avery

2.5K posts

avery banner
avery

avery

@readasv

🦋 Eu Sem Você

Mulholland Drive Katılım Şubat 2024
32 Takip Edilen23 Takipçiler
lena
lena@whitewyyne·
anyone wanna play arammmm >.<
GIF
English
5
2
17
473
avery
avery@readasv·
@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem lots of snuck premises here, so let’s take a step back and resolve this. you’re arguing an ought for misandry, so evidently you think language is malleable. so by that extension, misandry is not tied to any one thing, so why ought its definition require oppression? your internal-
English
2
0
0
6
avery
avery@readasv·
@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem you think it’s better to talk in disjointed replies like this? come on, i’m a civil gal, why not?
English
1
0
0
8
白葡萄酒
白葡萄酒@blackmetaltalon·
i wanna cosplay so fucking bad but i do not have the money for allat…
English
1
0
1
95
avery
avery@readasv·
@Manenkos @usethesonic @ali1exe7 kraken’s damage is highest early and falls off from there. can you explain the reasoning behind building guinsoo’s first?
English
0
0
0
17
avery
avery@readasv·
@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem you sent them, yes. none of that works for what i’m asking if that’s where you’re leading, it’s non sequitur. i’m asking you about the utility of a definition. all it needs to be is useful within conversation
English
1
0
0
5
lis(t)ek🇮🇩
lis(t)ek🇮🇩@lis_t_ek_real_1·
@readasv @ubelfem Tell me, were you the person that I sent 3 ss explaining why misandry isn't real or it wasn't you?? (if not then I'll send it then)
English
1
0
0
12
avery
avery@readasv·
@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem and besides, i’m telling you which area i was referring to when i said you were out of your depth 😭 idk why you’re arguing this point when i just clarified it for you
English
0
0
0
2
lis(t)ek🇮🇩
lis(t)ek🇮🇩@lis_t_ek_real_1·
@readasv @ubelfem No, the original point of the post and the comment was feminism. And your comment also mentioned feminism, that's why I am still mentioning it
English
2
0
0
8
avery
avery@readasv·
@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem the topic is related to feminism, but we do not disagree about that. can you recognize how our disagreement is different from your disagreement with that guy you’re arguing with in this thread?
English
0
0
0
4
Mr. Nobody
Mr. Nobody@Mr_Nobody775170·
@playboicurrryy Im not recieveing only because it contains the fkin' name 'epstein'
English
0
0
0
1.8K
.
.@playboicurrryy·
i am not answering this bro
. tweet media
English
48
1.2K
16K
193.1K
avery
avery@readasv·
@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem (2) as you need to justify why these definitions hold more utility than what they are currently taken to mean. i say we need a word to refer to prejudice towards men, and that is what misandry currently is taken to mean. so why ought it be defined otherwise?
English
1
0
0
7
avery
avery@readasv·
@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem (1)fair enough. what this was all leading to is that your way of defining these words is very different from what most people understand them to be, so descriptively they do not line up. this would require you to argue that they ought to be defined otherwise, which is a challenge
English
1
0
0
6
avery
avery@readasv·
@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem no, language. we haven’t even had any disagreements about feminism, i’m fairly progressive so i don’t imagine we would anyways. but you aren’t knowledgeable about linguistics (which is fine) so just let me try to explain this stuff for you so you can understand the language i use
English
1
0
0
5
lis(t)ek🇮🇩
lis(t)ek🇮🇩@lis_t_ek_real_1·
@readasv @ubelfem How is that not very true 🫩🫩? I think that feminism is the topic I am educated about the most and this is what it started as
English
1
0
0
6
avery
avery@readasv·
@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem no no this is different. both ways of thought account for language evolving, but a descriptivist would say you can’t make ought statements about language while prescriptivists think you can make ought statements. i’m trying to figure out which one you are
English
1
0
0
5
lis(t)ek🇮🇩
lis(t)ek🇮🇩@lis_t_ek_real_1·
@readasv @ubelfem Words change with time. "Words mean just what they are agreed upon to mean" can't exist with how all the languages evolve
English
1
0
0
9
avery
avery@readasv·
@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem i actually did just explain that, i just wanted to further point out how terribly difficult you’re being bc it is really, really frustrating
English
1
0
0
2
lis(t)ek🇮🇩
lis(t)ek🇮🇩@lis_t_ek_real_1·
@readasv @ubelfem Well I already asked you why it is "needed" here yet you can't explain. Just constantly reply that I can't ask and only fight
English
1
0
0
11
NotUnclePepeloni
NotUnclePepeloni@NotUnclPepeloni·
@Milo_H4 This is legitimately why they used to slap women. Just to shut them up so they could focus on what needed to be done.
GIF
English
5
7
333
11.7K
avery
avery@readasv·
@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem and it’s important bc my argument will be different depending on how you view language. you said earlier that you don’t talk about things when you’re out of your depth, but that doesn’t seem to be very true. so please, just let me lead the conversation when it comes to this
English
1
0
0
5
lis(t)ek🇮🇩
lis(t)ek🇮🇩@lis_t_ek_real_1·
@readasv @ubelfem "instead of fighting on everything" buddy google is not something that hard to get if you have a Twitter I can and did search, I just still don't understand what does it add to the conversation (also can you please stop calling me a girl, kinda makes me uncomfortable 😔😔)
English
3
0
0
16
avery
avery@readasv·
@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem (3) you what you think. i’m wondering if you think we can make ought statements about words.
English
0
0
0
5
avery
avery@readasv·
@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem (2) descriptivist would say that words mean just what they are agreed upon to mean. a prescriptivist would say that you can make prescriptive claims about language, that you can say that a word ought to mean something. so it’s not a tittle like a historian or whatnot, i’m asking
English
2
0
0
13