and perhaps other protocol adjustments are needed to create an optimal environment for Project Tokens to thrive, but Dynamic Fees V1 was undoubtedly a directionally correct step for these kinds of token projects
- Creator Fees can be used in a variety of ways to significantly improve the token’s investability but require better UX
- Many tokens, however, don’t need Creator Fees, and this results in a more uneven playing field, where memecoin creation was incentivized too much instead of memecoin trading.
Major changes are coming. I can’t say too much yet, but as always, pump fun will take a market-based approach, and let traders decide whether a narrative truly deserves Creator Fees, and how those should be used.
There will be more communications coming from me soon about what we’re building and the future of $PUMP
I’m extremely excited for what 2026 holds.
Pump.fun@Pumpfun
creators fees need a change - here’s the first of many to come in the near future: introducing creator fee sharing - share fees with up to 10 wallets - transfer coin ownership - revoke update authority more updates coming soon 👇🏻
English
Full disclosure, and just to get this out there publicly so that it's impossible to "leak". I haven't told anyone yet. Some people are making guesses. The reasoning is off, but they do hit certain areas. 👇
I might name the Chinese version of my book/memoir "币安人生". This is not related to any meme tokens or listings. But I embrace the meme culture. I like that meme/word. It's sticky, for me.
Disclaimer: I don't hold any "币安人生" meme coin, and have no intention to do so. And I also reserve all rights not to use that title. I might change my mind last minute.
The English name of the memoir will likely be completely different, not decided yet.
Book ETA, 4-6 weeks, English and Chinese version both at the same time. Self published. Takes too long to go through a publisher, even though they will likely help significantly with distribution.
All proceeds I receive from the book will go to charity. Not trying to make money from the book.🙏
lana@lanaaielsa
#币安人生 这个时间节点币安把 #币安人生 终于推向现货，这里是一个比较敏感的时间节点，因为所有人都在赌现货，所有人都在埋伏，经过 $Giggle 后所有人的共识都是上了后就浇，那为什么会在这个节点来上现货？ 在这里我的判断大概有两个点 1.近期sol风头开始上升期，各路冬眠了一段时间的地址又开始活跃起来了，币安通过上现货的方式重新刺激bsc的关注度来应对这一波sol的冒头。 2.币安人生过去两个月一直稳定在100-120m左右的位置，但是不确定是有控盘力量在操控还是大家的共识一直维持在这个位置。但是这个标的太明显了，我觉得从MM的角度根本无法建立起足够可以控盘的筹码量，因为这是目前bsc最难控筹的标的。在过去两个月里多次通过API更新的方式来营造马上上现货的信号，我理解是在测试市场的反应。 目前币安这个节点上线，那么有另外一个可能是给币安人生装上新的角度来引起大家的第二波fomo来推动上了现货后的后续购买力。 在看到快讯后我的第一反应是可能 @cz_binance 的书要发行了，根据之前cz和一姐发推的显示，他们反感大家一味的根据他们发送推特的内容来不断p新盘子并且道德绑架来进行互动。在可以预见的未来bsc上最大的角度是cz的自传即将出版，综合下来有可能cz极有可能给自传命名为《币安人生》，这样一方面可以给这个标的叙事进一步提高，又防止大家进一步p无限的小盘子，同时能够把bsc上最高的共识龙头给捧起来，这样才有机会营造下一个XXB上限的meme。 那么我们如何把握住这个确定性的机会？ 考虑到 CZ 的身份（前全球首富、币安创始人）以及他这本书的潜在爆炸性（涉及监管、内幕、个人起伏），他极大概率会选择： @simonschuster ：出版过《乔布斯传》、《马斯克传》，并且最近 @EricTrump 的自传也是该出版社发行； @penguinusa：出版过关于SBF的书籍 @HarperBusiness：出版过coinbase foudner @brian_armstrong 的自传 或许这几家出版社监控起来，随时会有惊喜！ ps：写到现在发现币安人生的k线走的比想象中稳多了，让我想起了去年的 $neiro
English
If you missed the live drawing yesterday you can rewatch it here:
clip.pump.fun/J8zjyj4HHnGap8…
English
English
