ELLA b

17.5K posts

ELLA b banner
ELLA b

ELLA b

@realELLAb

#LifeOfaBeautyTraveler 💋 Fluent in Empathy. Kind Heart. Open Mind. Be good & do good is what I live by.

United States Katılım Eylül 2009
7.5K Takip Edilen10.4K Takipçiler
Larry Forman
Larry Forman@TheDUIGuyPlus·
Karen Read next steps that SHOULD happen: 1) Call the jurors back in to the courtroom and have some testimony as to what their vote was and where they stood during deliberations. 2) Dismiss Counts 1 and 3 with prejudice due to the jury's decision. 3) CW can decide whether or not to retry count 2 ONLY. Double jeopardy would then inhibit the state from moving forward on charges 1 and 3. Charge 2 is manslaughter while operating under the influence of alcohol.
English
67
84
981
217.3K
ELLA b
ELLA b@realELLAb·
@TheNFLanalyst “The only charge on which the jury was deadlocked was vehicular manslaughter, where the jury apparently voted 9 - 3 in favor of guilt.” Says 9 in favor of guilt. How?? 🤦🏼‍♀️
English
0
0
7
435
Aidan Kearney
Aidan Kearney@DoctorTurtleboy·
Crowd just burst out in cheers that we can hear inside the courtroom.
English
146
89
2.2K
378.9K
🅽🅴🆁🅳🆈
🅽🅴🆁🅳🆈@Nerdy_Addict·
Tuey-Rodriguez charge is given to a deadlocked jury to encourage them to reach a verdict by reconsidering the evidence and the views of their fellow jurors. The instruction aims to promote thorough deliberation without coercion. #KarenRead
English
4
3
38
4.7K
Aidan Kearney
Aidan Kearney@DoctorTurtleboy·
The jury has come back hopelessly deadlocked, and claim they have been over ALL the evidence. Adam Lally thinks that the jury hasn't had enough time to deliberate. Yannetti says they have fundamental differences and can't come to a verdict. He asks Judge Cannone to issue a Tuohy-Rodriguez, ordering them to come to a decision
English
107
65
1K
345.3K
Debbie Amorelli
Debbie Amorelli@djamorelli·
@GogIvanka The jury is not reading this. If they did it would an easy decision.
English
1
0
7
337
ELLA b
ELLA b@realELLAb·
@cathyrusson She said she wasn’t going to read them the Allen charge or what they call Tuey-Rodriguez charge in MA.
English
0
0
3
132
Cathy Russon
Cathy Russon@cathyrusson·
The judge will bring the jury in and read them an instruction that in some states is referred to as an Allen or Dynamite charge. MA has a different version. The instruction encourages the jury to go back and continue deliberating. #KarenRead
English
4
2
51
8K
river
river@lust4honey·
@Bederowlaw can they give the allan charge later since they didn’t do it now though?
English
1
0
1
1K
Bederow Law
Bederow Law@Bederowlaw·
And the judge does the worst thing she can: basically nothing. She could have given an Allen charge on day 4 of deliberations
English
98
43
948
88.5K
Aidan Kearney
Aidan Kearney@DoctorTurtleboy·
Reminder - there is no way 12 people will ever unanimously agree that Karen Read committed murder beyond a reasonable doubt. It’s impossible for any honest person to believe. I have no idea what the jury is doing, but I know that it’s impossible to find 12 people who will all agree that she should go to jail for the rest of her life.
English
352
95
2.5K
352.6K
Aidan Kearney
Aidan Kearney@DoctorTurtleboy·
Most polls show that less than 10% of trial watchers believe Karen Read is guilty. Odds are 1 or 2 jurors reached that conclusion initially, but they must keep an open mind. Now the other 10 have to convince them they’re wrong by going through the evidence. This is how our jury system was designed to work. This is normal. The not guilty jurors will be able to change the minds of the guilty jurors. The guilty jurors cannot change the minds of not guilty jurors. Not guilty is inevitable.
English
157
80
1.9K
398.6K
Cathy Russon
Cathy Russon@cathyrusson·
BREAKING: Tracy Ferriter pleaded guilty this morning and received 10 years probation. Her husband Tim Ferriter was found guilty late last year on the same charges and received 5 years in prison. This case involved their 14-year-old adopted son and became widely known as the boy in the box. They had a room constructed for him in their garage that locked from the outside.
Cathy Russon tweet mediaCathy Russon tweet media
English
23
24
123
24K
🅽🅴🆁🅳🆈
🅽🅴🆁🅳🆈@Nerdy_Addict·
The commonwealth saved all the men with hair for their finale
English
4
1
50
4.1K
Gwensday
Gwensday@Gwensday3·
@Lillyyyy00 @Free_Karen_Read I wonder if the canton high school search was to see if any evidence had turned up in a school dumpster. Random wild speculation I know 🙂
English
3
0
12
656
FreeKarenRead
FreeKarenRead@Free_Karen_Read·
Wait...Jennifer McCabe googled herself as this was all going on? WTF
English
29
18
634
78K
ELLA b
ELLA b@realELLAb·
@ourx_vault Question - how would you explain not one person noticing John laying on the lawn? There was barely any snow at 12:30 and numerous people going in and out of the house.
English
0
0
0
77
Yellow Cottage Tales
Yellow Cottage Tales@ourx_vault·
I am very worried that the state botched the #KarenRead trial, despite presenting irrefutable vehicle data that documents the moment Karen's SUV struck John. Let's get into it. At 12:20, John punched "34 Fairview" into Waze on his phone. A few minutes later, driving on Cedarcrest, Karen missed the turn. To correct the mistake, she did a U-Turn. This event was documented by Trooper Paul in the vehicle data. As was the next significant event, 8 minutes later, when the data shows 2 triggers which indicate a pedestrian collision at high speed. After the U-turn, Karen went right onto Fairview. This was at 12:24. 8 minutes later, she put the car into drive and went forward a short distance, then suddenly threw it in reverse and hit the gas. Hard. The accelerator was 75% depressed and achieved a speed of 24 MPH. A pedestrian collision is not hard enough to trigger the airbags. So when Yannetti says no event was recorded, this is all he means. But the data detects a slight, unexpected drop in speed despite no parallel drop on the accelerator or no hitting of the brakes. In addition, the steering wheel experienced a shift from one direction to the other. These two things in combination create what vehicle data experts recognize as a pedestrian collision. This happened 8 minutes after the U-turn. Which matches perfectly with the time John's phone moved for the last time. The GPS on John's phone shows the U-Turn just before 12:24. The collusion in reverse is recorded 8 minutes later. At or just before 12:32. And that's the time John's health app shows his phone last moves. The problem is that this is THE critical aspect of the state's case, and they HAVE to convince the jury this is what happened. A jury that has waited patiently for 7 tedious weeks of monotonous questions where not only does the tone not very, but even the wording remains so much the same that it feels robotic. Like Chat GPT is conducting the questioning. So as the suffering jurors are sitting home tonight, do they even understand they've just heard the key data that shows Karen did this? It would be understandable if they didn't. The trooper was nervous and often inarticulate. Just not ready for the show. In combination with the prosecutor, it was dangerously lacking. And on Monday, when Alan Jackson launches his assault, it will become dangerously vulnerable.
English
240
13
132
107.5K
ELLA b
ELLA b@realELLAb·
@cathyrusson No one would of known it was a juror if she didn’t say it was!
English
0
0
7
498