Rawas Mohamed

@jordan_ross_8F Openclaw

The founders who figure out OpenClaw in the next 90 days are going to look like geniuses in 2027. The problem is most agency owners don't have time to figure out the install, the security risks, where to start, or what to actually hand it first. So my team built a 48-page beginner's guide that does it for you. Inside: — The exact prompts to hand it on day one — Plain English setup for Mac and Windows — How to secure it so it doesn't burn your business down — 42 copy-paste workflows across sales, marketing, ops, and finance Your competitors are sleeping on this. Comment OPENCLAW and I'll send it.

@EvanWritesOnX Inshallah, this is good news for all of us who are prepared.

When you come after me for calling this a theatre; remember that Khameini was eliminated on day 1, along with a list of IRGC leaders on subsequent days. Remember that in response to this, Iran effectively inflicted MORE damage to the GCC states, who had NOTHING to do with Iran's leadership decapitations, than it did on Israel. And remember that soon enough, you will see Iran and the GCC, become friends like nothing ever happened. You will see trade deals; you will see robust alliances. And then you will see Iran normalize with Israel. And you will incomprehensibly look back and wonder what happened.

@andrewbrown At the same time isnt it also the best time to get to learning coding as well?

If you're not writing code, how are going to fix the problem when the Agent can't? LLMs are not getting that much smarter, we just have fancier plumbing around them. I have 20 years experience coding day in an day out, my skills are locked in. But for you, sorry but you're going to have to hit the coding gym.

@EvanWritesOnX @EvanWritesOnX — As much as reconciliatory statements i have seen from Iran, couldnt see any such statements from GCC countries. Is this by design? If so what are the evidences that are allowing you to read btw the lines?

Already starting to age well...

@EvanWritesOnX Based on your analyses how do you see this pattern accelerating GCC normalization deals, and what opportunities might it unlock for TPS nodes in energy and infrastructure sectors?

The financial and political pressure to end this "war" is now coming from inside the room. Wall street journal reported that Trump's own advisors are privately urging him to articulate an exit plan, warning that a prolonged conflict will damage Republican midterm prospects. Wall street expects the Fed to remain hawkish on rates as long as the war persists, which puts Trump's domestic economic agenda directly at odds with continuation. Fortune reported that markets are pricing in sustained Fed hawkishness tied to the conflict's inflationary effects. This is all FIC pressure. On Iran's side, operatives from the Ministry of Intelligence have reached out indirectly to the CIA to discuss terms. The backchannel is operational. The financial forces on both sides is pushing for resolution. Three structural obstacles are preventing the settlement from crystallizing in my observation, and none of them are about military capability or willingness to fight. The first is the divergence between Trump and Netanyahu on war termination. Trump wants a quick, declarable victory and an exit. His incentive structure is economic: rising oil prices, inflation risk, and midterm exposure all push toward rapid conclusion. Netanyahu's incentive structure runs in the opposite direction. The war provides domestic political cover like it always has, keeps his coalition intact, and creates leverage over his ongoing legal vulnerabilities. He has functional veto power through the "mutual decision" framework governing US-Israeli operations, and his conspicuous absence from public view may itself be a negotiating posture, allowing him to avoid being the visible face of concessions while the terms are shaped around him. I think the reports of his disappearance are information warfare noise, but the silence itself may be useful to a leader who needs distance from whatever deal emerges. The second is Mojtaba Khamenei's consolidation window. Iran's new Supreme Leader, installed after his father's death cannot negotiate a ceasefire in his second week in power without looking like he capitulated under fire. He needs a minimum runway of credible resistance rhetoric before any agreement can be reframed as a "strategic decision" rather than a surrender. This is a timing thing. Every new leader in this position requires the same thing: time to establish authority before spending it. The rhetorical intensity from Iran right now is the sound of that clock running, not evidence of genuine escalatory intent. The third is the guarantee gap. Iran's publicly stated ceasefire conditions require a US guarantee that neither America nor Israel will strike Iran again in the future. This is a demand the US cannot deliver because of Israels current cabinet wildcard behavior. Iran's leadership knows this. The demand is a negotiating anchor designed to be walked down to something achievable, likely a time-limited security framework with verification mechanisms. But the distance between the opening position and the landing zone requires rounds of backchannel negotiation that take time to execute. None of these obstacles are permanent. The Trump-Netanyahu divergence resolves when US economic pain threshold crosses the political utility Netanyahu extracts from continuation, which the advisor pressure and Wall Street signaling suggest is approaching fast. Mojtaba's consolidation window closes naturally within weeks as he establishes institutional control. The guaranteed gap narrows through backchannel iteration that is already happening. I think the trajectory points toward settlement in the next 30 days.

@Al_Quraan114 Is it okay to have your eyes closed while reciting?

Another Gem, If you listen to it for the first time, it'll turn into a habit in your day.❤️ It has an incredible amount of psychological comfort, Masha'Allah.

@FarzaTV @amasad Love this! ✨

Got something special: The models are insane rn. And I feel like no one is showing beginners what's possible. On Saturday I'm going to teach a group of people how to build their first ever app with AI. After, I'll give you: Free Codex + ChatGPT Plus. Free Replit Core. Free Wispr Flow Pro. Free Odysser Pro. All for 1-mo. This is the best starter pack possible. The session itself will focus on Replit + Codex. It will be online and free. It'll be like a live tutorial, then we'll all cowork + build alongside each other in Discord. Last week 2500 joined, 70% had never touched a coding agent before + never built anything ever, and by the end ppl were deploying real apps to Vercel. If you wanna join call, reply with your fav emoji. Will DM. Ty to the homies for making this happen + replying to my emails so quickly: @openai, @replit, @wisprflow, and @joinodysser.

@EvanWritesOnX Force majeure for a prolonged period is required for renegotiations. Does this mean we should expect the strait to be closed for a few more weeks?

This "war" is aggressively isolating the US. Force Majeure is a legal clause that suspends contractual obligations when an extraordinary event makes delivery impossible. Kuwait Petroleum invoking it on oil sales is not primarily about failing to deliver barrels. It is about legally voiding the entire contractual architecture those barrels were sold under. And that architecture has US fingerprints throughout its structure. A long-term oil supply agreement between a Gulf national oil company and a major buyer is not simply a commitment to deliver barrels at a set price. It is a bundle of terms that encoded American leverage: pricing denominated in US dollars, payments routed through the US-controlled banking system, benchmark pricing formulas tied to Western financial markets, and clauses requiring compliance with US sanctions that effectively gave Washington veto power over which buyers could be served. The dollar was not incidental to these contracts. It was the control mechanism. Every barrel of Gulf oil that moved through this architecture paid a political rent to Washington; not through direct ownership, but through settlement control, pricing power, and the ability to cut off any buyer Washington disapproved of. Force Majeure voids the contract. The legal trigger being, Hormuz closure, active regional warfare is "real" and therefore valid. When Kuwait Petroleum invokes it, it is not violating an agreement. It is legally exiting one. Washington's embedded leverage is extinguished with it. This is the death of the US when it comes to participating on the global stage. The TPS (banks, investment firms, and multinationals) that actually move money across borders has been quietly trying to escape Washington's contractual architecture for years. Every time Washington imposes sanctions, global banks lose market access. Every time Washington weaponizes the payments system, international firms absorb compliance costs and legal exposure. The financial establishment has been watching its Gulf investment opportunities remain dismal as a direct consequence of Washington's foreign policy choices, and it has been looking for the exit. The Force Majeure is the door. The new supply agreements do not have to be written with the same structure. A Gulf national oil company negotiating fresh terms after a Force Majeure declaration can offer pricing in alternative currencies, payment through non-Western clearing systems, delivery terms that do not route through US-monitored infrastructure, and direct investment partnerships that cut out the American intermediaries entirely. The TPS that re-engage under these new terms do so without Washington's political requirements attached. They get better deals; direct equity positions instead of intermediation fees, no sanctions compliance overhead, genuine market access. Gulf states get better deals; flexible buyers, alternative settlement options, no American veto over their customer list. The US gets nothing. Its leverage architecture has been legally extinguished, and global capital has no incentive to rebuild it. American foreign policy, particularly the use of sanctions and dollar weaponization as political tools, had been steadily reducing global capital's freedom of movement while serving the interests of the defense industry and political lobbying coalitions. The financial industrial complex and the defense establishment have genuinely different interests; one profits from stability and market access, the other profits from conflict and arms sales. As those interests diverged, so did the strategies. The Iran conflict gave the FIC what it needed: a legally valid extraordinary event that voids the existing contracts and opens a renegotiation window. The Hormuz closure is the Force Majeure trigger. The restructuring of Gulf oil contracts away from dollar architecture is the financial transition that the multipolar world has been building toward for a decade. This "war" is the instrument being used to execute a transition that was already underway. This is accelerating TPS capital flight.

@damianplayer Very interesting. Id like to first start with myself and then start selling the service. But how do i begin? Any framework to get started to implement it for myself first?

this is fucking wild… nobody is selling claude-as-a-service to corporate boomers.. and it’s THE most obvious arbitrage play on the internet. this demographic controls the majority of company budgets in the US. they have the authority to sign checks, the urgency to stay relevant, and zero idea where to start. higher average deal sizes, longer retention, and almost no price sensitivity compared to any other segment. and almost every AI person on earth is ignoring them to chase startup founders and tech bros who already know what claude is. think about why this gap exists. the entire “AI twitter” culture is dominated by engs marketing to other engineers. claude projects for developers. cursor tutorials for coders. agent frameworks for people who already know what an API is. the audience everyone fights over is the one that needs help the least. meanwhile people in corporate aged 30-60 are sitting there with $100k+ salaries, expense accounts, and a genuine fear of getting left behind. they’re actively asking their teams “what are we doing with AI?” and getting blank stares back. the first person who shows up and makes it simple wins the entire relationship. the setup is not complicated. claude projects, custom instructions, knowledge bases, workflow integrations. two hours of work per client. you’re not building agents. you’re making someone go AI-native and making them feel like they have an unfair advantage at work. someone in our network is doing exactly this. targets mid-level to senior corporate professionals. calls it “the AI native setup.” charges $2,500-$5,000+ per engagement. his clients refer three more clients every time because the person who got set up becomes the smartest person in their office. retention is near 100%. nobody cancels a service that makes them look indispensable. the reason nobody targets them is also pure ego. people who understand claude don’t want to explain it to a 52 year old VP of operations. they’d rather build for the audience they relate to and fight over the same pool of technical early adopters who already have 69+ tools doing the same thing. massive arbitrage opportunity for anyone willing to translate what they already know into language a non-technical professional understands. the demand is real. the competition is basically zero. and the willingness to pay is higher than anything you’d get from a founder with a $15k monthly burn who needs equity instead of cash. this is exactly the customer driving the most revenue for solo AI consultants right now. people who don’t want to learn (the majority of people).. they want to be set up, handed the keys, and told they’re ahead of their colleagues. if you know claude, you can do that in an afternoon. the world is going AI-native and nobody should be left behind. questions on either side of this, building the service or becoming AI-native yourself: drop them below. I’ll answer everything.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ god speed to all!

@lady_valor_07 Katana Zero.

What is it?

@cryptolyxe Does reading over here count?

what’s the best way to increase intelligence i want unlock the entirety of my brain. any suggestions

@2free4most @dwkos @BrianRoemmele What if the law is determined by where it originates from ?

@dwkos @BrianRoemmele that literally makes no sense though bc it's in our solar system

A new 3I/ATLAS image. It is exhibiting non-standard physics: New a massive exhaust-like jets are observed FACING towards the Sun. This is unconventional behavior of any observed Comet and defies the out gassing flow one would expect. The new image is from the Nordic Optical Telescope on UT 2025 November 11 by astronomers David Jewitt and Jane luu. (Via @DobsonianPower)

@HalfLife3Out I was here.

no

@Rainmaker1973 To never take debt, and if you must - then to repay it on promised time.

Name one.

@Ajatshatru_28 In our part of Indian, its called somethings similar to your name.. chaton

It's present in every Indian home and no one knows it's name 🤣

@Rainmaker1973 Old Boy (2003)

Name one.

@iam_kendiii Two likes.

One of the most common signs that something has been written by chatbots is the expression “It’s not just X, it’s Y”. E.g. “It’s not just about helping others, it’s about growing as a person.” What are some others?

@EdLatimore Dont we have almost the entire column 17 in our water supply?

The periodic table we never knew we needed.

@veggie_eric Ask the other person who knows their name.preferably someone you dont know.

i need advice wat to do when you've forgotten someone's name but you've been acquaintances for long enough that it's way past the point where it's socially acceptable to ask them their name again