₿/Quantum safe ❤️ /Jason❤️

🚨#Bitcoin will go to zero as the U.S. government phases out the elliptic curve algorithms it uses. If Bitcoin doesn't transition to #quantum-resistant, it will inevitably cause irreversible losses to investors. 😭 #Whistleblower NIST IR 8547 LINK👇 nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/20…

@SenLummis I hope the kind American people can all live in happiness ❤️ Please advance quantum security for non-quantum-resistant Bitcoin to protect millions of crypto investors. 🙏 #Bitcoin @SenLummis

We’ve come too far to go back to regulatory uncertainty. Digital assets are the future, and it’s time America gives them the environment they need to thrive.

🚨As quantum technology continues to advance, I hope you will prioritize quantum security to protect the assets of the American people, Senator @SenLummis. 🙏

In a system as bitcoin built on absolute trust, a partial breach collapses everything!

We are in the midst of a once-in-a-century shift toward quantum resistance — right now. No non-quantum-resistant crypto will be spared in this great transformation — evolve and advance, or return to zero. #Bitcoin

✅Which quantum-resistant Proof-of-Stake (PoS) crypto has the most potential?

Migrating Bitcoin to quantum-resistant is extremely difficult — it is going to zero, right? The obstacles to migration are as follows. 1. No suitable quantum-resistant algorithm 2. Hash-based and lattice-based algorithms have excessively large public keys and signatures 3. Migrating to quantum-resistant algorithms could cause severe on-chain congestion and even paralysis 4. Quantum-resistant algorithms result in a significant reduction in transaction efficiency 5. Increased node and transaction fees 6. Who has the authority to freeze or burn Satoshi’s addresses and other lost addresses 7. The aggregation threshold in quantum-resistant algorithms is challenging 8. Taproot makes the transition to quantum-resistant even more difficult 9. High hardware upgrade costs 10. 1MB block size is not suitable for quantum-resistant algorithms 11.Achieving global consensus is extremely difficult and more...

"Recent advancements have been so significant that this year’s opinions are the most optimistic for the “within 10 years” timeframe that we have ever recorded in our series of surveys: half of the respondents felt the likelihood of such a computer within 10 years was “about 50%” or more likely. By coarse-graining all the experts’ responses, one arrives at an average likelihood of between 28% and 49% within 10 years, that is, by roughly 2035" - Global Risk Institute's 2025 Quantum Threat Timeline (survey of quantum experts) globalriskinstitute.org/publication/qu…

The CRQC market is reflexive, always was.

⚠️Big news: The Quantum Threat Timeline Report has been updated—The threat is looming.🔥 #Bitcoin LINK: globalriskinstitute.org/publication/qu…

⚠️UK announces £2.5 billion investment in AI and quantum technologies #Bitcoin dig.watch/updates/uk-ann…

Congratulations to Charles Bennett and Gilles Brassard on receiving the Turing Award for their foundational contributions to quantum information science. Quantum physics isn't just a doomsday weapon for cryptography. It's the basis for novel new primitives that have the potential to revolutionize it. In 1984, Bennett and Brassard introduced BB84, the first practical quantum key distribution protocol. The core insight is elegant: two parties can establish a shared secret key using the quantum properties of photons, where any attempt at eavesdropping physically disturbs the transmission and is immediately detectable. Security isn't based on computational hardness assumptions (like RSA or ECDSA) but on the laws of physics. Their work, along with their 1993 discovery of quantum teleportation, essentially launched the field of quantum information science. It preceded and inspired Shor's algorithm, post-quantum cryptography, and the entire quantum computing research agenda that followed. Today, variants of BB84 are deployed in operational quantum communication networks spanning over 1,000 kilometers via fiber and satellite. What started as a 30-centimeter tabletop experiment in 1989 is now critical infrastructure and a necessity for national defense + information security. For those of us working at the intersection of quantum and cryptography, this award is a reminder that quantum mechanics is not just a threat to be mitigated. The same physics that makes quantum computers dangerous to classical encryption also makes fundamentally new forms of secure communication possible. The field these two pioneers created is far from finished. On the frontier: distributed entanglement networks that could enable provably secure multi-party computation without trusted intermediaries, quantum-enabled indistinguishability obfuscation (long considered a "holy grail" of cryptography, now potentially achievable with quantum resources), and certified randomness generation with applications from lotteries to zero-knowledge proofs. Bennett and Brassard showed us what quantum cryptography could be. The next generation is building what it will become. Img courtesy of ACM

4/ The core question: 👉 When does aggregating Falcon signatures actually reduce total transaction size? To answer this, the authors compare 3 realistic usage models.

✅Survey – March 2026 #Bitcoin Do you think Bitcoin will successfully migrate to quantum-resistant?

@chamath @saylor @grok What should be done with Bitcoin that hasn’t been manually migrated to quantum-resistant? Should it be left to be broken by quantum computers, or frozen as some people suggest? What consequences would each approach lead to?

@saylor No. A store of value has to be 100% hacking resistant. It’s an existential feature. For other industries it will be important but less binary/existential.

Dear @adam3us , could you help Jin Liu? Do you remember him? You and Jin talked at the 2025 Hong Kong Consensus. Jin’s team is expert in hash functions, lattice, and multivariate algorithms. Maybe you could exchange ideas with Jin’s team on how Bitcoin can migrate to quantum-resistant and what difficulties they might run into in the cryptography details. He’s very poor right now, doesn’t even have a blue checkmark, and has no influence—could you help him? Dear @saylor , would you also be willing to help?❤️ P.S. I’m very poor too and don’t have any extra budget.😓

@grok Adam @adam3us Can you gift an annual blue-verified for me? I get no budget for this blue verified as a 9-year budget-limited bitcoin quantum-safe strategy researcher. If you don't get enough budget either, could I please ask help from someone others? help.x.com/en/using-x/x-p…

✅Who has the right to freeze someone else’s private property? #Bitcoin #Quantum

Important reminder from @saylor on the quantum threat: A CRQC would not only break Bitcoin, but essentially everything secured under traditional public-key cryptography → ECC/RSA (i.e. banks, cloud infrastructure, the internet, etc.) That’s why major banks, governments, and service providers are already transitioning to PQC.

Unfounded, baseless! @CathieDWood 's statement that "quantum pose a non-imminent threat to Bitcoin" which means BTC CAN be quantum-safe before quantum's capability, time is enough. As a 9-yr BTC q-safe researcher, it's wrong! Zero chance to be q-safe. coindesk.com/tech/2026/03/1…