avery

@whitewyyne @blackmetaltalon why do all my oomfs on here need to be European 😡

@readasv @blackmetaltalon nope

anyone wanna play arammmm >.<

@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem - critique fails if it doesn’t, so that’s a pretty important claim to substantiate

@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem lots of snuck premises here, so let’s take a step back and resolve this. you’re arguing an ought for misandry, so evidently you think language is malleable. so by that extension, misandry is not tied to any one thing, so why ought its definition require oppression? your internal-

@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem you think it’s better to talk in disjointed replies like this? come on, i’m a civil gal, why not?

@bluejetone_ @blackmetaltalon GO AWYAYY

@readasv @blackmetaltalon Dm

i wanna cosplay so fucking bad but i do not have the money for allat…

@blackmetaltalon @bluejetone_ i need you 👀

@readasv @bluejetone_ NO I NEED IT

@Manenkos @usethesonic @ali1exe7 kraken’s damage is highest early and falls off from there. can you explain the reasoning behind building guinsoo’s first?

@usethesonic @ali1exe7 you can adapt depending on what you face and do kraken first both are very good just situational

725 aa range, 1K dmg per auto and R+Q have almost the same dmg as ap build, absolutely insane

@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem you sent them, yes. none of that works for what i’m asking if that’s where you’re leading, it’s non sequitur. i’m asking you about the utility of a definition. all it needs to be is useful within conversation

@readasv @ubelfem Tell me, were you the person that I sent 3 ss explaining why misandry isn't real or it wasn't you?? (if not then I'll send it then)

@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem and besides, i’m telling you which area i was referring to when i said you were out of your depth 😭 idk why you’re arguing this point when i just clarified it for you

@readasv @ubelfem No, the original point of the post and the comment was feminism. And your comment also mentioned feminism, that's why I am still mentioning it

@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem the topic is related to feminism, but we do not disagree about that. can you recognize how our disagreement is different from your disagreement with that guy you’re arguing with in this thread?

@Mr_Nobody775170 @playboicurrryy nothing else troubles you?

@playboicurrryy Im not recieveing only because it contains the fkin' name 'epstein'

i am not answering this bro

@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem (2) as you need to justify why these definitions hold more utility than what they are currently taken to mean. i say we need a word to refer to prejudice towards men, and that is what misandry currently is taken to mean. so why ought it be defined otherwise?

@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem (1)fair enough. what this was all leading to is that your way of defining these words is very different from what most people understand them to be, so descriptively they do not line up. this would require you to argue that they ought to be defined otherwise, which is a challenge

@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem no, language. we haven’t even had any disagreements about feminism, i’m fairly progressive so i don’t imagine we would anyways. but you aren’t knowledgeable about linguistics (which is fine) so just let me try to explain this stuff for you so you can understand the language i use

@readasv @ubelfem How is that not very true 🫩🫩? I think that feminism is the topic I am educated about the most and this is what it started as

@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem no no this is different. both ways of thought account for language evolving, but a descriptivist would say you can’t make ought statements about language while prescriptivists think you can make ought statements. i’m trying to figure out which one you are

@readasv @ubelfem Words change with time. "Words mean just what they are agreed upon to mean" can't exist with how all the languages evolve

@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem i actually did just explain that, i just wanted to further point out how terribly difficult you’re being bc it is really, really frustrating

@readasv @ubelfem Well I already asked you why it is "needed" here yet you can't explain. Just constantly reply that I can't ask and only fight

@NotUnclPepeloni @Milo_H4 you’re normal fs

@Milo_H4 This is legitimately why they used to slap women. Just to shut them up so they could focus on what needed to be done.

Women screaming in serious situations is so annoying like how is that gonna help at all pls shut up

@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem and it’s important bc my argument will be different depending on how you view language. you said earlier that you don’t talk about things when you’re out of your depth, but that doesn’t seem to be very true. so please, just let me lead the conversation when it comes to this

@readasv @ubelfem "instead of fighting on everything" buddy google is not something that hard to get if you have a Twitter I can and did search, I just still don't understand what does it add to the conversation (also can you please stop calling me a girl, kinda makes me uncomfortable 😔😔)

@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem (3) you what you think. i’m wondering if you think we can make ought statements about words.

@lis_t_ek_real_1 @ubelfem (2) descriptivist would say that words mean just what they are agreed upon to mean. a prescriptivist would say that you can make prescriptive claims about language, that you can say that a word ought to mean something. so it’s not a tittle like a historian or whatnot, i’m asking