Ravi

16 posts

Ravi banner
Ravi

Ravi

@ravi_md

Katılım Haziran 2025
369 Takip Edilen158 Takipçiler
Ravi
Ravi@ravi_md·
@TiltFolio @BenBCDE Analyzing the correlation between gold, Bitcoin, and the equity markets is really interesting. It's really not behaving like it historically has after it began its recent bull market. I would be interested to hear your thoughts on that.
English
1
0
1
17
TiltFolio
TiltFolio@TiltFolio·
@BenBCDE Going to take some time for most to realize that gold is going to dominate returns going forward. As you know, being masked by returns in AI stocks for now. But $SPY vs. $GLD is telling us the real story.
English
1
1
4
181
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
@DevinWeatherby Very correct. But it does it... ...The opposite way. Covid created the bottom FTX collapse create the bottom The same way, the "positive Iran news", topped the markets. And then I haven't talked about the 1000's of news events that did nothing. News is worth ignoring
English
3
0
16
674
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$btc News does not move markets News does not impact markets News does not influence markets... ...they way you think it does, but in the opposite way. By the time the news arrives, the move is already done. We have shown it in real time, and we traded it in real time.
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$btc shorts - The Iran Peace Treaty Deal, how to deal with (ignore) news and the forward pricing nature of markets. My bold claim: we will see new lows once more and the deal should be framed in bearish light, not bullish That's a mouthful of a title. But I'm getting a lot of comments re-occurring which are of the form: "Astro, why build shorts on this pump, Trump is negotiating deals for reopening Hormuz, once the deal is closed, we will go higher". Before I get deeper, I can always be wrong on the trade and we can just send and my attempt to bust the comment above could be a complete failure. But the reality is different. Ever had the feeling of closing a long because "bad news is looming?" "war threats are coming". Or ever had the feeling of closing a short because "war is about to end?". Then accepting the reality I am about to share will likely help you erase that fear for good. The market constantly prices in the current sentiment and current collective mind of the news out there. Right now, that collective mind is lots of hope for good news while the good news hasn't arrived yet. Markets are forward pricing in nature, not backwards pricing. The current news available and known to everyone does not move price, it already has. That's why we watch the charts, and not the news. That's why we don't try to explain every move using news either since not all news is equally important. The market never cared what Jerome Powell said, only the anticipation and sentiment around it does. If this trade closes into a W and we see new lows, let that be a lesson, to not care about the news, when entering a trade, when holding a trade, when exiting a trade. Because if the deal doesn't go through and $btc makes new lows, everyone will blame it on the deal. But guess what, if the deal goes through and $btc still makes new lows, people will call the asset "bad" or "lagging" or "why is spx moving up and not btc, sell your bitcoin now, the asset is dead". Case and point, there will always be a narrative to why price did x, y or z. People will always look for reasons. Show me the charts and I'll tell you the narrative. Remember my bold claim. Once and if we made new lows and my (bold) plan to build shorts into it plays out, I will go back to this tweet, and you will become wiser, I promise. If not and the idea is wrong, at least, I tried. But I promise you that the business as usual is new lows once more. And, once $btc made new lows, we will not blame it on the deal (if it goes wrong), we will not blame it on $btc being a lagging asset compared to $spx at the moment (if the deal goes right). And then there is the third scenario, where nothing happens, or only a smaller pump. Then the bulls come out loudly, tell me I was wrong, and then we see new lows regardless. So, it's all a façade, hence we will simply ignore the news, news is just a subset of the narrative, which always comes after the move, not before. Markets are forward pricing.

English
22
11
274
29.6K
Ravi
Ravi@ravi_md·
@astronomer_zero I have been following you closely. No one matches your insight on all CT that I've been exposed to. You have real intellectual honesty and strategy. Highly appreciated. I would pay for subscription if you made one.
English
1
0
1
256
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$btc sizeable shorts Notice the consolidation inside our profit zone. And limits set for 74.1k (live instructions) Quick post, just to comment on how we consolidate now inside the partial zone we mapped out. Very common, again liquidity resorption, nothing special. The slowdown of price now creates nervousness and settles the surprise effect of the move down back into a little bit of doubt and anticipation, very classic, very common. And while our plan is in place and while it almost always plays it, we always strive for (close to) perfect execution regardless, keeping it humble. During liquidity pool resorption, I therefore always take partials. It relieves stress during that build-up of anticipation again. Old followers know this very well by now. If you don't partial, even small price retraces off the liquidity pool will feel like regret and you instantly feel forced to partial where you didn't intend to, resulting in suboptimal gains. Again, yes my plan of 74.1k is in place, but like a good rock face climber takes stops and sleeps on nice cliff faces before reaching the peak, we take stops too to breathe. Price is as temporary as a soap bubble so while unpartialed positions may feel comfortable now, less so when price moves (regardless if its up or down, nervousness in profit exits too especially when getting close to target, this is called target anxiety) The overall result will be less than holding in full, but you have time to enjoy the view (profits) and still reach the end destination, with a much more peaceful mind. Anyone who runs 2 or 3RR trades to full target without partials every single time, knows how stressful it is. Stress free trading beats stressful trading. And it's frankly just part of consistent profitability . Speaking of profit targets, I have set my limits for 74.1k to close off the trade except 20%. Last 20% will be closed on final local precision below 74.1k.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$btc sizeable shorts First zone reached. ✅Taking profits here. ✅ Fourth W in a row in the making. Alright! The plan is ancient, yet the plan is clear. Of me calling loudly and clearly for 74.1k, and taking 1 partial in between. We planned out every single step along the way, as well as every zone we would take profits, and we now reached that first zone. Simple means to take profits. Another trade called live, conviction, and clear instruction every step along the way. With this trade, being a bigger size trade. That's TP1 and our fourth win in a row in the making. Enjoy.

English
22
13
224
44.4K
Ravi
Ravi@ravi_md·
@astronomer_zero Very inpressive work. Said begrudgingly. Happy youre a weekly bull
English
0
0
1
136
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$btc sizeable shorts First zone reached. ✅Taking profits here. ✅ Fourth W in a row in the making. Alright! The plan is ancient, yet the plan is clear. Of me calling loudly and clearly for 74.1k, and taking 1 partial in between. We planned out every single step along the way, as well as every zone we would take profits, and we now reached that first zone. Simple means to take profits. Another trade called live, conviction, and clear instruction every step along the way. With this trade, being a bigger size trade. That's TP1 and our fourth win in a row in the making. Enjoy.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$btc shorts Added the same exact part in again, at the exact same price, with the same exact plan in mind. Alright, our call last time offered the exact predicted $1300 move we wanted to see. It didn't give a cent less, it didn't give a cent more. We entered at that time in anticipation of that move, but due to the slow reaction and bank holiday, exited again. We now reached back to the same price level of 77.4k. This time, it's likely the reaction will be more prompt and clear, especially in the order flow, so I am adding the first portion back in. I realize it's somewhat of a parade of entering and exiting at the exact same price a few times, for which I apologize. Mind you these shorts overall are slightly large in base size than my overall position, especially when positioning is finalized and especially compared to the first 3 trades in this current win streak. And thanks to the signature responding to the $1300 mark perfectly, we get to continue to execute our overall plan and we can continue to operate our overall pre planned execution. So this is exactly where I wanted to ad and stay added now, for the first half of the positioning process of this trade. A trade that carries a bit more conviction, a bit more time, and a bit more management, than my usual endeavour indeed. Conviction comes with clarity, and this trade is the clearest of the 4 trades we had, and so should the overall size after finalisation. I am convinced in this leading us to 74.1k after all is said and done, new lows, and I still don't believe it's worth longing before reaching it. Enjoy, and happy holding along. I will guide you through the entire process of it as always, in live time, with live entries and exits.

English
43
10
229
45.7K
Ravi
Ravi@ravi_md·
@TiltFolio NVIDIA has broken its consolidation to the upside. I suspect both will see rather steep impulsive moves prior to a rapid, intense, and brief correction before long term continuation after sentiment reset. Just my guess.
English
0
0
1
11
TiltFolio
TiltFolio@TiltFolio·
@ravi_md It's a great question. I'm stumped. I can argue both ways: $SMH has gone too far, and $NVDA is leading lower. Meanwhile, my own leading indicator (i.e. "the internals") suggest all is fine, so semis are that powerful. I simply don't know.
English
1
0
0
103
TiltFolio
TiltFolio@TiltFolio·
So as $SMH makes new all-time highs - again, $NVDA continues to languish. Either SMH or NVDA is priced incorrectly. Historically NVDA led the whole sector higher. So who is correct?
TiltFolio tweet media
English
3
1
7
2.7K
Ravi
Ravi@ravi_md·
@degenturbo80188 @Globalflows It couldn't be more obvious what he is doing. He has a massive spot liquid/locked exposure of the hyperliquid token, exceeding his net notional short exposure of approximately $110 million of the hype token. Likely position is net long via spot and partially hedged via perp.
English
1
0
3
70
MacroRage
MacroRage@degenturbo80188·
@Globalflows Then can you explain your line of thinking ? Thanks.
English
1
0
1
966
Capital Flows
Capital Flows@Globalflows·
You really think Loracle is short ? Such first order thinking
English
14
7
158
24.5K
Ravi
Ravi@ravi_md·
@JBulkeley Do you have historical data for your indicators
English
1
0
0
10
JBulkeley
JBulkeley@JBulkeley·
BTC $80,683 — structural snapshot: 7 p.m. UTC Very quiet............. MSXI +31.1 (BULLISH) — 6th consecutive positive day MSSI 37.1 (ELEVATED) — stress fading but not yet CALM MSVI 23.1 — vol compressed, IV barely above RV The interesting signal: funding at 0.0001%. Near zero across 6 exchanges through a $4K+ range. This move is spot-driven, not leveraged. No crowded longs to unwind. Skew at -2.93 — puts slightly bid but nothing extreme. PCR 0.66 — calls dominate positioning. Term structure in mild contango (0.90). Structural read: positioning is clean, stress is fading, vol is compressed. The kind of setup where moves extend rather than reverse. All readings are Ed25519 signed, independently verifiable. myceliasignal.com/docs/indices/ #deribit #x402 #btc
JBulkeley tweet media
English
1
0
3
120
Ravi
Ravi@ravi_md·
@cointradernik it would be really helpful if you made a YouTube video that explains these indicators and different ways you use them. These have a wealth of information
English
0
0
3
3.1K
Ravi
Ravi@ravi_md·
@Globalflows Do you have any inkling of how long this macro regime is sustainable? If we assume fed continues pause
English
0
0
1
18
Capital Flows
Capital Flows@Globalflows·
Here is how to think about the difference between nominal and real interest rates Ill link the entire educational primer on interest rates below
English
2
2
33
6.8K
Ravi
Ravi@ravi_md·
@an_Skelly @Kimberl56843016 @GriftReport Hey my friend take a closer look in the video The biker actually clearly sticks his knee out and hits her on person. If he didn’t do that he would have just gone right beside her
English
0
0
13
111
G R I F T Y
G R I F T Y@GriftReport·
A father who was ordered to pay compensation to a cyclist for filming him as he knocked over his young daughter has finally won his legal battle. The cyclist, who was only identified as Jacques D, was originally taken to court in Verviers for kneeing the little girl, only to be given a suspended sentence because he had been criticised enough on social media. Jacques then sued Mr Mpasa for defamation, because the backlash the video received resulted in him feeling so threatened by the public that he was scared to leave his own house. In April 2023, the child's father was ordered to pay the cyclist 4,500 euros in compensation. But now, after a lengthy appeal, a court in Liege has ruled out the original decision in favour of Jacques D, who is president of a local cycling club. Typical lycra lout wanker!!
English
964
1.3K
12.4K
2.9M
Ravi
Ravi@ravi_md·
@StockMKTNewz This has absolutely nothing to do with security or geopolitics. AI chip restriction accomplishes: 1. Massive (albeit transient) limitation on Chinese LLM industry 2. Removed about 1/3 of demand from NVIDIA, cost goes down and availability up
English
1
0
9
1.8K
Evan
Evan@StockMKTNewz·
The CEO Anthropic AI just said he DOES NOT think we should be selling AI chips to China 🇨🇳 "I think it's completely nuts...It's very important that we defeat China in this technology."
English
121
65
673
123.9K
Ravi
Ravi@ravi_md·
I don’t see any clear indication it will be removed. Quite the opposite - if you notice, most legacy models like o3 and 4.5 have been removed, but 4o remains, assuredly due its fervent supporters. Unlike the others, I do believe 4o can be run relatively cheaply. I understand that GPT-5 does not meet your use desires, the GPT-5 line is indeed not nearly as intuitive, emotionally resonant, and agreeable as 4o. I encourage you to also experiment with Claude (after working with personalizing preferences) for your specific case. This model can also be quite emotionally resonant and agreeable, particularly after personalizing the preferences.
English
2
0
1
150
Ravi retweetledi
Yuchen Jin
Yuchen Jin@Yuchenj_UW·
SoftBank was the largest shareholder of Nvidia. but they sold their entire 4.9% stake in Nvidia in 2019 for $3.6B. It's worth $200B today. Jensen Huang made fun of Masa in front of him is so funny lmao!
English
72
520
6.9K
1.5M
Ravi
Ravi@ravi_md·
@cairoasmith That is emotionally challenging. What would be the most meaningful technological advancement that would have the greatest impact on the perceived quality of your life?
English
2
0
44
15K
Cairo Smith
Cairo Smith@cairoasmith·
On the spinal cord injury subreddit they warn you that a chunk of your good friends will start ghosting you inexplicably 1-2 years after you don't recover, which sounded ridiculous, but then it happened to me down to the letter.
English
216
444
12.2K
641.2K