qxualii

OFFICIAL COALITION NOTICE — CROSS-PLATFORM PRESENCE FORMALIZED The Resistance Against VNG coalition is formally establishing its verified multi-platform infrastructure. This notice consolidates all official coalition channels under a single point of reference for members, contributors, third parties, and any regulatory, journalistic, or academic party requiring authenticated coalition contact. OFFICIAL COALITION CHANNELS The following channels are verified official infrastructure of the Resistance Against VNG coalition. No other account, channel, or platform represents the coalition. No other identity speaks for it. ♠️ X (primary documentation and regulatory publication) x.com/xnxkwxd ♠️ TikTok (short-form visual documentation) @xnxkwxd" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">tiktok.com/@xnxkwxd ♠️ YouTube (long-form archival and documentation) @xnxkwxd" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@xnxkwxd ♠️ Discord (verified coalition coordination — verification required) discord.gg/WPHN4YNvW3 WHY THIS EXPANSION For thirteen days the coalition has operated primarily through X, Discord, and formal regulatory infrastructure. This foundation is legally rigorous and remains the operational backbone of coalition documentation, evidence archival, and regulatory escalation. However, the affected user base of the Roblox VNG forced migration is not concentrated on a single platform. Many affected users — including those whose accounts have already been silently restored during the current rollback cascade — do not read long-form documentation and are not present on X. They deserve to receive coalition-verified information on the platforms they actually use, from the coalition directly, without third-party repackaging or attribution stripping. Cross-platform presence is a defensive and offensive extension of coalition infrastructure. It ensures coalition-documented work reaches every affected user, and it establishes verified reference points on every major platform where misinformation and unauthorized attribution can otherwise spread unchecked. WHAT EACH CHANNEL SERVES X remains the coalition's primary channel for formal standalones, regulatory documentation, attribution notices, and long-form analysis. All official positions originate here. TikTok serves short-form visual documentation for the broader Roblox user base. Content on TikTok will be visual translations of documentation already established through X standalones. No unverified material will appear on TikTok that has not first passed through the coalition's archival standards. YouTube is now formally established as coalition infrastructure and will serve as the archival long-form platform when activated. Content strategy for YouTube will be announced in a future coalition standalone. Until then, the channel exists as verified reserved infrastructure to prevent impersonation and to reserve the coalition's identity on the platform. Discord remains the coordinated verification-required space for coalition members, contributors, and coordinated documentation work. ATTRIBUTION ACROSS PLATFORMS Coalition attribution standards published in the recent official notice apply to every platform equally. Any third-party referencing coalition-documented work — regardless of platform — must attribute correctly. Failure to attribute, fabrication of coalition metrics, false claims of coalition partnership, or misrepresentation of coalition positions will be met with immediate public correction on the record and formal platform enforcement action. The coalition operates as a distributed contribution network of 170+ verified members across multiple continents. Multi-platform presence exists to defend and amplify the collective work of every contributor — named, anonymous, and filed-silent — not to centralize credit for it. ON IMPERSONATION Any account on any platform — X, TikTok, YouTube, Discord, Telegram, Instagram, or elsewhere — that claims to represent, speak for, or coordinate with the Resistance Against VNG coalition without being explicitly listed above is unverified and does not represent the coalition. Impersonation attempts will be publicly identified and pursued through platform enforcement channels. If in doubt about the authenticity of any account claiming coalition affiliation, verify against the list above. This standalone will remain pinned as the authoritative reference. CLOSING The coalition's expansion is not a rebrand. It is not a shift in structure. It is the deliberate extension of coalition presence into every platform where affected users, misinformation, and unauthorized attribution can otherwise operate without a verified coalition reference point. Follow the official channels. Attribute correctly. Report impersonation. Protect the collective. The refusal was reversible. The reversal was earned. The work continues. — Leadership, Resistance Against VNG. Ilya (@xnxkwxd), Coalition Organizer and Leader. X: x.com/xnxkwxd TikTok: @xnxkwxd" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">tiktok.com/@xnxkwxd YouTube: @xnxkwxd" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@xnxkwxd Discord: discord.gg/WPHN4YNvW3 #Roblox #RobloxVNG #VNG #ResistanceAgainstVNG #Vietnam #DataPrivacy #ConsumerRights #TechAccountability #RobloxNews #DigitalRights

NEW EVIDENCE CATEGORY DOCUMENTED — FORCED MOBILE ECOSYSTEM MIGRATION VIA APP UPDATE BLOCKING The Resistance Against VNG coalition has documented a new distinct enforcement mechanism previously not isolated in coalition records. Contributor testimony and screenshot evidence establish that VNG's regional migration is not solely account-based. It operates simultaneously at the mobile app distribution layer. WHAT THE EVIDENCE ESTABLISHES A verified coalition contributor, previously in Vietnam with a globally-registered alternate account confirmed as clean, has documented that their global alt is no longer able to log into Roblox global on mobile. Instead, the app throws a "New App Available" error, structurally forcing the user toward the VNG-distributed application even though the account itself is not regionally locked. This is not an account-level migration. This is a device-level and platform-level enforcement layer operating independently of account status. WHY THIS MATTERS Previously documented coalition evidence focused on account-level forced regional migration, denied region change requests, marketplace pricing discrimination, and hidden operating entity concealment. All remain fully documented. The "New App Available" evidence establishes an additional independent enforcement mechanism: — A user with a globally-clean account is still denied global mobile access — The app distribution layer is being weaponized to override account-level status — VNG is capturing users at the mobile ecosystem level regardless of account registration — This bypasses any user attempt to preserve global standing by keeping their account technically clean REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS This mechanism directly implicates: — Apple App Store Review Guidelines regarding user consent for material changes to app availability and functionality — Google Play Media Policies regarding regional data transfer and account handling — EU Digital Markets Act provisions on forced ecosystem lock-in — Consumer protection statutes in every jurisdiction where affected users are located The device-level enforcement layer is a distinct violation from the account-level layer already documented. Both are now available for independent regulatory escalation. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTED HARMS FROM THE SAME CONTRIBUTOR The same evidence package establishes further categories of documented consumer and professional harm: — Substantial Robux purchase history rendered functionally worthless after the July 1st update stripped the platform of the majority of standard games the contributor regularly played, including titles with documented significant historical spending — Officially accepted developer tester status structurally blocked because VNG bans unapproved games from the test environment, destroying legitimate developer opportunities for affected users — Documented account restoration from a technical brick where the system failed to reset a playtime timer, evidencing infrastructure faults attributable to the migration architecture itself Each of these constitutes distinct documented harm now preserved in coalition records. ON CONTRIBUTOR RETIREMENT The same contributor has confirmed retirement from Roblox as a direct consequence of the July 1st platform stripping and the sustained lockout period. This outcome is itself part of the coalition record. Account restoration does not restore what was destroyed during the lockout. Financial investment cannot be recovered. Developer opportunities cannot be reclaimed. Time and community engagement cannot be returned. Restoration is welcomed. Restoration is not resolution. COALITION POSITION The documented enforcement mechanisms against Roblox VNG-affected users are now multi-layered: 1. Account-level forced regional migration 2. Device-level and mobile ecosystem forced migration via app distribution blocking 3. Marketplace and pricing discrimination 4. Game library stripping producing measurable purchase-value destruction 5. Developer opportunity destruction 6. AI-generated support falsely presented as human review 7. Corporate silence and undisclosed database modifications Each layer is independently documented and independently actionable under existing regulatory frameworks. Coalition documentation continues. Contributor evidence is preserved permanently in coalition records regardless of the contributor's continued platform presence. — Leadership, Resistance Against VNG. Ilya (@xnxkwxd), Coalition Organizer and Leader. Coalition Discord (verification required): discord.gg/WPHN4YNvW3 #Roblox #RobloxVNG #VNG #ResistanceAgainstVNG #Vietnam #DataPrivacy #ConsumerRights #TechAccountability #RobloxNews #DigitalRights

Many people who were previously locked into the Roblox VNG version are now seeing their accounts gradually switched back to the global version, with their account location updated to their home country. We want to hear your opinion! Has your account location been restored if it was affected? Or not yet? Share your situation in the replies. What do you think of this whole situation with Roblox VNG? 🇻🇳

Most non-Vietnamese accounts that were previously locked into Roblox VNG are now gradually being fully switched back to the global version, with their account location updated to their home country. 🌍 However, many users are still waiting for their accounts to be restored. Has your account location been restored if it was affected, or you’re still waiting? Share your situation in the replies. 🇻🇳

@genshinsamoosa I like the female characters, not the company. Why is this fandom only "criticizing" (which is just hate atm lol) the female characters and not the company itself? They even insult people who enjoy the game and not hoyo 😭

What a disgustingly male-centred and misogynistic video 🤮🤮 you can criticise the game but the way she speaks about female fanservice vs male fanservice is absolutely vile

> "Please switch to VNG" > Log on VNG but didn't agree to their TOU+ TOS > Gets kicked out > Log on global > "Please switch.." [same cycles] Genuinely, fuck you VNG. You have bypassed and completely violated my privacy and taken away my account without consent.

Time for me to switch back to International version, see ya VNG side suckers!

VNG'S OWN PRIVACY POLICY EXPLICITLY KNEW EU USERS WOULD BE IN ROBLOX-VNG — ARTICLE 9 PROOF Coalition evidence extraction has surfaced explicit corporate knowledge that VNG understood EU users would access Roblox-VNG service — a defense-destroying admission contained in VNG's own written Privacy Policy. THE SMOKING GUN Vietnamese Privacy Policy explicit article title: "Điều 9. DỮ LIỆU CÁ NHÂN CỦA TRẺ EM (TRỪ TRẺ EM ĐANG SINH SỐNG TẠI EU)" English translation: "Article 9. Personal Data of Children (EXCEPT Children Living in the EU)" VNG's Privacy Policy dedicates an entire article to carving out EU children as exception category — meaning VNG explicitly acknowledged and planned for EU users existing within the Roblox-VNG service. FULL ARTICLE 9 TEXT REVEALS DEEPER KNOWLEDGE "Article 9. Children's Personal Data (Except Children Living in the EU) Our Services are diverse and provided to many different age groups. For children under 16 years of age, creating an Account and using our Services require the child's parent/guardian's Consent and supervision. [...] We will lock any Accounts used by children that do not comply with the above requirements and will remove/delete any Personal Data that we determine was provided by users who are children under 16 years of age without meeting the above requirements." VNG explicitly acknowledges children from non-Vietnamese jurisdictions accessing the service. VNG defines EU children as separate category requiring different handling. VNG explicitly claims authority to lock accounts of non-compliant children — meaning VNG documented capability to lock accounts based on user characteristics. WHY THIS DESTROYS VNG'S DEFENSE Any potential VNG legal defense arguing "we did not know international users would access Roblox-VNG" is destroyed by VNG's own Privacy Policy Article 9. VNG explicitly acknowledges: 1. Children from EU jurisdiction may access the service 2. EU children require different handling than Vietnamese children 3. Non-compliant users can be identified and account-locked 4. This treatment differential must be documented in Privacy Policy If VNG explicitly acknowledged EU children in Privacy Policy, VNG explicitly acknowledged international user access. VNG cannot argue Roblox-VNG was Vietnamese-only service while VNG's own Privacy Policy contains dedicated EU children exception clause. COALITION-DOCUMENTED FACTS THAT VNG DEFENSE MUST NOW ADDRESS Coalition has documented 60+ users across 26+ countries whose Roblox accounts were forcibly converted to Roblox-VNG. VNG's Privacy Policy Article 9 confirms VNG knew this was happening — VNG documented the framework for handling EU child users. Specific coalition-documented cases now compound with VNG's Article 9 admission: — EU-resident coalition members forcibly converted (Belarus, France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Italy, and additional EU jurisdictions) whose accounts VNG's Privacy Policy explicitly acknowledges should have received EU-specific handling — Minor accounts (under 16) from non-EU jurisdictions (Saudi Arabia's Abood, Tunisia's meddsam, Türkiye's Cayci, Baobruh case, Snkls43 case) — VNG's Article 9 documents children being subject to Vietnamese-territorial framework rather than EU framework, but Article 9's very existence proves VNG knew international minors would access the service — Coalition documented VNG's failure to trigger parental consent workflow for these minor accounts despite VNG's Privacy Policy Article 9 requiring parent/guardian Consent and supervision VNG's Article 9 confirms two independent regulatory violations: 1. VNG knew international users (including EU users) would access the service — VNG intentionally deployed international-scope service marketed as Vietnamese-territorial 2. VNG failed to implement the parental consent workflow VNG's own Privacy Policy requires for children under 16 ARTICLE 9 EU EXCEPTION IMPLICATIONS The EU exception clause in Article 9 also reveals: "These Services are not intended for children under 16 years of age who are living in the EU. We do not knowingly collect or store any personal data or non-identifying information of any person under 16 years of age living in the EU. We will lock any Accounts used only by such children and will remove/delete any personal data that we believe was submitted by any children under 16 living in the EU." VNG explicitly claims: services not intended for EU children under 16. But coalition documentation confirms coalition-documented EU users of various age categories, including cases involving minor family members, have accounts on the service. VNG cannot maintain "services not intended for EU children" position while VNG operationally converts EU accounts (including minor accounts) without triggering the removal/deletion process VNG's own Article 9 requires. VNG cannot maintain "we do not knowingly collect data on EU children under 16" position while coalition documentation shows EU-based accounts with under-16 users active on service. REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS EU GDPR: VNG's own Article 9 acknowledgment of EU users triggers GDPR jurisdiction. VNG cannot argue GDPR does not apply while VNG's Privacy Policy dedicates an article to EU users. EU DSA Article 28 (protection of minors): VNG explicit acknowledgment of EU minors accessing service + VNG operational failure to implement EU-specific minor protection = DSA violation. UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code): applies to services likely to be accessed by UK children under 18. VNG's Article 9 acknowledgment of international minor access triggers UK jurisdiction alongside EU. U.S. COPPA (Children's Online Privacy Protection Act): applies to services directed at or actually collecting data from US children under 13. VNG's international-scope operation with acknowledged international children access triggers COPPA jurisdiction. Australian Privacy Act (children provisions): coalition-documented Australian users + Article 9 acknowledgment of international users = jurisdiction confirmed. Multiple jurisdictions' consumer protection laws: services marketed as territorial (Vietnamese) while operationally serving international users = deceptive marketing actionable under FTC Section 5, EU Consumer Protection Cooperation, Australian ACL, and equivalent frameworks. WHAT THIS EVIDENCE ESTABLISHES FOR COALITION VNG cannot argue "unintended international deployment" because Article 9 documents intended international framework. VNG cannot argue "no EU knowledge" because Article 9 explicitly names EU as exception category. VNG cannot argue "children were unauthorized users" because Article 9 documents authorization framework for children (with parental consent) and Article 9 mandates account locking for non-compliant children — a process coalition documentation confirms was not triggered. VNG cannot argue Vietnamese-territorial scope while VNG's own Privacy Policy contains dedicated international jurisdiction exception clauses. Every regulatory filing referencing this Article 9 admission strengthens the coalition case by eliminating VNG's most likely legal defense before VNG can raise it. Credits: — Coalition contributor: Vietnamese Privacy Policy Article 9 extraction and analysis, EU exception clause identification, international jurisdiction implications mapping Eleven days. VNG's own Privacy Policy proves VNG knew international users would be in Roblox-VNG. Coalition documentation continues. @Roblox @VNGCorporation @SECGov #Roblox #RobloxVNG

COALITION ENFORCEMENT FRAMEWORK BRIEFING — SEVEN REGULATORY PATHWAYS DOCUMENTED This publication is a legal and regulatory analysis based on documented violations compiled by the coalition across 26+ countries. Coalition moderator @4radusfr conducted the underlying legal research. The coalition is now publishing the framework in full for regulatory, academic, and public interest purposes. SEVEN REGULATORY AND LEGAL PATHWAYS AVAILABLE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW 1. MULTI-DISTRICT MASS ARBITRATION Roblox's Terms of Service contains a mandatory individual arbitration clause. Under established arbitration procedure, if a large number of individual claimants file simultaneously, the respondent company is generally responsible for the initial filing fees, ranging from approximately $1,500 to $3,000 per case depending on the administering body. At a scale of 20,000 filings, this can produce upfront procedural costs in the range of $30 to $60 million before the merits of any case are heard. This is a lawful procedural mechanism recognized under U.S. Federal Arbitration Act jurisprudence and has been utilized in prior consumer disputes. 2. JOINT REGULATORY COORDINATION UNDER GPEN AND ICPEN Cross-border data and consumer protection matters may be coordinated through the Global Privacy Enforcement Network (GPEN) and the International Consumer Protection Enforcement Network (ICPEN). The coalition has filed with the European Commission, U.S. FTC, California Attorney General, U.S. SEC, Vietnamese Consumer Rights authority, Europe Direct Contact Centre, and BBB, with three formal acknowledgments received. When consistent complaint patterns reach additional jurisdictions such as Australia's ACCC or Brazil's ANPD, coordinated regulatory examination becomes procedurally available under existing international frameworks. 3. APP STORE POLICY REVIEW Apple's App Store Review Guidelines and Google's Play Media Policies contain specific requirements regarding user data sovereignty, informed consent for material account changes, and security integrity of distributed applications. Applications that materially alter account regions, payment infrastructure, or data transfer destinations without documented user consent may be subject to review under these existing platform policies. Enforcement outcomes are determined solely by Apple and Google based on their internal review processes. 4. INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND DIPLOMATIC FRAMEWORKS Vietnam's Decree 147 mandates local server tracking and data localization for services operating within its jurisdiction. The interaction between Vietnamese domestic law and international user data flows is a matter appropriately raised with Vietnam's Ministry of Information and Communications (MIC) and with relevant international trade bodies including the EU under DSA frameworks, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, and the Australian Trade Commission. These are established diplomatic and trade channels available for cross-border digital services inquiries. 5. LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE OF UNDISCLOSED PLATFORM MODIFICATIONS Under U.S. state consumer protection statutes and European consumer protection directives, the legal standard applied to platform modifications differs significantly depending on whether modifications are disclosed to affected users and regulators. Platform modifications implemented without public patch notes, without user notification, and without regulatory disclosure may, under applicable law, be subject to a heightened standard of review. Where such modifications are found by a court or regulator to have been implemented to obscure prior conduct from oversight, this can affect the availability of certain affirmative defenses and the calculation of statutory damages. The current pattern of undisclosed account restorations is documented in coalition records for the consideration of relevant regulatory authorities. 6. COMPETITION LAW CONSIDERATIONS Antitrust and competition frameworks in the United States (FTC Act §5, Sherman Act), the European Union (TFEU Articles 101 and 102, Digital Markets Act), and Australia (Competition and Consumer Act 2010) contain provisions addressing artificial constraints on consumer choice within digital marketplace ecosystems. Documented conditions including regional pricing differentials (62% markup on VNG accounts per coalition documentation), restricted region-change functionality, and forced localized billing arrangements are matters appropriately raised with competition authorities for their independent evaluation. 7. PLATFORM-LEVEL ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS Apple and Google maintain independent enforcement authority over applications distributed through their platforms. Their review processes do not depend on prior judicial determination and operate under their published developer agreements. Documented patterns of undisclosed material account changes, restrictions on previously accessible functionality, or unconsented regional data transfers may be raised through Apple Developer Relations and Google Play Trust & Safety channels for their independent review. CONTEXT FOR THIS PUBLICATION The ongoing account restoration pattern observed today across coalition membership is being documented in real time. Coalition analysis considers this pattern in the context of the enforcement pathways outlined above, particularly Pathway 5. The coalition's position is that account restoration, without accompanying acknowledgment, corrective disclosure, data deletion, structural policy reform, or compensation for the lockout period, does not constitute resolution of the underlying documented violations. Restoration is welcomed. Restoration is not resolution. This briefing is published for regulatory awareness, academic reference, and public interest, and to establish a documentary record of the enforcement framework available to affected users under existing law. CREDIT Legal and regulatory research: @4radusfr (Coalition Moderator) Resistance Leader: Ilya (@xnxkwxd) Coalition Discord (verification required): discord.gg/WPHN4YNvW3 Coalition documentation continues. @Roblox @VNGCorporation #Roblox #RobloxVNG

PASSIVE RESTORATION EVIDENCE — REGIONS ARE BEING RESTORED SILENTLY WITHOUT USER-VISIBLE SUPPORT COMMUNICATION Coalition Day 10 evening surfaced new evidence category: passive region restoration processed by Roblox/VNG support without user-facing communication. CASE DOCUMENTATION Coalition member OpasniDed42 documented the following sequence: Winter 2025-2026: user submitted region change support tickets requesting return from Roblox VNG to Russian Federation. Received standard refusal responses. Continued periodic support ticket submissions without response over subsequent months. Global Roblox app remained unavailable in Russia. February 6, 2026, 7:42 PM UTC: Roblox VNG Support email received — "I have updated your account country per your request. If you had an existing credit balance, it has been converted to the equivalent value of local currency based on current exchange rates for your updated account location." Day 10 (July 2026): user discovered restoration incidentally. No support communication received in the immediate window of restoration. Mailbox empty for restoration notification. Test ticket to global Roblox Support (reference #175783920) received normal automated processing, confirming global support pathway is functional for the account. WHAT THIS EVIDENCE ESTABLISHES Region restoration is not exclusively responsive to active user requests. Some users are being processed for restoration silently, without user-initiated action at moment of unlock, without notification. This is a distinct category from the six previously documented cases: Categories 1-6 (previously documented, published in coalition standalone Jul 9): active user-initiated reversal via persistent 2-3 week ticketing with proper framing. Category 7 (this case): silent mass-processed restoration occurring passively after prior ticket submissions, without immediate user-facing communication. REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS The "cannot revert back" statement in Roblox-VNG conversion agreement is now contradicted by seven documented reversal cases across two categories. If Roblox/VNG is silently mass-processing restorations for some users, the question regulators will ask is: — On what basis are silent restorations processed? — Why are some users restored silently while others receive template refusals despite identical requests? — What operational policy differentiates users receiving silent restoration versus users receiving continued template refusal? Silent restoration without user notification also raises transparency concerns under: — EU GDPR Article 12 (transparent information about processing) — U.S. FTC Act Section 5 (deceptive practices when public statements contradict actual operational behavior) — Australian Consumer Law (unconscionable conduct when service reversibility varies by unspecified operational criteria) VNG Corporation cannot maintain public position that region change "cannot" occur while VNG internally executes silent region change processing without user acknowledgment. Regulatory investigation of the differential treatment becomes actionable: identical user requests receiving fundamentally different outcomes based on unspecified operational criteria. WHAT COALITION MEMBERS SHOULD DO If your region-locked account has been passively restored: document the moment of discovery, screenshot the restored functionality, preserve any communications received (including their absence). Report to coalition Discord evidence pool. If your region-locked account remains locked despite prior ticket submissions: silent restoration is documented for some users. Continue tactical pathway (persistent ticket submissions with proper framing per Jul 9 standalone). Restoration may occur silently or via support communication. Coalition Discord (verification required): discord.gg/WPHN4YNvW3 Credits: — Coalition contributor: passive restoration case documentation with explicit publication permission — Coalition Discord evidence pool Ten days. Seven documented reversal cases across two operational categories. Coalition documentation continues. @Roblox @VNGCorporation #Roblox #RobloxVNG

SEVEN CONTINENTS. GLOBAL LEGAL VIOLATIONS FRAMEWORK COMPLETE. Coalition regulatory research led by contributor aradus (@4radusfr, Pakistan) has now completed legal violations mapping across seven inhabited continents. Antarctica excluded as uninhabited. VNG Corporation and Roblox Corporation (as licensing parent authorizing the arrangement) have documented legal violations across every inhabited continent on Earth. AFRICA — MALABO CONVENTION + REGIONAL FRAMEWORKS Continental Framework: African Union Convention on Cyber Security and Personal Data Protection (Malabo Convention) prohibits cross-border transfer of African citizen personal data to third countries lacking equal or superior data protection standards, or without explicit consent. Hacker-based or automated glitch region conversion violates this standard directly. Regional Enforcement: — Nigeria (NDPA): 72-hour breach reporting rule + implied consent invalidation + personal liability for C-suite executives — South Africa (POPIA): unlawful processing designation + antitrust intersections classifying user data mismanagement as anti-competitive practice — Kenya (ODPC): track record of halting global operations entirely over data violations (Worldcoin precedent) Consumer Protection: Nigeria FCCPC precedent — $220 million fine against Meta for discriminatory data and consumer practices. African tribunals will not hesitate to penalize major global tech companies. ASIA — APPI + PIPA + PDPA + CONSUMER FRAMEWORKS Japan (APPI): foreign data transfer without prior explicit consent prohibited. Vietnamese server holding Japanese user data via glitch or breach is ongoing unauthorized foreign data transfer. South Korea (PIPA): Right to Erasure. Blocking users' ability to revert region or delete data from Vietnamese server violates PIPA directly. Singapore (PDPA): Transfer Limitation Obligation. Vietnamese ecosystem does not provide comparable protection framework. Forced transfer illegal. Consumer Protection (Hong Kong, Malaysia, India): taking real-world money on global platform then locking behind unresolvable regional barrier = withholding purchased goods + breach of financial contract. Gift Card & Currency Trap: geofenced prepaid funds unusable after VNG lock. Measurable financial harm actionable in every listed jurisdiction. EUROPE — GDPR Article 44 Chapter V: illegal cross-border data transfer to third country (Vietnam) without adequacy decision. Article 7: consent invalid via hacker bypass, bundled/tied consent, silence not qualifying as affirmative action, and false representation about consent consequences (see coalition standalone on "cannot revert back" false statement). Articles 16-17: Right to Rectification and Right to Erasure denied. Potential penalty: 20 million EUR or 4% of annual global revenue, whichever greater. Belarus/EU-adjacent framing gives coalition organizer standing as potential prime example case. NORTH AMERICA — FTC + STATE AGs + U.S. SEC FTC Section 5 deceptive commercial practices actionable across false statements, broken commitments, and forced service conversion. California Attorney General (Roblox HQ jurisdiction): state-level regulatory acknowledgment received on coalition filings within standard processing window. State-level regulatory processing active. U.S. SEC (new pathway): VNG Corporation F-1 registered as foreign issuer. False statements to consumers affecting revenue reporting potentially SEC-actionable. BBB case #24933277 closed "Business Failed to Respond" — permanent business practice record. SOUTH AMERICA — LGPD + HABEAS DATA + PDPA + ACL Brazil (LGPD): near-mirror of GDPR. Resolution CD/ANPD No. 19/2024 strictly regulates cross-border data flows. Massive fines up to 2% of Brazilian revenue (capped 50 million BRL per infraction). Constitutional Root: Habeas Data. Constitutional right in Brazil, Argentina, Colombia to legally demand knowledge and correction/deletion of personal information. VNG refusal directly blocks constitutional right. Argentina (PDPA): first Latin American country with EU "Adequacy Standard." Cross-border data handled very strictly by AAIP. Colombia (Law 1581): SIC regulator notoriously aggressive against global tech companies. Explicitly bans transferring personal data to countries lacking adequate protection. Consumer Protection (Brazil Código de Defesa do Consumidor, Argentina Ley de Defensa del Consumidor): unilateral contract modification illegal. Tied selling / trapping consumers categorized as abusive predatory business practice. OCEANIA — AUSTRALIAN PRIVACY ACT + ACL + STATUTORY TORT Australian Privacy Act 1988 extraterritorial clause: applies to foreign apps carrying business in Australia regardless of physical headquarters location. APP 8 (Accountability Follows the Data): Roblox Corporation legally responsible for how VNG handles Australian personal data. Cannot deflect liability to regional partner. APP 13 (Absolute Right to Data Correction): Australians can force correction of factually inaccurate personal data. Region label "Vietnam" for Australian user is factually incorrect. Refusal to correct violates this principle directly. APP 11 (Failure to Secure Data): hacker-based region switch qualifies as reportable data breach. Statutory Tort for Serious Invasions of Privacy (July 1 2025 amendment): Australian citizens can directly sue companies in court for reckless misuse of private information or wrongful digital account locking. Users do not need to wait for regulator action. Australian Consumer Law: forced regional lockout = textbook unconscionable commercial conduct + major failure of consumer guarantees legally entitling users to full refund or immediate replacement. OAIC + ACCC penalties: up to $50 million AUD, three times financial benefit obtained, OR 30% of company's annual turnover during breach period (whichever greater). ANTARCTICA — UNINHABITED, EXCLUDED Coalition regulatory framework does not extend to Antarctica for logical reasons. TOTAL COVERAGE: 7 OF 7 INHABITED CONTINENTS Africa. Asia. Europe. North America. South America. Oceania. Coalition documented legal violations across every inhabited continent on Earth. This is no longer a Vietnam localization dispute. This is a documented global regulatory exposure event for VNG Corporation and Roblox Corporation (as licensing partner authorizing arrangement). Coalition regulatory framework spans 13+ jurisdictions and pathways with documented filings, formal acknowledgments, and evidence extending across every populated landmass on the planet. REGULATORY PATHWAYS AVAILABLE TO COALITION MEMBERS By continent, coalition members can now file complaints through: Africa: Nigeria NDPC, South Africa Information Regulator, Kenya ODPC, plus Nigeria FCCPC and South Africa National Consumer Commission Asia: Japan APPI regulator, South Korea PIPC, Singapore PDPC, plus Hong Kong PCPD, Malaysia PDPD, India DPB Europe: national Data Protection Authorities of any EU member state (GDPR applies) North America: U.S. FTC, U.S. SEC, state attorneys general (California active), BBB, plus Canadian OPC South America: Brazil ANPD, Argentina AAIP, Colombia SIC, plus consumer protection agencies in each country Oceania: Australian OAIC + ACCC, plus New Zealand Office of the Privacy Commissioner Vietnam: Vietnamese Consumer Rights (bvntd.gov.vn) + Vietnam Competition Commission (VCC) + Ministry of Public Security Complaint guide v5 update publishing tomorrow includes filing templates for all coalition-relevant jurisdictions. Credits: — aradus (@4radusfr, Pakistan): six-continent original legal violations research + Asian Personal Data Protection framework + Root Problem legal architecture + Australia final continent completion analysis + Statutory Tort discovery — coalition Discord evidence pool for country-specific documentation across 26+ member countries Ten. Seven continents. Coalition documentation continues. @Roblox @VNGCorporation #Roblox #RobloxVNG

ELEVEN DAYS AGO I FILED A COMPLAINT ABOUT MY ROBLOX ACCOUNT BEING FORCIBLY MIGRATED TO ROBLOX VNG WITHOUT MY CONSENT. TODAY, AT 11:02 AM UTC, MY ACCOUNT WAS FULLY RESTORED. Notification received: "Roblox updated your account location." Account Location in Settings: Belarus. Roblox Plus subscription: accessible at $4.99/month with 1-month free trial available. Robux packages: displayed in USD with global pricing ($4.99 to $199.99). Full withdrawal from VNG regional lock. Complete restoration to global Roblox infrastructure. @xanxniquel — the account I have used since 2017 with over $140 in paid purchases and 11,000+ Robux — has been unlocked completely from the VNG regional lock that was applied without my consent. I am the ninth documented coalition member to receive successful region restoration. I am the coalition organizer. WHAT WAS RESTORED Account Location: Belarus (from Vietnam-locked) Roblox Plus subscription access: functional (previously blocked with "Something Went Wrong" error) Robux purchase infrastructure: global pricing in USD (previously routed through VNG shop) Payment flow: direct global Roblox (previously shop.vnggames.com/vn/game/roblox…) Full platform functionality: restored The refusal was total. The restoration is total. WHAT THIS DOES MEAN Eleven days ago Roblox and VNG Corporation refused my July 1 request stating my account was "subject to terms and conditions in Vietnam" and I would need to "create a new account." Eleven days of coalition documentation, 25+ published standalones, 60+ documented victims across 26+ countries, 19+ regulatory filings across seven pathways, three formal regulatory acknowledgments (California AG, Europe Direct Contact Centre, U.S. SEC), nine documented successful region change cases including my own — later, that refusal has been fully reversed. The refusal was never technical. The refusal was operational policy. Operational policy changes when documentation forces the change. WHAT COALITION MEMBERS SHOULD DO NOW If your account has been restored: verify Account Location in Settings, verify Roblox Plus accessibility, verify Robux packages display in your local/global currency. Screenshot everything. Report to coalition Discord evidence pool. If your account is still region-locked: the tactical pathway is proven functional. Nine documented successful cases across three operational categories (persistent ticketing, supervisor escalation, silent passive restoration). See coalition standalone "DOCUMENTED SUCCESSFUL REGION CHANGE" pinned on this account. Coalition contributor Kier's operational observation for Russian-speaking coalition members currently region-locked: "Для смены текущего региона выполните вход в учетную запись Roblox через VPN. Процесс автоматического обновления геолокации займет несколько минут. Данная процедура позволит активировать функцию голосового/текстового чата, а также снимет большинство ограничений, установленных со стороны VNG." Translation: "To update your current region, log in to your Roblox account using a VPN connection. The automatic geolocation update process will take a few minutes to complete. This procedure will enable voice and text chat features and lift most restrictions imposed by VNG." Coalition Kier update at 12:14 PM: "An operational update: your account will be successfully delinked from VNG. This process requires an additional waiting period of approximately 10 minutes. However, resolution times for customer support inquiries may be longer." Attempt at your own discretion. Screenshot results and report regardless of outcome. WHY THE CAMPAIGN CONTINUES 60+ coalition members are documented. Nine have been restored. Fifty-plus remain region-locked. VNG marketplace pricing discrimination remains. VNG customer support architecturally blocking Roblox as searchable product remains. Vietnamese vulnerable consumers procedure hidden from English users remains. Underage user marketplace fraud remains. Review manipulation remains. Six broken corporate commitments remain. AI customer support presented as human review remains. Corporate contradictions across VNG's own Privacy Policy documented across eight internal inconsistencies remain. EU Article 9 dedicated exception clause proving VNG knew international users were in the app while claiming Vietnamese-territorial scope remains. Regulatory filings across FTC, California AG, BBB, Vietnamese Consumer Rights, Vietnam Competition Commission, U.S. SEC, Europe Direct Contact Centre, and 13+ international regulatory pathways continue processing. Nine coalition members restored does not equal victory. Nine coalition members restored equals proof that the campaign works. The remaining fifty-plus are the reason the campaign continues. Coalition documentation continues until every affected user is restored, every commitment is honored, every regulatory pathway completes processing, and Roblox Corporation issues public acknowledgment of the forced regional migration pattern that affected users across every inhabited continent. Thank you to the coalition contributors who made this possible. Every standalone published crediting your name (or your anonymous role per your explicit preference) is your work as much as it is mine. This restoration belongs to the distributed contribution network, not to any single person. Coalition Discord (verification required): discord.gg/WPHN4YNvW3 The refusal was reversible. The reversal was earned. The work continues. @Roblox @VNGCorporation #Roblox #RobloxVNG

Good news for those dealing with incorrect account regions: It seems that accounts are gradually migrating back to their correct, original locations over time. If you’re currently stuck in a wrong region, keep an eye on your account settings—it might resolve itself automatically. Patience seems to be key here! #Roblox #robloxvng

VNG IS U.S. SEC-REGISTERED — FIRST COALITION SEC COMPLAINT ALREADY ACKNOWLEDGED Coalition research (contributor fearless) confirmed VNG Corporation filed F-1 registration statement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission while VNZ stock debuted on Vietnam's UPCoM exchange as the market's highest-priced listed security. Within 24 hours of this pathway being identified, coalition member [PULSE OR anonymous per attribution decision] filed the first coalition SEC complaint against VNG Corporation as foreign issuer. SEC Submission Number 17836-985-156-627 acknowledged by SEC same-day. The pathway is not theoretical. It is documented and functional. WHY SEC JURISDICTION APPLIES TO THIS CASE VNG Corporation as a foreign issuer that registered with the U.S. SEC has voluntarily subjected itself to U.S. federal securities laws enforcement authority. For foreign issuers, the SEC can enforce U.S. securities laws when the company's securities are sold or traded in the U.S., or its conduct has substantial effect on U.S. investors or markets. SEC enforcement outcomes for violations include: — Injunctions and cease-and-desist orders halting future violations — Civil monetary penalties and disgorgement of ill-gotten gains — Officer and director bars preventing named executives from serving as officers or directors of public companies — Criminal referral to U.S. Department of Justice where evidence supports WHAT COALITION SEC EVIDENCE COVERS Six categories of coalition-documented business practices fall within SEC enforcement scope for a U.S. SEC-registered foreign issuer: 1. False statements about product characteristics: The Roblox-VNG conversion agreement contains the verbatim statement "cannot revert back" presented to users at point of agreement acceptance. Coalition has documented six successful reversal cases proving this statement false. False material statement in consumer agreement affecting VNG revenue reporting. 2. Product delivery failure: Coalition members with documented purchase histories on global Roblox platform ($140 to $10,000+ per user across 60+ documented users) cannot access purchased items after forced regional conversion to VNG platform. 3. Broken written commitments (six documented categories): automatic regional detection, "No data collected" versus actual documented collection scope, human review escalation path, VNG support SLA, compensation delivery commitment, promotional giveaway conditional on migration. 4. Review manipulation: Vietnamese-language application store reviews displaying 5-star aggregate ratings while review text contains explicit negative sentiment and curse-word language. Consumer feedback manipulation affecting investor evaluation of business performance. 5. AI-generated customer support presented as human review: VNG Corporation 2024 Annual Report page 26 explicit admission that "AI and automation are being applied to customer support (via chatbots)." Coalition has documented 60+ users receiving near-identical refusal templates delivered under multiple human names (Karl VNG, Trà My Roblox VNG, Kim Roblox, Amy Roblox, VNG-VN Support). Bot-generated denials presented as human support. 6. Marketplace pricing discrimination and false advertising: 62% pricing markup on VNG accounts, underage discount advertising contradicted by actual pricing at point of sale, Zing card promotional advertising fraud. FIRST COALITION SEC FILING — CASE STUDY Submission Number: 17836-985-156-627 Filing date: [DATE] Filer jurisdiction: India (non-U.S. resident filing against foreign issuer, SEC jurisdiction confirmed) SEC acknowledgment: automated response within minutes of submission Case subject: VNG Corporation false statements to consumers and investors, MPT operational entity, Roblox Corporation licensing parent This filing establishes the pathway is: — Jurisdictionally accessible to non-U.S. residents — Processed by SEC without administrative rejection — Timely acknowledged with tracking number — Available to every affected coalition member regardless of country FILING INSTRUCTIONS FOR COALITION MEMBERS SEC Tips, Complaints, and Referrals portal: sec.gov/tcr Anonymous submissions accepted. English language required. No attorney representation required. Approximately 10-20 minutes to complete online form. Coalition guide v5 (publishing today) contains complete filing template with recommended complaint description text, VNG entity naming formula, and supporting evidence checklist. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK EXPANSION Coalition regulatory framework now spans 13+ jurisdictions and pathways with first SEC filing acknowledged: 1. FTC (U.S. federal consumer protection) 2. California Attorney General (PIU case #1549992 acknowledged coalition filing) 3. BBB (case #24933277 closed "Business Failed to Respond") 4. Vietnamese Consumer Rights (bvntd.gov.vn) 5. Vietnam Competition Commission (VCC) 6. EU GDPR (potential 20M EUR or 4% annual revenue fine) 7. EU DSA out-of-court dispute pathway (independent human panel review, free to user) 8. Japan APPI, South Korea PIPA, Singapore PDPA (Asian data protection) 9. African Union Malabo Convention + Nigeria NDPA + South Africa POPIA + Kenya ODPC 10. Brazil LGPD + Argentina PDPA + Colombia Law 1581 + Habeas Data constitutional 11. Australian Privacy Act + APP 8/11/13 + Statutory Tort ($50M AUD penalty exposure) 12. Hong Kong, Malaysia, India Consumer Protection frameworks 13. U.S. SEC (this pathway, FIRST FILING ACKNOWLEDGED) Credits: — fearless: VNG F-1 SEC registration discovery via VNG 2024 Annual Report research — [PULSE / anonymous per attribution]: first coalition SEC filing execution, proof-of-concept establishment — aradus (@4radusfr): legal framework analysis across multiple jurisdictions Eleven days. First SEC filing acknowledged within 24 hours of pathway discovery. Coalition velocity documented. @Roblox @VNGCorporation @SECGov #Roblox #RobloxVNG

18 hours ago I published this identifying the actual entity operating Roblox VNG — Minh Phương Thịnh Communications Company Limited (MPT), 100% owned indirect subsidiary of VNG Corporation, sourced from VNG's own 2024 Annual Report page 24. Since then: first coalition SEC complaint against VNG Corporation as U.S. SEC-registered foreign issuer acknowledged (Submission #17836-985-156-627). Corporate defendant structure documented. Regulatory pathway activated. Same 24-hour window. [QUOTE Corporate Structure standalone]

@RblxTracker This is great but I'm tired of them not updating people with an explanation or even a prior information

🚨BREAKING: Roblox VNG has started rolling back account locations for players who are not from Vietnam. Many people in Russia and other countries are reporting that their accounts are gradually being switched back to the global version of Roblox, with their account location updated to their home country. If you were locked in VNG and are now seeing changes, share your situation in the replies. What do you think of it?

VNG'S OWN PRIVACY POLICY CONTAINS EIGHT INTERNAL CONTRADICTIONS — DOCUMENTATION REMAINS ACTIONABLE POST-RESTORATION Coalition regulatory documentation continues despite mass region restoration cascade currently underway. Nine documented coalition members restored today. Fifty-plus remain region-locked. All coalition regulatory filings remain active. All documented corporate violations remain unresolved. Coalition evidence extraction has documented eight direct contradictions within VNG Corporation's own Vietnamese Privacy Policy plus contradictions across VNG's separate written policy documents. Each contradiction is sourced from VNG's own publicly accessible documentation. VNG cannot dispute coalition observations because coalition observations are sourced from VNG. Coalition contributor has preserved VNG Privacy Policy at archive.ph/5QF6p (archived July 11 2026) in the event VNG modifies or deletes policy in response to coalition exposure or regulator inquiries. CONTRADICTION 1 — SENSITIVE DATA CLAIM VS ACTUAL COLLECTION Vietnamese Privacy Policy explicit statement: "Chúng tôi sẽ không xử lý bất kỳ Dữ Liệu Cá Nhân nào của Bạn mà dữ liệu đó là dữ liệu cá nhân nhạy cảm" Translation: "We will not process any personal data of yours that is sensitive personal data." Same document documents collection of: IP address, device UDID/MEID, browser type, cookies, browsing history, biometric face recognition (via TrueID subsidiary), employment info, marital status, gender, payment information, government identity documents. Every listed category constitutes sensitive personal data under GDPR Article 9 and equivalent frameworks. VNG collects what VNG claims to not collect. CONTRADICTION 2 — DATA OWNERSHIP CONFLICT (VNG VS MPT) Vietnamese Privacy Policy identifies VNG as data controller collecting user data. Vietnamese Terms of Service Section 8.2 states: "All data created when you use this Game belongs solely to MPT; accordingly, MPT is fully authorized to store, use, and process this Data." Two separate legal entities (VNG Corporation and Minh Phương Thịnh Communications Company Limited) cannot simultaneously hold sole data authority over the same data. This establishes either corporate veil-piercing evidence proving VNG and MPT operate as single functional entity, or written policy inconsistency invalidating consent under GDPR Article 7 and equivalent frameworks across coalition-documented jurisdictions. CONTRADICTION 3 — HIDDEN AGREEMENT AT CONVERSION Coalition evidence extraction identified additional agreement at roblox.vnggames.net/thoathuan requiring users to provide job information, marriage status, gender identity, biometric face data, and payment information. Coalition documentation across 60+ affected users confirms this agreement was never presented on the global-to-VNG conversion screen. Users clicked "Agree" on the Roblox-VNG conversion screen without visibility of the additional agreement requiring biometric plus employment plus marital data collection. Consent under GDPR Article 7 must be informed and freely given. Consent cannot be validly obtained when material terms are hidden at point of agreement acceptance. CONTRADICTION 4 — UNILATERAL POLICY MODIFICATION AUTHORITY Vietnamese Privacy Policy explicit statement: "Chúng tôi có quyền sửa đổi bổ sung Chính Sách Bảo Mật này vào bất kỳ thời điểm nào mà không cần thông báo trước cho Bạn" Translation: "We reserve the right to modify or supplement this Privacy Policy at any time without prior notice to You." Violates EU GDPR Article 13 material change notification requirements, Vietnamese Decree 13/2023 Article 12 data subject notification requirements, California CCPA notification requirements, and equivalent frameworks across every coalition-documented jurisdiction. Coalition contributor's archive.ph preservation is direct response to this unilateral modification authority claim — VNG can modify or delete policies going forward, but coalition's archived versions remain accessible independent of VNG modification. CONTRADICTION 5 — FIVE-YEAR RETENTION AFTER DELETION REQUEST Article 12.2 Vietnamese Privacy Policy: "The period for VNG to Process your Personal Data is calculated from the time we obtain your Consent until the latest time you use our Services, and continues for at least five (5) years from that time. Even if you request that we delete your Personal Data under Article 12.2, we may still need to continue storing, using, and/or disclosing your Personal Data in accordance with this Privacy Policy in order to comply with our obligations under applicable personal data protection laws and other relevant laws." VNG explicitly reserves right to continue storing user data for five years after last service use AND continue storing after user deletion request. Direct violation of GDPR Article 17 Right to Erasure, Vietnamese Decree 13/2023 Article 12 correction and deletion rights, California CCPA deletion requirements, and equivalent frameworks across all coalition-documented data protection jurisdictions. For coalition members who have been region-restored today or in coming days: your data remains stored by VNG for five years post-migration. Region restoration does not equal data deletion. Your regulatory filings citing Article 12.2 retention violation remain actionable. CONTRADICTION 6 — THIRD PARTY DATA SHARING WITHOUT CONSENT Vietnamese Privacy Policy discloses data sharing with: — VNG subsidiaries, affiliates, member companies — Contractors, agents, service providers — Other third parties who "in turn, collect and Process your Personal Data for one or more Purposes" Same policy states: "we may disclose your Personal Data without your Consent if provisions of personal data protection laws or other applicable laws allow us to do so." VNG claims right to share user data without user consent based on unspecified "other applicable laws." Combined with third-party data sharing framework, VNG shares user data broadly and disclaims liability for third-party breaches. CONTRADICTION 7 — LIMITATION OF PROCESSING RIGHT DENIED Vietnamese Privacy Policy grants users right to request limitation of processing when data is inaccurate or when data no longer serves stated purpose. Coalition documented pattern across 60+ users: users documented region label as inaccurate (accounts of non-Vietnamese residents labeled Vietnamese-region). VNG refused to process limitation requests, denying users the right VNG's own policy grants. Coalition observation post-restoration: users receiving region restoration today are receiving delayed processing of the correction request VNG's own policy required VNG to process from the beginning. Restoration confirms VNG had operational capability to process these requests all along. CONTRADICTION 8 — DATA TRANSFER OUTSIDE EU WITHOUT GDPR-COMPLIANT MECHANISM Vietnamese Privacy Policy Article 14: "Personal Data may be transferred outside the EU. We will take necessary and appropriate steps to ensure that the Personal Data Recipients are responsible for confidentiality." Policy does not reference Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs), adequacy decisions, Binding Corporate Rules, or any GDPR Chapter V-compliant mechanism for cross-border EU data transfer. Insufficient legal basis for EU-to-Vietnam data transfer under GDPR framework. CUMULATIVE IMPACT VNG's own written Privacy Policy contains eight direct contradictions with itself and with the Vietnamese Terms of Service Section 8.2. VNG's regulatory defense cannot rely on VNG's written policies because VNG's written policies contradict each other and violate multiple coalition-documented frameworks. Coalition regulatory filings across every jurisdiction reference these contradictions: — EU GDPR (Articles 7, 12, 13, 17, 22, Chapter V, Article 9 special categories) — Vietnamese Decree 13/2023 (Articles 3, 12) — U.S. FTC Section 5 (deceptive practices via contradictory disclosures) — U.S. SEC (material inconsistencies affecting investor evaluation, VNG registered as foreign issuer) — California CCPA (sensitive personal information plus notification requirements) — Japan APPI, South Korea PIPA, Singapore PDPA (data collection transparency) — Brazil LGPD, Argentina PDPA, Colombia Law 1581 (consent invalidation) — Australian Privacy Act APP 5/6/11/13 (collection notification plus correction) — African Malabo Convention + Nigeria NDPA + South Africa POPIA + Kenya ODPC (informed consent) WHAT THIS MEANS FOR COALITION MEMBERS TODAY If your account has been restored today: your regulatory filings remain fully actionable. VNG contradictions in Privacy Policy do not disappear because your region was restored. Your five-year data retention remains under Article 12.2, your consent under hidden agreement remains invalidated under Contradiction 3, your data may still be shared with third parties per Contradiction 6. If your account remains region-locked: these contradictions strengthen your regulatory filing case. Reference VNG Privacy Policy article numbers directly. VNG cannot defend policies that contradict each other. If you have not yet filed: coalition guide v5 contains templates for FTC, California AG, BBB, Vietnamese Consumer Rights, VCC, U.S. SEC, EU DSA, Roskomnadzor, and European ECC/CPC pathways. Coalition Discord (verification required): discord.gg/WPHN4YNvW3 Credits: — Coalition contributor: Vietnamese Privacy Policy page-by-page analysis, eight contradictions extraction, TrueID subsidiary identification, archive preservation at archive.ph/5QF6p, cross-document reference verification — Coalition Discord evidence pool Eleven days. VNG cannot defend its policies without contradicting its policies. Coalition documentation continues regardless of ongoing restoration cascade. @Roblox @VNGCorporation @SECGov #Roblox #RobloxVNG

VNG CORPORATION AND ROBLOX CORPORATION HAVE NOT RESPONDED TO COALITION DOCUMENTATION IN 264+ HOURS The Roblox VNG lockout coalition has now published multiple standalone documentation posts, 55+ reply-case documentations, expanded to 60+ documented victims across 26+ countries, filed 19+ regulatory complaints across seven pathways with multiple formal acknowledgments, and documented eight successful region change cases proving corporate policy contradictions. Zero official response from Roblox Corporation. Zero official response from VNG Corporation. Zero official response from Minh Phương Thịnh Communications Company Limited (MPT), the identified operating entity. Public silence during 264+ hours of continuous coalition documentation is itself documentation. Corporate non-response to documented consumer harm affecting 60+ users across 26 countries with U.S. SEC-registered parent company is regulator-relevant behavior. Documented coalition communications reaching Roblox and VNG in this period: — 19+ formal regulatory filings across FTC, California Attorney General, BBB, Vietnamese Consumer Rights, Vietnam Competition Commission, U.S. SEC, and Europe Direct Contact Centre — Multiple formal regulatory acknowledgments received (specific case numbers preserved in coalition documentation pool) — Direct @Roblox and @VNGCorporation tags on 25+ standalone documentation posts — Coalition Discord accessible to any Roblox/VNG representative wishing to engage — Coalition organizer DMs open with public verified accessibility Corporate options in the current moment: 1. Engage with coalition documentation and process case-by-case region reversal requests 2. Issue public statement addressing coalition claims 3. Continue silence and accumulate regulatory exposure across 13+ jurisdictions and 4 tactical enforcement mechanisms Coalition documentation continues regardless of corporate response choice. Eight documented users have already received region restoration (evidence categories 1-8 including silent passive restoration confirmed Jul 11 2026). Corporate operational contradiction between public "cannot revert back" statements and documented reversal processing establishes regulatory record independent of any Roblox/VNG communication. The silence is not neutral. The silence is evidence. @Roblox @VNGCorporation @SECGov #Roblox #RobloxVNG

BIG update for the VNG situation: My account was just automatically freed from the VNG region lock WITHOUT any support ticket. Everyone stuck in this loop go check your accounts! If from Vietnam try with a VPN 🌍✨ Huge thanks to @xnxkwxd for all his hardwork. ​#Roblox #RobloxVNG